Activity
From 10/06/2025 to 11/04/2025
11/04/2025
- 01:40 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, I need to try your example when connecting from OpenEdge to the FWD server. The ...
11/03/2025
- 05:23 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, I need to try your example when connecting from OpenEdge to the FWD server. The changes look good, I just nee...
10/31/2025
- 08:42 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- I don't have an issue with changing @fwd_create_pg_cluster.sh@. I'm saying we need other changes too, to deal with th...
10/30/2025
- 06:03 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There are some examples in old testcases @uast/web_services/wsdl_test*.p@ programs, but ... - 10:23 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > As Constantin noted, we also need to be able t... - 04:24 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > As Constantin noted, we also need to be able to configure this as part... - 08:58 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Greg Shah wrote:
> As Constantin noted, we also need to be able to configure this as part of the project json file, ... - 08:02 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- As Constantin noted, we also need to be able to configure this as part of the project json file, since it affects cfg...
10/29/2025
- 04:43 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Updated #10722-8... default is 100 connections
- 04:37 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- I am adding a @--max-connections VALUE@ option (defaults to 100) to the @fwd_create_pg_cluster.sh@ script. This scrip...
- 01:22 PM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- For MS SQL Server, the number of maximum connections can be obtained using:...
- 11:46 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> The container project's newer scripts that incorporate PG versions 14 to 17 strictly speakin... - 11:42 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- The container project's newer scripts that incorporate PG versions 14 to 17 strictly speaking do not allow you to con...
- 11:16 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> *Roger*: where do you configure max_connections in the docker postgresql image? What is... - 10:54 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- *Roger*: where do you configure max_connections in the docker postgresql image? What is the default value?
*Ovidi... - 05:52 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Constantin - can you please review my changes to WebServiceImpl.java and LowLevelSocketImpl.ja...
10/27/2025
- 06:35 PM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Rebased *9687c* to *trunk* revision *16246*.
Tested features - all works correctly:
* hotel_gui
** virtual deskt...
10/16/2025
- 08:23 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- @max_connection@ is per-cluster, so all databases in that cluster (including multi-tenant) will use this value. So, ...
- 07:57 AM Bug #10733: evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in production
- When deploying to production, there is configuration which needs to be adjusted depending on the customer's load. Th...
- 07:36 AM Bug #10733 (New): evaluate and document mandatory configuration required when deploying FWD in pr...
10/08/2025
- 10:02 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I mean the basepath - if that is /ws and the request URI is /wsa, then it will match. I... - 05:16 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I mean the basepath - if that is /ws and the request URI is /wsa, then it will match. I think basepath needs to be s...
- 05:12 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Tomasz, beside the @requestUri.startsWith(instance.getBasePath())@ check mentioned by Hy... - 04:54 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz, beside the @requestUri.startsWith(instance.getBasePath())@ check mentioned by Hynek, I think we are OK.
- 04:53 AM Feature #10685: Move name_map.xml to the cvt folder
- The purpose of this task is to move the name_map.xml to the conversion folder, this is a breaking change which will r...
- 04:52 AM Feature #10685 (Closed): Move name_map.xml to the cvt folder
10/07/2025
- 09:29 AM Feature #9687 (Review): drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- 09:29 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- I've just checked and the current trunk introduces a feature that may require a bit more work before merging - revis...
- 05:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I agree that @StandardServer@ should not be aware of activated handlers. However, the handlers... - 04:33 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > The solution for the potential context conflict isn't well structured...
10/06/2025
- 09:46 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 9687c.
Thank you
> Please fix the added javadoc of @SoapServiceFilterHandler.h... - 05:25 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Instead of a filter, did you consider distinct context handlers? I.e. to have a context handle... - 05:00 AM Feature #9687: drop support for Java 8 and Java 11
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Hynek - please review revision 16214
Code review 9687c.
Please fix the added javadoc of ...
Also available in: Atom