Activity
From 10/06/2018 to 11/04/2018
11/01/2018
- 07:12 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- I have a heavy duty test which uses lots of PUT statements - and what 4GL does in 1-2 seconds FWD does in 10 to 30. ...
- 05:14 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Using @getBytes().length@ makes sense.
- 04:49 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Eric, thanks!
Greg: I have another issue, this time in @BinaryData.setString@ - this assumes the number of bytes i... - 04:43 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- 3741a/11295 has passed all ETF testing.
- 03:39 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If this really creates too much overhead to be included in BDT, then can we pass a wrapper for th... - 03:32 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- No, this will create a huge mess and much confusion.
If this really creates too much overhead to be included in BD... - 03:27 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > ...all temp-tables, and any records held in the JDBC driver...
>... - 03:16 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> ...all temp-tables, and any records held in the JDBC driver...
Actually, temp-table recor... - 03:05 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The @assignDirect@ and @variable@ members of BDT should probably be marked @transient@ so it is c... - 02:59 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- I'm running the last round (batch) now. The other two have passed.
- 02:39 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Eric, the diffs are OK, please go ahead with runtime testing (if you haven't already).
- 02:42 AM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> please send me the diffs (or the baseline and converted sources) once you have the conve...
10/31/2018
- 03:10 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. The @assignDirect@ and @variable@ members of BDT should probably be marked @transient@ so it i... - 12:51 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Code Review Task Branch 3741a Revision 11295
Wow! That is a massive code drop. It took me all morning to review ... - 12:41 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- OK, converting now.
- 11:46 AM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- 3741a rev 11295 fixes some regressions and it passed MAJIC main and conversion testing.
Eric: please go ahead with... - 08:02 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric: please let me know if you can help me with ETF testing; you will need to reconvert...
10/30/2018
- 07:39 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- 3741a rev 11293 is under MAJIC testing now.
What is left are to finish the conversion of output parameters and jav... - 05:28 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Indeed, there is one way out before the new block is processed: the @ControlFlowOps.invokeImpl()@ ~ line 3350. Here, ...
- 04:43 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- I'm getting this:...
- 04:34 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- The @TM.deregisterOutputParameterAssigner()@ is called before the call of an procedure/function and native API routin...
- 03:37 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Ovidiu, please help me with something: shouldn't @TM.deregisterOutputParameterAssigner@ be called in case the i.e. RU...
- 01:14 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Applications can't depend upon behavior that abends in the 4GL. It is safe to let it assign. Put notes in the Javad...
- 01:01 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Greg, documentation states that if the OUTPUT/INPUT-OUTPUT variable is out of scope, then terminate with an error con...
10/29/2018
- 07:43 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, please confirm another possible bug: @BaseDataType.generateDefault@ now generate... - 04:39 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Ovidiu, please confirm another possible bug: @BaseDataType.generateDefault@ now generates an unknown value, as the BD...
- 03:39 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Some other weird things related to @DLL-CALL-TYPE@: if the @LIBRARY@ attribute is not set BEFORE the @SET-PARAMETER@,...
- 02:28 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Forgot about runtime/conversion of:
* extent arguments
* field reference arguments
* by-reference and append argum... - 06:35 AM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, I think there is a bug in @date.assign(BaseDataType)@ - if the current date inst... - 04:07 AM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- An ETA for what is left:
* the @dll-call-type@ - I'll finish this and have a cleaned up version by tomorrow, to put ...
10/26/2018
- 04:38 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Ovidiu, I think there is a bug in @date.assign(BaseDataType)@ - if the current date instance is unknown and the argum...
10/25/2018
- 05:23 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- A dec-char-char case (var data type, set-parameter data type, procedure parameter data type), shows some interesting ...
10/20/2018
- 09:52 AM Feature #3756: minor modifications for SESSION system handle support
- The following improvements for the SESSION system handle are needed:
* V6DISPLAY attribute (we do not need to supp... - 09:50 AM Feature #3756 (WIP): minor modifications for SESSION system handle support
- 09:48 AM Feature #3755: DEBUGGER system handle stubs
- Implement complete conversion support for the DEBUGGER system handle and all attributes/methods. The runtime should ...
- 09:40 AM Feature #3755 (Closed): DEBUGGER system handle stubs
- 09:36 AM Feature #3754: TRANSACTION resource support
- Implement the following:
* TRANSACTION handle-based resource
* SET-COMMIT() method
* SET-ROLLBACK() method
* TR... - 09:15 AM Feature #3754 (Closed): TRANSACTION resource support
- 09:14 AM Feature #3753: I18N additions
- Implement the following I18N features for Phase 1 (POC):
* FIX-CODEPAGE statement
* CODEPAGE-CONVERT() (runtime)
... - 09:11 AM Feature #3753 (Closed): I18N additions
- 09:09 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- As phase 2 of development, please add basic support for this set of source/target pairs:...
- 09:05 AM Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- At this time, the following source/target pairs have basic support (see @com.goldencode.p2j.util.LargeObjectOps@):
...
10/19/2018
- 05:01 PM Feature #3752: CLIENT-PRINCIPAL resource and other security features
- Implement support for the following:
+CLIENT-PRINCIPAL resource+
* CREATE CLIENT-PRINCIPAL statement
* CLIENT-... - 04:36 PM Feature #3752 (Closed): CLIENT-PRINCIPAL resource and other security features
- 04:32 PM Feature #3751 (WIP): implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- 02:22 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- In #3308-252, Constantin found that the OO 4GL supports "duck typing".
- 02:19 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Some comments from people at PSC:
# Methods act like internal procedures when there is no return value and act lik... - 02:16 PM Feature #3751: implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
- Implement complete support for both OO 4GL and structured error handling.
+Object Oriented (OO) 4GL+
* -CLASS- ... - 02:09 PM Feature #3751 (Closed): implement support for OO 4GL and structured error handling
10/17/2018
- 09:46 AM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- I think your examples are *not* showing direct memory usage.
From #3741-21:
> Another example is this: var-type... - 05:18 AM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- My plan at this time is this:
* implement the infrastructure to make everything working
* if there is difference be... - 03:08 AM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> My first worry was that this was some kind of direct memory issue. For example, the value might ...
10/16/2018
- 06:42 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- My first worry was that this was some kind of direct memory issue. For example, the value might be passed as a memor...
- 03:24 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- There is some weird stuff with OUTPUT/INPUT-OUTPUT parameters, when the data-type specified at @SET-PARAMETER@ and th...
- 12:41 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > This will require some refactoring of the NativeInvoker APIs, to access it directly.
>
> I ... - 12:13 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- > it may make sense to have this started for the CALL handle
Agreed, go with this.
> This will require some re... - 12:07 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Greg, something related to ControlFlowOps: some time ago I had a thought of using a builder approach for invoking thi...
10/15/2018
- 06:13 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Open issues which will be left after everything else is working or... - 06:10 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Open issues which will be left after everything else is working or postponed:
> * runti... - 05:08 PM Feature #3741: implement complete support for the CALL object handle and related attributes and m...
- Open issues which will be left after everything else is working or postponed:
* runtime for @PROCEDURE-TYPE@ and @TH...
Also available in: Atom