Activity
From 03/22/2013 to 04/20/2013
04/20/2013
- 06:54 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130420a.zip/vmn_upd20130420b.zip as replacement of vmn_upd20130416a.zip/vmn_upd201304...
04/19/2013
- 05:55 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Current status of BUFFER-COMPARE/BUFFER-COPY runtime support.
My estimation for changes related with fixing notes 1... - 04:45 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
>In RecordBuffer.createSimpleFieldsMap, you have the following:
>if (operationType == Opera... - 02:54 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- But BUFFER-COPY method does not create record. There are no mentions about this in
documentation and example below a... - 01:40 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> > Maybe I am wrong, during testing I understood that statement wor... - 09:50 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Maybe I am wrong, during testing I understood that statement works but does nothing in this... - 09:33 AM Feature #2122 (WIP): add runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- 11:12 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Code review 20130410a:
Wow! Quite a bit of change. Looks good overall; some comments/questions below:
* Plea...
04/18/2013
- 06:32 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
>
> In RecordBuffer.setCompareMode(BaseDataType, character), why are you turning on case sen... - 06:25 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
>
> In @RecordBuffer.copy(DataModelObject, String[], boolean, DataModelObject, boolean)@, yo... - 03:48 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Sorry, I don't know how to disable this, and what I found online suggested there is not a simple way to just turn off...
- 03:09 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- The reason of some formatting errors is unpleasant Ubuntu's feature: paste on middle mouse click.
Sometimes it happ... - 02:44 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Code review 20130416a:
Along with your changes, you have introduced some formatting and javadoc issues in BufferIm... - 04:46 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> I did source comparison because I applied the patch for Hibernate and built it from source... - 04:45 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- > The name discrepancy is confusing. Did you do a source or binary comparison?
>
> Let's use the standard, final,... - 04:31 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Did you do an import (e.g., p2j_test database) to test the ImportWorker changes?
- 04:25 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- The name discrepancy is confusing. Did you do a source or binary comparison?
Let's use the standard, final, binar... - 04:11 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- I checked this version out of git. I don't know why version in build.gradle is called "4.1.9-SNAPSHOT", but the code ...
- 03:56 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Are all the Hibernate-related jars whose names have the word SNAPSHOT in them the most recent, _stable_ releases? Us...
- 11:07 AM Feature #2120 (WIP): add runtime support for dynamically prepared queries
- 11:05 AM Feature #2127: complete runtime support for dynamically prepared queries
- This task includes:
* complex WHERE clauses using natural joins (i.e., the OF keyword) or dynamic temp-tables;
* op... - 11:04 AM Feature #2127 (Closed): complete runtime support for dynamically prepared queries
- 10:40 PM Feature #2126: add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime internal use
- This feature is needed for permanent tables to enable bulk delete with embedded SQL and with delete loops optimized b...
- 10:27 PM Feature #2126 (Closed): add support for table-level locking (share and exclusive) for runtime int...
- 10:22 PM Bug #2083 (Closed): client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- 10:08 PM Feature #2125: add runtime support for dynamic buffer creation and cleanup
- Please post hours here but post history in the parent issue.
- 10:07 PM Feature #2125 (Closed): add runtime support for dynamic buffer creation and cleanup
04/17/2013
- 06:21 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- The attached update fixes conversion of the INITIAL buffer field attribute (was converting to operate on BUFFER handl...
- 04:27 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- > Hm...I'm not crazy about this as a solution.
I agree, I just needed to run regression testing ASAP.
I have ... - 11:29 AM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> OK, I've added all P2J classes into p2jpl.jar. It seems that the problem has disappeared.
... - 03:15 PM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- Proposed development approach:
* perform testing in note 5 to determine whether assumptions are correct;
* implemen... - 02:53 PM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- As alluded to above, it appears that the metadata tables are the backing data store for many of the handle-based attr...
- 02:11 PM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- We need a runtime facility to map between legacy (4GL) file/field names and converted (P2J) file/field names, for thi...
- 01:57 PM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- Minimum fields we need to support in @_Field@ table due to customer use:
* _field-name
* _file-recid
* _label
* _... - 01:04 PM Feature #2115: add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
- Minimum fields we need to support in @_File@ table due to customer use:
* _file-name
* _dump-name
* _file-label
*... - 07:41 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130416a.zip/vmn_upd20130416b.zip as replacement of vmn_upd20130413a.zip/ vmn_upd20130...
04/16/2013
- 05:55 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- OK, I've added all P2J classes into p2jpl.jar. It seems that the problem has disappeared.
- 05:29 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Sorry, as the result the message changed to ...
- 05:20 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- I've reinstalled jar for the database on lightning I'm using - no result.
- 04:50 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- When you run dangerous_db_restore.sh to prepare for a new regression harness run, it installs p2jpl.jar in the new da...
- 04:33 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Eric, "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/goldencode/p2j/net/SilentUnwindException" error occurs only on lightning s...
- 09:15 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> ... - 08:08 AM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- Yes, my testcases converts fine. They are attached.
You can close the issue. - 09:35 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> BTW, I have fixed one more problem with wrong field order in result (not included to last u...
04/15/2013
- 07:08 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Issue 0:
The first issue to fix, the log full of it: ... - 06:03 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Issue 2:
Reproduction:
4 - C - Y - A
Enter data:
I
1029
Stacktrace:... - 04:00 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Issue 1:
Reproduction:
V - O - 1 - W - 2
_Data to enter:_
283338
3.1.5
3.2.2
34000
35000
Stacktrace:
<pre...
04/13/2013
- 06:47 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- BTW, I have fixed one more problem with wrong field order in result (not included to last update I sent). Now fields ...
- 06:38 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I still think the field names are handled incorrectly. It happens to work in this case, beca...
04/12/2013
- 06:39 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130413a.zip/vmn_upd20130413b.zip as replacement of vmn_upd20130328a.zip/ vmn_upd20130...
04/11/2013
- 06:17 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- vmn_upd20130411a.zip is fine. You can check it in and distribute it. It should have no risk to the conversion and s...
- 05:57 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Attached update vmn_upd20130411a.zip is replacement of vmn_upd20130409a.zip, merged with revision 10336
- 05:50 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I assume the appropriate @tt1@ record has to be referenced from a previous lookup, like FIND... - 05:44 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Yes, it seems this is converting wrong. We should have another variant of @RecordBuffer.com... - 05:26 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> > > Will P2J support @SAVE RESULT IN@ ... - 02:50 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review for vmn_upd20130409a.zip:
>
> 1. Please remove the recordOrDisplayError() variants... - 02:20 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> > Will P2J support @SAVE RESULT IN@ option in @BUFFER-COMPARE@?
>... - 01:18 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Code Review for vmn_upd20130409a.zip:
1. Please remove the recordOrDisplayError() variants. It is too confusing t... - 10:07 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Will P2J support @SAVE RESULT IN@ option in @BUFFER-COMPARE@?
Yes, we need to support th... - 02:43 PM Feature #1652: add conversion and runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- In addition to the requirements in note 1, we will have to deal with the following:
* name conversion, to ensure tab... - 01:11 PM Feature #2122: add runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- This issue is meant to track hours for implementing runtime support. All history/discussion should be posted to the ...
- 01:10 PM Feature #2122 (Closed): add runtime support for dynamically prepared temp-tables
- 12:47 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- SO creation error was related to already solved boolean literal rendering issue, it turned out that one file was merg...
04/10/2013
- 05:57 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Will P2J support @SAVE RESULT IN@ option in @BUFFER-COMPARE@?
- 03:34 PM Feature #1658: improve database trigger support
- My estimates:
1. 3 h - Allow registration for WRITE and FIND schema triggers.
2. 16 h, need to find these proper ... - 02:55 PM Feature #1658: improve database trigger support
- What needs to be done:
1. Allow registration for WRITE and FIND schema triggers.
2. Fire WRITE and FIND triggers ...
04/09/2013
- 05:29 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- @lib/hibernate3.jar@ and @lib/ehcache-1.1.jar@ should be removed.
- 01:29 PM Feature #2120: add runtime support for dynamically prepared queries
- A prototype will integrate limited conversion support into the runtime environment, such that given a set of buffers ...
- 01:18 PM Feature #2120 (Closed): add runtime support for dynamically prepared queries
- 11:56 AM Bug #2034: correct conversion of CAN-FIND({FIRST|LAST} ... {SHARE-LOCK|EXCLUSIVE_LOCK} [NO-WAIT])
- On second thought, as long as the sort phrase is correct, @hasAny@ will find the correct first or last record. So, r...
- 10:58 AM Bug #2083: client-side where-clause leak in FindQuery
- Ovidiu, I would like to close out this issue. Please confirm that the test case(s) you were using work correctly wit...
- 05:11 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Greg, please check attached update vmn_upd20130409a.zip merged with revision 10336
I added method recordOrDisplayEr... - 10:36 PM Feature #2118 (Closed): add runtime support for _index and _index-field metadata tables
- 10:35 PM Feature #2117 (Closed): add runtime support for _lock metadata table
- 10:34 PM Feature #2116 (Closed): add runtime support for _user metadata table
- 10:33 PM Feature #2115 (Closed): add runtime support for _file and _field metadata tables
04/08/2013
- 06:21 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim: please prepare a separate update with the ErrorManager related changes. I know you have ongoing work on the b...
- 09:53 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin: I think that Vadim is trying to create an alternate version of ErrorManager.recordOrShowError() that does...
- 05:10 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- Please post an update including your work so far, so I can begin reviewing.
- 03:19 PM Feature #1580: upgrade Hibernate to latest level
- At this point I'm aware of the single issue which occurs on SO creation. I'll run regression testing in order to reve...
- 01:30 PM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- commited to bzr as revision 10336
- 01:22 PM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- updated file header comments
- 11:41 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- The changes in cs_upd20130405b.zip (a superset of 0405a) look good. Please update the file header comments to reflec...
04/06/2013
- 10:51 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- To display a message, use the @LogicalTerminal.message@ API from the business logic (note that each message gets wrap...
04/05/2013
- 06:08 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> For cases when ERROR condition is not raised but messages are still shown, the new @di... - 05:03 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > You described how to implement runtime behavior similar to 4GL in each concrete case. But my question was actually ...
- 06:04 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- chr also exist in postgress , renamed it to toChr, didn't find anything for the others.
- 04:47 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Added update
- 04:13 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- It seems "replace" already is a function name in PostgreSql. I will replace "replace" with "replaceText" and search f...
04/04/2013
- 05:59 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> I have attached update vmn_upd20130401a.zip/vmn_upd20130401b.zip
> It contains @FETCH-SELE... - 04:46 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- You described how to implement runtime behavior similar to 4GL in each concrete case. But my question was actually no...
- 03:18 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > I still don't understand how ErrorManager will recognize what mode (silent or not) should be used. From examples I ...
- 02:38 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> # add the new @ErrorManager.displayOrLogError@ API now, so you can use it for error mess...
04/03/2013
- 01:16 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- The Text.setTemporaryCaseSensitive (actually the entire class) is extracted from the character.java class. I don't th...
- 08:23 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * Please re-read the JavaDoc for @Text.setTemporaryCaseSensitive@. I'm not sure it was meant... - 07:17 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > Again, the testcase does not help us in determining the ... - 06:13 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Again, the testcase does not help us in determining the NO-ERROR behavior, as a runtime ...
04/02/2013
- 12:48 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > > *class Date, line 1435* - note 70
> Should I fix it directly in CVS without sending special update and regressio... - 12:19 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Please edit each case and add the value of the ERROR:NUM-MESSAGES attribute (you can add ...
04/01/2013
- 05:58 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Code review 20130328a:
>
> * Why have you commented out the re-throwing of the @reason@ T... - 04:41 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130401a.zip/vmn_upd20130401b.zip
It contains @FETCH-SELECTED-ROW()@ conversion, usin... - 11:46 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Please edit each case and add the value of the ERROR:NUM-MESSAGES attribute (you can add it in the same MESSAGE line ...
03/31/2013
- 05:36 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Vadim Nebogatov wrote:
> Duding testing I have found out that @FETCH-SELECTED-ROW()@ conversion requires @BrowseWidg... - 05:35 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Code review 20130328a:
* Why have you commented out the re-throwing of the @reason@ Throwable in @BlockManager.pro...
03/30/2013
- 06:45 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
*class <Not found in code>*
Example:...- 06:42 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class <Not found in code>*
Example:... - 06:40 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class <Not found in code>*
Example:... - 06:37 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class ControlFlowOps, line 3519*
Example:... - 05:57 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Moved to #2106, note 2
*class <Not found in code>*
Example:... - 05:43 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Moved to #2106, note 1
*class <Not found in code>*
Example:... - 05:29 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- this note should be ignored according note 85
*class HandleOps, line 67*
Example:... - 05:24 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class handle, line 254*
Example:... - 05:18 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Moved from #2080, notes 3,4
*class BrowseWidget, line 751*
Example:... - 04:59 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class NumberType, line 3189*
Example:... - 04:55 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class ControlFlowOps, line 3577*
Example:... - 04:36 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class ControlFlowOps, line 2991*
Example:...
03/29/2013
- 05:32 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- *class Date, line 1435*
Example:... - 04:48 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- In regard to the use of an .odt document for reporting information about the errors, I prefer that you put the inform...
- 01:44 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have found also that @SESSION:TIMEZONE@ is not supported (but mentioned in code).
Example is ... - 12:43 PM Bug #2093 (Closed): VALEXP support in P2J
- 12:42 PM Bug #2093: VALEXP support in P2J
- At this moment, with the exception of the cases where the expression from the string condition is not valid, I don't ...
- 10:36 AM Bug #2093: VALEXP support in P2J
- Is there anything left to do on this issue or can it be closed?
- 10:26 AM Bug #2095 (Closed): FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- 09:43 AM Bug #2097 (Closed): FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- The fix has addressed the original problem and does not appear to have regressed anything else in the customer's serv...
- 09:19 AM Bug #2094 (Closed): OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
03/28/2013
- 06:59 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130328a.zip/vmn_upd20130328b.zip as replacement of vmn_upd20130326a.zip/ vmn_upd20130...
- 06:23 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric, sorry for so dangerous RecordBuffer.java. I think it was wrong bazaar merge with latest bzr revision. I do not ...
- 05:10 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Document with tests is updated
- 03:56 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Regarding vmn_upd20130326a.zip: there are hundreds of unnecessary/unwanted format changes in RecordBuffer, which mak...
- 01:07 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Duding testing I have found out that @FETCH-SELECTED-ROW()@ conversion requires @BrowseWidget.fetchSelectedRow()@ wit...
03/27/2013
- 06:22 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached some first test cases. Is such format would be ok?
Please notice that I found also some cases that ... - 03:17 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- The update has passed conversion regression testing and is committed to bzr rev. 10333.
- 02:20 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- A fix candidate is attached. Currently running it through conversion regression testing.
03/26/2013
- 05:22 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have attached update vmn_upd20130326a.zip/ vmn_upd20130326b.zip
with current state of BUFFER-COPY() and BUFFER-COM... - 09:58 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I want to resolve this properly as part of this work. This includes any cases of ErrorManager.displayError() that sh...
- 03:23 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> ...but I wonder if we shouldn't treat the first @each person@ the same like @each w-person@... - 09:57 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- I understand. The algorithm is working in fact if you analyze the first clause that works.
And starting from here, I... - 09:31 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The reason why the where clause filtered to client-side is probably the @where_clause_prep2... - 04:44 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- The reason why the where clause filtered to client-side is probably the @where_clause_prep2.rules@. You can read in i...
- 02:53 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- I have isolated the #2068 note 272 regression like this:...
03/25/2013
- 04:31 PM Bug #2097 (Review): FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- The ecf_upd20130325e.zip update (finally) has passed conversion regression testing; there are some differences in th...
- 03:56 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Hopefully the final candidate; conversion regression testing it now.
- 01:39 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Another candidate, in conversion regression testing now.
- 09:49 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- While there are a number of expected differences, there are also still some regressions, though far fewer than the la...
- 05:37 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Fix candidate for regressions. Testing now.
- 04:53 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- This update regresses many files in Majic; cannot check it in.
- 03:59 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- Missed a bit of cleanup in one of the files.
- 03:48 AM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- A fix candidate and test cases are attached. I am currently putting the fix through conversion regression testing. ...
- 03:58 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- OK, I forgot that the ERROR attribute is set for error conditions raised when the NO-ERROR clause is used (this expla...
- 03:30 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin,
I have removed @SESSION:SUPPRESS-WARNINGS = YES.@ and started from command line. But it did not affect ... - 05:42 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I do not understand which line of code generates the 9039 and 12860 messages. Please remove the @SESSION:SUPPRESS-WAR...
- 01:01 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- The current fix doesn't work for all cases, e.g.:
1. REPEAT PRESELECT.
2. DEFINE QUERY.
Note that FIELDS/EXCEP... - 11:42 PM Bug #2095 (Review): FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- The update has passed conversion regression testing and I have committed it to bzr rev. 10329.
- 10:43 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- The update looks good to me. I am running conversion regression testing on it now.
- 08:00 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Fixes the cases specified in note #2. Probably fixes all other cases too.
03/24/2013
- 05:33 PM Bug #2101 (Closed): multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not c...
- I've compared conversions of the customer's server project with and without this fix and it seems correct in all the ...
- 09:46 PM Bug #2101 (Review): multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not c...
- Update ecf_upd20130323a.zip has passed conversion regression testing and is committed to bzr rev. 10325.
- 08:23 PM Bug #2101: multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not converting...
- Although I'm not the assignee, in having to think through the problem for the above post, I took a quick look at the ...
- 05:27 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- BTW, location of the original problem is pmplan/gapptfn5.p.cache, line 700.
- 05:25 PM Bug #2094 (Review): OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- Passed conversion regression testing, committed to bzr revision 10328. I'll do a separate server folder conversion wi...
- 05:03 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- Change looks good to me. Please check in and distribute if/when it passes conversion regression testing.
- 04:04 PM Bug #2094 (WIP): OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- 03:47 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- Properly handles the @OUTER-JOIN@ and @LEFT OUTER-JOIN@ to convert the same.
- 03:37 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- This update adds support for the OUTER-JOIN clause for a record phrase. -The LEFT OUTER-JOIN will not emit anything.-...
- 10:09 PM Bug #2094: OUTER-JOIN record phrase option not honored
- The following:...
- 05:10 PM Bug #2097: FOR EACH with multiple, nested CAN-FINDs converts badly
- I'm working toward what I think the correct conversion would be:...
- 04:29 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin, I use ErrorManager.recordOrThrowError.
In my example above, 4GL meets errors 9039 and 12860 with differ... - 07:29 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- PS: about @SESSION:SUPPRESS-WARNINGS = YES.@. Note that in the 4GL editor, if you run a program which doesn't set the...
- 07:26 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > Another observation. Not all 4GL errors throw “exceptions”, some of them look like not critical errors or warnings,...
- 07:20 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Another observation. Not all 4GL errors throw “exceptions”, some of them look like not critical errors or warnings, e...
- 03:53 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- > Conversion code should also support this option, returning value if ON-ERROR is set (current behaviour) and propaga...
- 03:51 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Constantin: yes, it is just switch in behavior I was looking.
Conversion code should also support this option, retur... - 03:07 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Eric/Vadim: there is another way to supress the 4GL's errors, the @NO-ERROR@ clause. When trying to understand when a...
- 02:02 AM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Yes, I also think so. Return value has no sense if 4gl propagates its "exceptions". I only thought that maybe this pr...
- 09:26 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- This indicates that the idiom of:...
- 10:11 PM Bug #2084 (Closed): Conversion misplaced parameter for can-find statement
- 10:10 PM Feature #2000 (Closed): add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- 09:49 PM Feature #2092 (Closed): add server-side database support for several builtin functions
03/23/2013
- 06:54 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- This update has passed conversion regression testing (CA 0323d used deleteRecord for the "quick_delete" loops, instea...
- 12:58 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- ca_upd20130323d.zip update looks good to me. If it passes conversion regression testing (expect some changes to Maji...
- 12:52 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Replaces ca_upd2013023a.zip, and has the changes from note 105.
- 12:33 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- You are not missing anything, this is the first time I touch embedded sqls, so that's why the questions. Now I have a...
- 12:30 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- This refers to:...
- 12:23 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- For embedded SQL, I was referring to this rule in convert/database_access:...
- 12:19 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Let's use:...
- 11:38 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Eric: the ca_upd20130323a.zip has regressions. I see that the Buffer.delete API is used by other cases, like DELETE s...
- 10:23 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- This update changes the API for BUFFER-DELETE to deleteRecord, because else will collide with the resource's delete()...
- 06:53 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- Also I have noticed the difference in behavior of 4GL and converted code.
I am comparing a lot of tests in the form... - 06:50 PM Bug #2101: multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not converting...
- This issue was first reported in note 192 of #2068.
The following converts badly:... - 06:34 PM Bug #2101 (Closed): multi-buffer FOR loop with rowid and to-rowid functions in WHERE clause not c...
03/22/2013
- 05:38 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- > I still think the include/exclude call should directly follow the associated addComponent call. I think it is easie...
- 05:31 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- I guess there's one more option; chain the call, as in:...
- 05:04 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- So if the full list of options is:
1. Add the list of fields to query c'tor / addComponent
2. include(String ...) -... - 04:34 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> For a multi-table query the buffer should be specified, but as an option we can have quali... - 04:28 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- For a multi-table query the buffer should be specified, but as an option we can have qualified field names:...
- 03:32 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- OK, but please emit this method immediately after the associated @addComponent@ call.
> ... - 03:07 PM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Unless someone has objections, for multi-component queries, I'll make include/exclude methods of the parent query:
<... - 11:42 AM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- > Removes FIELDS/EXCEPT nodes.
Thanks, I'm starting server folder conversion, hope nothing new will appear. - 11:36 AM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Removes FIELDS/EXCEPT nodes.
- 10:38 AM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- OK
- 10:14 AM Bug #2095: FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options not honored
- Stanislav: if it doesn't take you long to build some rules which just drop/hide the FIELDS/EXCEPT nodes (so they will...
- 02:32 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Costin Savin wrote:
> Well theoreticaly it is already there because both Buffer and TempTable extend it, but probabl... - 02:32 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Well theoreticaly it is already there because both Buffer and TempTable extend it, but probably it's good to see it i...
- 02:12 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Costin, regarding cs_upd20130322b.zip - you forgot to add the new interface to HandleCommon. Please put it right afte...
- 01:43 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Commited as revision number 10317
- 01:07 PM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- cs_upd20130322b.zip has passed conversion regression testing. Please check it in and distribute.
- 10:54 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- cs_upd20130322b.zip looks good. I am putting it through conversion regression testing.
It does look like we still... - 08:21 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- Added proposed update for missing addFieldToIndex methods. Moved the defaultBufferHandle() method form the Buffer int...
- 05:06 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- This class evolved a little. The @defaultBufferHandle()@ (implementation of @DEFAULT-BUFFER-HANDLE@) was at the begin...
- 04:35 AM Feature #1668: add support for additional (non-dynamic) database attributes
- > ADMData was my mistake (should have not added it, as I don't see the ADM-DATA attribute defined for the temp-table ...
- 02:15 PM Feature #2080: add runtime support for database methods
- I have noticed from testing in 4GL that error message...
- 10:46 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- CA 0322c.zip was committed to bzr revision 10315 and CA 0322e.zip to 10316.
- 10:40 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Both updates look good, please check them in.
- 09:30 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Both 0322c.zip and 0322e.zip have passed conversion regression testing.
- 07:42 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Adds missing @queryRows(integer)@ API.
- 06:49 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- Solved note 151 by always expanding array vars passed to the REPOSITION-TO-ROWID method. This avoids adding an @query...
- 06:06 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- I'm working on note 151.
- 05:23 AM Feature #1947: add conversion support for database methods
- See note 202 from #2068, which documents a server failure. Note that the @REPOSITION-TO-ROWID@ can accept mixed exten...
- 10:24 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- ca_upd20130322g.zip committed to bzr revision 10214.
- 09:15 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- The code looks fine. If it passes testing, check it in and distribute it.
- 09:11 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- Fixes a regression in the TABLE-HANDLE parameter conversion, introduced by 10293.
- 08:55 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- OK, I'll look at it.
- 08:15 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- It has been regressed since revision 10279.
Correct output is:... - 07:38 AM Feature #2000: add conversion support for table and table handle parameters
- Stanislav: did this convert properly after you added TABLE-HANDLE parameter support?...
- 08:18 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Go ahead and check this in immediately (and distribute it). It has no effect on conversion and it is already being r...
- 07:07 AM Feature #2092: add server-side database support for several builtin functions
- Removed the extra ' character from p2jpl.ddr at line 699
Also available in: Atom