Activity
From 07/02/2026 to 07/31/2026
Today
- 05:55 PM Feature #11526 (Internal Test): Implement in-memory uniquness validation using Bloom filters
- I see nothing wrong with the update. Cool!
I see the %Done is still at 60. Are there some other thing to implement... - 09:54 AM Feature #11526: Implement in-memory uniquness validation using Bloom filters
- Ovidiu, thank you for the feedback, please take a look at rev 16613.
- 02:02 PM Feature #11467 (Internal Test): Improve ImportWorker performance
- +Review of 11467a / r 16568+
I do like the new code. I think it is more readable. You addressed some of the issues... - 11:18 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, any other concerns?
Let's be sure to include multi-tenant in the testing.
O... - 03:01 AM Feature #11467 (Review): Improve ImportWorker performance
- Eric, any other concerns?
*Ovidiu* - please take at the changes again (moved to review for better visibility). - 12:36 PM Support #11633: Reduce manual c3p0 tuning burden across cluster scale changes
- Committed on *11633a, rev. 16659*.
ConnectionBudgetManager manages connection buget per physical instance, keyed b... - 09:55 AM Feature #11638 (Review): Reduce FastFindCache invalidation thrashing
- Constantin, when you have the time, please review 11638a.
- 07:10 AM Feature #11638: Reduce FastFindCache invalidation thrashing
- The initial implementation shows promise, these are the results of comparing memory retention of FFC, trunk vs 11638a...
- 05:17 AM Feature #11638 (WIP): Reduce FastFindCache invalidation thrashing
- 05:17 AM Feature #11638: Reduce FastFindCache invalidation thrashing
- @FastFindCache@ currently reacts to writes by invalidating cached results very aggressively. In a workload where the ...
- 05:12 AM Feature #11638 (Review): Reduce FastFindCache invalidation thrashing
07/20/2026
- 06:03 PM Feature #11526: Implement in-memory uniquness validation using Bloom filters
- +Review of 11526a/r16612+
I found only small issue in a single source file from the changeset:
* @FilterManager.j... - 10:06 AM Feature #11526 (Review): Implement in-memory uniquness validation using Bloom filters
- Implemented the memory management in rev/16612, Ovidiu, please review.
- 09:10 AM Bug #11573 (Test): Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- 11573b was merged to trunk/16658 and 10614_main/16432.
- 08:55 AM Bug #11573 (Merge Pending): Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- 11573b can be merged now.
07/18/2026
- 02:08 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Worth taking a note is that with *11467a*, there are larger gaps between *recid*, which happens on the following case...
- 01:45 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I haven't reviewed the code, so this may not be a relevant inquiry, but please confirm:
>
...
07/17/2026
- 05:05 PM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> SQL dump gives output difference every time when you import from database, due to the fact ho... - 03:02 PM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Done in +11467a/r16568+.
Ovidiu, please review again. - 10:23 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Done in +11467a/r16568+.
- 10:03 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- I see this from claude, it may be a valid point:
> * *[MINOR]* _functional_ @ImportWorker@.@importTable@ (bulk path)... - 07:21 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Tested *10614_main* to import the database. Import time has reduced with nearly 50%.
Committed revision *16567* on... - 05:32 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Currently working on #7143-1977, but I think it will be ready EOD.
- 05:31 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Let me know if and when the branch is ready to merge.
- 03:16 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Teodor, please also test a (small) import with 10614_main.
> ... - 03:15 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor, please also test a (small) import with 10614_main.
On that app, we don't have... - 03:14 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Teodor, please also test a (small) import with 10614_main.
- 02:56 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Addressed code review #11467-17 in +11467a/r16566+.
- 01:55 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- SQL dump gives output difference every time when you import from database, due to the fact how data is being stored i...
- 08:27 AM Feature #11526 (WIP): Implement in-memory uniquness validation using Bloom filters
- Even for preview, it needs to be workable for multi-tenant. Let's keep going on improvements before merge.
- 07:31 AM Feature #11526: Implement in-memory uniquness validation using Bloom filters
- For memory management I am implementing 3 things:
1. Making filter sizing table-specific instead of one fixed medium... - 07:20 AM Feature #11526: Implement in-memory uniquness validation using Bloom filters
- I am ok with presenting this feature as a prototype for now, which is easily disabled, but certainly not as a finishe...
- 07:10 AM Feature #11526: Implement in-memory uniquness validation using Bloom filters
- The current implementation is not suited for a multi tenant env, the memory consumption will be too high. I need to i...
07/16/2026
- 12:42 PM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- I think that is a pass.
However, if you want to do a cross-check you can do a SQL database dump (backup) in text (SQ... - 12:37 PM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- That is expected since the dump as imported would be in 8859-1 and the database as imported is UTF-8. The import tra...
- 12:02 PM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Use our export tool to dump the content to @.d@ and then compare the @.d@ files to the originals.... - 09:27 AM Feature #11467 (Internal Test): Improve ImportWorker performance
- 09:27 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Ovidiu, can you review +11467a/r16565+. Thanks!
+Review of 11467a / r16565+
I think the... - 07:38 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> I am finding a way to validate the import on a *41GB* dump.
Use our export tool to dump th... - 06:16 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- I am finding a way to validate the import on a *41GB* dump.
- 06:08 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- I've ran the import with the #8755 18GB data dump (as I still have previous logs), and:
* 8755d import
> 100.00000%... - 05:43 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I would have expected a greater improvement than just ~25%.
I think I have a high s... - 05:34 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> *CLOB* data type is using @COPY@ statement, there is no issue regarding that. I have gated *B... - 05:31 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- When running @ant import.db@, @clean.db@ is being executed, which drops the database.
Word-index triggers are being ... - 05:20 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> I have done a couple of fixes, most of them were style fixes, support of COPY for word index ... - 05:01 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- Some measurements done on two projects, one with a smaller dump and another one, with way larger dump.
Project 1:
... - 04:58 AM Feature #11467 (Review): Improve ImportWorker performance
- 04:58 AM Feature #11467 (WIP): Improve ImportWorker performance
- 04:58 AM Feature #11467: Improve ImportWorker performance
- I have done a couple of fixes, most of them were style fixes, support of COPY for word index tables, tuned *ImportWor...
- 10:39 AM Support #11633: Reduce manual c3p0 tuning burden across cluster scale changes
- max_connections is 'per cluster'. This needs to consider the max_connections for that cluster, and group these value...
- 10:35 AM Support #11633: Reduce manual c3p0 tuning burden across cluster scale changes
- I like this a lot. In order to handle load balancing and the natural variability of the number of tenant sessions pe...
- 09:59 AM Support #11633: Reduce manual c3p0 tuning burden across cluster scale changes
- One idea could be:
Configure a single cluster-wide connection budget per physical database instead, and let each ... - 09:56 AM Support #11633 (New): Reduce manual c3p0 tuning burden across cluster scale changes
- 10:25 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- I don't think so, as Alex said in #11625, only keeping track of the dmo state is not enough, there are RecordNursery ...
- 10:10 AM Bug #11573 (Internal Test): Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Yes, the remaining changes from 11573b are a subset of the previous revision. The removed changes have potential. Wil...
- 04:26 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- I reverted some of the fixes for tests failing in trunk as they are incomplete and out of scope, Ovidiu, please revie...
07/15/2026
- 03:08 PM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> I fixed the regressions and some issues in trunk, details in #11625. I did a bit of a rework ... - 10:55 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- I checked and this does not make much sense in 4gl also...
- 10:43 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- You are right, if the flush fails, the delete fails also. I will look for another solution.
- 10:00 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Artur, about the "flush before delete" - I think this may be problematic. The change exists only in memory until flu...
- 09:42 AM Bug #11573 (Review): Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- I fixed the regressions and some issues in trunk, details in #11625. I did a bit of a rework so the changes are bette...
- 03:49 AM Bug #11573 (WIP): Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- There are some regressions in tests Constantin provided in #11625, working on a fix.
- 02:45 PM Feature #11526: Implement in-memory uniquness validation using Bloom filters
- We need to move this ahead. If this is disabled by default, is it safe to merge?
- 02:50 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Rebased to trunk rev. 16656.
- 02:36 AM Feature #9545: confirm/add table parameter support
- Eduard, please rebase again and I'll move to full review and testing.
07/14/2026
- 01:08 PM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Ovidiu, thank you for catching these, I addressed the issues in rev 16647, please take a look again.
- 12:54 PM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- +Review of 11573b / r16646+
I was interested in balancing of the savepoints because of another task and I had a lo... - 11:43 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Actually, I'm in progress of doing it.
- 11:42 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Ovidiu: please review also.
- 11:26 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- I can do another 2 projects besides etf. I will also ask for help with chui regression testing. If the review is posi...
- 11:19 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- What additional testing does this need, once it is reviewed?
- 08:51 AM Bug #11573 (Review): Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- The problem was that rollback condition in SavepointManager.rollback() was too broad, trying to compensate for the fa...
- 03:43 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Yes, this is regressed by 11573b, thank you very much, Constantin.
07/13/2026
- 05:21 PM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Eduard, I think this is the recreate for the regression in 11573b:...
- 11:35 AM Feature #1585 (Closed): add conversion and runtime support for word indexes
- 11:34 AM Feature #5219: implement native full-text search for word index and CONTAINS support
- The idea of this task is to leverage the native database full-text-search capability. It could be implemented for on...
- 08:57 AM Feature #5220 (Closed): extend word index support to SQL Server
07/08/2026
- 11:09 AM Bug #11573 (WIP): Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- 11573a was merged to trunk/16643 and custom branch rev 16429.
- 09:50 AM Bug #11573 (Merge Pending): Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> I tested the multi tenant project, large gui application unit tests and etf, all passed.
You... - 09:45 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- I tested the multi tenant project, large gui application unit tests and etf, all passed.
07/07/2026
- 08:46 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> Done. Now 11573b contains all the changes and I will continue working on it, but 11573a conta... - 08:30 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Done. Now 11573b contains all the changes and I will continue working on it, but 11573a contains only the trigger rel...
- 08:24 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> Constantin,
> The regression in ETF comes from the second set of changes, but rev 16622-166... - 08:12 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Constantin,
The regression in ETF comes from the second set of changes, but rev 16622-16623 addresses one of the is... - 02:34 AM Bug #11502: Recycle dirty share H2 session
- Artur tested with this branch and he confirmed that the testing on #10614 app has passed.
07/06/2026
- 08:43 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Thank you, Alex.
I will fix the test case, then retest etf, hopefully it will be enough. - 08:41 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Artur, I committed to testcases/1847 plenty of tests in @tests/persistence/flushing_validation/flush_pipeline_regress...
- 08:40 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> * *[MAJOR]* _functional_ @Block@.@rollback@ / @SavepointManager@.@rollback@: Removing the @tx...
07/02/2026
- 04:51 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> I could setup ETF and test myself, please let me know.
You can start doing the ETF setup, ... - 04:49 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- I think the first finding is relevant because if I run the tests manually, it passes. I think there is something rela...
- 04:47 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- If this is going to be substantial effort on your part, I could setup ETF and test myself, please let me know.
- 04:45 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- I still have not found the procedure because the test suite is large.
Please check the automated code review and s... - 03:14 AM Bug #11573: Remove unnecessary JDBC savepoint during validation
- Teodor,
Please send me in private the 4gl sources for the failing test.
Also available in: Atom