Activity
From 06/18/2026 to 07/17/2026
07/16/2026
- 03:56 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- Documented the new @directory.xml@ parameters in [[p2j:Network]].
07/15/2026
- 08:46 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- I have done the suggestion about disabling chunk transfer when chunk size parameter is 0, alongside with the history ...
- 07:48 AM Bug #11327 (Internal Test): implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between clie...
- Teodor, I haven't found anything wrong with the approach and implementation. Next steps:
* fix the history entry in... - 02:47 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- Task branch *11327a* was rebased to trunk revision *16650*. Last revision is now *16655*.
- 02:36 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- Teodor, please rebase.
07/09/2026
- 03:05 PM Feature #11539: port and/or re-implement runtime support in C# (or other CLR implementation)
- An interesting idea which has occurred, but it is not related to porting the FWD runtime to C#.
Blazor Hybrid, a f... - 06:55 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- Currently, *11327a* has *5948* new lines of code. It is in review.
If the testing goes well, I think it can be merge... - 06:50 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- Hi all,
What is the status on this one in terms of availability on trunk\9866c? it seems significant - 06:07 AM Bug #11327 (Review): implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and ...
- Fix is in 16639.
07/08/2026
- 09:00 AM Bug #11327 (WIP): implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- Constantin, you are right about the interaction between FWD client and websocket.
There are some places where there ...
07/07/2026
- 05:57 AM Bug #11325 (Test): JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- Branch 11325a was merged into the trunk as rev 16639 and archived.
- 05:16 AM Bug #11325 (Merge Pending): JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD...
- 11325a can be merged now.
- 05:14 AM Bug #11325: JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- CHUI regression tests were passed. Hotel Gui web client in the virtual desktop mode and in the embedded mode has no n...
- 12:42 AM Bug #11327 (Review): implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and ...
07/06/2026
- 05:22 PM Bug #11325: JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- Main CHUI regression tests were passed with 2 known failed test cases.
- 12:25 PM Bug #11325: JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- During manual testing of large customers applications I observed that on soft logout the web client throws @IllegalSt...
- 05:07 AM Bug #11325: JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- Rebased 11325a up to rev 16641.
- 03:31 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- I have tested latest changes of #11327 on a big GUI project, with custom fonts and GUI elements.
I was able to run t...
07/03/2026
- 02:21 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- For intra-jvm, I have changed the @assign@ method on @memptr@ to avoid fully materializing a @byte[]@ when copying fr...
07/02/2026
- 08:54 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- -I don't think the impact would be significant because @memptr@ max size is *2 MB*.- It is actually *2 GB*.
07/01/2026
- 11:37 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- Constantion Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor, something we need to think about: appserver calls can be in the same JVM - so, ... - 06:55 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- Task branch *11327a* was rebased to trunk revision *16634*. Last revision is now *16635*.
06/26/2026
- 08:53 AM Bug #11327: implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- Committed revision *16614* on task branch *11327a*:
* Added initial work. - 08:24 AM Bug #11327 (WIP): implement size limited "chunking" for bulk data transfer between client and server
- I have started to work in this task.
I have implemented a new type of stream, @BinaryPayload@, which wraps the @by... - 05:13 AM Bug #11325 (Internal Test): JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD...
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I rebased 11325a rev 16625.
Sergey, good work integrating the server-side filesystem cha... - 03:37 AM Bug #11325: JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- I rebased 11325a rev 16625.
- 09:58 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> That's my fault. My apologies. I used the names from downloaded library instead of GC conve... - 08:52 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Why are you changing the naming convention? Please rename the patch f...
06/25/2026
- 04:41 PM Feature #9686: move FWD to Java 25
- I've added JDK25 to the Docker development images. These are being pushed to the goldencode Docker Hub for use with ...
- 03:22 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- Here's the code block where we decide which to use... we don't have a method to pull in the very old versions for pat...
- 03:03 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Why are you changing the naming convention? Please rename the patch files to match the conventio... - 02:35 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- Why are you changing the naming convention? Please rename the patch files to match the convention used for the older...
- 01:58 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I think we should have different scripts for each OS. At least for latest 2-3 LTS. I am not... - 01:39 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- I think we should have different scripts for each OS. At least for latest 2-3 LTS. I am not sure whether:
* the name... - 12:41 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > You have sufficient rights on projsrv01 to do it.
>
> I'll take tha... - 12:23 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You have sufficient rights on projsrv01 to do it.
I'll take that as approval (whereas if you d... - 12:02 PM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- You have sufficient rights on projsrv01 to do it.
- 11:53 AM Bug #11515: Patching NCURSES Using Static Linking on Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS (Noble Numbat)
- Can we get the @ncurses_curses_h_in_v6.4+20240113.patch@ and @ncurses_lib_getch_c_v6.4+20240113.patch@ files uploaded...
06/24/2026
- 02:52 AM Bug #11325: JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Sergey, review for 11325a rev 16495:
> * I'm OK with the changes, but please rebase
> ...
06/19/2026
- 09:03 AM Bug #11325 (Review): JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- Constantin, please review the committed revision 16606(11325a).
- 05:42 AM Bug #11325 (WIP): JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- 05:42 AM Bug #11325: JVM shutdown hooks executed on FWD server, but they belong to the FWD client
- Constantin, I am sorry for missed your note. Do we need to fallback to @OrderedShutdownHooks.registerShutdownHook(1, ...
Also available in: Atom