Activity
From 04/06/2025 to 05/05/2025
05/05/2025
- 04:25 PM Feature #9002: Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when updating it
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Thank you, Radu for the attempt.
> The explanation is that 15880 to 9002a is 'built' on 98... - 03:58 PM Feature #9002: Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when updating it
- Thank you, Radu for the attempt.
The explanation is that r15880 of 9002a is 'built' on top of 9831a (which is also i...
05/02/2025
- 08:53 PM Feature #9002: Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when updating it
- Ovidiu, I think something is missing. Either I did something wrong when checking out the branch, either there are som...
04/30/2025
- 07:59 PM Feature #9002 (Review): Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when...
- Committed revision 15880 to 9002a.
Now the complex operations on landlord database are performed in transactions.
... - 02:13 PM Feature #9002: Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when updating it
- The initial commit contains only the _"connection resiliency"_ part of the task: now the tenant manager will try to r...
- 02:29 PM Feature #8863 (WIP): Add tenantName logic related to sec_authentication_domain in FWD
- In the meet today, I affirmed that the first and last bullet are already implemented, just need to be tested/confirme...
04/29/2025
- 07:54 PM Feature #9002 (WIP): Improve landlord database connection resiliency and add transactions when up...
- Created 9002a. Committed revision 15879.
04/24/2025
- 03:13 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, did you do @./gradlew all@ ? The GWT part for FWD Admin Console does not get build for normal 'jar'.
I've ...
04/23/2025
- 05:12 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- The change was not omitted. I had to roll it back because the @cpath@ will be added inside @WebServiceAuth.authorize(...
- 02:25 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Review of 7080a rev 15860:
* this change from the patch in #9687 was omitted; the authorization ACLs work with the f... - 02:09 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Yes, 7080a. The changes were committed as r15860.
- 10:27 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, do you have a branch for this?
04/22/2025
- 04:46 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've pushed 9687b revision 15895 to xfer.
- 03:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for the customer to access or does it need more changes and/or testing?
I've reb... - 08:40 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for the customer to access or does it need more changes and/or testing?
I am reb... - 08:37 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Is this ready for the customer to access or does it need more changes and/or testing?
- 06:07 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Cleaned up duplicate API libs as described in #9674-28
Pushed up to revision 9687b/15878.
04/15/2025
- 04:06 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Please create a branch and put the changes there. Thanks.
04/14/2025
- 05:22 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin,
Is there a branch for the changes you proposed for fixing the context issues reported in #9687 which we... - 09:17 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * One issue I see is that the implemented methods are @doHandl... - 08:56 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, please see attached patch - test all REST-admin requests, and admin handler. It... - 06:35 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu, please see attached patch - test all REST-admin requests, and admin handler. It should work.
The point is... - 03:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Yes, that was my problem also.
> The problem now is that the @AdminRestHandler@ will att...
04/12/2025
- 03:45 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > That issue is caused by adding @DefaultHandler@ in sequence to Admini...
04/11/2025
- 06:04 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Yes, that was my problem also.
Initially, I did not write code like... - 03:01 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I may be completely wrong, but in Jetty, if you have multiple handlers for a path, aren't all of them called, in orde...
- 12:45 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Ovidiu, did you try using admin app after the change ?
> Now its possible to access embedded... - 11:26 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> That issue is caused by adding @DefaultHandler@ in sequence to Administration Console applicat... - 09:54 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Rebased @9687b@ to @trunk/15850@.
Migrated Ovidiu's changes, but still have issue as described in #9687-98
I guess ... - 05:30 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is n...
04/10/2025
- 12:05 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, some new issues.
>
> Navigating to the root path gives a page with 404 error and li... - 09:25 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz: When you get the chance, please update [[p2j:JVM Requirements]] to add Java 11 and Java 17. Later, when we r...
- 08:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What has to be fixed before we can provide this as an early release to a customer? That customer... - 07:58 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- What has to be fixed before we can provide this as an early release to a customer? That customer needs to make Jetty...
- 07:29 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, some new issues.
I am on it. - 07:28 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following change to @build.gradle@.
... - 07:05 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, some new issues.
Navigating to the root path gives a page with 404 error and list of contexts (admin and _... - 11:33 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Brett,
Your request is probably correct. Both _sec-auth tables were stuck as R/O. It an issue caused by a failed mer... - 10:45 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- When trying to add a domain I am getting this
{
"success": false,
"errors": [
"com.goldencode.p...
04/09/2025
- 06:46 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- It is working now, I just needed to change it to the logical db name, not the physical. Thanks!
- 06:43 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I think this is strange.
The (GET - I assume) for @https://localhost:7443/admin/security/domains/shared@ will try to... - 06:15 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- When trying to list the domains I am getting this response
{
"errors": [
"Error initializing persist... - 12:31 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Brett Rexius wrote:
> Do you have Postman examples for /admin/security/domains?
Sure. See attached. The admin sub... - 11:51 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Do you have Postman examples for /admin/security/domains?
- 05:59 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is not possible to get @/gui@ or... - 09:08 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't recall what was the reason. What compilation issues do you get?
> I get it w... - 07:21 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following cha... - 07:14 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following change to @build.gradle@.
... - 07:02 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- In order to make regression tests compile I had to make following change to @build.gradle@.
I am not sure why - pro... - 04:34 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is n... - 12:22 PM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Got it. Is there a way to find the code for @gradlew native@ ? I looked into @build.gradle@ but... - 11:14 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- > Got it. Is there a way to find the code for @gradlew native@ ? I looked into @build.gradle@ but did not find anythi...
- 09:59 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Got it. Is there a way to find the code for @gradlew native@ ? I looked into @build.gradle@ but did not find anything.
- 09:48 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- > > In @build.gradle@ you can see we write it into code like @Version.java@.
> >
> Hmm, ok. Should this version be... - 09:33 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > How could we get the version at build time?
>
> In @build.gradle@ you can see we write it in... - 09:17 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- > How could we get the version at build time?
In @build.gradle@ you can see we write it into code like @Version.ja... - 08:06 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> The idea here:
>
> * At build time, we should create a static string literal in the native...
04/08/2025
- 07:29 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've found related issue - in case @/admin@ API is enabled it is not possible to get @/gui@ or... - 11:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Let me know if you need additional help.
Thank you, it worked.
I've found related issue -... - 01:16 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- We can't recreate the problem here. The only theory we have is that the @p2j.dll@ is not updated with a later versio...
- 12:45 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Where does this Redmine stand? It's in 'Test' status, but Kevin can still recreate this.
04/07/2025
- 01:26 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I would think so.
>
> See @httpConfig.addCustomizer(new SecureRequestCustomizer());@ in @Ge... - 11:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz, with 9687a I'm getting @HTTP ERROR 400 Invalid SNI@.
> >
... - 11:05 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, with 9687a I'm getting @HTTP ERROR 400 Invalid SNI@.
>
> For development (where I ... - 10:54 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, with 9687a I'm getting @HTTP ERROR 400 Invalid SNI@.
For development (where I don't care about certificat... - 09:17 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Rebased to trunk/15842.
Resolved minor conflicts.
Pushed up 9687b/15866. - 10:04 AM Bug #9804 (Test): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 10:03 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Branch 9804a was merged to trunk rev 15845 and archived.
- 10:01 AM Bug #9804 (Merge Pending): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- I've redone tests, I'm merging to trunk and 7156c/e now.
- 08:23 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya, please see 9804a rev 15849 - this address the review.
>
> I've added timeout f... - 08:18 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya, please see 9804a rev 15849 - this address the review.
I've added timeout for the remote-side request.
Fo... - 07:04 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya B wrote:
> Aren't the workers supposed to be reused by the SoapHandler and RestHandler? I mean @worker.getHelp... - 06:59 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > * What about synchronizing @LegacyServiceWorker.getHelper@ and @RemoteLegacyServiceWor... - 06:41 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya B wrote:
> Review of 9804a r15848:
> * Remove pasoe references in @RemoteLegacyServiceWorker@ and there seems... - 06:08 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Review of 9804a r15848:
* Remove pasoe references in @RemoteLegacyServiceWorker@ and there seems to be one reference... - 05:21 AM Bug #9804 (Review): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Rebased 9804a from trunk rev 15842 - new rev 15848.
Galya: please do a final review. - 03:32 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Testing went well over the weekend. I only emailed Constantin this morning and forgot to update the task.
- 05:33 AM Bug #9878: Java client process hangs when -verbose:class is part of jvmargs
- I can replicate this in Java 11, 17, 21.
When -verbose:class is part of the client's java argumens the Java client... - 05:25 AM Bug #9878 (New): Java client process hangs when -verbose:class is part of jvmargs
Also available in: Atom