FWD » Core Development » Database

04/05/2025

04:42 PM Feature #9831: add admin API to set c3p0 configuration for individual tenant databases

Created branch 9831a and committed the implementation.
Committed revision 15843. Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:23 AM Bug #9872: Runtime import statement relies on the ImportWorker to read lob data.

The @PropertyMapper@ is one class which was created only during the import, as an utility of @ImportWorker@. The fact... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04/04/2025

06:10 PM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...

I rebased 9093a. Pushed up to revision 15848.
I also created #9875 to hold customer specific scripts for importing... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03:45 PM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...

Indeed, I tried to keep it up-to-date.
However, there were a couple of big updates this wee, so it requires rebasi... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03:40 PM Feature #9093 (Internal Test): add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import ...

Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, I think you said last standup that this branch was ready for merge, but it is still ... Eric Faulhaber

03:33 PM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...

Ovidiu, I think you said last standup that this branch was ready for merge, but it is still in review status, with no... Eric Faulhaber

06:14 AM Bug #9872: Runtime import statement relies on the ImportWorker to read lob data.

In @PropertyMapper.readLobData@, @Importworker@ is used to retrieve the path to the lob file. @Importworker@ is not s... Artur Școlnic

06:12 AM Bug #9872 (New): Runtime import statement relies on the ImportWorker to read lob data.

Artur Școlnic

05:00 AM Bug #9853 (Test): ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a b...

Branch 9853a was merged to trunk rev 15841 and archived. Alexandru Lungu

04:50 AM Bug #9853 (Internal Test): ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the ed...

Alexandru Lungu

04/03/2025

05:04 PM Bug #9853: ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a bracket

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Committed 9853a/15839 and 15840, replacing !isPreselect with errorCondition. Please review.... Constantin Asofiei

08:26 AM Bug #9853: ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a bracket

Committed 9853a/15839 and 15840, replacing !isPreselect with errorCondition. Please review. Alexandru Lungu

06:51 AM Bug #9853: ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a bracket

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Would you prefer @errorCondition@? I guess it is less confusing than seeing @isPreselect@ a... Constantin Asofiei

06:50 AM Bug #9853: ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a bracket

Yes, this is what is happening in @next@. Would you prefer @errorCondition@? I guess it is less confusing than seeing... Alexandru Lungu

06:45 AM Bug #9853: ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a bracket

Can we rely on @errorCondition@ instead of @!isPreselect()@? That's set like this:... Constantin Asofiei

06:32 AM Bug #9853: ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a bracket

> But, the condition to enter this block is if (cacheOnReval || isPreselect()) - so, can the preselect be false, when... Alexandru Lungu

06:26 AM Bug #9853: ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a bracket

I don't really understand the fix.
The line @Results cached = cacheResults(old, true);@ where @Results old = adapt... Constantin Asofiei

03:58 AM Bug #9853 (Review): ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a...

Committed 9853a/rev. 15838.
Constantin, please review. Alexandru Lungu

08:03 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Stefanel,
> I think 7020d is broken at this moment, @RecordMeta@ probably fails to compile... Stefanel Pezamosca

07:57 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Stefanel,
> I think 7020d is broken at this moment, @RecordMeta@ probably fails to compile... Stefanel Pezamosca

07:48 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Stefanel,
I think 7020d is broken at this moment, @RecordMeta@ probably fails to compile. The reason is the usage of... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

06:55 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

I think making all FOR EACH queries FORWARD-ONLY was the main cause of this problem. I will revisit this after review... Dănuț Filimon

06:51 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

This seems solved with trunk 15839 (after rollback of #7991). Looks it is related to FORWARD-RESULTS fix. Constantin Asofiei

04/02/2025

11:20 AM Bug #9853 (WIP): ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a br...

I investigated this case. It is about a fail-safe of @ProgressiveResults@ to invalidate if things look not-alright. B... Alexandru Lungu

05:12 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Fixed. Please see *7020d revision 15846*.
I also have rebased 7020c to trunk 15830. Same as 7020d. Stefanel Pezamosca

04/01/2025

12:29 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

First, a quick look at 7020c (r15824):
* @FqlToSqlConverter.java@
** multiple usages of @appendExpandedName()@: the... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03/31/2025

10:14 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

*7020d* was rebased to *trunk revision 15830* and is now at revision *15843*.
In revision *15844* I committed a fi... Stefanel Pezamosca

06:43 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

... Dănuț Filimon

04:12 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

The issue is:... Dănuț Filimon

03:43 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

I was able to reproduce the issue. Dănuț Filimon

03:41 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please attach the .df file; what postgresql version do you use?
Just realized I have ... Dănuț Filimon

03:39 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

Please attach the .df file; what postgresql version do you use? Constantin Asofiei

03:39 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

This is the server log of the test, takes more than 5 minutes to run the test. Dănuț Filimon

03:28 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Alex, I can't reproduce this error with latest trunk/15829.
I've tested now and it fails:
<... Constantin Asofiei

02:55 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

Alex, I can't reproduce this error with latest trunk/15829. Dănuț Filimon

02:28 AM Bug #9852 (WIP): Portal "C_10" does not exist error

Dănuț Filimon

06:18 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Testing performed with *rev. 15835*:
- unit tests of a large customer application ✅
- harness ✅
- Chui regressio... Eduard Soltan

03/29/2025

01:57 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > [...]
> I see @READ-json@, I was expecting a @read-xml@ based on the changes in @XmlIm... Eduard Soltan

03/28/2025

06:14 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> I have made the modification in @TempTableBuilder@.
The setters use @_prepared()@ and the ge... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04:44 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

I have made the modification in @TempTableBuilder@.
But also made some changes in @XmlExport@ and @XmlExport@ to m... Eduard Soltan

04:11 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Good, that's the idea.
I think the code will work as expected. My observations for @TempTableBuilder.java@, the on... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03:33 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Committed on 9763b, rev. 15832.
Sure thing, I added the method in @TempTableBuilder@, and the attributes will be set... Eduard Soltan

03:20 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Indeed, it does. This is specific to dynamic temp-tables, therefore, this is the proper place to do it.
LE: the im... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03:03 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Not in @AbstractTempTable@, just in @TempTableBuilder@.
But this implies to override all... Eduard Soltan

02:17 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Not in @AbstractTempTable@, just in @TempTableBuilder@.
LE: and the attributes will be set in @TempTableBuilder.cr... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:14 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Only in this particular case (@AbstractTempTable._dynamic()@ returns @true@), the attribut... Eduard Soltan

02:09 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> I am thinking to initialize the @ctx.tt.tempTablePrepare@ and create the @defaultBuffer@, but... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:07 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

The @AbstractTempTable@ has two specialised subclasses: @StaticTempTable@ and @TempTableBuilder@ (for dynamic temp-ta... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:06 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> The problem is that @TempTableBuilder@ does not initialize the @defaultBuffer@. Hence setting... Eduard Soltan

01:45 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

There is a regression in at @dataset ddt1:read-xml@, when has no buffer set.
In @XmlImport.importDataset@ it go on... Eduard Soltan

12:49 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Ovidiu, why do we use @if (buffer.getSerializeName().toStringMessage().equalsIgnoreCase(name)... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

07:19 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

The unit tests and smoke tests of a large GUI application went fine.✅
Also got some news that unit test of a very ... Eduard Soltan

04:29 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Testing on another customer application was successful. No more errors encountered nor strange behaviors. ✅ Radu Apetrii

03:10 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Ovidiu, why do we use @if (buffer.getSerializeName().toStringMessage().equalsIgnoreCase(name)@ in XmlImport.importDat... Eduard Soltan

10:59 AM Bug #9853: ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a bracket

... Alexandru Lungu

10:54 AM Bug #9853 (Test): ProgressiveResults invalidate badly when changing the record on the edge of a b...

Alexandru Lungu

10:54 AM Bug #9852: Portal "C_10" does not exist error

... Alexandru Lungu

10:53 AM Bug #9852 (WIP): Portal "C_10" does not exist error

Alexandru Lungu

03/27/2025

04:59 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

I tested @read-json@ and @read-xml@, and they are fine.
Also made some tests with datasets (@define dataset dtt1 f... Eduard Soltan

04:44 PM Bug #9763 (Internal Test): xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Committed on 9763a, rev. 15796.
A couple of minor observations:
* Please revert @RecordBuff... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03:00 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Committed on 9763a, rev. 15796.
I modified the @JsonImport@, @JsonExport@, @XmlExport@ and @XmlImport@, to use just ... Eduard Soltan

12:08 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard, for some reasons I missed some files in #9763-47 (I think I pressed Ctrl+C in wrong console):
* @JsonExpo... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:24 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Also initialize to defaultBuffer in StaticTempTable before setting up its attributes. Eduard Soltan

08:40 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> ** lines 2660-2692: these method seem to be duplicates of 2695-2725? The file most likely f... Eduard Soltan

07:41 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

+Review of 9763b/15792+
This is pretty good, but there are several things which must be addressed:
* @AbstractTem... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03/26/2025

04:26 AM Bug #9763 (Review): xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eduard, is 9763b ready for review?
Yes, it is ready for review. Eduard Soltan

08:00 PM Feature #9093 (Review): add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables ...

I created the new tenant import mode. It is called @strict@ and also added an alias @strict-default@. In this case th... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03/25/2025

10:32 AM Feature #9831: add admin API to set c3p0 configuration for individual tenant databases

The following c3p0 database connection pool settings, normally set in the directory for a primary database, should be... Eric Faulhaber

10:20 AM Feature #9831 (Closed): add admin API to set c3p0 configuration for individual tenant databases

Eric Faulhaber

09:41 AM Support #4060: investigate converting extent fields to array columns

I wanted to investigate this a little bit. 7020d branch makes it easier to implement this. Most places are already us... Stefanel Pezamosca

09:38 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard, is 9763b ready for review? Constantin Asofiei

06:29 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

So, to summarize: *7020d* is based on *trunk 15813*. *7020d* has all the changes from 7020c but with some other impro... Stefanel Pezamosca

03/24/2025

11:06 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

7020d was rebased to trunk revision 15813.
7020d contains now all the changes from 7020c + some improvements. There ... Stefanel Pezamosca

03/21/2025

08:44 AM Support #4060: investigate converting extent fields to array columns

Recently we found out that:
* Most databases have a limit on the number of columns in a table.
** PostgreSQL: 160... Greg Shah

03:34 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Greg Shah wrote:
> For some reason, the work on 9537a is actually in #8982 and the last notes there suggest that we ... Stefanel Pezamosca

03/20/2025

02:58 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

If the shared frame above is fixed, yet the customer application hit that other limit, we'd need both to be fixed bef... Roger Borrello

02:54 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Greg Shah wrote:
> For some reason, the work on 9537a is actually in #8982 and the last notes there suggest that we ... Roger Borrello

02:18 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

For some reason, the work on 9537a is actually in #8982 and the last notes there suggest that we have a design limita... Greg Shah

11:47 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Is there any relationship between branches 9537a and 7020c? I am especially concerned with m... Stefanel Pezamosca

11:39 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Is there any relationship between branches 9537a and 7020c? I am especially concerned with my big application, since ... Roger Borrello

11:27 AM Feature #7020 (Review): always use "expanded" extent fields

I have rebased 7020c to trunk revision 15800.
I have committed revisions 15823/15824 with some fixes. Please revie... Stefanel Pezamosca

10:57 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Now that I think about the potential issues, I believe this plan will be safer. So, I’m ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

03/19/2025

02:09 PM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...

I am preparing a new @tenantMode@, which will restrict the import to @Default@ physical database only to tables not m... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:06 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Branch 9763c was merged to trunk rev 15800 and archived. Constantin Asofiei

03:38 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Created task branch 9763c from trunk rev 15790. 15791 fixes a problem with an edge case (regression in trunk 15785),... Constantin Asofiei

04:21 AM Feature #7020 (WIP): always use "expanded" extent fields

Thank you for the review. I will start working on addressing the above now.
> * as noted above, is the drop of the... Stefanel Pezamosca

03/18/2025

12:58 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Review of 7020c / 15792.
I see that you did what I was afraid to do: completely drop the support for custom extent... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

12:32 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eduard, isn't @SERIALIZE-NAME@ used for JSON? So please try @READ-JSON@ and @WRITE-JSON@... Eduard Soltan

11:29 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard, isn't @SERIALIZE-NAME@ used for JSON? So please try @READ-JSON@ and @WRITE-JSON@. Constantin Asofiei

11:25 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Main faindings regarding buffer attributes:
@NAMESPACE-URI@
1) for statement @buffer btt1:NAMESPACE-URI@, it w... Eduard Soltan

05:09 AM Bug #9763 (WIP): xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard Soltan

04:43 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

9763a was merged into trunk revision 15785 and archived. Eduard Soltan

05:08 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

9543a was merged into trunk revision 15786 and archived. Eduard Soltan

04:17 AM Bug #9756 (Test): Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Stefanel Pezamosca

04:13 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Branch 9756a was merged into trunk as rev. 15784 and archived. Stefanel Pezamosca

03/17/2025

09:01 AM Feature #9543 (Merge Pending): implement missing BUFFER attributes

Please merge after 9763a Constantin Asofiei

06:35 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Performed a conversion of Regression test project and it went without any problems. Eduard Soltan

03:24 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please use @rt_lvl_stub@, not @none@.
The necessary change added.
Eduard Soltan

03:21 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > You are missing history entry in a file. gaps are not updated... Constantin Asofiei

03:16 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> You are missing history entry in a file. gaps are not updated.
Updated gaps, and add... Eduard Soltan

02:54 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

You are missing history entry in a file. gaps are not updated. Constantin Asofiei

02:40 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Constantin, shouldn't we generate the optimised @logical.TRU... Eduard Soltan

09:01 AM Bug #9763 (Merge Pending): xml-node-name buffer option

Please merge after 9756a. Constantin Asofiei

03:16 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> You are missing history entry in a file.
Added history entry. Eduard Soltan

02:55 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

You are missing history entry in a file. Constantin Asofiei

02:43 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

I performed a conversion of Regression test project with 9763a, rev. 15774. And it went without any problems. Eduard Soltan

05:03 AM Bug #9756 (Merge Pending): Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Please merge 9756a to trunk *after 9676a*. Alexandru Lungu

04:53 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

I have continued testing various CONTAINS testcases and there were no other issues.
This can be merged. Stefanel Pezamosca

03/14/2025

07:09 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eduard, the fact that 4GL doesn't allow @label@ as a field name doesn't mean is not poss... Eduard Soltan

03:42 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard, the fact that 4GL doesn't allow @label@ as a field name doesn't mean is not possible for the DMO property nam... Constantin Asofiei

02:12 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, you are right. Eduard: for now, please rename @setLabel@ and @getLabel@ to @lab... Eduard Soltan

03/13/2025

06:51 PM Bug #9756 (Internal Test): Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

O am OK with the changes in r15769. Ovidiu Maxiniuc

08:09 AM Bug #9756 (Review): Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

I made some other minor changes in revision 15769. Stefanel Pezamosca

03:44 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, you are right. Eduard: for now, please rename @setLabel@ and @getLabel@ to @lab... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:21 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Ovidiu, you are right. Eduard: for now, please rename @setLabel@ and @getLabel@ to @label@; this way we don't introd... Constantin Asofiei

02:09 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

I looked at 9763a.
* @buffer_definitions.rules@:
** contains some hard tabs (@#09@, @\t@)
** rules should use t... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:54 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I assume you mean 9763b.
Yes, you are right. Sorry, I did not realise that there are 2 ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:52 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I looked at 9763a and I do NOT agree with the implementation.
I assume you mean 9763b. Constantin Asofiei

01:51 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

I looked at 9763a and I do NOT agree with the implementation.
IMHO, the values of these new attributes should be s... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:25 PM Bug #9763 (Internal Test): xml-node-name buffer option

Please do some minimal tests with 9763a to get this into trunk. Constantin Asofiei

06:34 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> Test also with @buffer tt1:write-xml@ and @buffer tt1:xml-node-name = "something".@.... Eduard Soltan

04:36 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Added runtime support for buffer attributes, on 9763b, rev. *15771*.
>
> @buffer btt1:writ... Constantin Asofiei

04:34 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Added runtime support for buffer attributes, on 9763b, rev. *15771*.
@buffer btt1:write-xml("longchar", lc).@
@... Eduard Soltan

01:31 PM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin, shouldn't we generate the optimised @logical.TRUE@ instead when a literal is us... Constantin Asofiei

12:10 PM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

There is another conversion issue. Instead of... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:15 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I do not think you need to add a new method.
> The _missing_ method is most likely @Common... Eduard Soltan

10:56 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

I do not think you need to add a new method.
The _missing_ method is most likely @CommonHandle.readOnlyError(String ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09:29 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * did you test how the setter converts for @CAN-READ@?
>
>> Well, is converts in... Eduard Soltan

08:49 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Addressed review issues in rev. *15773*.
Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * did you test how the setter converts for @... Eduard Soltan

08:17 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Review of @9543a, revision 15771:
* why the @AutoSynchronize@ interface? If the attribute is specific only to BUFFER... Constantin Asofiei

03/12/2025

06:34 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

I have started reviewing the branch, but it will not be ready until tomorrow due to its size. Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:37 AM Feature #7020 (Review): always use "expanded" extent fields

Done. 7020c was rebased to trunk revision 15770. 7020c is at revision 15792 and is ready for review. Stefanel Pezamosca

09:43 AM Feature #7020 (WIP): always use "expanded" extent fields

Greg Shah wrote:
> Stefanel: Is there anything else that needs to get done on this task?
As I extracted some of t... Stefanel Pezamosca

09:33 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields

Eric/Ovidiu: Please make it a priority to get this code review done. We have several bugs being held open due to thi... Greg Shah

11:16 AM Bug #9683: CompoundQuery is doing extra hydration attempts

Review of 9683a:
There is still a place:... Alexandru Lungu

10:07 AM Feature #9543 (WIP): implement missing BUFFER attributes

Eduard Soltan

10:03 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Added conversion support on 9543a, revision *15770*.
For @AUTO-SYNCHRONIZE@ can be setable and queryable, although... Eduard Soltan

07:11 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes

Eduard, please add conversion support for these two. Constantin Asofiei

08:56 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

I fixed this in 9756a revision 15769.
Other tests passed. If there are no other objections I think 9756a is safe f... Stefanel Pezamosca

08:09 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Oh, I discovered an issue that is also in trunk. One example of problematic statement @contains(words, -)@ I will fix... Stefanel Pezamosca

07:57 AM Bug #9756 (Internal Test): Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

I will continue testing the functionality with different parameters for contains. Stefanel Pezamosca

07:40 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Cool. I have looked at the code. The changes are minimal. They are OK in my opinion. Howeve... Stefanel Pezamosca

06:42 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Cool. I have looked at the code. The changes are minimal. They are OK in my opinion. However, we can assume the first... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

05:16 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

I changed boolean[] to BitSet and used ConcurrentHashMap for skipPatterns in 9756a revision 15767. Stefanel Pezamosca

08:32 AM Bug #7924 (Test): add support for creating an empty database

The effort was moved to #7894 task and completed.
Branch 7894a was merged into trunk as rev. 15770 and archived.
... Dănuț Filimon

06:33 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

9763a rev 15771 changes @return new character("label")@ to @return character.UNKNOWN@.
I'll move ahead with the co... Constantin Asofiei

06:20 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> As @LABEL@ is *not an attribute* for BUFFER or TEMP-TABLE (you can't set or get it via @... Eduard Soltan

05:58 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please post the test and how it converts now.
The 4gl test:... Eduard Soltan

05:55 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

As @LABEL@ is *not an attribute* for BUFFER or TEMP-TABLE (you can't set or get it via @h:LABEL@), then please do not... Constantin Asofiei

05:53 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Please post the test and how it converts now. Constantin Asofiei

05:36 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Committed on 9765a, rev. *15768*. Conversion support for NAMESPACE-URI, NAMESPACE-PREFIX, SERIALIZE-NAME and LABEL bu... Eduard Soltan

04:44 AM Bug #9763 (WIP): xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> However the following syntax in OE will not raise any errors @def temp-table tt1 field f1 as ... Constantin Asofiei

04:34 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Is this LABEL only for buffers, or temp-table, too? Is it acc... Eduard Soltan

04:28 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Is this LABEL only for buffers, or temp-table, too? Is it accessible via @BUFFER btt1:L... Eduard Soltan

04:23 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Is this LABEL only for buffers, or temp-table, too? Is it accessible via @BUFFER btt1:LABEL = "something"@? Constantin Asofiei

04:15 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eduard, so I found @SERIALIZE-NAME@ also at the @DEF BUFFER@ statement. Please work on ... Eduard Soltan

03:32 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Eduard, so I found @SERIALIZE-NAME@ also at the @DEF BUFFER@ statement. Please work on adding all these. I don't kn... Constantin Asofiei

03/11/2025

02:16 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > 9763a/15767 only adds conversion support for buffer's @xml-node-name@ attribute. But t... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

12:55 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

I don't see any @label@ support in @BufferImpl@, so we may want to defer that.
Otherwise, please create a more com... Constantin Asofiei

12:31 PM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:

> Eduard: please do some small tests and see if conversion of these works properly.
... Eduard Soltan

11:48 AM Bug #9763 (New): xml-node-name buffer option

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Ovidiu: please review 9763a
>
> 9763a/15767 only adds con... Constantin Asofiei

11:24 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu: please review 9763a
9763a/15767 only adds conversion support for buffer's @xm... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10:00 AM Bug #9763 (Review): xml-node-name buffer option

A buffer can set its own @XML-NODE-NAME@ - and multiple buffers (for the same temp-table) can have different @XML-NOD... Constantin Asofiei

09:51 AM Bug #9763 (Test): xml-node-name buffer option

Constantin Asofiei

11:08 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> The cache I made only saves the ast given by FQLParser, and has only the String fql as a... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10:43 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> * related to the new, rather large, boolean arrays in @Contains@ and @LogicalExpressionConv... Stefanel Pezamosca

10:37 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> * also in @FqlToSqlConverter.fqlAstCache@, I think there are 90% cases when the AST tree do... Stefanel Pezamosca

10:29 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Review of 9756a/15766.
>
> I agree that these are two directions we can improve performa... Stefanel Pezamosca

10:28 AM Bug #9756: Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Review of 9756a/15766.
I agree that these are two directions we can improve performance. The ideas are good. But I... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

06:23 AM Bug #9756 (Review): Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Please review! Stefanel Pezamosca

06:22 AM Bug #9756 (WIP): Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Working at #7020 I also made some performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods. LogicalExpressionConvert... Stefanel Pezamosca

03:07 AM Bug #9756 (Test): Performance improvements for CONTAINS udf related methods.

Stefanel Pezamosca

10:41 AM Bug #9764: Some events (like VALUE-CHANGED) are invoked after errors are displayed for the buffer...

Given a browse with a set query. This query can have one ore more buffers set. One of the buffers (say buff1) contain... Delia Mitric

10:37 AM Bug #9764 (New): Some events (like VALUE-CHANGED) are invoked after errors are displayed for the ...

Delia Mitric

04:35 AM Bug #9755: Reimplement AdaptiveQuery dynamic-mode using a LookAheadResults delegate

Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> ...
> There is no point in "revalidating" if a @LookAheadQuery@ delegate for dynamic-mode ... Dănuț Filimon

03/10/2025

02:33 PM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...

I downloaded the files from your link. Thank you.
As you said, there are 2 directories:
* the @emptydbwithschema@... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:57 AM Feature #9093: add protection for multi-tenant imports to optionally only import tables that are ...

I've prepared 4 empty database bzip2 backups and the current metadata split into the two separate directories as we c... Brian Woodard

10:12 AM Bug #9755: Reimplement AdaptiveQuery dynamic-mode using a LookAheadResults delegate

I did some prototyping, but I must admit that having it as a @Query@ is much too complex comparing to having it as a ... Alexandru Lungu

07:15 AM Bug #9755: Reimplement AdaptiveQuery dynamic-mode using a LookAheadResults delegate

h4. Problem
A pattern was detected in a customer application that uses a browsed query, which is automatically scr... Alexandru Lungu

06:51 AM Bug #9755 (New): Reimplement AdaptiveQuery dynamic-mode using a LookAheadResults delegate

Alexandru Lungu

04:42 AM Bug #9633: bulk delete for permanent tables

Branch 9656a was merged to trunk rev 15762 and archived. Constantin Asofiei

03:37 AM Bug #9633: bulk delete for permanent tables

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Review of 9656a/15759.
Done, please see rev 15760.
Constantin Asofiei