Activity
From 10/11/2025 to 11/09/2025
11/07/2025
- 12:37 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > In order to pass one of tests I had to make FILE-INFO:FILE-SIZE to reread file size.
> Was it static on purpose (...
11/06/2025
- 03:43 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg
In order to pass one of tests I had to make FILE-INFO:FILE-SIZE to reread file size.
Was it static on purpos... - 01:28 PM Bug #10831 (Review): Incorrect handling of UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error> causes IllegalStateExceptio...
- Please review.
- 01:27 PM Bug #10831 (WIP): Incorrect handling of UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error> causes IllegalStateException t...
- Task branch 10831a was created and the fix was committed. With r16262 the double rollback is gone and the exception i...
- 01:14 PM Bug #10831: Incorrect handling of UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error> causes IllegalStateException to be t...
- As noted in the title, there is a flaw in handling of statements @UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error>@ if this occurs in a @CA...
- 12:53 PM Bug #10831 (Closed): Incorrect handling of UNDO, RETURN ERROR <error> causes IllegalStateExceptio...
- 08:26 AM Bug #10567 (Internal Test): same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- I am OK with the changes in 10567a. they are cleaner than my attempt in #10818 in fact :)
- 07:54 AM Bug #9906 (Closed): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- 06:25 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir: Please post the commit message here and we can close the task.
The branch 9906b was ... - 04:06 AM Bug #9906 (Merge Pending): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- 04:06 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Vladimir: Please post the commit message here and we can close the task.
- 03:51 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- > There is no active 9906b branch to review.
I approved merge in #7143-1731 after reviewing in #7143. I wasn't awa... - 03:38 AM Bug #9906 (Review): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- 02:53 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- There is no active 9906b branch to review.
11/05/2025
- 04:27 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Another OE 11.7 difference:
You can set @LOG-MANAGER:LOGGING-LEVEL@ only to a value greater than it was already set,... - 02:14 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> It means that any version specific code should be protected. If there is existing code that work... - 02:40 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Hynek, please review. Could 9906b rev. 16259. be merged into the trunk?
11/04/2025
- 03:07 PM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> This change introduced a regression due to overly restrictive access to date methods (s... - 02:12 PM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- This change introduced a regression due to overly restrictive access to date methods (see #7143-1728).
I created 990...
11/03/2025
- 03:54 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg
While working on ABLUnit tests for LOG-MANAGER I had a major problem with resetting LOG-MANAGER state to defaul...
10/30/2025
- 09:49 AM Bug #10391 (Test): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Branch *10391b* was merged into trunk as rev. *16254* and archived.
- 09:39 AM Bug #10391 (Merge Pending): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Please merge 10391b to trunk now.
- 09:37 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Șerban Bursuc wrote:
> Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > Serban, can you confirm that 10391b is fixing the OG issue in the... - 09:34 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Serban, can you confirm that 10391b is fixing the OG issue in the customer application?
... - 09:22 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Serban, can you confirm that 10391b is fixing the OG issue in the customer application?
- 04:27 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- > Alexandru: we need this in trunk if we are making a release today.
I will be doing a delivery today. Please focu... - 03:48 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Alexandru: we need this in trunk if we are making a release today.
- 04:45 AM Feature #10467: Make READ-JSON dataset handle method able to read json files not containing the n...
- I tested with both trunk and 9457c again today and no.
10/29/2025
- 03:29 PM Feature #10467: Make READ-JSON dataset handle method able to read json files not containing the n...
- Paul: is this fixed already by other tasks?
- 05:11 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Rebased *10352a* to trunk revision *16250*.
- 05:01 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Teodor: please rebase 10352a.
10/28/2025
- 10:07 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please add history entries.
Sorry for that. Committed rev *16252* on branch *10391b*.... - 09:57 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- +Eugenie
Paul: Please update [[regression:Open Regressions in FWD v4]] to add a entry for this issue. - 09:55 AM Bug #10391: Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Please add history entries.
- 09:53 AM Bug #10391 (Review): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Created task branch *10391b* and committed rev. *16251* that fixes the regression found in #7143-1723
10/27/2025
- 10:06 AM Bug #10391 (WIP): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Paul - please work on a standalone testcase for #7143-1723 and lets discuss it.
10/24/2025
- 08:06 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- That is a fair point, Ovidiu. I've been thinking about a similar solution. As you note, we would not want to change...
10/23/2025
- 04:41 PM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Delia Mitric wrote:
> Sure, here is an example:
> [...]
This is very interesting. It shows how OE will use the mem... - 07:50 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Don't we already handle this conversion in the @Stream@ and subclasses?
As I've noticed, the... - 12:56 PM Bug #9906 (Closed): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- 12:37 PM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Please merge 9906a to trunk.
Merged as rev. 16241 - 11:11 AM Bug #9906 (Merge Pending): Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Please merge 9906a to trunk.
- 10:01 AM Feature #9955 (Test): Implement ClientPrincipal:TENANT-ID and ClientPrincipal:TENANT-NAME
- Branch 9955a was merged to trunk rev. 16239 and archived.
- 08:00 AM Feature #9955 (Merge Pending): Implement ClientPrincipal:TENANT-ID and ClientPrincipal:TENANT-NAME
- This can be merged after 10542a.
- 08:48 AM Bug #10558 (Test): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- Branch 10558a was merged to trunk rev. 16234 and archived.
- 07:58 AM Bug #10558 (Merge Pending): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABL...
- 07:58 AM Bug #10558: READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- This can be merged after 10519a.
- 08:42 AM Bug #10519 (Test): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Branch 10519a was merged to trunk rev. 16233 and archived.
- 07:57 AM Bug #10519 (Merge Pending): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- This can be merged after 10509a.
- 08:37 AM Bug #10509 (Test): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- Branch *10509a* was merged to trunk rev. *16232* and archived.
- 07:57 AM Bug #10509 (Merge Pending): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- This can be merged after 10455a.
- 08:24 AM Bug #10336 (Test): Issue on object deletion: java.lang.IllegalStateException
- Branch 10336b was merged to trunk rev. 16230 and archived.
- 07:56 AM Bug #10336 (Merge Pending): Issue on object deletion: java.lang.IllegalStateException
- This can be merged after 10391a.
- 08:20 AM Bug #10391 (Test): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Branch *10391a* was merged into trunk as rev. *16229* and archived.
- 07:52 AM Bug #10391 (Merge Pending): Comparisons methods not returning the correct result in poly cases
- Paul, please merge 10391a now.
10/22/2025
- 01:12 PM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Rebased to latest trunk, fixed after rebase to make it compile... - 03:03 AM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Rebased to latest trunk, fixed after rebase to make it compile. Revno is now 16235.
> ... - 09:00 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > I have an access to OE 11.7 - should I update @tests/logmanager@ tests... - 08:53 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I have an access to OE 11.7 - should I update @tests/logmanager@ tests to make them work ? Whic... - 08:43 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > I have an access to OE 11.7 - should I update @tests/logmanager@ tests to make them work ? Which OE version should ...
- 08:06 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Tomasz Domin wrote:
> I've started with testcases examples (tests/logmanager).
I've executed @testcases/tests/log... - 08:01 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > What if str1 is built from many CHR results with different targetCodepages?
>
> I see your ... - 06:55 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- > What if str1 is built from many CHR results with different targetCodepages?
I see your point that a single flag... - 04:19 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Before adding the the logic for "conversion" from *cpinternal* to *cpstream* for writing in files, there are some thi...
- 05:48 AM Bug #10613 (Closed): Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
10/21/2025
- 03:57 PM Bug #9906: Incorrect date parsing in FWD DATE(CHARACTER) implementation
- Rebased to latest trunk, fixed after rebase to make it compile. Revno is now 16235.
Can we merge this change now? ...
10/16/2025
- 07:37 AM Bug #10732: Fix Stream.assignDatum to handle all possible BDT types
- From Greg in #10707-6 :
>
> My concern is with the existing design.
>
> # We don't handle all possible BDT type... - 07:36 AM Bug #10732 (New): Fix Stream.assignDatum to handle all possible BDT types
- 06:51 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Anything left to be reviewed?
- 06:34 AM Bug #10624: DO WHILE that contains a FINALLY block can be executed too many times
- I am OK with the approach in 10624a, but I would also like a second opinion from Constantin.
My concern is mostly ...
10/15/2025
- 05:05 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Can I get logs from customer applications to find a baseline ?
>
> We can ask for some logs ...
10/14/2025
- 05:24 AM Bug #10203 (WIP): XMLs cannot be imported into a dataset without a schema present
- Committed revision *106220* on task branch *10203a*:
- Improved @DATASET:READ-XML@ infer support when DATASET node i... - 02:25 AM Bug #10203: XMLs cannot be imported into a dataset without a schema present
- Rebased branch @10203a@ to trunk revision @16219@.
- 03:54 AM Bug #10712 (Review): SAX-READER QName parameter is wrong
- Committed revision *16220* on task branch *10712a*:
- Fix for @START-ELEMENT@ and @END-ELEMENT@ sax-reader callback ... - 03:34 AM Bug #10712 (WIP): SAX-READER QName parameter is wrong
- Created task branch *10712a*.
- 03:33 AM Bug #10712: SAX-READER QName parameter is wrong
- There is the following standalone test:
{{Collapse(TestSaxReaderQName.cls)... - 03:29 AM Bug #10712 (Closed): SAX-READER QName parameter is wrong
10/13/2025
- 08:34 AM Bug #10636 (Review): 4GL FOR FIRST LEAVE statement exits the function
- Committed revision *16215* on task branch *10636a*:
- NEXT/LEAVE points to the outer block, when the current FOR BLO...
Also available in: Atom