Activity
From 11/19/2022 to 12/18/2022
12/16/2022
- 02:59 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Something is wrong in the @BufferImpl.fill()@ logic regarding child relations. In the @data_relation/recursive_relati...
- 03:48 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I need to iterate over a DATA-SOURCE twice - first with the original QUERY and then with the 'relaxed' one. What is t...
- 10:59 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I'm OK with the @6709-20221216.patch@.
You've tested conversion for both the large customer application and also H... - 09:53 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please post an updated patch for review.
> We emit the getter or the @FieldReference@ in @conv... - 08:30 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- > The bug is fixed and the conversion was successful. Should I commit the changes?
Please post an updated patch fo... - 03:31 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Danut, please address the bug and make sure to test conversion with that application.
The bug is... - 08:06 AM Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- I've made a mistake and used the wrong patch when testing previously. The second @removeRecords@ call didn't execute ...
12/15/2022
- 02:11 PM Bug #6997: OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- I returned to this testcase. I altered the original code a bit and I found more evidences in favour of confirming the...
- 08:36 AM Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Another update: after the last post I started working on a Factory design pattern for @SortCriterion@. This patch inc...
12/14/2022
- 02:07 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I've realized that we do not really need an auxiliary temporary table to use recursive CTE instead of iteration (see ...
- 02:31 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The FILL operation is QUERY driven. And that happens for each buffer affected (that is, aft... - 11:46 AM Bug #6997: OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- It does not make full sense. The BY-REFERENCE should be bound to the target table temporarily, hiding that table. As ...
- 05:46 AM Bug #6997: OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- In start.p, a temporary table @main@ is created which is assigned 1 element, then that table is used as an output par...
- 05:44 AM Bug #6997 (New): OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- 10:01 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Looks like the problem was caused by a @FOR FIRST table@ statement. Fixed by checking if the previous sibling of the ...
- 09:23 AM Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I am aware of the @force-no-undo@ setting which forces all tables into @no-undo@. If this flag is set, no @SavepointM...
- 06:27 AM Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- I've wrapped my head around this topic (@ProgressiveResults@ vs @ScrollingResults@) for a while now, so I can provide...
- 05:55 AM Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- Originally, my intention was to delete the records from a table based on the @targetMultiplex@ when the @outputParame...
- 04:22 AM Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Update: I noticed that @SortCriterion.toString@ gets called quite often so I had a look in that function to see if so...
12/13/2022
- 06:48 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> BTW: it looks that @FILL@ for recursive dataset can be very expensive since it can require ... - 11:56 AM Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I think @Session.log@ is responsible for logging the sub(tx) details needed for savepoints or rollback. This is enab...
- 11:13 AM Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I guess a simple first step is to profile typical flows in real applications and see if we can associate any bottlene...
- 11:08 AM Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- NO-UNDO temp-tables are used heavily in many 4GL applications. Typically, regular temp-tables are used as well, such ...
- 10:41 AM Feature #6995 (Closed): possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- 10:37 AM Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > consider way stronger optimizations directly in the H2 engine: this involves some extended work... - 07:47 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> As a side question, I see some changes from for-each structure into index based iteration: ... - 06:58 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- I got deep in most of the changes in rev. 8 - they seem reasonable. As a side question, I see some changes from for-e...
12/12/2022
- 02:29 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Based on my tests the @FILL@ for recursive DATA-RELATION add records which are not in the DATA-SOURCE QUERY only if b...
- 12:19 PM Feature #6928 (Review): H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- The changes are in fwd-h2 project rev 8.
Alexandru: please review. - 08:17 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I've uncommitted 3821c rev 14436. It causes the following regression in conversion for a large customer application....
- 04:29 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You can just do this:
> ...
12/10/2022
- 11:52 PM Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- Dănuț,
I am sorry for the delay, somehow the notification emails got lost at the bottom of the list and I only saw...
12/09/2022
- 10:30 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Eric: This is still waiting for review.
- 08:39 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > What puzzles me is the logic for 'relaxing' the @qEmp@ conditions to... - 08:19 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> What puzzles me is the logic for 'relaxing' the @qEmp@ conditions to find the parent record... - 07:45 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Please not that while the recursive relation does load the FK parent in the parent temp-table (s... - 05:32 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- The @data_relation/recursive_relation_fill.p@ test fails with FWD with @Cannot run GET methods on query qEmp until it...
- 04:51 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> >
> > > Marian,
> > > Is it correct that the DATA-SOURCE query shou... - 04:46 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>
> > Marian,
> > Is it correct that the DATA-SOURCE query should select a subset of a sin... - 08:16 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Regression is fixed, current revision number is 14434.
12/08/2022
- 04:40 PM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- > > 1. I don't think we should limit the for each processing to only match temp-tables and buffers. All record phrase...
- 04:32 PM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I think @FieldReference@ is less clean looking and it will be slower. In #4928, we do have some ideas to improve it ...
- 08:45 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- ...
- 03:24 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. I don't think we should limit the for each processing to only match temp-tables and buffers. A... - 04:33 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris, if you have a fix for the conversion regression, please commit it.
- 01:06 PM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Revision 6371a/14431 fixes some issues, including the following with the DMO interface assembly:
* a package path ... - 03:45 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>More than that, I understand that you aim for a 'fast-copy' mechanism where the rows are cop... - 03:27 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > > Oh, I see. Indeed, in this case we cannot be sure which versi... - 03:02 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Oh, I see. Indeed, in this case we cannot be sure which version of the CTE syntax to use.... - 05:59 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Oh, I see. Indeed, in this case we cannot be sure which version of the CTE syntax to use.
... - 01:31 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > It appears that DATASET:FILL() is not working at all for RECURS... - 05:57 AM Support #6708 (Review): track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Committed 3821c/rev.14425. Small fix. The number of invalidated queries displayed in the Overview was wrong when @OUT...
12/07/2022
- 04:42 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> It appears that DATASET:FILL() is not working at all for RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION (the @Data... - 11:56 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I'm thinking about adding support for a RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION by re-writing the DATA-SOUR... - 10:45 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- The @BufferImpl.fill()@ method is pretty long (400 lines of code) and complicated.
I'm thinking about adding support...
12/05/2022
- 03:01 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- It appears that DATASET:FILL() is not working at all for RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION (the @DataSet.getTopBufferList()@ re...
- 07:34 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Code Review 6709-rpt-20221205.diff
Good, it is getting closer.
1. I don't think we should limit the for each pr... - 03:51 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. Please switch out the use of a @Stack@ for the @ScopedSymbolDictionary@.
I made the @FOR EACH... - 06:07 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- My suspicion is the logical change in @XmlHelper.setAttribute()@ - I added a check for @value.isEmpty()@ and it proba...
- 12:51 AM Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I found that I was unable to convert test cases using 6371a/14119, with an error during anno... - 02:50 AM Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- After I did some investigation upon the @PreselectQuery.assembleHQL@ function, two types of optimization occurred to ...
- 02:13 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- |_. version |_. server run |_. client run |_. indexed (ms) |_. unindexed(ms) |
|h2-1.4.200.jar | 1...
12/02/2022
- 04:52 PM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Here are the results for two server runs, each with 5 client connection:
|\3=. First Run |/9. |\3=. Second Run |
|_... - 02:32 PM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Alexandru/Ovidiu: previously I uploaded the wrong jar (it was the rev 7 one, not the patched one). Please try with t...
- 09:09 AM Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Committed 3821c/rev.14409. Made a change in order to display the parent methods in the 4GL code by the number of call...
- 08:44 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> However, FWD in this case generates no row data at all.
It appears that this is the prob...
12/01/2022
- 10:46 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- When PK and a FK are specified in an incorrect order in the @relation-fields@ clause (see #6444-23), 4GL does not com...
- 10:30 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've noticed an intersting thing. In the absense of the @nsPrefix@ 4GL @WRITE-XML@ creates ... - 05:29 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I've noticed an intersting thing. In the absense of the @nsPrefix@ 4GL @WRITE-XML@ creates "html-style" output. See a...
- 04:46 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > What about navigation& I mean the following statement:
> > [...]
>... - 04:44 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> What about navigation& I mean the following statement:
> [...]
> How @a recursive ABL pro... - 04:35 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > What I'm doing wrong?
> By looking at the records created the 'cE' ... - 04:34 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> What I'm doing wrong?
By looking at the records created the 'cE' is the PK and 'cM' is the... - 04:27 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> This is mostly used by the 'tree-like' .NET UI components, as far as 4GL is concerned the effec... - 04:09 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Marian, can you shed any light on the RECURSIVE feature?
>
> This ... - 03:34 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Marian, can you shed any light on the RECURSIVE feature?
This is mostly used by the 'tree... - 02:54 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Found a number of incompatibilities in @(READ|WRITE)-XML(SCHEMA)?@ support for RECURSIVE DATASET.
Fixing them in 6129b. - 01:00 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor,
>
> You cannot have the same table to be both the source and destination for a @fi... - 01:10 AM Feature #6371 (WIP): implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I found that I was unable to convert test cases using 6371a/14119, with an error during annotations:...
11/30/2022
- 06:31 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor,
You cannot have the same table to be both the source and destination for a @fill@ operation (we do not suppo... - 12:28 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Another problem with @RECURSIVE@.
I'm trying to write a test for @FILL@ (see the attachment).
When I run it I get... - 12:23 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian, can you shed any light on the RECURSIVE feature?
- 11:20 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- The OE documentation about @RECURSIVE@ Data-Relation object I see the following statement about such realtions:
<pre... - 04:07 PM Feature #6371 (Review): implement SAVE CACHE statement
- 02:18 AM Feature #6454 (Review): database informational features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor, other than requiring review for the patch in #6454-11 and for 6129b/14335, is this tas... - 02:04 AM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor, other than requiring review for the patch in #6454-11 and for 6129b/14335, is this task finished from your poin...
11/29/2022
- 01:06 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I assume you talk about the recent serialization updates for temp-tables and FOREIGN-KEY-HI... - 12:37 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I assume you talk about the recent serialization updates for temp-tables and FOREIGN-KEY-HIDDEN attribute. I do not t...
- 10:16 AM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Ovidiu, thank you for the summary of status. I am reassigning to... - 07:50 AM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I understand that this is because we do not have even stubs for RCODE-INFO:CRC-VALUE and RCODE-... - 04:24 AM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Strangely enough I have found no @@DatabaseReferences@ annot... - 03:09 AM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Strangely enough I have found no @@DatabaseReferences@ annotation in a converted large cust... - 05:59 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- |_. version |_. server run |_. client run |_. indexed (ms) |_. unindexed(ms) |
|fwd-h2-1.4.200-6.jar| 1... - 05:34 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- I am doing the stress tests right now.
> I've been running the H2 unit tests, too, and this showed some problems w... - 04:16 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Thanks, Ovidiu, I'll profile some more and see what happens.
11/28/2022
- 06:42 PM Bug #6919 (Review): fix ErrorManager.displayError in TempTableBuilder
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I see you added static import for @ErrorManager@. There are very few places where this is d... - 04:15 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, thank you for the summary of status. I am reassigning to Igor for implementation. Pl... - 04:01 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, Constantin, 3821c or 6129b for these changes? They most likely will be needed in 6129b fi... - 03:52 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- > Greg, Constantin, 3821c or 6129b for these changes? They most likely will be needed in 6129b first, but we should d...
- 01:29 PM Feature #6444 (WIP): dataset improvements
- 01:25 PM Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu, thank you for the summary of status. I am reassigning to Igor for implementation. Please assist him if he has...
- 03:15 PM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- With attached @h2-1.4.200.jar@, 1st run:
|_. n |_. indexed |_. non-indexed |
| 1 | 799 ms | 453 ms |
| 2 | 302 ms ... - 10:18 AM Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Attached is the second version of the patch and a stress-test for the UPDATE statement (10k field setters). The 'in-...
- 09:51 AM Feature #6928 (WIP): H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- 02:52 PM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I understand that this is because we do not have even stubs for RCODE-INFO:CRC-VALUE and RCODE-... - 02:50 PM Feature #6454: database informational features
- > I understand that this is because we do not have even stubs for RCODE-INFO:CRC-VALUE and RCODE-INFO:LANGUAGES.
> D... - 02:30 PM Feature #6454: database informational features
- As far as I can see, @RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST@ inplementation in FWD uses the value of the @tables@ attribute of the @@...
- 12:23 PM Feature #6454: database informational features
- I've noticed the following problem.
The statement... - 11:37 AM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> * It looks that the only database restriction we have to support is @READ-ONLY@. Should be ... - 10:04 AM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Igor, RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST... - 09:59 AM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Igor, RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST is already added in 6129b.
>
... - 09:18 AM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST is already added in 6129b.
Constantin,
I see only @Rcode... - 02:49 AM Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor, RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST is already added in 6129b.
- 04:47 AM Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Committed 3821c/rev.14395. Made the changes mentioned in #6708-12 and fixed a problem where preselect and dynamic cal...
11/27/2022
- 01:06 PM Feature #6454: database informational features
- * As I can see from the code @DBPARAM@ reports *all* parameters supported by FWD for @CONNECT@
* It looks that the o...
11/26/2022
- 02:09 AM Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Review of @lobs.diff@:
>
> Good job! Implemented as requested in #6448-2.
> Please do t... - 10:21 PM Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Review of @lobs.diff@:
Good job! Implemented as requested in #6448-2.
Please do the cleanup (fix indentation of l...
11/25/2022
- 05:40 PM Feature #6459: query features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor, I'm looking into the history of this part of the code. I don't think it's as simple as... - 01:35 PM Feature #6459: query features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor, I'm looking into the history of this part of the code. I don't think it's as simple as... - 11:08 AM Feature #6459: query features
- Igor, I'm looking into the history of this part of the code. I don't think it's as simple as releasing the record unc...
- 05:59 AM Feature #6459: query features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What's the stacktrace where #6459-5 calls @throwOffend()@?
Here it is:... - 05:24 AM Feature #6459: query features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> According to my tests, both forms of @FIRST-OF@/@LAST-OF@ are fully supported.
>
> I've... - 05:31 PM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- OK, this is close to correct.
1. Please switch out the use of a @Stack@ for the @ScopedSymbolDictionary@. The i... - 07:11 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I made the changes for the report. Now, it can track FIND statements that reference the same buffer as the FOR EACH i...
- 05:30 PM Bug #6919: fix ErrorManager.displayError in TempTableBuilder
- Review of @6919.diff@.
Good job! There were a lot of methods to check.
Interesting findings. I was not expectin... - 12:51 PM Feature #6454 (WIP): database informational features
- 12:50 PM Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Implemented as described in #6448-2.
The attached .diff file is for 6129b/14333.
Please review.
Thank you.
- 10:19 AM Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've got the following exception on the database import with 6129b/14333.
> [...]
> Is it... - 10:01 AM Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- I've got the following exception on the database import with 6129b/14333....
- 08:04 AM Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Nice work! I could generate insightful reports using customer applications. I will suggest only some fine tuning here...
11/24/2022
- 10:57 AM Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- > consider way stronger optimizations directly in the H2 engine: this involves some extended work into the H2 optimiz...
- 10:56 AM Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- *CHECKPOINT*
I am pending the work here as I can't find any more consistent optimizations to motivate that multi-t... - 10:24 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- > This is my intent, but I wanted to share my work until now.
Understood. No worries.
> Also, I guess you mean... - 05:00 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Neither annotations/annotations.xml and annotations/annotations_prep.xml can't be used for the ne... - 10:05 AM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- > Eric, what should we do: remove this list or expose this as a enhanced feature with a method in SESSION handle?
... - 01:15 AM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Actually, if we replace throwing @XmlStreamException@ with @return false@ this will resul... - 08:13 PM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> In fact, I do not understand why we add @TempTableBuilder@ to the @HandleChain@. I have not... - 09:43 AM Feature #6448 (WIP): make location of LOB files configurable for import
- 09:42 AM Feature #6459: query features
- I do not see how we can reliably figure out how the @CACHE@ attribute value affects the performance. Such things usua...
- 09:39 AM Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Committed 3821c/rev.14384. I applied all the suggestions mentioned by Alexandru in #6708-7 and moved all the changes ...
- 09:06 AM Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- I rebased 6708a with 3821c. Danut, you can now move the changes from 6708a to 3821c.
11/23/2022
- 01:39 PM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> In fact, the caller of this method just returns @false@ on @XmlStreamException@. Since this... - 06:52 AM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> This class is unique in the fact that we have control of the short lifetime of the @TempTab... - 11:16 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Code Review 6709-rpt.diff
Neither @annotations/annotations.xml@ and @annotations/annotations_prep.xml@ can't be us... - 07:40 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I took a different approach after taking a look at #3194 and modified how the report is made. I created a new rule se...
- 06:20 AM Bug #6923: inner transaction block reverts too much
- I attached a patch with some changes that, in my opinion, make more sense than the current implementation. Mainly, th...
11/22/2022
- 01:52 PM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Sorry, but I'm confused. We create a new @TempTableBuilder@ instance e.g. in the @readTable... - 12:41 PM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The problem is that @TempTableBuilder@ -s are @HandleChain@ objects which are kept in a lin... - 08:41 AM Feature #6459: query features
- According to my tests, both forms of @FIRST-OF@/@LAST-OF@ are fully supported.
I've also fixed the problem with @...
11/21/2022
- 05:58 PM Bug #6919 (WIP): fix ErrorManager.displayError in TempTableBuilder
- I am attaching my changes for review. This should be the complete implementation, I will do more testing tomorrow.
- 02:57 PM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Related to 6129b/14329: after @ErrorManager.recordOrShowError@ do not @throw@ a new excepti... - 02:21 PM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Igor,
Related to 6129b/14329: after @ErrorManager.recordOrShowError@ do not @throw@ a new exception. After the 4GL... - 09:52 AM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> >> how safe is to abend here?
> > I think that it is safe because actually, it should never happ... - 07:30 AM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- >> how safe is to abend here?
> I think that it is safe because actually, it should never happen if the schema is co... - 07:40 AM Bug #6940 (Test): unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in a...
- Code Review Task Branch 6129b Revision 14327
The concept of the change is sound. Combined with the fact that it d... - 07:38 AM Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- In the end there was no information in email, @testcases/uast/@, Redmine or @bzr@ that could lead be back to the orig...
11/19/2022
- 08:16 AM Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- There is no change in the application used for task #346. In the customer's app, all changes look 'expected', the pa...
- 08:00 AM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Review for 6129b/14326:
> * how safe is to abend here?
> [...]
I think that it is saf... - 07:41 AM Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Review for 6129b/14326:
* how safe is to abend here?...
Also available in: Atom