Activity
From 12/05/2022 to 01/03/2023
01/03/2023
- 02:35 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- The changes to support the DMO interface/class unloading and re-use at the proxy level are turning into something mor...
- 02:27 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Let's assume that only the denormalized extents will be supported for now. It doesn't make sense... - 09:47 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Let's assume that only the denormalized extents will be supported for now. It doesn't make sense to add the more com...
- 11:33 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've changed my test so that data sources used for FILL get data from the permanent tables.... - 11:09 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I've changed my test so that data sources used for FILL get data from the permanent tables.
However, at runtime, I s... - 07:08 AM Bug #6829: H2 forces re-parse of all prepared statements when metadata is changed
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Alexandru, I have in a heap dump @UnclosablePreparedStatement@ instances with ~90KB reta... - 03:48 AM Feature #6720 (WIP): lazy hydration
01/02/2023
- 05:34 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris Schegolev wrote:
> > If there are any other critical configuration values that cannot be determined by defau...
12/31/2022
- 03:29 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> If I understand the issue correctly, I respectfully disagree. In the event there is no expli... - 02:56 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, please correct me if I am overly aggressive on this.
>
> If the application code can b... - 02:17 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In this case, I suspect we should implement the application-visible behavior.
I see. In this c... - 02:15 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I understand that, ultimately, the content of the databases (ABL and FWD) are identically a...
12/30/2022
- 06:11 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I added an implementation for SchemaValidator + unit test for it. See revision 14442.
- 11:00 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- > Do we have an example of the table structure where such 2-field DTTZ storage is used? First column is DATETIME and ...
- 05:07 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- > Greg, please correct me if I am overly aggressive on this.
If the application code can be implemented to rely up... - 03:19 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Well, the _binary_ might not have been the best attribute here to describe the compatibility.
I understand that, u... - 02:35 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I understand that. Can we isolate this damage to recursive relations only? These cases are ... - 02:11 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
>
> > > Should we care about the order in which records are added to the target tables dur... - 01:59 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > I understand that refactoring from using a 'plain' query string (@hql@) to a query string... - 01:34 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I understand that refactoring from using a 'plain' query string (@hql@) to a query string h...
12/29/2022
- 03:23 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I pushed an update for error handling and other minor changes - rev. 14441.
Greg Shah wrote:
> We have 2 customer... - 12:14 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris Schegolev wrote:
> Also, for the primary key: I guess we need to add a validation before registering a new tab... - 07:57 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- >> 2 What is the issue with timezoned types (timestamp with time zone)?
>
> We need to support them ultimately, but...
12/28/2022
- 04:47 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Also, for the primary key: I guess we need to add a validation before registering a new table to check that the table...
- 04:41 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Before you changed it to "TODO: Surrogate Primary Key", the note for 8-byte integer read, "T... - 02:09 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris Schegolev wrote:
> I updated the documentation / WIKI page. A few questions here:
>
> 1 What's the TODO for... - 01:59 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- > If this blocks you from making headway on the recursive FILL operation, please work on another item that needs atte...
- 01:51 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I think we should wait for Ovidiu's input when he returns before undertaking any massive cha... - 01:43 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > [...]
> > I understand that refactoring from using a 'plain' qu... - 01:40 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> [...]
> I understand that refactoring from using a 'plain' query string (@hql@) to a query... - 01:38 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I don't know what the intent of this variable was, maybe something that is only changed for ... - 01:37 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> At this moment it looks that @FqlToSqlConverter.generateUniqueSqlColumnNames@ is always @tr... - 05:30 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- At this moment it looks that @FqlToSqlConverter.generateUniqueSqlColumnNames@ is always @true@.
Can I rely on this?
... - 02:56 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Working on the second pass query for the recursive data-relation FILL support I have to deal with the situation when ...
12/27/2022
- 05:28 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I updated the documentation / WIKI page. A few questions here:
# What's the TODO for Surrogate Primary Key about?
...
12/25/2022
- 04:20 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I think that we also can avoid it if the DATA-SOURCE QUERY uses a single table but at this ...
12/23/2022
- 11:15 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> That seems like a great idea, as long as column-level comments are supported in @create tabl... - 09:45 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- > As for branching, in git I would rebase 6371a onto 6129b. Not sure how to do that in Bazaar and don't want to break...
- 01:32 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris Schegolev wrote:
> I am implementing one-to-many SQL->4GL type mappings. I would only suggest to use column's ... - 09:43 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- In the relation model, the physical order or the records in the table is irrelevant and the order of records in the r...
12/22/2022
- 05:09 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I am implementing one-to-many SQL->4GL type mappings. I would only suggest to use column's comment property for 4GL t...
- 04:26 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris, please work on the validation of the mutable database requirements described in the [[p2j:Non-Standard_Save_Ca...
- 09:51 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Eric: Please review and advise.
- 09:49 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Code Review 6709-20221222.diff
The conversion changes seem reasonable.
Do we really need to implement this as p... - 08:40 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I will try to patch a customer application I have on my development environment to test the changes. If everything is...
- 07:02 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I managed to convert Hotel GUI and a few smaller tests and use FieldReference. I actually didn't make use of @convert...
- 09:50 AM Support #7004 (New): eliminate the off-end processing in the TransactionManager and minimize the ...
12/21/2022
- 11:30 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I pushed a cleanup for PostgreSQL dialect - there were MySQL types mixed in.
- 02:11 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Revision 6371a/14438 works around the @SchemaDictionary@ issue described in #6371-80, but the workaround is limited, ...
12/20/2022
- 05:42 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Committed 3821c/rev.14460. Added nested find annotation and report. Any annotated @FIND@ that is nested in a @FOR EAC...
12/19/2022
- 06:09 PM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Yes.
- 03:41 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You've tested conversion for both the large customer application and also Hotel GUI?
Yes, both... - 01:32 PM Bug #6834: RAQ navigation on records having NULL values on same index components
- The issue is described with details and example in #6755. I will copy it here because that task contains sensitive da...
- 10:28 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I am not very happy with this double iteration. It implies a performance penalty. Ultimatel... - 10:12 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I need to iterate over a DATA-SOURCE twice - first with the original QUERY and then with th...
12/16/2022
- 02:59 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Something is wrong in the @BufferImpl.fill()@ logic regarding child relations. In the @data_relation/recursive_relati...
- 03:48 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I need to iterate over a DATA-SOURCE twice - first with the original QUERY and then with the 'relaxed' one. What is t...
- 10:59 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I'm OK with the @6709-20221216.patch@.
You've tested conversion for both the large customer application and also H... - 09:53 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please post an updated patch for review.
> We emit the getter or the @FieldReference@ in @conv... - 08:30 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- > The bug is fixed and the conversion was successful. Should I commit the changes?
Please post an updated patch fo... - 03:31 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Danut, please address the bug and make sure to test conversion with that application.
The bug is... - 08:06 AM Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- I've made a mistake and used the wrong patch when testing previously. The second @removeRecords@ call didn't execute ...
12/15/2022
- 02:11 PM Bug #6997: OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- I returned to this testcase. I altered the original code a bit and I found more evidences in favour of confirming the...
- 08:36 AM Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Another update: after the last post I started working on a Factory design pattern for @SortCriterion@. This patch inc...
12/14/2022
- 02:07 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I've realized that we do not really need an auxiliary temporary table to use recursive CTE instead of iteration (see ...
- 02:31 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The FILL operation is QUERY driven. And that happens for each buffer affected (that is, aft... - 11:46 AM Bug #6997: OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- It does not make full sense. The BY-REFERENCE should be bound to the target table temporarily, hiding that table. As ...
- 05:46 AM Bug #6997: OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- In start.p, a temporary table @main@ is created which is assigned 1 element, then that table is used as an output par...
- 05:44 AM Bug #6997 (New): OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- 10:01 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Looks like the problem was caused by a @FOR FIRST table@ statement. Fixed by checking if the previous sibling of the ...
- 09:23 AM Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I am aware of the @force-no-undo@ setting which forces all tables into @no-undo@. If this flag is set, no @SavepointM...
- 06:27 AM Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- I've wrapped my head around this topic (@ProgressiveResults@ vs @ScrollingResults@) for a while now, so I can provide...
- 05:55 AM Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- Originally, my intention was to delete the records from a table based on the @targetMultiplex@ when the @outputParame...
- 04:22 AM Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Update: I noticed that @SortCriterion.toString@ gets called quite often so I had a look in that function to see if so...
12/13/2022
- 06:48 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> BTW: it looks that @FILL@ for recursive dataset can be very expensive since it can require ... - 11:56 AM Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I think @Session.log@ is responsible for logging the sub(tx) details needed for savepoints or rollback. This is enab...
- 11:13 AM Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I guess a simple first step is to profile typical flows in real applications and see if we can associate any bottlene...
- 11:08 AM Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- NO-UNDO temp-tables are used heavily in many 4GL applications. Typically, regular temp-tables are used as well, such ...
- 10:41 AM Feature #6995 (Closed): possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- 10:37 AM Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > consider way stronger optimizations directly in the H2 engine: this involves some extended work... - 07:47 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> As a side question, I see some changes from for-each structure into index based iteration: ... - 06:58 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- I got deep in most of the changes in rev. 8 - they seem reasonable. As a side question, I see some changes from for-e...
12/12/2022
- 02:29 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Based on my tests the @FILL@ for recursive DATA-RELATION add records which are not in the DATA-SOURCE QUERY only if b...
- 12:19 PM Feature #6928 (Review): H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- The changes are in fwd-h2 project rev 8.
Alexandru: please review. - 08:17 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I've uncommitted 3821c rev 14436. It causes the following regression in conversion for a large customer application....
- 04:29 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You can just do this:
> ...
12/10/2022
- 11:52 PM Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- Dănuț,
I am sorry for the delay, somehow the notification emails got lost at the bottom of the list and I only saw...
12/09/2022
- 10:30 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Eric: This is still waiting for review.
- 08:39 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > What puzzles me is the logic for 'relaxing' the @qEmp@ conditions to... - 08:19 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> What puzzles me is the logic for 'relaxing' the @qEmp@ conditions to find the parent record... - 07:45 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Please not that while the recursive relation does load the FK parent in the parent temp-table (s... - 05:32 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- The @data_relation/recursive_relation_fill.p@ test fails with FWD with @Cannot run GET methods on query qEmp until it...
- 04:51 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> >
> > > Marian,
> > > Is it correct that the DATA-SOURCE query shou... - 04:46 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>
> > Marian,
> > Is it correct that the DATA-SOURCE query should select a subset of a sin... - 08:16 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Regression is fixed, current revision number is 14434.
12/08/2022
- 04:40 PM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- > > 1. I don't think we should limit the for each processing to only match temp-tables and buffers. All record phrase...
- 04:32 PM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I think @FieldReference@ is less clean looking and it will be slower. In #4928, we do have some ideas to improve it ...
- 08:45 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- ...
- 03:24 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. I don't think we should limit the for each processing to only match temp-tables and buffers. A... - 04:33 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris, if you have a fix for the conversion regression, please commit it.
- 01:06 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Revision 6371a/14431 fixes some issues, including the following with the DMO interface assembly:
* a package path ... - 03:45 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>More than that, I understand that you aim for a 'fast-copy' mechanism where the rows are cop... - 03:27 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > > Oh, I see. Indeed, in this case we cannot be sure which versi... - 03:02 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Oh, I see. Indeed, in this case we cannot be sure which version of the CTE syntax to use.... - 05:59 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Oh, I see. Indeed, in this case we cannot be sure which version of the CTE syntax to use.
... - 01:31 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > It appears that DATASET:FILL() is not working at all for RECURS... - 05:57 AM Support #6708 (Review): track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Committed 3821c/rev.14425. Small fix. The number of invalidated queries displayed in the Overview was wrong when @OUT...
12/07/2022
- 04:42 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> It appears that DATASET:FILL() is not working at all for RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION (the @Data... - 11:56 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I'm thinking about adding support for a RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION by re-writing the DATA-SOUR... - 10:45 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- The @BufferImpl.fill()@ method is pretty long (400 lines of code) and complicated.
I'm thinking about adding support...
12/05/2022
- 03:01 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- It appears that DATASET:FILL() is not working at all for RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION (the @DataSet.getTopBufferList()@ re...
- 07:34 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Code Review 6709-rpt-20221205.diff
Good, it is getting closer.
1. I don't think we should limit the for each pr... - 03:51 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. Please switch out the use of a @Stack@ for the @ScopedSymbolDictionary@.
I made the @FOR EACH... - 06:07 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- My suspicion is the logical change in @XmlHelper.setAttribute()@ - I added a check for @value.isEmpty()@ and it proba...
- 12:51 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I found that I was unable to convert test cases using 6371a/14119, with an error during anno... - 02:50 AM Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- After I did some investigation upon the @PreselectQuery.assembleHQL@ function, two types of optimization occurred to ...
- 02:13 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- |_. version |_. server run |_. client run |_. indexed (ms) |_. unindexed(ms) |
|h2-1.4.200.jar | 1...
Also available in: Atom