Activity
From 03/25/2025 to 04/23/2025
04/23/2025
- 05:12 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- The change was not omitted. I had to roll it back because the @cpath@ will be added inside @WebServiceAuth.authorize(...
- 02:25 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Review of 7080a rev 15860:
* this change from the patch in #9687 was omitted; the authorization ACLs work with the f... - 02:09 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Yes, 7080a. The changes were committed as r15860.
- 10:27 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, do you have a branch for this?
04/22/2025
- 04:46 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've pushed 9687b revision 15895 to xfer.
- 03:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for the customer to access or does it need more changes and/or testing?
I've reb... - 08:40 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for the customer to access or does it need more changes and/or testing?
I am reb... - 08:37 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Is this ready for the customer to access or does it need more changes and/or testing?
- 06:07 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Cleaned up duplicate API libs as described in #9674-28
Pushed up to revision 9687b/15878.
04/15/2025
- 04:06 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Please create a branch and put the changes there. Thanks.
04/14/2025
- 05:22 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin,
Is there a branch for the changes you proposed for fixing the context issues reported in #9687 which we... - 09:17 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * One issue I see is that the implemented methods are @doHandl... - 08:56 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, please see attached patch - test all REST-admin requests, and admin handler. It... - 06:35 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu, please see attached patch - test all REST-admin requests, and admin handler. It should work.
The point is... - 03:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Yes, that was my problem also.
> The problem now is that the @AdminRestHandler@ will att...
04/12/2025
- 03:45 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > That issue is caused by adding @DefaultHandler@ in sequence to Admini...
04/11/2025
- 06:04 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Yes, that was my problem also.
Initially, I did not write code like... - 03:01 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I may be completely wrong, but in Jetty, if you have multiple handlers for a path, aren't all of them called, in orde...
- 12:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Ovidiu, did you try using admin app after the change ?
> Now its possible to access embedded... - 11:26 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> That issue is caused by adding @DefaultHandler@ in sequence to Administration Console applicat... - 09:54 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Rebased @9687b@ to @trunk/15850@.
Migrated Ovidiu's changes, but still have issue as described in #9687-98
I guess ... - 05:30 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is n...
04/10/2025
- 12:05 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, some new issues.
>
> Navigating to the root path gives a page with 404 error and li... - 09:25 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz: When you get the chance, please update [[p2j:JVM Requirements]] to add Java 11 and Java 17. Later, when we r...
- 08:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What has to be fixed before we can provide this as an early release to a customer? That customer... - 07:58 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- What has to be fixed before we can provide this as an early release to a customer? That customer needs to make Jetty...
- 07:29 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, some new issues.
I am on it. - 07:28 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following change to @build.gradle@.
... - 07:05 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, some new issues.
Navigating to the root path gives a page with 404 error and list of contexts (admin and _... - 11:33 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Brett,
Your request is probably correct. Both _sec-auth tables were stuck as R/O. It an issue caused by a failed mer... - 10:45 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- When trying to add a domain I am getting this
{
"success": false,
"errors": [
"com.goldencode.p...
04/09/2025
- 06:46 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- It is working now, I just needed to change it to the logical db name, not the physical. Thanks!
- 06:43 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I think this is strange.
The (GET - I assume) for @https://localhost:7443/admin/security/domains/shared@ will try to... - 06:15 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- When trying to list the domains I am getting this response
{
"errors": [
"Error initializing persist... - 12:31 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Brett Rexius wrote:
> Do you have Postman examples for /admin/security/domains?
Sure. See attached. The admin sub... - 11:51 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Do you have Postman examples for /admin/security/domains?
- 05:59 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is not possible to get @/gui@ or... - 09:08 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't recall what was the reason. What compilation issues do you get?
> I get it w... - 07:21 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following cha... - 07:14 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following change to @build.gradle@.
... - 07:02 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following change to @build.gradle@.
I am not sure why - pro... - 04:34 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is n... - 12:22 PM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Got it. Is there a way to find the code for @gradlew native@ ? I looked into @build.gradle@ but... - 11:14 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- > Got it. Is there a way to find the code for @gradlew native@ ? I looked into @build.gradle@ but did not find anythi...
- 09:59 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Got it. Is there a way to find the code for @gradlew native@ ? I looked into @build.gradle@ but did not find anything.
- 09:48 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- > > In @build.gradle@ you can see we write it into code like @Version.java@.
> >
> Hmm, ok. Should this version be... - 09:33 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > How could we get the version at build time?
>
> In @build.gradle@ you can see we write it in... - 09:17 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- > How could we get the version at build time?
In @build.gradle@ you can see we write it into code like @Version.ja... - 08:06 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> The idea here:
>
> * At build time, we should create a static string literal in the native...
04/08/2025
- 07:29 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is not possible to get @/gui@ or... - 11:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Let me know if you need additional help.
Thank you, it worked.
I've found related issue -... - 01:16 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- We can't recreate the problem here. The only theory we have is that the @p2j.dll@ is not updated with a later versio...
- 12:45 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Where does this Redmine stand? It's in 'Test' status, but Kevin can still recreate this.
04/07/2025
- 01:26 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I would think so.
>
> See @httpConfig.addCustomizer(new SecureRequestCustomizer());@ in @Ge... - 11:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz, with 9687a I'm getting @HTTP ERROR 400 Invalid SNI@.
> >
... - 11:05 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, with 9687a I'm getting @HTTP ERROR 400 Invalid SNI@.
>
> For development (where I ... - 10:54 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, with 9687a I'm getting @HTTP ERROR 400 Invalid SNI@.
For development (where I don't care about certificat... - 09:17 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Rebased to trunk/15842.
Resolved minor conflicts.
Pushed up 9687b/15866. - 10:04 AM Bug #9804 (Test): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 10:03 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Branch 9804a was merged to trunk rev 15845 and archived.
- 10:01 AM Bug #9804 (Merge Pending): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- I've redone tests, I'm merging to trunk and 7156c/e now.
- 08:23 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya, please see 9804a rev 15849 - this address the review.
>
> I've added timeout f... - 08:18 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya, please see 9804a rev 15849 - this address the review.
I've added timeout for the remote-side request.
Fo... - 07:04 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya B wrote:
> Aren't the workers supposed to be reused by the SoapHandler and RestHandler? I mean @worker.getHelp... - 06:59 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > * What about synchronizing @LegacyServiceWorker.getHelper@ and @RemoteLegacyServiceWor... - 06:41 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya B wrote:
> Review of 9804a r15848:
> * Remove pasoe references in @RemoteLegacyServiceWorker@ and there seems... - 06:08 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Review of 9804a r15848:
* Remove pasoe references in @RemoteLegacyServiceWorker@ and there seems to be one reference... - 05:21 AM Bug #9804 (Review): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Rebased 9804a from trunk rev 15842 - new rev 15848.
Galya: please do a final review. - 03:32 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Testing went well over the weekend. I only emailed Constantin this morning and forgot to update the task.
- 05:33 AM Bug #9878: Java client process hangs when -verbose:class is part of jvmargs
- I can replicate this in Java 11, 17, 21.
When -verbose:class is part of the client's java argumens the Java client... - 05:25 AM Bug #9878 (New): Java client process hangs when -verbose:class is part of jvmargs
04/04/2025
- 12:08 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I see common code like this:
> [...]
> Please add a worker method.
Thank you. I've ... - 08:46 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I see common code like this:...
- 08:13 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've removed dependency on @commons-httpclient@ which seems not to be in use since #6692 and migrated *NoHostVerify* ...
- 03:19 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek
> Note that 9687a is a development branch and 9687b is a branch constantly re-based to ... - 09:19 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Galya B wrote:
> > > Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with o... - 08:52 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Greg Shah wrote:
> +Testcases Needed+
> * [[p2j:Appserver Tests]]
> ** see #1608, #2124, #3854, #6424, #6488, #641... - 08:23 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with only one directory.xml ... - 08:14 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Galya B wrote:
> Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with only one directory.xml that is derived from t... - 07:59 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with only one directory.xml that is derived from the template?
- 07:50 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Galya B wrote:
> Where is the startup guide on how to write tests, add them to testcases and run them in Harness?
... - 07:39 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Where is the startup guide on how to write tests, add them to testcases and run them in Harness?
04/03/2025
- 06:04 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Ovidiu - do you have any testing tools/scripts/configuration/curl for testing API with 9687b ?... - 04:34 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, 8976a was merged to trunk, this includes changes to the REST Admin handlers. Pl... - 08:53 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > As for the formatting according to the formatting standards the imports sh... - 07:21 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Galya B wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I wonder if I'd rather use something similar @super.sendError@ in there to...
04/02/2025
- 02:15 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- h3. Changes in configuration and runtime of REST APIs
| |_{width:45%}. Before 8976a /
Trunk r15836 |_{width:45%}.... - 12:58 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric/Greg: if testing is OK with 8976a, we need to release this before #9687, so the jet... - 07:30 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, I've made some minor edits to the main page.
Thank you.
> For the existing S... - 05:16 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Eric/Greg: if testing is OK with 8976a, we need to release this before #9687, so the jetty changes are applied to 897...
- 03:27 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, I've made some minor edits to the main page.
For the existing SESSIONS and TENANT rest APIs, please create... - 12:29 PM Feature #8976 (Test): Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Branch 8976a was merged into trunk as rev. 15837 and archived.
- 09:09 AM Feature #8976 (Merge Pending): Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Please merge 8976a to trunk now.
- 08:54 AM Feature #8976 (Internal Test): Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- As noted above, the 8976a branch passed the regression tests. I am confident it can be merged into trunk.
I rebased ... - 11:11 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek
> I actually expected you will takeover spreadsheet webapp migration as you've made cha... - 11:05 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review of the SPREADSHEET changes in 9687a.
>
> There are two dependency declarations ... - 11:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, 8976a was merged to trunk, this includes changes to the REST Admin handlers. Please rebase, as we need to fi...
- 08:41 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Code review of the SPREADSHEET changes in 9687a.
There are two dependency declarations of @jetty-server@ in ext/sh... - 07:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * also, please rebase
Rebased to trunk/15836, created and pushed 9687b/15854, no majo... - 07:09 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > I wonder if maybe Galya should also look at the... - 06:26 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Galya B wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I wonder if maybe Galya should also look at the, as SSO may be impacted by... - 05:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Saying that:
> @javax.servlet-api@ is to be removed as it is also provided by @jetty-servlet-... - 05:13 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Thank you Constantin
Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, this is for 9687a as of rev 15783
> * @AuthFilter@ - st... - 03:34 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Galya B wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I wonder if maybe Galya should also look at the, as SSO may be impacted by... - 03:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I wonder if maybe Galya should also look at the, as SSO may be impacted by changed.
In @Vir... - 02:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, this is for 9687a as of rev 15783
* @AuthFilter@ - status code was changed from 401 to 404
* @TenantHandler...
04/01/2025
- 04:21 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Re-adding reviewers removed by accident.
- 04:20 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek, Constatin
Please review 9687a/15768-15783
Note that:
- I was trying to minimize interface changes thus in... - 10:24 AM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- 09:07 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We will deliver it to the customer as a branch as soon as your testing is done. That customer do... - 08:32 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- We will deliver it to the customer as a branch as soon as your testing is done. That customer does not use the sprea...
- 08:28 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg
I am more or less done here - ready for review and for broader testing.
There is still spreadsheet handling u... - 08:03 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > Do we need following dependencies, first two are marked by the customer, but they are only APIs ?
You would know... - 07:40 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've updated dependencies to what I think are latest supported versions and did initial testing of 9687a/15783 - hote...
03/31/2025
- 04:27 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I think it is done. Please review my changes in:
* [[p2j:Administration_REST_API|Administration of REST API]];
** [... - 08:33 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I am preparing the wiki updates. They will be ready soon. I'll let you know.
- 07:39 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, please go through the points in #7080-108, if you haven't already.
- 01:38 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > should I upgrade all FWD dependencies to latest working versions as I did in #6692 ?
Yes, unless you have a reas... - 12:00 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Should I upgrade all items marked in orange ?
>
> Yes, these are all considered a problem.
... - 10:23 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > Should I upgrade all items marked in orange ?
Yes, these are all considered a problem.
> There one thing I do... - 10:15 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I also did a small upgrade of dependencies to reduce vulnerabilities. I am checking if I could ... - 08:01 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > I also did a small upgrade of dependencies to reduce vulnerabilities. I am checking if I could update more dependen...
- 05:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please run @./gradlew dependencies@ and look into the dependency tree; for these two whi... - 04:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Please run @./gradlew dependencies@ and look into the dependency tree; for these two which are removed, they look to ...
- 03:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, do you have a list of library versions which have changed (or added/removed)? Co... - 02:13 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, do you have a list of library versions which have changed (or added/removed)? Compare the build/lib folder wi...
- 01:37 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> >
> > Hynek
> > I've upgraded @sheet@ webapp/project for Jetty 12, it now deploys and start... - 01:28 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Status report 9687a/15782:
Jetty 12 servers:
* StandardServer - *works*
* EmbeddedWebServer - *works* : Embed...
03/29/2025
- 08:02 PM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Branch 8976a passed hotel GUI tests, dockered harness smoke tests for a customer application and the unit-tests of an...
03/28/2025
- 09:30 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 7156c + 8904a patch worked, I'm waiting for some testing from Danut.
- 09:29 AM Bug #9804 (Internal Test): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Code Review Task branch 9804a Revisions 15816
All good. - 06:04 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please add some text to the @AppServerHelper@ to that effect. Make it clear that the class is no... - 09:22 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- /In #6662, we inserted code to set the @FWD_VERSION@ environment variable in the environment of a child process when ...
- 09:08 AM Feature #9851 (Test): hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- 09:19 AM Bug #9848: Wrong agent startup time reported in logs
- Please include in this task also stress-testing the appserver agent startup, i.e. launch 50-100 agents and see if the...
- 04:56 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- This is strange.
I've tested again on my Windows machine and i don't get the crash.
This is how the client is s...
03/27/2025
- 04:14 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Status report:
Websockets - works fine for gui client and analytics/reporting, to be checked for spreadsheet app a... - 08:34 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > I don't think these were added as separate tasks. They were added wit... - 08:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I don't think these were added as separate tasks. They were added with the general implementat... - 02:47 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- I pulled code, cleaned, and refreshed my local environment yesterday morning. The time stamp on the p2j.dll files in...
- 02:05 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- > > 2. The @AppServerHelper@ is not thread safe for some of its state. I'm especially thinking about the @disconnect...
- 09:23 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya B wrote:
> In @BaseSession@ the change of @LinkedList@ to @LinkedHashSet@ requires to go over all implementati... - 09:06 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- In @BaseSession@ the change of @LinkedList@ to @LinkedHashSet@ requires to go over all implementations of @SessionLis...
- 04:56 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task branch 9804a Revisions 15812 and 15813
>
> 1. In @RemoteAppServerConnectionPo... - 10:50 AM Bug #9848: Wrong agent startup time reported in logs
- At the moment, the calculation for the agent's startup time is slightly incorrect. In @AppServerLauncher.launchFirstA...
- 10:02 AM Bug #9848 (New): Wrong agent startup time reported in logs
03/26/2025
- 07:37 PM Feature #7080 (Internal Test): expose all admin APIs via REST
- The branch 8976a was updated and rebased to latest trunk. Current revision is 15830.
- 09:38 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, I see that you changed SessionsRestHandler to use @DELETE:/admin/sessions/all@ instead of @DELETE:/admin/ses...
- 04:59 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Admin console works :) - I forgot to include it in the list above, its EE8 webapp.
- 04:12 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Do you anticipate any need for the customer to run conversion with this branch (assuming they hav... - 03:38 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Do you anticipate any need for the customer to run conversion with this branch (assuming they have already run conver...
- 12:17 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've updated reporting server for a new Jetty12 WebSockets semantics. I... - 09:18 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Initial testing report as for today:
>
> Websockets - works fine
>
> Servers:
> * Repor... - 09:03 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, do you have any pending changes not checked in? I need to do some Spreadsheet performa... - 09:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Greg
> What about support for modules #9626 ? I guess this can be added here as well ? Or is ... - 08:43 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, do you have any pending changes not checked in? I need to do some Spreadsheet performance tests for #9828 wit...
- 03:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Once I am done with initial testing I will ask for support regarding integration testing for s... - 01:59 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg
What about support for modules #9626 ? I guess this can be added here as well ? Or is it a next step ? - 01:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Initial testing report as for today:
Websockets - works fine
Servers:
* EmbeddedWebServer - works fine
* Repo... - 04:12 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Kevin, please double-check that you are not using an old p2j.dll.
- 04:03 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- It has the same stack trace (and failure) as the original report:...
- 03:45 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Testing with version 15801.
Testing reports has shown that the following error message is written to the rptrun_st... - 03:34 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Code Review Task branch 9804a Revisions 15812 and 15813
1. In @RemoteAppServerConnectionPool.dispatch()@ the javad... - 11:28 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg, please review, too.
03/25/2025
- 03:25 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Have you configured @WebServiceResource@ resource in @directory.xml@, under @resource-plu... - 02:25 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> You have @src/com/goldencode/p2j/security/WebServiceResource.j... - 01:59 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * @AdminRestHandler@: @authHandler = new WebAuthHandler("admin", "basic", "/admin/login",... - 01:52 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Review of 8976a rev 15810:
> * please run javadoc with Java 8 and fix any issues in you... - 10:52 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I have not given an in-depth look at the persistent changes
Code review 8976a/15809-1... - 09:34 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Review of 8976a rev 15810:
* please run javadoc with Java 8 and fix any issues in your files, if you haven't already... - 09:33 AM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Moved review to #7080
- 05:40 AM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Ovidiu, I see that 8976a has latest changes discussed in #7080. Please make sure the code compiles with Java 8, I wa...
- 09:15 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya: when you have time, please review.
- 03:09 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Regarding Jetty upgrade to version 12 there are three main types of Jetty services to upgrade:
- Jetty HTTP Handlers...
Also available in: Atom