Activity
From 03/07/2025 to 04/05/2025
04/04/2025
- 12:08 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I see common code like this:
> [...]
> Please add a worker method.
Thank you. I've ... - 08:46 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I see common code like this:...
- 08:13 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've removed dependency on @commons-httpclient@ which seems not to be in use since #6692 and migrated *NoHostVerify* ...
- 03:19 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek
> Note that 9687a is a development branch and 9687b is a branch constantly re-based to ... - 09:19 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Galya B wrote:
> > > Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with o... - 08:52 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Greg Shah wrote:
> +Testcases Needed+
> * [[p2j:Appserver Tests]]
> ** see #1608, #2124, #3854, #6424, #6488, #641... - 08:23 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with only one directory.xml ... - 08:14 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Galya B wrote:
> Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with only one directory.xml that is derived from t... - 07:59 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Should I write 4GL tests for testcases that work with only one directory.xml that is derived from the template?
- 07:50 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Galya B wrote:
> Where is the startup guide on how to write tests, add them to testcases and run them in Harness?
... - 07:39 AM Support #8922: runtime infrastructure tests
- Where is the startup guide on how to write tests, add them to testcases and run them in Harness?
04/03/2025
- 06:04 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Ovidiu - do you have any testing tools/scripts/configuration/curl for testing API with 9687b ?... - 04:34 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, 8976a was merged to trunk, this includes changes to the REST Admin handlers. Pl... - 08:53 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > As for the formatting according to the formatting standards the imports sh... - 07:21 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Galya B wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I wonder if I'd rather use something similar @super.sendError@ in there to...
04/02/2025
- 02:15 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- h3. Changes in configuration and runtime of REST APIs
| |_{width:45%}. Before 8976a /
Trunk r15836 |_{width:45%}.... - 12:58 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric/Greg: if testing is OK with 8976a, we need to release this before #9687, so the jet... - 07:30 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, I've made some minor edits to the main page.
Thank you.
> For the existing S... - 05:16 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Eric/Greg: if testing is OK with 8976a, we need to release this before #9687, so the jetty changes are applied to 897...
- 03:27 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, I've made some minor edits to the main page.
For the existing SESSIONS and TENANT rest APIs, please create... - 12:29 PM Feature #8976 (Test): Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Branch 8976a was merged into trunk as rev. 15837 and archived.
- 09:09 AM Feature #8976 (Merge Pending): Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Please merge 8976a to trunk now.
- 08:54 AM Feature #8976 (Internal Test): Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- As noted above, the 8976a branch passed the regression tests. I am confident it can be merged into trunk.
I rebased ... - 11:11 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek
> I actually expected you will takeover spreadsheet webapp migration as you've made cha... - 11:05 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review of the SPREADSHEET changes in 9687a.
>
> There are two dependency declarations ... - 11:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, 8976a was merged to trunk, this includes changes to the REST Admin handlers. Please rebase, as we need to fi...
- 08:41 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Code review of the SPREADSHEET changes in 9687a.
There are two dependency declarations of @jetty-server@ in ext/sh... - 07:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * also, please rebase
Rebased to trunk/15836, created and pushed 9687b/15854, no majo... - 07:09 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > I wonder if maybe Galya should also look at the... - 06:26 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Galya B wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I wonder if maybe Galya should also look at the, as SSO may be impacted by... - 05:50 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Saying that:
> @javax.servlet-api@ is to be removed as it is also provided by @jetty-servlet-... - 05:13 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Thank you Constantin
Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, this is for 9687a as of rev 15783
> * @AuthFilter@ - st... - 03:34 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Galya B wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > I wonder if maybe Galya should also look at the, as SSO may be impacted by... - 03:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I wonder if maybe Galya should also look at the, as SSO may be impacted by changed.
In @Vir... - 02:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, this is for 9687a as of rev 15783
* @AuthFilter@ - status code was changed from 401 to 404
* @TenantHandler...
04/01/2025
- 04:21 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Re-adding reviewers removed by accident.
- 04:20 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek, Constatin
Please review 9687a/15768-15783
Note that:
- I was trying to minimize interface changes thus in... - 10:24 AM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- 09:07 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We will deliver it to the customer as a branch as soon as your testing is done. That customer do... - 08:32 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- We will deliver it to the customer as a branch as soon as your testing is done. That customer does not use the sprea...
- 08:28 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg
I am more or less done here - ready for review and for broader testing.
There is still spreadsheet handling u... - 08:03 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > Do we need following dependencies, first two are marked by the customer, but they are only APIs ?
You would know... - 07:40 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've updated dependencies to what I think are latest supported versions and did initial testing of 9687a/15783 - hote...
03/31/2025
- 04:27 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I think it is done. Please review my changes in:
* [[p2j:Administration_REST_API|Administration of REST API]];
** [... - 08:33 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I am preparing the wiki updates. They will be ready soon. I'll let you know.
- 07:39 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, please go through the points in #7080-108, if you haven't already.
- 01:38 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > should I upgrade all FWD dependencies to latest working versions as I did in #6692 ?
Yes, unless you have a reas... - 12:00 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Should I upgrade all items marked in orange ?
>
> Yes, these are all considered a problem.
... - 10:23 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > Should I upgrade all items marked in orange ?
Yes, these are all considered a problem.
> There one thing I do... - 10:15 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I also did a small upgrade of dependencies to reduce vulnerabilities. I am checking if I could ... - 08:01 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- > I also did a small upgrade of dependencies to reduce vulnerabilities. I am checking if I could update more dependen...
- 05:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please run @./gradlew dependencies@ and look into the dependency tree; for these two whi... - 04:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Please run @./gradlew dependencies@ and look into the dependency tree; for these two which are removed, they look to ...
- 03:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, do you have a list of library versions which have changed (or added/removed)? Co... - 02:13 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, do you have a list of library versions which have changed (or added/removed)? Compare the build/lib folder wi...
- 01:37 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> >
> > Hynek
> > I've upgraded @sheet@ webapp/project for Jetty 12, it now deploys and start... - 01:28 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Status report 9687a/15782:
Jetty 12 servers:
* StandardServer - *works*
* EmbeddedWebServer - *works* : Embed...
03/29/2025
- 08:02 PM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Branch 8976a passed hotel GUI tests, dockered harness smoke tests for a customer application and the unit-tests of an...
03/28/2025
- 09:30 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 7156c + 8904a patch worked, I'm waiting for some testing from Danut.
- 09:29 AM Bug #9804 (Internal Test): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Code Review Task branch 9804a Revisions 15816
All good. - 06:04 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please add some text to the @AppServerHelper@ to that effect. Make it clear that the class is no... - 09:22 AM Feature #9851: hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- /In #6662, we inserted code to set the @FWD_VERSION@ environment variable in the environment of a child process when ...
- 09:08 AM Feature #9851 (Test): hard code the FWD version string in the JNI code at build time
- 09:19 AM Bug #9848: Wrong agent startup time reported in logs
- Please include in this task also stress-testing the appserver agent startup, i.e. launch 50-100 agents and see if the...
- 04:56 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- This is strange.
I've tested again on my Windows machine and i don't get the crash.
This is how the client is s...
03/27/2025
- 04:14 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Status report:
Websockets - works fine for gui client and analytics/reporting, to be checked for spreadsheet app a... - 08:34 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > I don't think these were added as separate tasks. They were added wit... - 08:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I don't think these were added as separate tasks. They were added with the general implementat... - 02:47 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- I pulled code, cleaned, and refreshed my local environment yesterday morning. The time stamp on the p2j.dll files in...
- 02:05 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- > > 2. The @AppServerHelper@ is not thread safe for some of its state. I'm especially thinking about the @disconnect...
- 09:23 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya B wrote:
> In @BaseSession@ the change of @LinkedList@ to @LinkedHashSet@ requires to go over all implementati... - 09:06 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- In @BaseSession@ the change of @LinkedList@ to @LinkedHashSet@ requires to go over all implementations of @SessionLis...
- 04:56 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task branch 9804a Revisions 15812 and 15813
>
> 1. In @RemoteAppServerConnectionPo... - 10:50 AM Bug #9848: Wrong agent startup time reported in logs
- At the moment, the calculation for the agent's startup time is slightly incorrect. In @AppServerLauncher.launchFirstA...
- 10:02 AM Bug #9848 (New): Wrong agent startup time reported in logs
03/26/2025
- 07:37 PM Feature #7080 (Internal Test): expose all admin APIs via REST
- The branch 8976a was updated and rebased to latest trunk. Current revision is 15830.
- 09:38 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu, I see that you changed SessionsRestHandler to use @DELETE:/admin/sessions/all@ instead of @DELETE:/admin/ses...
- 04:59 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Admin console works :) - I forgot to include it in the list above, its EE8 webapp.
- 04:12 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Do you anticipate any need for the customer to run conversion with this branch (assuming they hav... - 03:38 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Do you anticipate any need for the customer to run conversion with this branch (assuming they have already run conver...
- 12:17 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've updated reporting server for a new Jetty12 WebSockets semantics. I... - 09:18 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Initial testing report as for today:
>
> Websockets - works fine
>
> Servers:
> * Repor... - 09:03 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz, do you have any pending changes not checked in? I need to do some Spreadsheet performa... - 09:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Greg
> What about support for modules #9626 ? I guess this can be added here as well ? Or is ... - 08:43 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, do you have any pending changes not checked in? I need to do some Spreadsheet performance tests for #9828 wit...
- 03:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Once I am done with initial testing I will ask for support regarding integration testing for s... - 01:59 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Greg
What about support for modules #9626 ? I guess this can be added here as well ? Or is it a next step ? - 01:57 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Initial testing report as for today:
Websockets - works fine
Servers:
* EmbeddedWebServer - works fine
* Repo... - 04:12 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Kevin, please double-check that you are not using an old p2j.dll.
- 04:03 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- It has the same stack trace (and failure) as the original report:...
- 03:45 PM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Testing with version 15801.
Testing reports has shown that the following error message is written to the rptrun_st... - 03:34 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Code Review Task branch 9804a Revisions 15812 and 15813
1. In @RemoteAppServerConnectionPool.dispatch()@ the javad... - 11:28 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg, please review, too.
03/25/2025
- 03:25 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Have you configured @WebServiceResource@ resource in @directory.xml@, under @resource-plu... - 02:25 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> You have @src/com/goldencode/p2j/security/WebServiceResource.j... - 01:59 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * @AdminRestHandler@: @authHandler = new WebAuthHandler("admin", "basic", "/admin/login",... - 01:52 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Review of 8976a rev 15810:
> * please run javadoc with Java 8 and fix any issues in you... - 10:52 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I have not given an in-depth look at the persistent changes
Code review 8976a/15809-1... - 09:34 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Review of 8976a rev 15810:
* please run javadoc with Java 8 and fix any issues in your files, if you haven't already... - 09:33 AM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Moved review to #7080
- 05:40 AM Feature #8976: Admin REST API for interacting with tenant authentication tables
- Ovidiu, I see that 8976a has latest changes discussed in #7080. Please make sure the code compiles with Java 8, I wa...
- 09:15 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Galya: when you have time, please review.
- 03:09 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Regarding Jetty upgrade to version 12 there are three main types of Jetty services to upgrade:
- Jetty HTTP Handlers...
03/24/2025
- 11:47 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> E.g. FWD API is making use of @javax.http.*@ classes in @SsoAuthenticator@, so it relies on lo... - 09:08 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Note there are due to migration there will FWD API changes, which I am not sure what to do with.
E.g. FWD API is mak... - 11:01 AM Support #9514: assess, recommend and document monitoring tools plan
- Some recent observations for using *jstack* in a container. Some settings have to be passed to docker upon building t...
- 10:51 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > > As for the real value of automation... I don't want... - 10:42 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya B wrote:
> > I think in FWD we have this notion that automation is not necessarily running... - 10:39 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> >> The API is defined at development time, not at runtime. You don't need to dynamically generate... - 10:32 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- >> The API is defined at development time, not at runtime. You don't need to dynamically generate it on a production ...
- 10:28 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > As for the real value of automation... I don't want to get there.
> >
> ... - 10:13 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Banks don't build platforms, they build applications. FWD is not an application, it is a platfor... - 10:06 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > > * JSON or Annotations
> > > ** It seems that we can either define the API in JSON and then g... - 09:54 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > As for the real value of automation... I don't want to get there.
>
> I never said that. Th... - 09:53 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg: before committing to use Swagger and Jersey, I'd like to have a simple POC to chec... - 09:53 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > As for the real value of automation... I don't want to get there.
I never said that. This has nothing to do wit... - 09:52 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > > * JSON or Annotations
> > ** It seems that we can either define the API in JSON and then generate Java stubs for... - 09:33 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The issue is that running extra code to dynamically generate and expose the API increases the att... - 09:20 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> * JSON or Annotations
> ** It seems that we can either define the API in JSON and then generate ... - 09:05 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu: I like the way your work is moving. The design in #7080-80 is good.
Constantin: We should go ahead with a c... - 07:54 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg: before committing to use Swagger and Jersey, I'd like to have a simple POC to check how it integrates with FWD.
- 07:35 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- If the customers don't want to develop tools (API clients), they can have the auto-generated always up-to-date web cl...
- 07:32 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Galya B wrote:
> In any case it's a matter of configuration.
https://anirtek.github.io/java/jetty/swagger/openapi... - 07:13 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Here is a full list of the supported server stubs, client SDKs and doc types it can generate: "swagger-codegen":https...
- 07:02 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> How does Swagger generate the server stubs? With annotations?
The api is declared in ya... - 06:43 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Galya B wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Yes, we can consider Swagger.
>
> Constantin, does #7080-80 mean we're not... - 06:40 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, we can consider Swagger.
Constantin, does #7080-80 mean we're not considering Swagger for... - 03:57 AM Bug #9804 (Review): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 9804a rev 15813 has:
* Improvements for remote FWD OpenClient connections: ensure that the remote side uses a single...
03/21/2025
- 05:57 PM Feature #7080 (Review): expose all admin APIs via REST
- The changes in 8976a / 15810:
* created @BaseAdminRestHandler@ as base @abstract@ class for all REST handlers:
** w... - 05:22 PM Feature #7080 (WIP): expose all admin APIs via REST
- I committed the changes to 8976a / 15810.
- 04:04 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Otoh, I don't think we want to reserve dispatcher threads for all apps, even if they don't use remote openclient.
- 03:49 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Perhaps we should have a safer way to set the number of dispatcher threads. For example, doesn't... - 03:44 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg: why is BaseSession.listeners a LinkedList instead of a HashSet? Are the listeners depende... - 03:25 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * with its size limited to 80% of the number of Dispatcher threads
>
> I think we nee... - 03:22 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- > Greg: why is BaseSession.listeners a LinkedList instead of a HashSet? Are the listeners dependent on when their ord...
- 02:16 PM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- Created task branch 9804a from trunk rev 15811.
In rev 15812, is the initial pass; it includes, on the remote FWD Op... - 06:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > > Hynek
> > > I have problems porting @Spre... - 05:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > Hynek
> > I have problems porting @SpreadsheetWebApp@ from Jetty 9 ... - 04:40 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek
> I have problems porting @SpreadsheetWebApp@ from Jetty 9 to Jetty 12, as some kind o... - 03:20 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek
I have problems porting @SpreadsheetWebApp@ from Jetty 9 to Jetty 12, as some kind of internal API was used (...
03/20/2025
- 09:30 AM Bug #9804 (WIP): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 03:19 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The only difference is that I think we need to move away from basic auth and design a more approp...
03/19/2025
- 04:23 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The point is: I see real usage in getting the full details 'up front', and not having to... - 02:23 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> #** the @/admin/tenants@ and @/admin/sessions@ should return only the list of resources, no... - 02:14 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I agree with these ideas.
The only difference is that I think we need to move away from basic auth and design a mo... - 01:59 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin and I have a discussion on meet and we reach the following conclusions (summarised):
# instead a having... - 01:14 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- > A question I have is do we expect the framework to ever expose endpoints that are not @/admin@, because to me every...
- 01:13 PM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- I'm not opposed to an explicit versioning in the URL, but this also would suggest that the older versions would be su...
- 09:46 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Versioning is introduced when the team is on the same page about the definition of backwards compatibility. Breaking ...
- 09:34 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Idea discussed in the daily meeting today:
* As this task is also about (re-)designing the REST API to expose the ...
03/18/2025
- 11:18 AM Bug #9804: improve the OpenClient remote calls
- The remote OpenClient calls are managed in FWD via the @RemoteLegacyJavaAppserverClient@ class, created via @LegacyJa...
- 10:42 AM Bug #9804 (Test): improve the OpenClient remote calls
- 05:39 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > See : https://javadoc.jetty.org/jetty-12/org/eclipse/jetty/serv... - 03:47 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> See : https://javadoc.jetty.org/jetty-12/org/eclipse/jetty/server/Request.Handler.html#handle(... - 05:19 AM Bug #9740 (Test): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- @9740a@ was merged into @trunk / rev 15787@
03/17/2025
- 06:13 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz Domin wrote:
> > In order to minimize changes I've stayed with @AbstractHandler@... - 08:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> In order to minimize changes I've stayed with @AbstractHandler@ despite its deprecated, as mov... - 08:01 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin: Please comment on this plan. Do we need to shift to the asynch approach?
- 03:52 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've started work on porting services to Jetty 12 API. There are differences requiring attention, it will take me 2-3...
- 12:02 PM Bug #9740 (Merge Pending): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Please merge after 9543a.
- 11:08 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes. There are other "interactive" mechanisms that are the equivalent to @OS-COMMAND@: @DOS@ and... - 11:00 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Lorian Sandu wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15781
> >
> > The change is go... - 10:27 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15781
>
> The change is good.
>
> Please confirm tha... - 10:25 AM Bug #9740 (Internal Test): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15781
The change is good.
Please confirm that Windows process launching,... - 09:46 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think there is a latent bug here: the @isSuspended = 0;@ that is done *after* the @generateExce... - 09:38 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Code Review Task Branch 9740a Revision 15780
The change is good.
I think there is a latent bug here: the @isSus... - 09:25 AM Bug #9740 (Review): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Please review.
- 09:25 AM Bug #9740 (WIP): Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Good point. OK, move ahead with the @if (isSuspended)@ addition on Windows.
Committed to @974... - 09:03 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Good point. OK, move ahead with the @if (isSuspended)@ addition on Windows.
- 08:54 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In the testcase from #9740-10, what happens if the 2nd command runs longer than the 3rd command?
... - 08:50 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- In the testcase from #9740-10, what happens if the 2nd command runs longer than the 3rd command?
- 07:35 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please check that the code @client.suspend(silent);@ on line 276 of @ProcessDaemon@ is executed m...
03/14/2025
- 10:44 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Please check that the code @client.suspend(silent);@ on line 276 of @ProcessDaemon@ is executed multuple times before...
- 09:43 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please see if you can test my concern in #9740-2 that there could be multiple suspended terminals... - 08:33 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Please see if you can test my concern in #9740-2 that there could be multiple suspended terminals simultaneously. If...
03/13/2025
- 12:05 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've started upgrading dependencies to get rid of old and vulnerable libraries and I've encountered a problem that ma...
- 10:59 AM Bug #9740: Client running in batch mode stops with a crash on Windows
- Reopening the discussion on this.
Is it ok to fix this by adding the @if (isSuspended)@ (#9740-1) that is in the l... - 08:53 AM Feature #4132: implement configurable user and session limits
- I've documented this configuration in [[p2j:Session Management]].
03/11/2025
- 04:44 PM Feature #9687 (WIP): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- 03:54 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- We need to move ahead with this ASAP. Having it ready by the end of March is important to at least one customer. Th...
03/07/2025
- 04:28 AM Feature #7080: expose all admin APIs via REST
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Another note here: I think we need the REST admin APIs to have mandatory authentication...
Also available in: Atom