Activity
From 02/15/2021 to 03/16/2021
03/17/2021
- 11:51 PM Feature #4768: finish copy-lob support
- Ovidiu, please note we still need to ensure that UNDO on a persistent table with a LOB field works correctly.
03/16/2021
- 07:15 PM Feature #4768: finish copy-lob support
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > * Check undo behavior (if any) with test cases.
> Actually the LOB fields are only allow... - 06:46 PM Feature #4768: finish copy-lob support
- > * Check undo behavior (if any) with test cases.
Actually the LOB fields are only allowed in @NO-UNDO@ tables, the ... - 04:43 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- I created the following test:...
- 03:42 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- This is a bit strange: suppose we have a record in buffer but, since the record was not validated, it may be invalid....
- 01:42 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > The 'uncommitted' records are just one for each each buffer. For the... - 12:53 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I do not think the problem here is the transaction. It seems to me that this is only relate... - 12:22 PM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- I do not think the problem here is the transaction. It seems to me that this is only related to serialization methods...
- 07:38 AM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- Eric/Ovidiu: the above looks like a temp-table flush issue.
- 05:52 AM Bug #5203: Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- There seems to be a difference in how 4GL is handling serialization/transaction scoping for temp-tables. First I thou...
- 05:52 AM Bug #5203 (Test): Temp Table - serialization/transaction scope/pk
- 01:02 PM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The @xmlNodeName@ and @serializeName@ are members of this structure and they are used on ... - 11:51 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- The code in @Column@ constructor is as old as the class itself. What has changed recently is the data structure and t...
- 11:34 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Aren't these changes in a very recent revision of 3821c? I think they are not present in the latest 4384i. Perhaps ...
- 11:23 AM Bug #5202 (WIP): Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- We do not use the @Table@ annotation directly, because that is the static hardcoded value. Instead, the values of its...
- 03:49 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- Eric/Ovidiu: please comment what's the proper way of resolving the xmlNodeName, serializeName for a temp-table.
- 03:44 AM Bug #5202: Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- While the @Table@ annotation has both the @xmlNodeName@ and @serializeName@ info, that is not available in @TempTable...
- 03:43 AM Bug #5202 (Test): Temp Table serialize-name/xml-node-name
- 03:05 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian: can you take a look at this part:
> > plus some formatting of the string read...
03/15/2021
- 04:46 PM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Greg Shah wrote:
> OK, defer the work. Please create a task for it.
Added #5201.
Marian: can you take a look at... - 04:45 PM Bug #5201: fix issues related to the error messages reported for invalid date/datetime/datetime-t...
- From #5120-7:
> ... rev 1010 of the xfer testcases project contains a set of tests of how literals are parsed as d... - 04:43 PM Bug #5201 (New): fix issues related to the error messages reported for invalid date/datetime/date...
- 10:42 AM Support #5200 (Closed): Database access issue
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Did a @deploy.all@ and that seems to be recreated the database, all good now... hmm, maybe one... - 10:25 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Is @CUSTOMER@ a persistent table or a temp-table?
>
> If persistent, what is the size of ... - 10:16 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Is @CUSTOMER@ a persistent table or a temp-table?
>
> If persistent, what is the size of ... - 10:06 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- Is @CUSTOMER@ a persistent table or a temp-table?
If persistent, what is the size of your database file (@deploy/d... - 09:37 AM Support #5200: Database access issue
- I'm having issues with accessing the 'fwd' database in one test, the database seems to be setup to use H2 and I don't...
- 09:36 AM Support #5200 (Closed): Database access issue
- 09:21 AM Support #5199 (Closed): decimal - get value
- 08:43 AM Support #5199: decimal - get value
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> There is the @decimal.toBigDecimal()@ if you want to get the @BigDecimal@ instance.
T... - 07:29 AM Support #5199: decimal - get value
- There is the @decimal.toBigDecimal()@ if you want to get the @BigDecimal@ instance.
- 03:28 AM Support #5199: decimal - get value
- Trying to get the JSON serialization as close as possible to the 4GL one I see for decimal data type the conversion i...
- 03:28 AM Support #5199 (Closed): decimal - get value
03/12/2021
- 09:33 AM Bug #5194: Stream handle - type missing, not deletable
- As a side note when serializing JSON data to a stream the 4GL does not close the stream, however the data is being fl...
- 03:57 AM Bug #5194: Stream handle - type missing, not deletable
- There are some issues with a stream handle, first it does not support @type@ property - trying to access it eventuall...
- 03:57 AM Bug #5194 (New): Stream handle - type missing, not deletable
03/11/2021
- 10:10 AM Bug #5192 (Hold): OO Quirk - Json Number with exponent
- 10:08 AM Bug #5192: OO Quirk - Json Number with exponent
- > we can implement it right in FWD and let all those numeric get methods parse the actual number instead of throwing ...
- 08:55 AM Bug #5192: OO Quirk - Json Number with exponent
- Although numbers with exponents are supported to some extent in 4GL implementation those are not really parsed, one c...
- 08:45 AM Bug #5192 (Hold): OO Quirk - Json Number with exponent
03/10/2021
- 04:28 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- The testcases are very good, thank you. The behavior is indeed just like tables/table-handles except for the interes...
- 02:25 AM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I have a set of testcases in our old/crappy testcase repo. I will check them in to the new/hotn... - 07:44 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, you mean a @return new progress.lang.object()@ will work in 4GL but will not wor... - 06:23 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian, you mean a @return new progress.lang.object()@ will work in 4GL but will not work in FWD? If yes, then this i...
- 05:51 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Each object var definition should be declared outside the top-lev... - 02:14 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > @o:foo()@ produces a compile error when called from @Extension@ because @o@ is @Base@ and @foo(...
03/09/2021
- 01:41 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > is there a way to resolve an instance from its ID, an equivalent for handle function?
>
> Ma...
03/08/2021
- 01:35 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Another reason it is not often seen is the use of @super@ in the child class as the reference to call overridden pare...
- 01:31 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Interesting. I had not run across that restriction before. I guess the package visibility rules limit the cases whe...
- 12:57 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I just find it surprising that the 4GL does not allow child classes to access protected methods i... - 12:47 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- > @o:foo()@ produces a compile error when called from @Extension@ because @o@ is @Base@ and @foo()@ is protected.
... - 10:02 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- These tests have OO 4GL code usage. You must checkout the "skeletons":/projects/p2j/wiki/Object_Oriented_Classes_and...
- 08:41 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Vladimir is making changes to the date parsing in #4880. Are the ... - 07:21 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > if this is an issue in FWD is not because the ID's are incremental or random but with the fact that the actual (int...
- 06:52 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 12088
> The changes are OK for me.
> Ovidiu: If you are ... - 05:35 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
>
> This is a real issue. The embedded mode web client includes a kind of javascript appserver f...
03/07/2021
- 11:35 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- OK, defer the work. Please create a task for it.
- 10:57 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir is making changes to the date parsing in #4880. Are the issues overlapping?
I think #4... - 10:51 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- Vladimir is making changes to the date parsing in #4880. Are the issues overlapping?
Are the tests broken because... - 10:23 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- There are some differences in the error messages/codes reported by FWD in case of invalid literals, but the functiona...
- 10:17 AM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- What is left to do on this task?
- 10:34 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- See attached for the tests I used.
@o:foo()@ produces a compile error when called from @Extension@ because @o@ is ... - 10:07 AM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- As part of the changes for #4350, I'm switching the @exactMethodLookup()@ to use @candidates()@ for making a list of ...
- 09:13 AM Bug #5035 (Test): Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
03/06/2021
- 01:29 PM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Is there anything else to do here?
No.
- 10:41 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 12088
The changes are OK for me.
Ovidiu: If you are OK with the persiste... - 07:29 AM Bug #5035 (WIP): Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- The changes are in 3821c rev 12088.
Ovidiu: please review. - 10:17 AM Bug #4749: Conversion error for object indeterminate extent output parameter
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 12087
The changes are good. - 08:01 AM Bug #4749: Conversion error for object indeterminate extent output parameter
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please add javadoc to @ArrayAssigner.register(BaseDataType[] array)@ and @ArrayAssigner.registerD...
03/05/2021
- 04:05 PM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > I haven't touched com-handle field, I assume this is also mapped as Long in 4GL, but its weird to test in FWD. And ...
- 03:13 PM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- I've switched both handle and object fields to Long and incremental value. There are two more issues to check, unkn...
- 11:41 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > anyone can walk through session first object/handle and use next-sibling to get access to everything
Yes, this i... - 11:07 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- I find this illusion of security kinda funny, random or incremental is exactly the same in a single threaded environm...
- 10:33 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I understand it is more secure but does it break any existing 4GL behavior?
Only in cases of w... - 09:59 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > The major reason why the resource ID for the persistent procedures/handles/etc needs to be random is because you ca...
- 09:43 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This seems reasonable. Do I understand correctly that the internal representation will never be ... - 08:42 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > I have the changes to move the object ID to a long, incrementing value. This will be used by the toString and temp-...
- 05:18 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- I have the changes to move the object ID to a long, incrementing value. This will be used by the toString and temp-t...
- 07:36 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, the signature for @JsonArray:read@ as documented at https://docs.progress.com/bu... - 06:30 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I have a fix for the @jsonarray:read(handle)@ case - the conversion rules will emit the TableParameter for builtin OO...
- 05:39 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, the signature for @JsonArray:read@ as documented at https://docs.progress.com/bundle/openedge-abl-reference-1...
- 04:31 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > @bzr merge@ is not working. Please unbind your skeleton project,... - 04:16 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> @bzr merge@ is not working. Please unbind your skeleton project, bind to the xfer proje... - 04:03 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- @bzr merge@ is not working. Please unbind your skeleton project, bind to the xfer project, run @bzr update@ and afte...
- 03:58 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, please use the skeleton checkout from xfer, @/opt/fwd/skeleton@ to create the pa... - 03:34 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, please use the skeleton checkout from xfer, @/opt/fwd/skeleton@ to create the patch. That is at revision 99.
- 02:04 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, you've made some changes to JsonConstruct and the read(TableParameter) method is... - 07:22 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- > I have a set of testcases in our old/crappy testcase repo. I will check them in to the new/hotness testcases repo. ...
03/04/2021
- 04:30 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, you've made some changes to JsonConstruct and the read(TableParameter) method is now gone.
This code no lo... - 02:14 PM Support #5120: Date/Datetime - from iso
- The changes are in 3821c rev 12081.
Also, rev 1010 of the xfer testcases project contains a set of tests of how li... - 10:30 AM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > If you want I can go ahead and fill in the tests unless this is already ...
03/03/2021
- 03:27 PM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In other words, can you define the same dataset in 2 or more ways in source code?
Yes, you can ... - 08:41 AM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > If you want I can go ahead and fill in the tests unless this is already covered someplace else.... - 08:23 AM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- > If you want I can go ahead and fill in the tests unless this is already covered someplace else.
How much work is... - 08:09 AM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian/Ovidiu: Can you give me your best understanding of the answers to the above questions? ... - 07:32 AM Feature #4350: method overload when they differ by a temp-table, dataset, buffer or object or ext...
- In regard to dataset and dataset-handle parameters, I need some help.
* Based on the 4GL docs, these are described... - 12:30 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- I have same issues with regular methods and constructors. Even regular method got same error with output table parame...
03/02/2021
- 08:09 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- Coincidentally, I am already working on this root cause in #4350. The problem is that we need to better handle metho...
- 07:40 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- test.p file....
03/01/2021
- 09:59 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- Please post a standalone example so that we can recreate the problem here.
- 09:46 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- I just pasted "*" due to the data safety of current project source code names. This error occurs in filenames without...
- 05:28 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Please post a small test which shows this problem. The reference is decremented somewhere where it should not be.
- 05:17 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Each object var definition should be declared outside the top-level block (in the Java m... - 03:57 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian Edu wrote:
> This is part of the 'OO SDK' and as per your suggestion everything under @com.goldencode.p2j.oo@... - 03:48 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Also, I see lots of classes have @null@ as the referent in i.e. its @BlockManager.functi...
02/26/2021
- 07:51 PM Feature #4378: properly handle clob/lonchar assignment, especially the implicit codepage conversion
- Actually the dereference operation pose other issues. The COPY-LOB is also not working correctly when a dereferenced ...
02/25/2021
02/24/2021
- 11:19 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- > ./abl/*.p:741:37: unexpected token: GetData
> ...
> 2.Error processing .*.p --- Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerE... - 11:08 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- > unexpected token: strict-entity-resolution
Correct, in your version of FWD we did not recognise this attribute a... - 08:43 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian Edu wrote:
> How should we proceed were, a new merge or just wait for the new 4384 branch and fix whatever ne... - 07:55 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, there are some compile errors -
> [...]
>
> Is this a typo? Shouldn't each ... - 08:40 AM Bug #4749 (Test): Conversion error for object indeterminate extent output parameter
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 12052
Overall, the changes are good.
Please add javadoc to @ArrayAssigne...
02/23/2021
- 12:50 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Branch 4384i was created from branch 3821c revision 12052.
Marian: please review revision 12051, it fixes some com... - 12:45 PM Bug #4749: Conversion error for object indeterminate extent output parameter
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> As for the dynamic array issues - the root cause was the fact that the Java reference fo... - 12:21 PM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- > Greg: I think we need a 4384i branch?
Yes. Please make one as soon as you are happy with the 3821c starting point. - 12:18 PM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian, there are some compile errors - ...
- 12:12 PM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, 4384h on xfer is still on rev 12004 - although I think is a little old, is still... - 12:04 PM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian, 4384h on xfer is still on rev 12004 - although I think is a little old, is still good, because I could use it...
- 02:46 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I've pushed 3821c revision 12046 to xfer. Do you want to branch from that, apply your changes ... - 10:26 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- Yes, GeneralInfoPart is my class....
- 08:44 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- > Does your tool support cast() function in that way?
Yes, FWD does support chaining a method call off of a @cast(... - 08:40 AM Feature #5160: About cast() function support
- From Deividas:
> I have issue in conversion process that error show up with cast() function
> ... - 05:05 AM Feature #5160 (New): About cast() function support
02/22/2021
- 07:20 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- > I've pushed 3821c revision 12046 to xfer. Do you want to branch from that, apply your changes and provide a bzr se...
- 07:18 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > since there seems to be some automatic changes applied to 'oo' packages should we make a new b... - 06:55 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- > since there seems to be some automatic changes applied to 'oo' packages should we make a new branch to incorporate...
- 04:09 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Constantin, just to clarify, the default to P.L.O is not for the (newly added) return type but f... - 03:08 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I agree that the return type should be added. But the approach to 'default to PLO' if t... - 08:14 PM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Perhaps the default value for @LegacySignature.returns()@ should be "VOID".
As for the poly cases, I think they sh... - 03:24 AM Bug #5029: OO constructor with array input parameter
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Marian, regarding #5029-15 - I've tried duplicating using this test:
> [...]
>
> But...
02/21/2021
- 11:28 AM Feature #5146: record additional legacy class and method data in annotations
- 3821c rev 12042 to 12044 fixes the 'extent', 'qualified' and adds 'returns' annotation to all legacy p2j.oo methods. ...
- 11:27 AM Feature #4965 (WIP): Parameter annotation - qualified
- All changes are in 3821c revs 12042 to 12044.
I did not touch the poly methods/parameters:... - 09:27 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- I've built a tool which automatically edits the source code for the @com.goldencode.p2j.oo@ classes and injects @qual...
02/19/2021
- 04:15 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- Lets assume you have a protected instance method @Base.foo@ and a class @Extension@ which extends @Base@.
# in a met... - 03:57 PM Bug #4978: Static method call in base class
- We need to be careful using qualified/unqualified. Most of the time when we say qualified, we mean the "package" por...
- 01:28 PM Bug #4978 (WIP): Static method call in base class
- The same behavior where the static member from a super-class can be accessed from a sub-class is allowed for variable...
- 03:11 PM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I already have code to calculate the return type using reflection and the existing annotations.... - 11:38 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- > I already have code to calculate the return type using reflection and the existing annotations.
3821c rev 12032 ... - 11:09 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- I already have code to calculate the return type using reflection and the existing annotations. I will check it in s...
- 11:05 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- It was easy to write a simple tool to check the @p2j.oo@ methods which have @LegacySignature@. The list of problems ...
- 09:59 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- > You mentioned at some point that the method's return type is not in LegacySignature - where was this logged?
See... - 09:47 AM Feature #4965: Parameter annotation - qualified
- Greg, you mentioned at some point that the method's return type is not in LegacySignature - where was this logged?
... - 01:55 PM Bug #4749: Conversion error for object indeterminate extent output parameter
- The conversion issue for @ObjectExtentGlobal@ is already fixed.
As for the dynamic array issues - the root cause w... - 11:14 AM Bug #5029: OO constructor with array input parameter
- Marian, regarding #5029-15 - I've tried duplicating using this test:...
- 10:55 AM Feature #5146: record additional legacy class and method data in annotations
- Regarding the return type for function and OO methods - my only problem is that there are ~3000 hand-written classes ...
02/18/2021
- 12:17 PM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > is there a way to resolve an instance from its ID, an equivalent for handle function?
>
> Ma... - 10:24 AM Bug #5035: Temp-Table index on P.L.O field
- > is there a way to resolve an instance from its ID, an equivalent for handle function?
Marian: We need your thoug... - 10:22 AM Bug #4749 (WIP): Conversion error for object indeterminate extent output parameter
02/16/2021
- 04:42 PM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- I've added wiki documentation that lists our currently "supported built-in OO classes":/projects/p2j/wiki/Object_Orie...
- 01:58 PM Bug #5029 (Test): OO constructor with array input parameter
- 01:12 PM Bug #5029: OO constructor with array input parameter
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> OK, that's because my tests always had the INPUT modifier. I'll fix this.
>
> For no...
02/15/2021
- 08:20 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Please use this patch. It will be in 3821c in the next couple of days....
- 08:04 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Marian, the root cause is because the reference is incremented when the INPUT parameter is initialized in the propert...
- 02:37 AM Feature #4384: Builtin OO Implementation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> As long as you use @TypeFactory.object@ or @UndoableFactory.object@ to initialize a prop...
Also available in: Atom