Activity
From 06/28/2017 to 07/27/2017
07/28/2017
- 10:42 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think need to find a way to avoid or minimize it because using instanceof means poor design ...
07/27/2017
- 04:12 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- > I think need to find a way to avoid or minimize it because using instanceof means poor design may be.
Agreed. ... - 03:54 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11188@.
This is the fix for class cast exception ... - 10:35 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11187@.
The update includes row resize feature co...
07/26/2017
- 08:23 AM Feature #1795: implement printing support (real GUI printing not the child process stuff used in ...
- Please note that Ovidiu has handled the conversion parts of SYSTEM-DIALOG-PRINTER-SETUP in #3313 (see branch 1830a). ...
- 10:47 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11186@.
The update makes preparation steps for ap...
07/25/2017
- 01:37 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eric did the most recent validation processing implementation including the more sophisticated ap... - 01:32 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > I just don't like the idea adding something that will be deleted later and wondering if I'm missing some lexer capa...
- 12:43 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > Are you simply suggesting that the only change would be @very early in rules processing delete validation statement...
- 12:36 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Eric did the most recent validation processing implementation including the more sophisticated approach.
Are you s... - 12:32 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Greg, consider the case of validation for @DISPLAY .. ENABLE ALL@ case. During processing of @ENABLE field@ we attach...
- 01:16 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Yep, I have _a lot_ of browse changes to commit, and I don't know how to coordinate other that committing it first. E...
- 04:17 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Stanislav: Please review this task so that you are aware of the changes Eugenie is making that are browse related. I...
- 10:11 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11185@.
This update makes first steps for impleme...
07/24/2017
- 03:46 PM Feature #1827: implement a replacement for the Windows help viewer
- I did not post the content from note 7 because it seems that all options are in fact some kind of primitives to commu...
- 01:27 PM Feature #1827: implement a replacement for the Windows help viewer
- I'm generally OK with this approach. The code currently has a partially stubbed conversion that is not as good as yo...
- 01:19 PM Feature #1827: implement a replacement for the Windows help viewer
- Ovidiu's proposal for this code:...
- 10:12 AM Feature #1827: implement a replacement for the Windows help viewer
- > Apparently the HEIGHT is interpreted as KW_HEIGHT_C, instead as KW_HEIGHT, as the parser expects. The WIDTH seems t...
- 09:46 AM Feature #1827 (WIP): implement a replacement for the Windows help viewer
- While working on adding conversion support I discovered an issue with @POSITION@ syntax of the @SYSTEM-HELP@ statemen...
- 09:36 AM Feature #3289: implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-GET-DIR
- > I can unify the paradigm of file/dir chooser dialogs with the other system dialogs. I kept the c'tor as the head of...
- 09:30 AM Feature #3289: implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-GET-DIR
- From Ovidiu:
> I can unify the paradigm of file/dir chooser dialogs with the other system dialogs. I kept the c'to... - 09:30 AM Feature #3289: implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-GET-DIR
- 1. I prefer the static SomeClass.create*Dialog() + chaining approach over than the constructor + chaining approach. ...
- 09:20 AM Feature #3289 (WIP): implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-GET-DIR
- Added conversion support in task branch 1830a, revision 11159.
The full-syntax construct like this:... - 09:28 AM Feature #3313: implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-PRINTER-SETUP
- I like the approach. Go ahead with this.
- 09:23 AM Feature #3313 (WIP): implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-PRINTER-SETUP
- Added conversion support in task branch 1830a, revision 11159.
The full-syntax construct like this:... - 09:22 AM Feature #3313 (Closed): implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-PRINTER-SETUP
- 09:18 AM Feature #3290: implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-FONT
- I like the approach. Go ahead with this.
- 08:56 AM Feature #3290 (WIP): implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-FONT
- Added conversion support in task branch 1830a, revision 11159.
The full-syntax construct like this:... - 08:52 AM Feature #3291: implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-COLOR
- It looks good. Go ahead with this approach.
- 08:51 AM Feature #3291 (WIP): implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-COLOR
- Added conversion support in task branch 1830a, revision 11159.
The full-syntax construct like this:...
07/22/2017
- 06:46 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11184@.
This is the fix for @END-BOX-SELECTION@ p... - 10:13 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The more testing discovered new issue with @END-BOX-SELECTION@ approach currently implemented. On the time the event ...
- 09:06 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The testcases repo has been updated to revision @1627@.
Two new testcases added to investigate and properly implem...
07/21/2017
- 02:10 PM Feature #3282: create a 4GL language extension to control screen refresh
- Code Review Task Branch 3282a Revision 11156
1. The gap analysis marking in @rules/gaps/lang_stmts.rules@ will not... - 10:28 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11182@.
Some unification and optimization was per...
07/20/2017
- 09:59 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11181@.
Adding runtime implementation for @GRID-S...
07/19/2017
- 05:03 PM Bug #1830: implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-GET-FILE support
- I agree, the approach is reasonable.
- 04:30 PM Bug #1830: implement SYSTEM-DIALOG-GET-FILE support
- Conversion finished. At this moment, a code like:...
- 01:37 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The note "77":https://proj.goldencode.com/issues/1834#note-77 has been updated to reflect new findings.
- 10:38 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The testcases repo has been updated to revision @1625@. Added another test(@uast/drag_n_drop/dnd_test0_1.p@) to inves...
- 08:51 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11180@.
Added real handling for @MOVE/RESIZE@ eve... - 11:01 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- I added @uast/combo_box/combo_box20_2.p@ as revision 1626 in testcases. Use this to see the regression in both GUI an...
- 11:00 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Agreed.
- 10:37 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > I'm OK with changes. Just to make sure the @FORMAT "x(1)"@ regr... - 10:25 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> I'm OK with changes. Just to make sure the @FORMAT "x(1)"@ regression is not starting with ... - 10:59 AM Feature #1818: implement a timer service to replace the PSTimer OCX
- Code Review Task Branch 1818a Revision 11162
I am generally OK with the changes.
>> 3. In common-progress.rules...
07/18/2017
- 06:00 PM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3279a Revision 11167
>
> I'm fine with the changes.
>
> Unless Euge... - 05:53 PM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Code Review Task Branch 3279a Revision 11167
I'm fine with the changes.
Unless Eugenie has any objections, I'm ... - 05:56 PM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- I like the approach.
- 05:51 PM Feature #3260: auto-conversion and enablement for the embedded web client
- A status for the automation of embedded windows.
The solution I found to automate the generation of embedded windo... - 10:28 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11179@.
This update changes the implementation ap...
07/16/2017
- 07:01 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11178@.
This is the fix for painting issue with n...
07/15/2017
- 10:46 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, please get it implemented to match the 4GL behavior including all of the event processing. ...
07/14/2017
- 12:04 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > I suspect we need to dynamically convert the VALEXP/VALMSG from the schema at runtime ...
>
> The only real tric... - 11:47 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- > I would suggest to go the way number 2 which is longer I guess. Just because I think we need to implement everythin...
- 09:19 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11176@.
The update fixes event priority issues an... - 09:09 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg,
Investigating next steps for implementing direct manipulation functionality I've got a point I need to discu...
07/13/2017
- 03:15 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11175@.
Small bug fix for @11174@ update with wro... - 11:10 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11174@.
The update starts handling implementation...
07/12/2017
- 04:40 PM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I found two testcases with SIMPLE comboboxes. After a few tests, the UI is just fine, the o... - 03:06 PM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- I found two testcases with SIMPLE comboboxes. After a few tests, the UI is just fine, the only differences are the fo...
- 10:30 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie: after the rebase, please do a code review. Focus on the combo-box changes.
I have tw... - 09:02 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Revision 11165 above is based on trunk 11155.
- 09:00 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie: after the rebase, please do a code review. Focus on the combo-box changes.
OK. - 08:58 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- Please rebase the branch.
Eugenie: after the rebase, please do a code review. Focus on the combo-box changes. - 08:44 AM Feature #3280: implement editor methods
- The task branch 3279a was rebased and updated. Current revision 11165.
Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch... - 11:01 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Just had an idea, I don't know how hard is to implement it.
> We can use a second, tempora... - 10:24 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Just had an idea, I don't know how hard is to implement it.
> We can use a second, tempora... - 10:19 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Related to the current status of the trunc 11155, all changes of the web client were described in merge notification ...
- 09:27 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Just had an idea, I don't know how hard is to implement it.
We can use a second, temporary transparent canvas in fro... - 09:14 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- There is a @xor@ operation that make _Shapes are made transparent where both overlap and drawn normal everywhere else...
- 08:57 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Sergey: Please see the recent notes in this task and comment.
- 08:47 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > I'm still hoping to find @JS@ analog of the @Java2D@ @setXORMod... - 06:16 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> I'm still hoping to find @JS@ analog of the @Java2D@ @setXORMode()@ implementation.
Euge... - 10:55 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> From Eugenie:
>
> If you create the proper drawing/primitive APIs in the @GuiDriver@, then eac... - 05:15 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- I took a look into customer's code and found that in one place non-string value is used as the initial value for @ADD...
07/11/2017
- 09:54 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- From Eugenie:
> The investigation for web client starting issues. The tests show additional subtasks for web clien...
07/10/2017
- 02:23 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- > It it a bit strange. You need to set @webClient/virtualDesktopEnabled@ to @true@ in your @directory.xml@. For unkno...
- 01:23 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Are you able to run standalone testcases with web client? The server directory is @simple/s... - 12:16 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > So can anyone clarify what is the status of the Web client for ... - 11:47 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> So can anyone clarify what is the status of the Web client for trunk @11155@?
It it a bit ... - 11:03 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> The @Classic@ theme is the base for all others, correct? If we implement some drawing in @C... - 10:32 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> From email conversation:
> On 07/06/2017 03:20 PM, Greg Shah wrote:
> > On 07/06/2017 08:... - 08:52 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- From email conversation:
On 07/06/2017 03:20 PM, Greg Shah wrote:
> On 07/06/2017 08:06 AM, Eugenie V. Lyzenko wrot... - 09:11 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- For external certificates @apache.crt@ issued by well-known authorities it is required to add @SSLCertificateChainFil...
- 08:19 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- I guess the best way is to make the notification abstracted so that it is not browse specific, but in this case it wi...
07/09/2017
- 05:49 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- This is the only log I have for web client with current trunk for hotel GUI.
Has anyone the same issue? I have add...
07/08/2017
- 04:39 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > Don't we eventually need to store the state for synchronization to the client side? Can we store it as we go and th...
- 01:48 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Don't we eventually need to store the state for synchronization to the client side? Can we store it as we go and the...
- 01:42 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Greg, I have a question about displaying browse intermediate state. The stack looks like...
- 10:36 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11172@.
The update finished the notes resolution....
07/07/2017
- 08:57 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11171@.
This is the partial notes resolution. Add...
07/06/2017
- 06:19 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > >Also, all rendering should be done... - 04:54 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> >Also, all rendering should be done in DRAG, using overlaid XOR o... - 03:05 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Review of 1834a/11169.
> # in @PaneConfig@: do we need to keep both @gridUnitHeightChars@ ... - 02:53 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>Also, all rendering should be done in DRAG, using overlaid XOR operation, twice: once using ... - 01:45 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- Review of 1834a/11169.
Nice job! Please see my observation below:
# in the default @BrowseInterface.setRowResizable... - 11:55 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11170@.
Small update to handle default setting fo... - 10:47 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11169@.
This update adds support for frame grid d... - 05:25 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Something else bothers me: since r11153 (or so) when running with Win10/win8 themes, the cl... - 04:44 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- I finished running @uast/rectangle/*@ tests. I noted two issues:
# tests 6(1): the gap between the two rectangles is... - 09:40 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> # the background colour of frames is rendered by @BorderedPanelGuiImpl@, see lines 233-251.... - 08:00 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie, indeed, there are a couple of issues regarding to frames, but they are not strictl... - 07:25 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Eugenie, indeed, there are a couple of issues regarding to frames, but they are not strictly related to styles:
# no...
07/05/2017
- 05:43 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Please let me know if you agree to the changes I committed to new branch 2676b (rev 11156).... - 05:03 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie, you were right, in some cases the line was not correctly drawn on Win8/10. I creat... - 03:56 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Eugenie, you were right, in some cases the line was not correctly drawn on Win8/10. I created a complex testcase (see...
07/04/2017
- 06:25 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- Interesting enough, if SCREEN-VALUE was updated in ROW-DISPLAY trigger during search by key, the new value is used fo...
- 03:55 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eugenie, please provide the exact 4GL code for this, I will run it on Win8.1 machine and co... - 03:49 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Eugenie, please provide the exact 4GL code for this, I will run it on Win8.1 machine and continue investigations.
Th... - 03:44 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- I agree, the buttons and other widgets look differently in Windows10 theme. But I do not think the GUI rectangle shou...
- 01:20 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- 2676a was merged to trunk as revision 11155. Test results and the branch itself were archived. Notification email was...
- 08:59 AM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- Ovidiu, I'm OK with merging 2676a to trunk - no further testing is needed, as it doesn't collide with 11154 trunk.
- 03:50 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been rebased with current trunk @11155@, new revision is @11168@.
- 10:34 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11167@.
Starting with this update the implementat... - 09:42 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- Private and public root CA keys are stored in @root-ca-pk.store@ protected by store password and key entry password. ...
07/03/2017
- 09:24 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11166@.
Added javadoc fix for @ClientsToPortsGene... - 07:13 AM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been rebased with current trunk @11154@, new revision is @11165@.
- 05:54 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- 2683a was merged to trunk as revision 11154.
- 05:54 AM Feature #3236 (Closed): implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- 05:53 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- The task branch 2683a was merged into the trunc as rev. 11154 and archived.
- 04:17 AM Feature #2683: reverse proxy implementation
- Please merge 2683a to trunk.
- 05:19 AM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- > But I still think to keep the values in order to make less changes and for the case I'm missing something, they don...
07/01/2017
- 05:54 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, I think I gave you the wrong password, and I need to re-generate them again - I get the same now (even from Ecl...
- 12:12 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, 2683a rev 11180 contains the certificate-related changes (and the chrome 'subject-alternate-name' fix, too). A...
- 11:40 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- There is this option @webClient/portsRange/forwardedHost@ that can be important to set in Amazon environment. (https:...
- 10:50 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Or we can pass it in as a parameter.
- 10:50 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes.
OK, then I'll need to save its encryption password for its private key in the directory. - 10:49 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes.
- 10:43 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, I'm almost done with this: do you want to add 're-use root CA', too? Because otherwise this would need to be re...
- 09:44 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > Otherwise I'll need to read the input from the arguments
Yes, let's make these arguments. I can pass them in as... - 09:43 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I am already automatically updating the @directory.xml@ placeholders using the Ansible scripting.... - 09:38 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I am already automatically updating the @directory.xml@ placeholders using the Ansible scripting. We can add another...
- 09:33 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If we can provide the mechanism to regen the cert for an arbitrary hostname, then we can meet our... - 09:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Virtual desktop mode works in the POC. AND because of the port range support, I can get multiple simultaneous sessio...
- 09:25 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I'll test it now.
Please consider the cert re-gen issue. - 09:22 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Are you OK with merging to trunk?
Yes, I don't see any issues.
> Also: I plan to enable virtu... - 09:15 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Also: I plan to enable virtual desktop in the poc directory. Is there any reason to disable it?
- 09:14 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Are you OK with merging to trunk?
- 09:07 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- main part passed, too.
- 09:24 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11164@.
This update starts visual effects impleme...
06/30/2017
- 07:19 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Is the ChUI regression testing still running?
CTRL-C I think is passed (cumulative, ... - 07:17 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin: Is the ChUI regression testing still running?
- 07:16 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Planning to log out sooner.
- 07:07 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I followed https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-use-apache-http-server-as-reverse-proxy-using-mod_...
- 06:59 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I setup certificates for the FWD server and the embedded web server for demo.goldencode.com. Those just replaced the...
- 06:56 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, I think it helps to fix embedded client's certificate issue. It seems that you wrote about it when preparing an ...
- 06:54 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Can't we just pass through the SSL of the FWD server's? We don't want to generate yet another certificate that is on...
- 06:49 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- At first it is required to create ssl virtual host and it seems that I followed this article https://www.digitalocean...
- 06:45 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- openssl package must be installed.
- 06:43 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Do all of these get installed with the @apache2@ package?
I am not sure, but it seems that the... - 06:34 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Do all of these get installed with the @apache2@ package?
- 06:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Please notice modules that enabled by site administrator. All these modules must be installed if you would like to ge...
- 06:27 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Also after your configuration has been done, you can check the installed modules by running...
- 06:19 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 55 modified poc directory.xml.
- 06:18 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Please look at these resources:
1)
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-install-linux-apache-my... - 05:35 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Also, please update the directory.xml to have the right ACL and the new port range support for 10 clients.
Include... - 05:31 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes.
I'm about to work on that next.
Please make a list of the following:
1. Packages to install to get Apac... - 05:08 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Do you need my help with Apache configuration?
- 05:03 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Don't mind, I found REDACTED/REDACTED
- 05:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Can you check in your changes to the POC embedded code?
It doesn't need to change the source c... - 04:54 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Can you check in your changes to the POC embedded code?
- 04:48 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg, Constantin these changes work with the Apache configuration provided by note 152, I... - 04:37 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > It should be a problem, I would like to change a direct access to https://localhost:8443/embedd... - 04:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > It should be a problem, I would like to change a direct access to https://localhost:8443/embedded
Go ahead. - 04:29 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, the poc is built now. I forgot that the embedded client needs a direct access too, but I changed its root ...
- 04:05 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Ok, but it worked on my host with Posgresql before that.
Hotel was setup for postgresq... - 04:02 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Ok, but it worked on my host with Posgresql before that.
- 04:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Are you on revision 53 of the POC project? You are probably on rev 52 which was hard coded to PostgreSQL.
Try rev... - 03:56 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I need help with poc setup, I run ant deploy.all and got ...
- 03:51 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- It seems that there no another changes. I updated this poc and started postgresql server, now running ant deploy.all ...
- 03:46 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > It seems that a single fixed port is the same as dynamically allocated from a degraded port range. I didn't provide...
- 03:41 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is there any remaining known issue with 2683a?
> I understand that the POC embedded code needs... - 03:31 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Is there any remaining known issue with 2683a?
I understand that the POC embedded code needs changes. Is there an... - 03:17 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Any code changes to embedded mode will need to be applied to the cu... - 02:51 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Any code changes to embedded mode will need to be applied to the customer POC project too.
Gre... - 01:52 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, Constantin these changes work with the Apache configuration provided by note 152, I did not use HTML rewrite mo...
- 01:39 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Any code changes to embedded mode will need to be applied to the customer POC project too.
- 01:26 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Yes, I understand, but there are no ways, we need to change index.html and ehotel.js. It ... - 01:20 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, I understand, but there are no ways, we need to change index.html and ehotel.js. It should take into account win...
- 01:16 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> At first it needs to change dojo config that was set by index.html to
Are these changes ... - 01:10 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > All access is through port 443 right? So that is the only port exp... - 01:03 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> All access is through port 443 right? So that is the only port exposed via the firewall?
>
> ... - 01:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- All access is through port 443 right? So that is the only port exposed via the firewall?
What are the starting UR... - 12:58 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I guess that we need to fix dojo configuration settings....
- 12:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg, if you need to proxy this url https://localhost:8443/, then it should be added sepa... - 12:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, I will need to proxy both 8443 and 7443. 8443 is the really important one.
Is there anything else needed? - 12:22 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg, if you need to proxy this url https://localhost:8443/, then it should be added separetely, like for this url ht...
- 12:18 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I just imported hotel server der certificate into Firefox and got embedded clients working properly.
- 12:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Added my default ssl configuration with a mapping file....
- 11:33 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11179 fixed java docs.
- 11:24 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11178, sorry for delay, during tests found that nodes are not updated if it is necessarily to sati...
- 10:58 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Can I commit com.goldencode.p2j.main.ClientsToPortsGenerator into 2683a?
Yes. - 10:51 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Can I commit com.goldencode.p2j.main.ClientsToPortsGenerator into 2683a?
- 10:49 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- The clients to ports mapping tool works properly, only it creates case insensitive node name like 'portsrange' instea...
- 10:28 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, I read docs and thought that @openBatch@ brackets are used only for security nodes.
- 10:26 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Constantin, could you help with this. I will try to add node to the directory using direc... - 10:21 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin, could you help with this. I will try to add node to the directory using directory API, is it a correct wa...
- 10:15 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- But it will be great if the Apache environment manual tests will be approved and tested on the different host machine.
- 10:12 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Thank you, I don't know that it seems that if the ports ra... - 10:06 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Make sure that we are testing in 2 modes:
1. Through a reverse proxy.
2. Direct access. - 10:05 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Thank you, I don't know that it seems that if the ports range is restricted, then it can ... - 10:04 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, I don't know that it seems that if the ports range is restricted, then it can be a weak place. I tested wh...
- 09:58 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > > Thanks, I need this help to run ... - 08:09 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Code Review Task branch 2683a Revision 11177
I like the changes.
I have only one question: is it possible to h... - 08:06 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Thanks, I need this help to run 2683a at least once manually wit... - 08:02 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Thanks, I need this help to run 2683a at least once manually with hotel_gui using the emb... - 08:00 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thanks, I need this help to run 2683a at least once manually with hotel_gui using the embedded and web clients taking...
- 07:57 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin: Thanks!
- 07:56 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Please run the ChUI regression testing immediately. The CTRL-C tests will be quite important.
- 07:55 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I didn't run ChUI regression tests.
I'll start these now.
- 07:55 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I don't know the answer to this. How critical is it to our delivery today?
>
> Can you provid... - 07:45 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I don't know the answer to this. How critical is it to our delivery today?
Can you provide a status of things?
... - 06:51 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Web sockets use keep-alive HTTP connections, but does it mean that they leave forever or there exists a default timeo...
- 06:35 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Looking into these ...
- 06:00 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I did not import CA into the browser, it seems that in the Firefox the icon looks like an orange triangle with an exc...
- 04:07 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I removed
> [...]
> from these tested configurations in order to use the standard hot... - 01:30 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I removed ...
- 01:21 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I have the following issue with the embedded client, probably due to certificate issue.
If the port settings in the ... - 03:27 PM Feature #2676: implement the equivalent to configurable support for a windows theme
- I used the whole set of GUI demo scenarios to test the 11172, comparing in parallel, the ABL on dedicated server, dif...
- 01:02 PM Bug #3306: Improve intermediate state in ROW-DISPLAY trigger.
- In addition, logic of Page Up, Page Down keys and search by key should be modified in order to match 4GL ROW-DISPLAY ...
- 09:46 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11163@.
This is the base skeleton functionality a...
06/29/2017
- 05:15 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes.
- 04:51 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- It works now, thank you, I just copied @WebClientLauncher@ section and replaced it with @WebClientRegistrar@. Are the...
- 04:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- This is an ACL issue. In @/security/acl/net/@ you need to add a section for @WebClientRegistrar@ to allow access to ...
- 04:16 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you :), I rerun with 2683a and found that client logs are rewritten....
- 04:05 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Thank you, I see here only logs for P2J trunc's web client, so the embedded server was no... - 04:00 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Thank you, I see here only logs for P2J trunc's web client, so the embedded server was not started at all and the spa...
- 03:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > I have problems with hotel_gui, and investigating them now.... - 03:53 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I have problems with hotel_gui, and investigating them now.
It seems that the spawned pr... - 02:29 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I have problems with hotel_gui, and investigating them now.
- 11:02 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- You are right, it is an issue.
- 11:01 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > > Yes, but it is required to wait ... - 10:58 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Yes, but it is required to wait until requests timeout is passed... - 10:57 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Yes, but it is required to wait until requests timeout is passed. Committed revision 1117... - 10:48 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, but it is required to wait until requests timeout is passed. Committed revision 11175 fixed this strict synchron...
- 10:39 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> The considered issue is that if all ports are used by the clients and new one user is try... - 10:27 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- The considered issue is that if all ports are used by the clients and new one user is trying to get a client, then it...
- 08:59 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- The manual GUI and regression testing are in process now, but the current code has some unknown issue and it should b...
- 08:45 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> They are present. Please look at these changes
> [...]
Please use a logger and not @Sys... - 08:40 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sorry, I didn't look carefully enough.
What about the readiness for regression/GUI testing? - 08:38 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Committed revision 11173 fixed these trivial issues.
>
> I don't see any new javadoc for Con... - 08:34 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- > Committed revision 11173 fixed these trivial issues.
I don't see any new javadoc for Constantin's request in not... - 08:29 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I am using the default @/etc/apache2/sites-available/default-ssl.conf@....
- 08:22 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Sergey: Please finish item 6 in #3236-92 and handle #3236-95. These should be trivial.
Committe... - 08:11 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey: Please finish item 6 in #3236-92 and handle #3236-95. These should be trivial.
I do need you utility prog... - 08:10 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11173 fixed all found issues, but now I am investigating the case when all two ports are used and ...
- 06:01 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: do the changes suitably address your concerns?
Yes.
> Also: perhaps we need to a... - 05:47 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 2. I think that #3236-85 is not yet addressed. What is your plan there?
I think it is address... - 04:57 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin: do the changes suitably address your concerns?
Also: perhaps we need to add some comments to make sure... - 04:55 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Code Review Task Branch 2683a Revision 11171
1. The @WebClientManager.try{Acquire|Release}Port()@ methods have a c... - 08:38 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Please review committed revision 11171 that added "session counter" from the note 81.
- 04:24 PM Bug #3306: Improve intermediate state in ROW-DISPLAY trigger.
- This task is about the browse state which is drawn when ROW-DISPLAY is triggered for multiple rows. See #3275-30 for ...
- 02:09 PM Bug #3306 (New): Improve intermediate state in ROW-DISPLAY trigger.
- 11:12 AM Feature #3282: create a 4GL language extension to control screen refresh
- The implementation has been committed to 3282a and is ready for review. GUI regression tests passed, ChUI tests in pr...
- 10:21 PM Feature #1834: implement direct manipulation (drag and drop)
- The task branch @1834a@ has been updated for review to revision @11162@.
The next preparation step to implement cl...
06/28/2017
- 06:07 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11170 fixed getFreeLocalPort, now exploring "session counter" from the note 81.
- 03:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> You considered the case of leaking resources in the general case, the port management tha... - 03:32 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Constantin, Hynek as I understand correctly there is a case when the web client lives for... - 03:31 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin, Hynek as I understand correctly there is a case when the web client lives forever and can't reconnect to ...
- 03:30 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Ok, thank you, we can try blocking API for this case.
- 03:23 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Which is the case with the current implementation, too - when all ports are taken and a... - 03:18 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Yes, it is expected behaviour, but it is only for the case if th... - 03:08 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Constantin, does it mean that this problem of leaking reso... - 03:04 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Yes, it is expected behaviour, but it is only for the case if the almost all resources ar... - 02:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Constantin, does it mean that this problem of leaking resources described above exists in... - 02:57 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Yes, it is expected behaviour, but it is only for the case if the almost all resources are used (#range -1), correct?...
- 02:53 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> >
> > Still, the extra load can be easily avoided by scanning th... - 02:45 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
>
> Still, the extra load can be easily avoided by scanning the usedLocalPorts map and only do... - 02:37 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > > If I understan... - 02:27 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > If I understand correctly, the check only occurs... - 02:24 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Beside the above, what I have in mind is a possible race condition; consider these execu... - 01:46 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, the check only occurs if we can't allocate a ... - 12:55 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> When @true@, @running@ flag indicates the client must restart, but the FWD session will ... - 12:53 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > So, I'm thinking that @isStillAlive@ should have a boolean parameter which 'forces' the... - 12:32 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the check only occurs if we can't allocate a port.
Unless I am read... - 12:13 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- If I understand correctly, the check only occurs if we can't allocate a port. In the common case (there is a free po...
- 12:10 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I agree if you mean that https involves heavy calculations.
Even without https, one ch... - 12:04 PM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- I agree if you mean that https involves heavy calculations. Committed rev. 11169 fixed all comments that I could do.
- 11:58 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
> >
> > * In WebClientSpawner ... - 11:14 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
>
> * In WebClientSpawner
> * Below the port should be giv... - 11:11 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
> * In WebClientSpawner
> ** @ if (!"/".equals(webClientConf... - 10:30 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> It seems that DojoToolkitHandler should not be changed, because it is not a web virtual d... - 10:09 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- It seems that DojoToolkitHandler should not be changed, because it is not a web virtual directory for the embedded se...
- 10:05 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
>
> In addition to Greg's and Constantin's finds.
>
> * I... - 09:45 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What I'm trying to confirm is that the FWD server always frees the resources, for a FWD ... - 09:33 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Code Review Task Branch 2683a.
In addition to Greg's and Constantin's finds.
* In WebClientSpawner
** @ if (!... - 09:31 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I did this because we can't free a given port until its system resources are released.
... - 09:17 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > If the web client is failed, then its session is closed, a... - 09:07 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> If the web client is failed, then its session is closed, and it seems that all listeners ... - 09:03 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- If the web client is failed, then its session is closed, and it seems that all listeners should be notified and @term...
- 07:28 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Sergey, the issues I have are these:
* have you tested if the FWD client terminates abruptly? In this case, the ser... - 06:19 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Code Review Task Branch 2683a Revision 11167
I have checked in some changes to fix code formatting issues. Overal... - 01:21 AM Feature #3236: implement port range support for the web client's embedded web server
- Committed revision 11167 prepared this branch 2683a for the review.
- 05:32 PM Feature #3275: improve browse support
- About "value cannot be displayed using ... " case for the browse:
If a cell value cannot be displayed using column f... - 12:48 PM Bug #3305: broken widget references management
- While testing a medium-large GUI application I noticed that at some time (I was not able to pinpoint the exact trigge...
- 12:36 PM Bug #3305 (New): broken widget references management
Also available in: Atom