Activity
From 01/20/2026 to 02/18/2026
02/18/2026
- 11:44 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- I can confirm, I have personally tested it.
And I must apologise again. In my note #9545-18 I have actually looked... - 08:33 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Have these programs been tested on OE? Sometimes the OE documentation is incorrect, misleading o... - 08:24 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Have these programs been tested on OE? Sometimes the OE documentation is incorrect, misleading or incomplete.
- 06:18 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Yet, I think the error is correct. Only the @test22.p@ is persistent. @test21.p@ is not. Th... - 06:10 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- OK, sorry I was mislead by the persistent initialisation of @test22.p@.
Yet, I think the error is correct. Only th... - 05:42 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The problem in #9545-12 testcase is that @start.p@ declares the temp-table @ttTest@ as @r... - 05:32 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> I understand this, and already handled majority of this error cases in 9545a. What I am tryin... - 03:11 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eduard,
>
> You can only @BIND@ a temp-table to a @REFERENCE-ONLY@ temp-table. There are...
02/17/2026
- 06:16 PM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Eduard,
You can only @BIND@ a temp-table to a @REFERENCE-ONLY@ temp-table. There are two cases here (these are my ... - 08:48 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- I could not find this anywhere in the documentation. My best guess is that for calling procedures that passes an actu...
- 07:08 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- However in a slightly more complicated case, extracted from the testcases:
start.p... - 06:54 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- start.p...
- 09:35 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Lorian Sandu wrote:
> I've started the @...@ script a few times and unfortunately it gets stuck (or works very slow)... - 09:30 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I've started the @conv-launch@ script a few times and unfortunately it gets stuck (or works very slow) at a step that...
- 01:43 AM Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- About the testcases cross-session tests, they have passed.
I have run the ChUI regression testing and I see two un...
02/16/2026
- 04:43 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I have made some tests on 9383c for the scenario what *Alexandru* pointed out on #9383-100 (DMO stale records).
Th... - 03:44 AM Feature #8834 (Closed): add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (an...
- 03:28 AM Feature #8834 (Test): add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and ...
- Merge notification for task branch 8834a.
- 03:18 AM Feature #8834 (Merge Pending): add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parame...
- Please merge 8834a now.
02/13/2026
- 04:50 PM Bug #11015: allow cleanup the DMO types, caches, etc for dynamic temp-tables
- +Review of 11015b, r16411+
First, to note that all affected files lack the H entries and possible (c) year update.... - 10:32 AM Bug #11015: allow cleanup the DMO types, caches, etc for dynamic temp-tables
* @AsmClassLoader@ - seems ok
* @CacheManager@ - is ok
* @DynamicConversionHelper@ - seems ok
* @DynamicTablesHe...- 09:57 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I have started doing some tests, but so far, I have didn't encountered issues with stale records. I will make more te...
- 09:55 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Committed revision *16421* on task branch *9383c*:
- Use @persistence.list@ instead of @persistence.scroll@ to store... - 08:26 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Ok.
In @BatchResults@, I am thinking to change @persistence.scroll@ to @persistence.list@.
One difference is that @... - 04:38 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- > I removed that because the batched records are not currently in the session cache.
But they end up in the sessio... - 03:33 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I assume the array you mention is the @BaseRecord.data@. Or you mean the cursor data array?... - 03:24 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> I don't currently know what @normalized@ means on the extent fields, but what I know is that ... - 02:25 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> What we have discussed in a daily today, to keep track of:
>
> * the batch size should b... - 04:21 AM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering
- I have continued working on changes needed for clustering in FWD. Even though we initially agreed that caches(includi...
02/12/2026
- 08:35 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- What we have discussed in a daily today, to keep track of:
* the batch size should be calculated based on the data... - 04:05 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Committed revision *16420* on task branch *9383c*:
- @BatchResults@ invalidates the query when PK is different.
- F... - 01:04 AM Bug #10937 (Internal Test): fwd-h2 'killedMultiplexesCleanup' must not abend if the batch is not ...
- Committed revision *16320* on task branch *10937a*:
- Replaced @nonEmptyTableFlags@ with H2 @fastHasRecords@.
02/11/2026
- 02:13 PM Bug #10937: fwd-h2 'killedMultiplexesCleanup' must not abend if the batch is not empty
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> I have done some performance tests with and without @nonEmptyTableFlags@ and I can confirm th... - 01:37 PM Bug #10937: fwd-h2 'killedMultiplexesCleanup' must not abend if the batch is not empty
- I have done some performance tests with and without @nonEmptyTableFlags@ and I can confirm that the performance is be...
- 05:39 AM Bug #10937: fwd-h2 'killedMultiplexesCleanup' must not abend if the batch is not empty
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Teodor,
> Although 10937b was already merged into trunk, there are some changes in 10937a ... - 02:11 PM Bug #11015 (Review): allow cleanup the DMO types, caches, etc for dynamic temp-tables
- Branch 11015b was created from trunk rev 16410.
In rev 16411, I've added the cache for the DMOMeta instances for d... - 11:54 AM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- I just wanted to post a method by which an application can be backward compatible for building. Some projects have mu...
- 09:36 AM Bug #10390 (Internal Test): FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST...
- I am OK with the changes - they are on spot with UNIQUE handling in dirty-share.
Please run ChUI regression testin... - 03:03 AM Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- Alex: please review this.
- 08:29 AM Bug #11037: Record not being evicted from FFCache
- I have committed @11037a/rev. 16327@. I removed the part where I was deleting the stale nodes at @put@ operation. I h...
- 06:46 AM Bug #10776: FFC.touch standing out in profiling
- Actually, the root cause for the problem exposed in #10776-10 is not because of the changes per-se on this branch. It...
- 02:20 AM Bug #9383 (Review): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults...
- Committed revision *16419* on task branch *9383c*:
- Cache the batch after fetching from database.
- Added @batchRe...
02/10/2026
- 10:40 AM Bug #10776: FFC.touch standing out in profiling
- Alex, while working on finishing #11037, I discovered a problem in the solution from #10776 for this testcase:...
- 10:31 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Committed revision *16418* on task branch *9383c*:
- When ResultSet is invalided, fetch the full record using batche... - 06:39 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- > Is this a JDBC problem because the query needs to be re-executed after the connection commit?
Yes. See #10172-31... - 06:29 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> * if you commit a transaction, the progressive results most probably get redundant, as each... - 06:19 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- A question about Alexandru's note from #9972-167:
> if you commit a transaction, the progressive results most probab... - 06:17 AM Bug #9383 (WIP): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is...
- Created task branch *9383c*.
- 06:57 AM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Not explicitly.
But this should not be a problem. When the DMO is initialised, the mandatory fields are automaticall... - 02:48 AM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Ovidiu, I did another review of the new standard.df and the @_trans@ meta table has new *mandatory* fields - did you ...
- 07:07 PM Bug #9950 (Test): Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> [...] If we upgrade the runtime of FWD to *trunk_16415*, but have _not_ reconverted (both wi... - 06:39 AM Bug #11037: Record not being evicted from FFCache
- I have ported the changes from @10776a@ into @11037a/rev. 16326@.
- 06:23 AM Bug #11037: Record not being evicted from FFCache
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Andrei, please embed the changes from 10776 into 11037a and let me review and test it as a ... - 05:56 AM Bug #11037 (Review): Record not being evicted from FFCache
- Andrei, please embed the changes from 10776 into 11037a and let me review and test it as a whole (according to #10776-9)
02/09/2026
- 06:52 PM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Roger,
> The application's behaviour shouldn't be affected. The upgrade should consist of... - 05:57 PM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Roger,
The application's behaviour shouldn't be affected. The upgrade should consist of:
* upgrade FWD to r16415
... - 04:58 PM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Are there any immediate changes to customer applications post merge?
- 02:46 PM Bug #9950 (Merge Pending): Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Please merge after 10894a.
- 02:26 PM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> [...] are there meta tables stored in the physical DB which are affected? This is requi... - 02:13 PM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Ovidiu, please remind me - are there meta tables stored in the physical DB which are affected? This is required to k...
- 02:08 PM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu: please prepare tasks in each customer project to upgrade to the new standard.df ... - 07:20 AM Bug #9950: Upgrade the metadata schema to a newer version
- Ovidiu: please prepare tasks in each customer project to upgrade to the new standard.df file. We will do this depend...
- 05:03 AM Bug #10937: fwd-h2 'killedMultiplexesCleanup' must not abend if the batch is not empty
- Teodor,
Although 10937b was already merged into trunk, there are some changes in 10937a which might be useful. What ... - 04:00 AM Feature #8834: add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and related...
- Harness, reports and navigation passed!
- 03:50 AM Feature #8834 (Internal Test): add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parame...
- 03:59 AM Bug #10772: NUM-RESULTS on a FOR EACH query fails
- Harness, reports and navigation passed!
02/06/2026
- 09:08 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Some things that I noticed:...
- 04:00 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> From the above example shows that NUM-REFERENCES is updated at the end of the called procedur... - 03:40 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- There is something in @TemporarBuffer.associateImpl@....
02/05/2026
- 03:50 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Hynek/Constantin/Eric: What testing is needed here?
> >
> > Should this ... - 08:55 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- Eric,
to answer your questions from the meeting.
* what happens when c3p0 runs out of connections?
The request... - 04:18 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- I checked the OE database logs, on agent startup there is no activity in the database, in the agent logs there are no...
- 03:57 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- I have been looking at DataSet implementation of @num-reference@, I think it is not quite right.
*start.p*...
02/04/2026
- 10:42 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- I want to document the testing env I am using:
* 1 PASOE agent with 300 executor threads
* the session manager conf... - 06:47 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- As far as I can understand, in OE, the db connection is reserved when starting a MSA session, whereas in FWD, the con...
- 05:57 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- It is a bit tricky with the @connect@ statement and appservers, the client cannot connect to a db and use the connect...
- 09:54 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- *start.p*...
- 08:47 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hynek/Constantin/Eric: What testing is needed here?
>
> Should this be in Internal Test status... - 08:11 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Also mind that in #11021, I removed the reposition in child components when doing @loadByVa...
02/03/2026
- 09:24 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- Connecting with...
- 07:32 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Did you configure the database to be automatically connected in the PASOE config, and se... - 07:30 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- Did you configure the database to be automatically connected in the PASOE config, and set the @-n@ argument at @prose...
- 07:26 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- I connected a PASOE agent to a database that has maximum 5 users. ...
- 04:42 AM Bug #11161 (WIP): fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- 08:49 AM Feature #8834: add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and related...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> You are correct. If this is happening also when the @cfgOverrides@ is being processed f... - 08:46 AM Feature #8834: add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and related...
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > * in @ParameterFileStartupParameter.readParameterFile@ - the f... - 08:40 AM Feature #8834: add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and related...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * in @ParameterFileStartupParameter.readParameterFile@ - the file needs to be read from ... - 08:33 AM Feature #8834: add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and related...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * does existing directory configurations still work, or will they need to be adjusted?
... - 08:28 AM Feature #8834: add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and related...
- Teodor, from 8834a rev 16351:
* in @ParameterFileStartupParameter.readParameterFile@ - the file needs to be read fro... - 08:04 AM Bug #10455 (Closed): Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- 08:03 AM Bug #10956 (Closed): Wrong primary index selection on FOR EACH table
- 08:03 AM Bug #10689 (Closed): Wrong temp-table FOR EACH sorting criteria
- 08:02 AM Bug #10560 (Closed): Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspo...
- 08:02 AM Feature #6457 (Closed): finish COPY-LOB support
- 08:02 AM Bug #10526 (Closed): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed
02/02/2026
- 10:01 AM Bug #11015 (WIP): allow cleanup the DMO types, caches, etc for dynamic temp-tables
- Branch 11015a was merged to trunk rev 16397 and archived.
- 09:58 AM Bug #10937: fwd-h2 'killedMultiplexesCleanup' must not abend if the batch is not empty
- Branch 10937b was merged to trunk rev 16396 and archived.
What remains is to decide how to improve the @nonEmptyFl... - 09:50 AM Bug #10901 (Closed): BEGINS trims the rvalue if the lvalue field is first in an index
- Branch 10901a was merged to trunk rev 16395 and archived.
- 09:38 AM Bug #10455 (Test): Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- Branch 10455b was merged to trunk rev. 16392 and archived.
- 05:31 AM Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- Merge to trunk after 10203a
- 09:16 AM Bug #10956 (Test): Wrong primary index selection on FOR EACH table
- Branch *10956a* was merged to trunk rev. *16389* and archived.
- 05:31 AM Bug #10956 (Merge Pending): Wrong primary index selection on FOR EACH table
- Merge to trunk after 10925a
- 08:54 AM Bug #10689 (Test): Wrong temp-table FOR EACH sorting criteria
- Branch 10689a was merged to trunk rev. 16386 and archived.
- 05:30 AM Bug #10689 (Merge Pending): Wrong temp-table FOR EACH sorting criteria
- Merge to trunk after 10636a
- 08:46 AM Bug #11027 (Test): Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- 07:44 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- Greg, at this moment, all the testing done for this task passed and also, didn't found any testcases related to this ...
- 08:44 AM Bug #10560 (Test): Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond...
- Branch 10560a was merged to trunk rev. 16384 and archived.
- 05:29 AM Bug #10560 (Merge Pending): Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer c...
- Merge to trunk after 6457a
- 08:28 AM Feature #6457 (Test): finish COPY-LOB support
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Merge to trunk after 10716a
6457a was merged into trunk rev. 16383 and archived. - 05:29 AM Feature #6457 (Merge Pending): finish COPY-LOB support
- Merge to trunk after 10716a
- 01:57 AM Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- 6457a rev 16365 fixes a XML header problem.
- 07:49 AM Bug #10526 (Test): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed
- 10526a was merged into trunk rev. 16380 and archived.
- 05:28 AM Bug #10526 (Merge Pending): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed
- Merge to trunk after 10935a
- 07:42 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
>
> Also mind that in #11021, I removed the reposition in child components when doing @load... - 06:45 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Eduard, please mind the @peek@ option. In peek mode, you do not load buffers, but rather gather the actual data that ...
- 02:56 AM Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- Rebased task branch *10390a* to trunk rev *16377*. This includes changes from #11027.
*Alexandru*, when you have t...
01/30/2026
- 09:22 AM Bug #11027 (WIP): Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- 08:00 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- Branch 11027a was merged into trunk as rev. 16374.
- 07:51 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- Before merging I realized the changed file didn't have history entries. I added that, and also changed the copyright ...
- 07:22 AM Bug #11027 (Merge Pending): Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- 11027a passed ETF and POC testing without any observable performance degradation. Please merge 11027a to trunk now.
- 07:24 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- I could not capture the raised condition via @ON ERROR/QUIT/STOP/END-KEY@ - at least for @mpro@, it seems to just ter...
- 07:21 AM Bug #11161: fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- In OpenEdge, @proserve@ command has the @-n@ argument which tells it the number of concurrent users it can serve. Se...
- 07:17 AM Bug #11161 (Review): fail gracefully when the database connection can not be established
- 07:09 AM Bug #10611: Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time
- ...
01/29/2026
- 09:41 AM Bug #9383 (New): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is...
- 09:41 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- @9383b@ was merged into @trunk / 16369@
- 09:35 AM Bug #9383 (Merge Pending): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a Progressive...
- Go ahead and merge now.
- 09:34 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please double-check in the docker container for the #10614 app, the heap set for the Cli... - 09:31 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Lorian Sandu wrote:
> I don't think there is anything left. The branch can be added to merge queue.
Please double-c... - 09:29 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Lorian, what else is left?
I don't think there is anything left. The branch can be ad... - 09:29 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Lorian, what else is left?
- 09:27 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- * CHui tests passed
* Large GUI app unit-tests passed - 06:20 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- The smoke test passed on the app I'm managing.
- 05:15 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Lorian Sandu wrote:
> Constantin, do you think we should test other apps besides ETF and #10614?
Yes. Both large G... - 05:15 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Constantin, do you think we should test other apps besides ETF and #10614?
- 08:11 AM Feature #9545 (WIP): confirm/add table parameter support
- I have run the @tests/table/parameter@ tests. And this are some problems spotted so far.
1) Right know I am focusi...
01/28/2026
- 05:13 PM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- Lorian Sandu wrote:
> I've created @9383b / rev 16369@ which reverts the changes that were introduced in @trunk / 16... - 08:09 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I've created @9383b / rev 16369@ which reverts the changes that were introduced in @trunk / 16217@.
- 03:36 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- From my POV, this is a customer specific pattern that breaks #9383 idea. I don't think we would be able to generate a...
- 03:35 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I documented the issue in #11154.
- 03:22 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used
- I am working on a scenario to test and check what can be done.
- 10:20 AM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Is this backward compatible with non-Docker configuration? If so, I think it should be added... - 08:45 AM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering
- Andrei Plugaru wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
>
> > Very clever... and your testing confirms?
>
> Yes, it work... - 06:39 AM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering
- As the discussion regarding the synchronization of metadata tables was not officially closed, I have done some analys...
- 04:33 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- I think a simple null check there will solve the issue.
I will redo some of the testing I am handling as I don't ... - 04:15 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- There is a regression on a large customer application caused by the latest revision.
I am attaching the stack trace ...
01/27/2026
- 11:01 AM Bug #9383 (WIP): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is...
- Alex/Razvan/Danut: please see #10614-83 and #10614-84. This revision introduces a regression where a 200k record que...
- 09:12 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- While testing the unit tests of a large GUI applications, I found some more issues, regarding the choice of the dirty...
- 04:02 AM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Very clever... and your testing confirms?
Yes, it works as expected. The trap from @ser...
01/26/2026
- 08:49 AM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering
- Andrei Plugaru wrote:
> *However, I have the solution for this: escaping the ampersand @&@ character*. This way the ... - 06:06 AM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering
- Roger, regarding the forwarding of the KILL signal to the Java process. I think I got to a cleaner approach using onl...
- 08:30 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- I have fixed review issues. Tested some customer applications. There is something which does not make sense to me in ...
01/23/2026
- 02:24 PM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- I have committed @11027a/16349@ with the fix from #11027-33.
Apart from the testing from #11027-26, the ChUi tests... - 08:48 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- I may have found a solution/workaround for the problem. As basically the problem was returning a wrong dirtyRecord ba...
- 07:48 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- There is a thing that distinguishes cross- from intra-: if the record is leaked from another session, then the first ...
- 07:23 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- Actually, the record that comes from the dirty DB seems to be the latest. The problem is that in @DefaultDirtyShareMa...
- 06:38 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- > In the chui tests, this is exactly what happens: the dirty record seems to be an older one, and the found record in...
- 06:30 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- I may have found a change that could be the root cause(for at least) a few regressions:...
- 03:28 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- Andrei Plugaru wrote:
> While running Chui regression tests found some regressions :((
> Currently I am looking int... - 03:16 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- While running Chui regression tests found some regressions :((
Currently I am looking into the following error: @Req... - 01:54 PM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering
- I resumed the work here by first rebasing the branch :))
@4369a@ has been rebased from trunk/16364. It is now at rev...
01/22/2026
- 07:16 AM Bug #10390 (Review): FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST ...
- 01:16 AM Bug #10390 (WIP): FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST sta...
- Committed revision *16358* on task branch *10390a*:
- Removed the fix for first testcase because it is being include... - 07:04 AM Bug #10772: NUM-RESULTS on a FOR EACH query fails
- Committed revision *16363* on task branch *10772a*:
- Replaced @new integer(...)@ with @integer.of()@ lookup and @in... - 06:33 AM Bug #10772 (Internal Test): NUM-RESULTS on a FOR EACH query fails
- +Review of 10772a/r16362+
Good job!
Sincerely, I do not recall of the change in @AbstractQuery@ (although other... - 04:55 AM Bug #10772 (Review): NUM-RESULTS on a FOR EACH query fails
- Committed revision *16362* on task branch *10772a*:
- Query which is not scrolling should not raise exception on @NU... - 04:49 AM Bug #10772 (WIP): NUM-RESULTS on a FOR EACH query fails
- Created task branch *10772a*.
- 05:36 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Review:
* please fix javadoc of parameter locator in @Cursor.reposition@, @Cursor.getLocator@ (both overloads), @C... - 03:50 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition
- Alex, I have rebased *10385a*, to trunk *rev. 16359*. I had a lot of conflicts with *rev. 16348*, could you check if ...
- 04:29 AM Bug #11027 (Review): Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- I have committed @11027a/16348@ with the safe check proposed by Teodor and also a missing break in a case where the d...
- 02:57 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- It is a safety check that we can ensure that the DMO hydrated values comes from database or from Session cache.
- 02:43 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Andrei, I have checked your changes and it makes sense.
> There is one change that I would d... - 01:41 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- Andrei, I have checked your changes and it makes sense.
There is one change that I would do to your change.
Computi... - 03:51 AM Bug #7999: FWD does not honor FIELDS/EXCEPT at dynamic queries
- Could you review the branch?
01/21/2026
- 11:05 AM Bug #11027 (WIP): Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- I committed 2 more revisions:
# @rev. 16346@: here it is a simple fix to activate next/prev when entering this @ ... - 04:09 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- I have committed @11027a/ rev. 16345@ with the removal of the redundant if in @DirtyShareContext.java@ and also wrapp...
- 09:34 AM Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue
- Rebased to trunk rev *16358*
- 09:33 AM Feature #6457: finish COPY-LOB support
- 6457a was rebased to trunk rev. 16358.
- 09:27 AM Bug #10956: Wrong primary index selection on FOR EACH table
- Rebased to trunk rev *16358*
- 09:16 AM Bug #10689: Wrong temp-table FOR EACH sorting criteria
- Rebased to trunk rev *16358*
- 09:15 AM Bug #10526: Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed
- Rebased to trunk 16358.
- 09:06 AM Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Teodor, please mind that Andrei is already working is a close area. Please have a chat with... - 05:52 AM Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- Teodor, please mind that Andrei is already working is a close area. Please have a chat with him first to see if you c...
- 05:46 AM Bug #10390 (Feedback): FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRS...
- 05:39 AM Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- Rebased branch *10390a* to trunk rev *16353*.
Committed revision *16357* on task branch *10390a*:
- @RAQ.executeI... - 08:47 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...
- Rebased task branch *10560a* to trunk revision *16358*.
- 04:02 AM Feature #8834: add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and related...
- Committed revision *16351* on task branch *8834a*:
- Added support for quoted @cfgOverrides@.
- Additional fixes li... - 02:42 AM Feature #8834: add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and related...
- Ok, I see. There are lots of places where the @split(" ")@ is being used and I think I shall replace that with a more...
- 02:56 AM Feature #9711: collation configuration cleanup
- I solved other issues that I encountered while testing with different databases and cpinternal values. Branch 9711a u...
01/20/2026
- 06:26 AM Feature #8834: add bootstrap configuration support for -db OE command line parameter (and related...
- Teodor, please test how @cfgOverrides@ can handle the spaces, in @directory.xml@ - is it enough to use @"@ in th...
- 06:21 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > I will commit soon the small changes based on the review, however, I would want to contin... - 05:42 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- > I will commit soon the small changes based on the review, however, I would want to continue testing the current cha...
- 05:19 AM Bug #11027: Unflushed record causes infinite loop
- >> @else if(compWithPristine < 0 && (activeBundleKey FIRST || activeBundleKey LAST))@ why only for FIRST/LAST?
> Hmm... - 05:32 AM Bug #10390: FIND FIRST buffer field change does not propagate into the next FIRST FIRST statements.
- I have starting working on this task and I have might found the root cause for each issue.
With the latest trunk, th...
Also available in: Atom