FWD » Core Development » Runtime Infrastructure

03/27/2025

04:14 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Status report:
Websockets - works fine for gui client and analytics/reporting, to be checked for spreadsheet app a... Tomasz Domin

08:34 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > I don't think these were added as separate tasks. They were added wit... Hynek Cihlar

08:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I don't think these were added as separate tasks. They were added with the general implementat... Tomasz Domin

02:47 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

I pulled code, cleaned, and refreshed my local environment yesterday morning. The time stamp on the p2j.dll files in... Kevin Baker

02:05 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

> > 2. The @AppServerHelper@ is not thread safe for some of its state. I'm especially thinking about the @disconnect... Greg Shah

09:23 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Galya B wrote:
> In @BaseSession@ the change of @LinkedList@ to @LinkedHashSet@ requires to go over all implementati... Constantin Asofiei

09:06 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

In @BaseSession@ the change of @LinkedList@ to @LinkedHashSet@ requires to go over all implementations of @SessionLis... Galya B

04:56 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task branch 9804a Revisions 15812 and 15813
>
> 1. In @RemoteAppServerConnectionPo... Constantin Asofiei

10:50 AM Bug #9848: Wrong agent startup time reported in logs

At the moment, the calculation for the agent's startup time is slightly incorrect. In @AppServerLauncher.launchFirstA... Andrei Plugaru

10:02 AM Bug #9848 (New): Wrong agent startup time reported in logs

Andrei Plugaru

03/26/2025

07:37 PM Feature #7080 (Internal Test): expose all admin APIs via REST

The branch 8976a was updated and rebased to latest trunk. Current revision is 15830. Ovidiu Maxiniuc

09:38 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu, I see that you changed SessionsRestHandler to use @DELETE:/admin/sessions/all@ instead of @DELETE:/admin/ses... Constantin Asofiei

04:59 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Admin console works :) - I forgot to include it in the list above, its EE8 webapp.
Tomasz Domin

04:12 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> Do you anticipate any need for the customer to run conversion with this branch (assuming they hav... Tomasz Domin

03:38 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Do you anticipate any need for the customer to run conversion with this branch (assuming they have already run conver... Greg Shah

12:17 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've updated reporting server for a new Jetty12 WebSockets semantics. I... Tomasz Domin

09:18 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Initial testing report as for today:
>
> Websockets - works fine
>
> Servers:
> * Repor... Tomasz Domin

09:03 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, do you have any pending changes not checked in? I need to do some Spreadsheet performa... Tomasz Domin

09:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Greg
> What about support for modules #9626 ? I guess this can be added here as well ? Or is ... Greg Shah

08:43 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz, do you have any pending changes not checked in? I need to do some Spreadsheet performance tests for #9828 wit... Hynek Cihlar

03:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Once I am done with initial testing I will ask for support regarding integration testing for s... Tomasz Domin

01:59 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Greg
What about support for modules #9626 ? I guess this can be added here as well ? Or is it a next step ? Tomasz Domin

01:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Initial testing report as for today:
Websockets - works fine
Servers:
* EmbeddedWebServer - works fine
* Repo... Tomasz Domin

04:12 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Kevin, please double-check that you are not using an old p2j.dll. Constantin Asofiei

04:03 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

It has the same stack trace (and failure) as the original report:... Greg Shah

03:45 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Testing with version 15801.
Testing reports has shown that the following error message is written to the rptrun_st... Kevin Baker

03:34 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Code Review Task branch 9804a Revisions 15812 and 15813
1. In @RemoteAppServerConnectionPool.dispatch()@ the javad... Greg Shah

11:28 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Greg, please review, too. Constantin Asofiei

03/25/2025

03:25 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Have you configured @WebServiceResource@ resource in @directory.xml@, under @resource-plu... Constantin Asofiei

02:25 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> You have @src/com/goldencode/p2j/security/WebServiceResource.j... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:59 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * @AdminRestHandler@: @authHandler = new WebAuthHandler("admin", "basic", "/admin/login",... Constantin Asofiei

01:52 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Review of 8976a rev 15810:
> * please run javadoc with Java 8 and fix any issues in you... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10:52 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I have not given an in-depth look at the persistent changes
Code review 8976a/15809-1... Eric Faulhaber

09:34 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Review of 8976a rev 15810:
* please run javadoc with Java 8 and fix any issues in your files, if you haven't already... Constantin Asofiei

09:33 AM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables

Moved review to #7080 Constantin Asofiei

05:40 AM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables

Ovidiu, I see that 8976a has latest changes discussed in #7080. Please make sure the code compiles with Java 8, I wa... Constantin Asofiei

09:15 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Galya: when you have time, please review. Constantin Asofiei

03:09 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Regarding Jetty upgrade to version 12 there are three main types of Jetty services to upgrade:
- Jetty HTTP Handlers... Tomasz Domin

03/24/2025

11:47 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> E.g. FWD API is making use of @javax.http.*@ classes in @SsoAuthenticator@, so it relies on lo... Tomasz Domin

09:08 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Note there are due to migration there will FWD API changes, which I am not sure what to do with.
E.g. FWD API is mak... Tomasz Domin

11:01 AM Support #9514: assess, recommend and document monitoring tools plan

Some recent observations for using *jstack* in a container. Some settings have to be passed to docker upon building t... Roger Borrello

10:51 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > > As for the real value of automation... I don't want... Galya B

10:42 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > I think in FWD we have this notion that automation is not necessarily running... Galya B

10:39 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> >> The API is defined at development time, not at runtime. You don't need to dynamically generate... Galya B

10:32 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

>> The API is defined at development time, not at runtime. You don't need to dynamically generate it on a production ... Greg Shah

10:28 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > As for the real value of automation... I don't want to get there.
> >
> ... Greg Shah

10:13 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> Banks don't build platforms, they build applications. FWD is not an application, it is a platfor... Galya B

10:06 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> > > * JSON or Annotations
> > > ** It seems that we can either define the API in JSON and then g... Galya B

09:54 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> > As for the real value of automation... I don't want to get there.
>
> I never said that. Th... Galya B

09:53 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg: before committing to use Swagger and Jersey, I'd like to have a simple POC to chec... Greg Shah

09:53 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

> As for the real value of automation... I don't want to get there.
I never said that. This has nothing to do wit... Greg Shah

09:52 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

> > * JSON or Annotations
> > ** It seems that we can either define the API in JSON and then generate Java stubs for... Greg Shah

09:33 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> The issue is that running extra code to dynamically generate and expose the API increases the att... Galya B

09:20 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> * JSON or Annotations
> ** It seems that we can either define the API in JSON and then generate ... Galya B

09:05 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu: I like the way your work is moving. The design in #7080-80 is good.
Constantin: We should go ahead with a c... Greg Shah

07:54 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg: before committing to use Swagger and Jersey, I'd like to have a simple POC to check how it integrates with FWD. Constantin Asofiei

07:35 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

If the customers don't want to develop tools (API clients), they can have the auto-generated always up-to-date web cl... Galya B

07:32 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Galya B wrote:
> In any case it's a matter of configuration.
https://anirtek.github.io/java/jetty/swagger/openapi... Galya B

07:13 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Here is a full list of the supported server stubs, client SDKs and doc types it can generate: "swagger-codegen":https... Galya B

07:02 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> How does Swagger generate the server stubs? With annotations?
The api is declared in ya... Galya B

06:43 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Yes, we can consider Swagger.
>
> Constantin, does #7080-80 mean we're not... Constantin Asofiei

06:40 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, we can consider Swagger.
Constantin, does #7080-80 mean we're not considering Swagger for... Galya B

03:57 AM Bug #9804 (Review): improve the OpenClient remote calls

9804a rev 15813 has:
* Improvements for remote FWD OpenClient connections: ensure that the remote side uses a single... Constantin Asofiei

03/21/2025

05:57 PM Feature #7080 (Review): expose all admin APIs via REST

The changes in 8976a / 15810:
* created @BaseAdminRestHandler@ as base @abstract@ class for all REST handlers:
** w... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

05:22 PM Feature #7080 (WIP): expose all admin APIs via REST

I committed the changes to 8976a / 15810. Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04:04 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Otoh, I don't think we want to reserve dispatcher threads for all apps, even if they don't use remote openclient. Constantin Asofiei

03:49 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Greg Shah wrote:
> Perhaps we should have a safer way to set the number of dispatcher threads. For example, doesn't... Constantin Asofiei

03:44 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg: why is BaseSession.listeners a LinkedList instead of a HashSet? Are the listeners depende... Constantin Asofiei

03:25 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * with its size limited to 80% of the number of Dispatcher threads
>
> I think we nee... Greg Shah

03:22 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

> Greg: why is BaseSession.listeners a LinkedList instead of a HashSet? Are the listeners dependent on when their ord... Greg Shah

02:16 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

Created task branch 9804a from trunk rev 15811.
In rev 15812, is the initial pass; it includes, on the remote FWD Op... Constantin Asofiei

06:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Hynek
> > > I have problems porting @Spre... Hynek Cihlar

05:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Hynek
> > I have problems porting @SpreadsheetWebApp@ from Jetty 9 ... Tomasz Domin

04:40 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek
> I have problems porting @SpreadsheetWebApp@ from Jetty 9 to Jetty 12, as some kind o... Hynek Cihlar

03:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Hynek
I have problems porting @SpreadsheetWebApp@ from Jetty 9 to Jetty 12, as some kind of internal API was used (... Tomasz Domin

03/20/2025

09:30 AM Bug #9804 (WIP): improve the OpenClient remote calls

Constantin Asofiei

03:19 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> The only difference is that I think we need to move away from basic auth and design a more approp... Galya B

03/19/2025

04:23 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The point is: I see real usage in getting the full details 'up front', and not having to... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

02:23 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> #** the @/admin/tenants@ and @/admin/sessions@ should return only the list of resources, no... Constantin Asofiei

02:14 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

I agree with these ideas.
The only difference is that I think we need to move away from basic auth and design a mo... Greg Shah

01:59 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin and I have a discussion on meet and we reach the following conclusions (summarised):
# instead a having... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:14 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

> A question I have is do we expect the framework to ever expose endpoints that are not @/admin@, because to me every... Greg Shah

01:13 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

I'm not opposed to an explicit versioning in the URL, but this also would suggest that the older versions would be su... Greg Shah

09:46 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Versioning is introduced when the team is on the same page about the definition of backwards compatibility. Breaking ... Galya B

09:34 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Idea discussed in the daily meeting today:
* As this task is also about (re-)designing the REST API to expose the ... Alexandru Lungu

03/18/2025

11:18 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls

The remote OpenClient calls are managed in FWD via the @RemoteLegacyJavaAppserverClient@ class, created via @LegacyJa... Constantin Asofiei

10:42 AM Bug #9804 (Test): improve the OpenClient remote calls

Constantin Asofiei

05:39 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > See : https://javadoc.jetty.org/jetty-12/org/eclipse/jetty/serv... Tomasz Domin

03:47 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> See : https://javadoc.jetty.org/jetty-12/org/eclipse/jetty/server/Request.Handler.html#handle(... Constantin Asofiei

05:19 AM Bug #9740 (Test): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

@9740a@ was merged into @trunk / rev 15787@ Lorian Sandu

03/17/2025

06:13 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > In order to minimize changes I've stayed with @AbstractHandler@... Tomasz Domin

08:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin wrote:
> In order to minimize changes I've stayed with @AbstractHandler@ despite its deprecated, as mov... Constantin Asofiei

08:01 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Constantin: Please comment on this plan. Do we need to shift to the asynch approach? Greg Shah

03:52 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

I've started work on porting services to Jetty 12 API. There are differences requiring attention, it will take me 2-3... Tomasz Domin

12:02 PM Bug #9740 (Merge Pending): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Please merge after 9543a. Greg Shah

11:08 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes. There are other "interactive" mechanisms that are the equivalent to @OS-COMMAND@: @DOS@ and... Lorian Sandu

11:00 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Lorian Sandu wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15781
> >
> > The change is go... Greg Shah

10:27 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15781
>
> The change is good.
>
> Please confirm tha... Lorian Sandu

10:25 AM Bug #9740 (Internal Test): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15781
The change is good.
Please confirm that Windows process launching,... Greg Shah

09:46 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Greg Shah wrote:
> I think there is a latent bug here: the @isSuspended = 0;@ that is done *after* the @generateExce... Lorian Sandu

09:38 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15780
The change is good.
I think there is a latent bug here: the @isSus... Greg Shah

09:25 AM Bug #9740 (Review): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Please review. Lorian Sandu

09:25 AM Bug #9740 (WIP): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Greg Shah wrote:
> Good point. OK, move ahead with the @if (isSuspended)@ addition on Windows.
Committed to @974... Lorian Sandu

09:03 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Good point. OK, move ahead with the @if (isSuspended)@ addition on Windows. Greg Shah

08:54 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Greg Shah wrote:
> In the testcase from #9740-10, what happens if the 2nd command runs longer than the 3rd command?
... Lorian Sandu

08:50 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

In the testcase from #9740-10, what happens if the 2nd command runs longer than the 3rd command?
Greg Shah

07:35 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Greg Shah wrote:
> Please check that the code @client.suspend(silent);@ on line 276 of @ProcessDaemon@ is executed m... Lorian Sandu

03/14/2025

10:44 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Please check that the code @client.suspend(silent);@ on line 276 of @ProcessDaemon@ is executed multuple times before... Greg Shah

09:43 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Greg Shah wrote:
> Please see if you can test my concern in #9740-2 that there could be multiple suspended terminals... Lorian Sandu

08:33 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Please see if you can test my concern in #9740-2 that there could be multiple suspended terminals simultaneously. If... Greg Shah

03/13/2025

12:05 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

I've started upgrading dependencies to get rid of old and vulnerable libraries and I've encountered a problem that ma... Tomasz Domin

10:59 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Reopening the discussion on this.
Is it ok to fix this by adding the @if (isSuspended)@ (#9740-1) that is in the l... Lorian Sandu

08:53 AM Feature #4132: implement configurable user and session limits

I've documented this configuration in [[p2j:Session Management]]. Greg Shah

03/11/2025

04:44 PM Feature #9687 (WIP): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz Domin

03:54 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

We need to move ahead with this ASAP. Having it ready by the end of March is important to at least one customer. Th... Greg Shah

03/07/2025

04:28 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Another note here: I think we need the REST admin APIs to have mandatory authentication... Galya B

03/06/2025

11:13 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Another note here: I think we need the REST admin APIs to have mandatory authentication/authorization.
Ovidiu: pl... Constantin Asofiei

03/05/2025

12:56 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Almost certainly yes. Greg Shah

10:18 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. Do we have thread safety issues in managing this @isSuspended@ flag? The @suspend()@ and @res... Constantin Asofiei

08:56 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

I have some converns with how we are managing the suspend/resume here. These concerns are not just related to the ch... Greg Shah

08:37 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

After a client that runs in batch mode finishes its execution it stops with a crash :... Lorian Sandu

08:30 AM Bug #9740 (Closed): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows

Lorian Sandu

10:07 AM Support #9730: Run hotel_gui in Windows 11

Thank you for noting these, Lorian. This is a task of mine, which hasn't been given enough attention. I ran into trou... Roger Borrello

03/04/2025

10:11 AM Support #9730: Run hotel_gui in Windows 11

Good news!
I was able to run the hotel app on Windows 11 ✅✅
Since the @prepare_hotel.cmd@ was *not working* p... Lorian Sandu

04:23 AM Support #9730: Run hotel_gui in Windows 11

I am trying to run the hotel_gui in Windows 11.
The revision of @hotel_gui@ i am using is @375@ (latest).
When ... Lorian Sandu

04:09 AM Support #9730 (New): Run hotel_gui in Windows 11

Lorian Sandu

08:25 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Yes, we need to also update other dependencies (for example, see the list in #9674). The Jetty issue is the biggest ... Greg Shah

02:11 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Greg Shah wrote:
> Tomasz: Please estimate the size of the work needed to migrate to the latest Jetty and other depe... Tomasz Domin

03/03/2025

04:12 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11

Tomasz: Please estimate the size of the work needed to migrate to the latest Jetty and other dependencies. Greg Shah

02/28/2025

09:47 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Yes, I agree. Those tables are security-related, not tenant-related. Greg Shah

09:05 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg, currently the @_sec-authentication-system@ and @_sec-authentication-domain@ are 'written' via @TenantManager@, ... Constantin Asofiei

02/27/2025

02:38 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

The @domain@ table has references to @domain_type@ and @tenant_name@. Therefore a @domain@ cannot be defined without ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

11:47 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

> Ovidiu, the @domain@ and @domain-type@, are these *only* related to multi-tenancy? Because as I recall these can a... Greg Shah

11:34 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, there is currently a single handler for @/admin/tenant@, @/admin/domain@ and @/admin/doma... Constantin Asofiei

09:31 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

> Greg, there is currently a single handler for @/admin/tenant@, @/admin/domain@ and @/admin/domain-type@. The last ... Greg Shah

07:02 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg, there is currently a single handler for @/admin/tenant@, @/admin/domain@ and @/admin/domain-type@. The last 2 ... Constantin Asofiei

06:21 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

> > > I was not, but @/admin/meta/<meta-tables>/@ and @MetaHandler@ will fit for me as a glove (or two of them? :)).
... Greg Shah

11:23 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > I would suggest one more small change for setup script:
> No...... Eugenie Lyzenko

10:49 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> I would suggest one more small change for setup script:
No... there may be spaces in the p... Roger Borrello

10:32 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

I would suggest one more small change for setup script:... Eugenie Lyzenko

08:54 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > > Thank you. I'll get this possibili... Roger Borrello

07:19 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Thank you. I'll get this possibility not early than tomorrow I t... Eugenie Lyzenko

07:11 PM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Thank you. I'll get this possibility not early than tomorrow I think.
I had success inst... Roger Borrello

02/26/2025

05:06 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Greg Shah wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > I was not, but @/admin/meta/<meta-tables>/@ and @MetaHandler@ will fi... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

04:10 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > You mean @/admin/meta/tenant/@? Then I'm OK to group these ... Greg Shah

04:02 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

> Greg, do we want to enable/disable certain rest ADMIN features? If not, then is enough to have a @server/default/re... Greg Shah

02:57 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> You mean @/admin/meta/tenant/@? Then I'm OK to group these together, and use the @META:... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

01:49 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * 8976b renames the ACL prefix from @TENANT@ to @REST-ADMIN@, while leaving @SESSION@ int... Constantin Asofiei

01:21 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * a better way to handle each REST feature being enabled/disabled and the token timeout (... Constantin Asofiei

12:47 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

> As a separate idea, the @domain@, @domain_type@, and @tenant@ could use a different initial prefix, like @/meta/@, ... Greg Shah

12:44 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

> /admin/login would enable a login for all REST features (like a 'super-admin')
Let's make this the only login fo... Greg Shah

12:43 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> *Ovidiu* - please document here all the REST paths added to @AdminHandler@ in 8976b, in ... Ovidiu Maxiniuc

10:01 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST

At this time, [[p2j:Administration_REST_API]] documents these REST APIs. I'm not including all the HTTP web methods,... Constantin Asofiei

09:57 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Greg Shah wrote:
> Please don't delete old versions of the script. Just add new ones. Redmine handles that just fi... Eugenie Lyzenko

09:56 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Please don't delete old versions of the script. Just add new ones. Redmine handles that just fine. If you delete t... Greg Shah

09:50 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

And the new file itself. Eugenie Lyzenko

09:49 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Roger Borrello wrote:
> Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > I expect this script to function across ... Eugenie Lyzenko

09:39 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Eugenie Lyzenko wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > I expect this script to function across a range of recent Ubuntu rele... Roger Borrello

09:12 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

> We will *not* consider non @LTS@ reseases?
Correct. We should support 18.04, 20.04, 22.04 and 24.04. Greg Shah

08:30 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

Greg Shah wrote:
> I expect this script to function across a range of recent Ubuntu releases. Let's get this finish... Eugenie Lyzenko

05:48 AM Support #5568: implement application-specific TERMINFO database overrides

I expect this script to function across a range of recent Ubuntu releases. Let's get this finished and only have to ... Greg Shah