Activity
From 04/04/2024 to 05/03/2024
05/03/2024
- 05:41 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- > > Are you saying code changes are needed? I don't think we expose @com.goldencode.p2j.persist.Record@ in converted...
- 05:12 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Are you saying code changes are needed? I don't think we expose @com.go... - 04:00 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Are you saying code changes are needed? I don't think we expose @com.goldencode.p2j.persist.Reco... - 07:58 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > * test customer applications for regression - the most important appl... - 06:03 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- > A remark - I don't think any of customer application would be ready for Java 17 right away - they most probably nee...
- 04:52 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> * test customer applications for regression - the most important applications - I guess we nee... - 10:55 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
- Galya B wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Log manager initialization fixed in 8206a rev. 15197. Please, revie... - 09:44 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Log manager initialization fixed in 8206a rev. 15197. Please, review.
I'm not sure i... - 09:21 AM Bug #8206 (Review): Logging manager issues
- Log manager initialization fixed in 8206a rev. 15197. Please, review.
- 06:29 AM Bug #8206 (WIP): Logging manager issues
- OK, I'll rebase the branch and add the missing change.
- 01:21 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
- Actually Vladimir is better familiar with these issues and has more insight on what needs to be achieved.
Vladimir...
05/02/2024
- 02:33 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Also I've found Java doc issue:...
- 03:10 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- From Tomasz via email:
You need to add -Djava.locale.providers=SPI,CLDR,COMPAT instead of and put fwdcpi.jar on a ... - 01:24 PM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 8206a Revisions 14987 through 14992
> Vladimir/Galya: I understand tha... - 10:54 AM Bug #8206: Logging manager issues
- With Theodoros gone, this will need to be rebased, tested and merged by someone else.
- 10:53 AM Bug #8206 (Internal Test): Logging manager issues
- Code Review Task Branch 8206a Revisions 14987 through 14992
I have no objections to the changes.
As far as I kn... - 07:55 AM Bug #7589 (Closed): org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder when deploying p2j.jar in tomcat
- 07:52 AM Bug #7589: org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder when deploying p2j.jar in tomcat
- This can be closed. We've delivered a way to disable the FWD's slf4j impl what was the issue.
- 06:32 AM Feature #8708 (Closed): cleanup of SLF4J
- All the reported issues are resolved. Nice!
- 03:20 AM Feature #8708 (Test): cleanup of SLF4J
- 8708a was merged to trunk as rev. 15185 and archived.
- 02:27 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- Galya B wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tested, it looks OK.
>
> Did you find any slf4j message from tika in th... - 02:01 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tested, it looks OK.
Did you find any slf4j message from tika in the client log?
05/01/2024
- 06:55 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- The first results for using Java 17 with big GUI application.
1. Conversion was completed. Build compiled.
2. The... - 09:27 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Yes, Hotel GUI in SSO mode works in trunk. Embedded mode does have a bug (see #8253) but it is not related to SSO.
- 09:24 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Do you have worked @SSO@ enabled @Hotel GUI@ for *Web* client with curr... - 09:17 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- P.S.S. I use SSO with trunk and testcases every week.
- 09:16 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- P.S. SSO is working only for *Web*. And embedded doesn't work without SSO.
- 09:15 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Do you have worked @SSO@ enabled @Hotel GUI@ for *Web* client with current @FWD@ trunk?
I'... - 09:13 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > This was due to not configured SSO for hotel GUI. I disabled SSO and it... - 09:05 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> This was due to not configured SSO for hotel GUI. I disabled SSO and it works now.
Intrigu... - 06:07 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > Roger Borrello wrote:
> > > > Eugenie ... - 03:43 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Roger Borrello wrote:
> > > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > > Ha... - 10:11 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > Have you tested @hotel_gui@ with w... - 08:46 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- OK. To start application with Java 8 we need to add at least the following into @build.gradle@:...
- 08:45 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Have you tested @hotel_gui@ with web client and Java 8? In my ca... - 08:41 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Have you tested @hotel_gui@ with web client and Java 8? In my case the client session can n... - 03:44 PM Feature #8708 (Merge Pending): cleanup of SLF4J
- It can merge to trunk.
- 03:37 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> There are vulnerabilities in all the previous versions. We should stick to 2.9.x. I'll test if... - 03:17 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > What do you mean? Jetty is working on those systems.
>
> The logging is b... - 02:28 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What do you mean? Jetty is working on those systems.
The logging is broken.
Another way to... - 02:14 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- What do you mean? Jetty is working on those systems.
- 02:13 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If this breaks the tika code, then we can't merge it because we have a customer using it in real ... - 02:12 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- If 6692a resolves this, then we may have to wait for it. We are literally trying to get Java 17 into trunk next week...
- 02:11 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- If this breaks the tika code, then we can't merge it because we have a customer using it in real life.
- 01:59 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We're sure that the tika parser code we are using doesn't require slf4j?
It uses a new version... - 01:48 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- We're sure that the tika parser code we are using doesn't require slf4j?
- 01:38 PM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- Can we merge this soon, because it's too annoying?
- 10:07 AM Feature #8708 (Review): cleanup of SLF4J
- 10:07 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- 8708a r15183 based on trunk r15182: remove the transitive dependency of @slf4j-api:2.0.10@ from @tika-core@.
Diff ... - 09:48 AM Feature #8708 (WIP): cleanup of SLF4J
- ...
- 08:52 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- Someone did something... wasn't me and this should have never appeared.
This warnings @Class path contains SLF4J b... - 07:56 AM Feature #8708: cleanup of SLF4J
- As of trunk rev 15182, you can see the following.
1. During FWD build, there is this:... - 07:43 AM Feature #8708 (Closed): cleanup of SLF4J
- 10:42 AM Bug #8656 (Test): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- 8656a was merged to trunk as rev. 15183 and archived.
- 10:29 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- You can merge to trunk now.
- 10:11 AM Bug #8656 (Merge Pending): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pd...
- 09:53 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- I did a comparison of the original behavior and output and the new one and shared the results in #8656-8. I can do mo...
- 09:50 AM Bug #8656 (Internal Test): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pd...
- Galya B wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > The code changes remove the zipping part for the split pdfs. Was this part... - 08:44 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> The code changes remove the zipping part for the split pdfs. Was this part of the requirements... - 06:25 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- Code review 8656a revisions 15156..15159.
The code changes remove the zipping part for the split pdfs. Was this pa... - 04:18 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- Sergey/Hynek: Please review.
- 01:24 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > A side observation is that the server struggles with such big data wh...
04/30/2024
- 07:29 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Branch @6692a@ has been tested with @hotel_gui@, @hotel_chui@ and standard regression testing ... - 04:56 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Seems like I have new issue:...
- 03:03 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- I've tried ETF, but a suite gets into an infinite loop, while one passes. This was with Java 8 conversion and Java 1...
- 01:43 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Branch @6692a@ has been tested with @hotel_gui@, @hotel_chui@ and standard regression testing suite. But it seems tha...
- 01:22 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
>
> > I'm going to check Java 17 now. Is the code converted with Jav... - 12:18 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> I'm going to check Java 17 now. Is the code converted with Java 8 compatible with Java 17... - 12:15 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Attempting to use @6692a@ with Java 8 causes exceptions:
> >
> ... - 12:12 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Attempting to use @6692a@ with Java 8 causes exceptions:
>
> [...]
>
> Is it expected... - 12:01 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Attempting to use @6692a@ with Java 8 causes exceptions:...
- 03:32 PM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- Galya B wrote:
> A side observation is that the server struggles with such big data when generating the report (@Rep... - 02:29 PM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- A side observation is that the server struggles with such big data when generating the report (@ReportsManager.buildR...
- 02:24 PM Bug #8656 (Review): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pd...
- 8656a r15159 based on trunk r15156 ready for review.
@jPod@ was originally used only for merging big pdf documents... - 02:15 PM Bug #8656 (WIP): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- 07:57 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- The @ant report_server@ is related to FWD Analytics and is not related to @ReportServlet@ from our admin console. Th...
- 07:50 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- @ant report_server@ gives a lot of errors and eventually fails. Ends up with:...
- 05:16 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- But ReportServlet is from FWD Admin console - for that try admin/test123.
- 05:15 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- I assume you've ran the report tasks? The default user is admin and the default password is the app's name as config...
- 05:04 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- What is the user / pass for the reporting login in testcases? I tried admin/admin, but I get @socket closed (1011) - ...
04/29/2024
04/25/2024
- 04:24 AM Bug #8383: Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya, 8383a/15059 does not compile.
The notorious @gradlew all@ doesn't work, while ... - 04:14 AM Bug #8383: Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- Galya, 8383a/15059 does not compile.
04/23/2024
- 04:04 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Also, a question, since I may have missed a detail... are there changes to be made in the @cl... - 02:47 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- > > Also, a question, since I may have missed a detail... are there changes to be made in the @client.sh@ and/or @ser...
- 12:30 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> We'll have to revert to cleanup, because the new mechanism of loading will have the default as part... - 11:47 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Also, a question, since I may have missed a detail... are there changes to be made in the @c... - 11:44 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> But I remembered a few more places that need update. The default @"fwd-slf4j"@ in @ClientBuilderOpt... - 11:30 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- It could be an option if needed later on. For now I think it's not necessary. But I remembered a few more places that...
- 11:23 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> OK, just one last clarification: Can you override the service loader with an empty property @-Dslf4... - 10:35 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> OK, just one last clarification: Can you override the service loader with an empty property @-Dslf4... - 10:21 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- OK, just one last clarification: Can you override the service loader with an empty property @-Dslf4j.provider=@?
- 10:19 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> Tomasz, can you test if the property overwrites the service loader? If it works, it should be fine.... - 08:57 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz, can you test if the property overwrites the service loader? If it works, it should be fine.
Also, to make ... - 08:48 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've added @CentralSlf4jProvider@ as service and it seems changes to @server.sh@ are not neede... - 07:27 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Updated the patch, I needed to put a correct name into @build.xml@
- 07:03 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> From https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#changesInVersion200
> > In SLF4J 2.0.x and later, during its i... - 02:15 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Attached a patch to @hotel_gui@ to make slf4j2 logging work (basically following property @-Ds... - 03:08 PM Feature #8651: Centralize inclusion of JS dependencies
- > If there is such a case where customers want an embedded mode with a standard front-end, it makes sense to keep the...
- 02:32 AM Feature #8651: Centralize inclusion of JS dependencies
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Nice analysis!
>
> I'm generally OK with the overall recommendations.
>
> > Decouple @hotel...
04/22/2024
- 07:23 PM Feature #8651: Centralize inclusion of JS dependencies
- Nice analysis!
I'm generally OK with the overall recommendations.
> Decouple @hotel_gui@ from the server depend... - 09:01 AM Feature #8651: Centralize inclusion of JS dependencies
- There are a few places where js is used in FWD:
* On the default login page for Virtual Desktop and Embedded modes: ... - 06:56 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- > Attached a patch to @hotel_gui@ to make slf4j2 logging work (basically following property @-Dslf4j.provider=com.go...
- 04:38 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- * Rebased to @trunk/15157@
* upgraded com.google.gwt/org.gwtproject dependencies
* reverted org.apache.pdfbox to la... - 03:09 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The logging patch looks reasonable. Tomasz: do you have any objections? If not, this should be ... - 02:31 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- The logging patch looks reasonable. Tomasz: do you have any objections? If not, this should be committed into 6692a...
- 07:16 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- As for the js dependencies, it seems the reporting server uses the resources from the jar, so they should stay, but a...
- 06:40 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Find attached the required changes to fix the logging dependencies and migrate slf4j implementation to version 2. Aft...
- 02:25 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- I've noticed a few issues with the logging dependencies:
* @org.slf4j:jcl-over-slf4j:1.7.36@ is replaced by @org.slf...
04/19/2024
- 10:04 AM Bug #8656: Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
- Dependency @de.intarsys.opensource:jPod@ is used only in @ReportServlet.java@ and can be replaced by @org.apache.pdfb...
- 10:01 AM Bug #8656 (Test): Dependency de.intarsys.opensource:jPod to be replaced by org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox
04/18/2024
- 06:11 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > The libraries in concern in r15171 are used only by custom front-ends in t... - 05:47 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Galya: Please review 6692a revision 15171.
> >
... - 05:28 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 6692a Revision 15171
>
> Although I do like managing the dependencies ... - 04:53 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> I think this is not related to the current upgrade to java 17. Do you mind to create a new task for... - 04:38 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > I agree with the comments from Greg and Galya. ... - 04:37 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya B wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > I agree with the comments from Greg and Galya. Still it makes sense to put... - 04:23 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I agree with the comments from Greg and Galya. Still it makes sense to put the dependencies th... - 04:15 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- I agree with the comments from Greg and Galya. Still it makes sense to put the dependencies that are integral part of...
- 03:28 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya: Please review 6692a revision 15171.
@fwd_sdk.js@ is not the right place to load the lib... - 04:53 AM Feature #8651: Centralize inclusion of JS dependencies
- There are specific Java Script dependencies needed for FWD to run in embedded mode. If they are included in a single ...
- 04:50 AM Feature #8651 (New): Centralize inclusion of JS dependencies
04/17/2024
- 05:24 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Galya: Please review 6692a revision 15171.
- 05:23 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Code Review Task Branch 6692a Revision 15171
Although I do like managing the dependencies explicitly in our JS cod... - 03:42 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I work with separate images for each supported java version if you... - 03:34 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I work with separate images for each supported java version if you remember thats why I neede... - 01:02 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I have some basic questions, since this task is moving steadily towards implementation. Grea... - 11:38 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Do we need Docker images based off both
>
> Yes
>
> > or do we make a wholesale changeov... - 10:41 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > OpenJDK or Oracle?
>
> In the code we should not have dependencies on either one.
>
> In ... - 10:23 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- > OpenJDK or Oracle?
In the code we should not have dependencies on either one.
In practive, we tend to use Ope... - 10:11 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- I have some basic questions, since this task is moving steadily towards implementation. Great job! These come from my...
- 09:01 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Code review 6692a revision 15171. The changes look good.
- 05:07 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Hynek: What would you estimate for the effort?
>
> I would say up to ... - 02:04 PM Feature #7799: automated vulnerability scanning
- A report for FWD @6692a/15172@, there should be less vulnerabilities, but in meantime a new ones has been discovered ...
04/16/2024
- 11:43 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Hynek: What would you estimate for the effort?
>
> I would say up to ... - 08:06 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hynek: What would you estimate for the effort?
I would say up to two days. The JS dependencies... - 07:38 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Hynek: What would you estimate for the effort?
- 07:28 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I prefer not to leave old dependencies in the code. On the other hand, I don't want to delay thi... - 02:05 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hynek: What do you think?
I like the idea of having the dependencies in @fwd_sdk.js@. Moving t...
04/15/2024
- 05:47 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- I prefer not to leave old dependencies in the code. On the other hand, I don't want to delay this branch since many ...
- 03:06 PM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Rebased 6692a to trunk/15146 and pushed 6692a/15146.
I started to work on JS updates, upgraded with webjars versio... - 03:45 AM Bug #8383 (Review): Some JsonObject methods create a LOG-MANAGER record in silent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya, some notes:
> * we need to be careful with naming FWD internal methods added to ...
04/12/2024
- 09:33 AM Bug #8624: Stream should detect whether it is being used from the client or the server
- @Stream@ is "dual mode" and is used as a base class for @RemoteStream@ which is used from converted code on the serve...
- 08:55 AM Bug #8624: Stream should detect whether it is being used from the client or the server
- @Stream.java@ is being used by both the server and the client, however some functions are OS dependent and this is no...
- 08:47 AM Bug #8624 (Closed): Stream should detect whether it is being used from the client or the server
04/11/2024
- 08:47 AM Feature #6692: move FWD to Java 17
- Rebased to trunk/15136, pushed into repository 6692/15156
Working on JS libraries updates.
04/09/2024
- 10:26 AM Bug #8607: Incorrect parsing of URI string.
- Given the investigation conducted in #8367-15, current implementation of URI parsing should be reconsidered.
- 10:23 AM Bug #8607 (New): Incorrect parsing of URI string.
Also available in: Atom