Activity

From 09/05/2025 to 10/04/2025

10/01/2025

10:34 AM Bug #10526: Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: You can see that there is a @release ttBook1@ of the query buffer.... Eduard Soltan
07:18 AM Bug #10526: Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: > However for this case the results are invalidation is not solved on database side, and the results of the query con... Alexandru Lungu
03:32 AM Bug #10526: Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: I came to the conclusion that the test from #10526-9 is falling because of another reason.
Before doing the perfor... Eduard Soltan
05:15 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: Oops, this commit is in this task, 10560a. Teodor Gorghe
05:14 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Committed revision *16166* on task branch *16166*:
> - Resolving the parent buffer by its le... Constantin Asofiei

09/30/2025

04:31 AM Bug #9383 (Internal Test): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a Progressive...: Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau wrote:
> Rev. 16144 should now hold the invariant from #9383-53. Please review.
I am sor... Alexandru Lungu

09/29/2025

04:37 AM Bug #10526: Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: I have a test case that recreates the problem:... Eduard Soltan

09/26/2025

09:24 AM Bug #10526: Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: @copy@ method from RB class receives @srcDMO@ and @dstDMO@ parameters as @DataModelObject@, but they could be instanc... Eduard Soltan
05:27 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > BTW, you can duplicate this with above testcase (the second FOR EACH) if in TempTableHelp... Constantin Asofiei
03:36 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: > So I think we are OK, but it still seems fragile - if you get an AdaptiveQuery which for some reason can't have H2 ... Alexandru Lungu
03:57 AM Bug #10621: 'Illegal mix of collations' error when using latest MariaDB JDBC driver: The option @collation_connection@ for the JDBC URL was added in @3.5.0@. However, I have tried to set this option and... Andrei Plugaru
03:40 AM Bug #10621: 'Illegal mix of collations' error when using latest MariaDB JDBC driver: > So, I guess using collation_connection=utf8mb4_unicode_ci in the JDBC URL would be the easiest fix.
Is this back... Alexandru Lungu
03:37 AM Bug #10621: 'Illegal mix of collations' error when using latest MariaDB JDBC driver: Ovidiu, I understand that @utf8mb4_general_ci@ would be the better choice, however the client still uses @utf8mb4_uni... Andrei Plugaru

09/25/2025

04:31 PM Bug #10621: 'Illegal mix of collations' error when using latest MariaDB JDBC driver: Looking back, I remember @utf8mb4_general_ci@ was chosen, because it better matches 4GL, although it is not as accura... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
10:50 AM Bug #10621: 'Illegal mix of collations' error when using latest MariaDB JDBC driver: When using the MariaDB JDBC driver(version 3.5.3) included in fwd, I am getting @Illegal mix of collations@ for examp... Andrei Plugaru
09:18 AM Bug #10621 (New): 'Illegal mix of collations' error when using latest MariaDB JDBC driver: Andrei Plugaru
10:55 AM Bug #10611 (WIP): Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time: This one fails the #9457 project, with 9457c. Constantin Asofiei
09:59 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Alex, about the previous note; this test:... Constantin Asofiei
09:42 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: > if within that FOR EACH block a record in this 'preselected result set' gets deleted, FWD still iterates it
If ... Alexandru Lungu
09:32 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: Greg Shah wrote:
> Will these tests also handle cross-session dirty share (i.e. testing for #8388)?
AFAIK, cross-... Alexandru Lungu
09:30 AM Feature #10583 (Review): Implement a Database specific records cache.: The fact that caching happens after the session is closed, means that the user does not experience any overhead that ... Artur Școlnic
07:31 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: Will these tests also handle cross-session dirty share (i.e. testing for #8388)? Greg Shah
07:20 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, please!
Ok, I will get on it then.
As for 10583a, the implementation is completed. At this... Artur Școlnic
07:17 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: > My dream is to have such suite integrated in the CI/CD and have a better coverage on FWD for multi-user tests. (#92... Greg Shah
07:01 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: I am documenting here a live discussion with Artur. The solution with exposing record to the shared cache on commit *... Alexandru Lungu

09/24/2025

02:11 PM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Eduard, see 10480a rev 16136 - The 'recid' component in the index is always 'asc' even for temp-tables.
*Alexand... Constantin Asofiei
04:06 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Artur, can you pick up 10480a fox performance testing (only runtime)?
Got news that perf... Eduard Soltan
10:06 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: Artur Școlnic wrote:
> We will have to come up with a clever mechanism of ensuring that only 'true' committed record... Artur Școlnic
09:10 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: I changed the approach a bit. Now dmo references are being cached in the shared cache and in the session cache, on re... Artur Școlnic
03:43 AM Bug #10590: Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> Eduard: please check your standalone tests, conversion testing looks like it passed ... Eduard Soltan
03:24 AM Bug #10590: Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: In rev 16181, it fixes some issues with the initial approach: In 'like' temp-table definitions, indexes are copied on... Constantin Asofiei
02:19 AM Bug #10560 (Review): Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspo...: Committed revision *16166* on task branch *16166*:
- Resolving the parent buffer by its legacy name instead of the X... Teodor Gorghe
02:14 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Should I commit the change from #10560-8?
Go ahead. Eduard Soltan
02:13 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: Should I commit the change from #10560-8? Teodor Gorghe
02:13 AM Bug #10560 (WIP): Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond ...: Teodor Gorghe
09:33 PM Feature #4369: implement stateless FWD server clustering: Fully implementing #8388 will eliminate the requirement to cluster dirty share state across servers. Eric Faulhaber

09/23/2025

09:42 AM Bug #10590: Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> 10590a rev 16178 has a change from 9457c 16205:
> * Fixed DEF TEMP-TABLE ... LIKE ... ... Constantin Asofiei
07:08 AM Bug #10590 (Internal Test): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: 10590a rev 16178 has a change from 9457c 16205:
* Fixed DEF TEMP-TABLE ... LIKE ... USE-INDEX - the index lookup mu... Constantin Asofiei
08:42 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: Artur Școlnic wrote:
> it is easily solvable by removing the cached record at the retrieve step and inserting it bac... Artur Școlnic
07:01 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: The only problem I see with the current implementation is that two (ore more) concurrent sessions can retrieve the sa... Artur Școlnic
06:41 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> * I don't think that @//initialize.accept(session);@ is right in @SessionFactory@. This w... Artur Școlnic
05:03 AM Feature #10583 (WIP): Implement a Database specific records cache.: From my understanding:
* every time a record is inserted in the FFC, it is also added to the shared records cache.... Alexandru Lungu
03:55 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: I analyzed the impact on memory consumption. There is an increase in the retained memory, each cached record will ret... Artur Școlnic
07:24 AM Bug #10611 (Internal Test): Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time: I'll put this into testing with other apps, but a simple flag change to now look for abbreviated names instead of exa... Constantin Asofiei
03:10 AM Bug #10611 (Review): Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time: Eduard Soltan
03:09 AM Bug #10611 (WIP): Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time: Committed solution on 10611a, rev. 16180. Eduard Soltan
02:51 AM Bug #10611: Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time: I have the following test case:... Eduard Soltan
02:42 AM Bug #10611 (Review): Incorrect abbreviation name resolved at conversion time: Eduard Soltan
06:44 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: On @XmlImport.resolveTableByXmlName@, I don't think is right to use the @ctx.ttname@, because the value is the local ... Teodor Gorghe
04:17 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: I think I found a problem in rev. 16164.
In @XmlImport.resolveTableByXmlName@ the current context should be used a... Eduard Soltan
04:09 AM Feature #10436 (WIP): Detect Sequential Data Access and Prefetch Records from the Database: Artur Școlnic

09/22/2025

08:01 AM Bug #10455 (Internal Test): Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue: I am OK with the changes in 10455a. Alexandru Lungu
02:13 AM Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue: Committed revision *16128* on task branch *10455a*:
- Addressed code review #10455-20. Teodor Gorghe
06:50 AM Bug #10526: Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: > Alexandru: can there other state which we need to ensure is applied when doing 'direct write' to a buffer's record?... Alexandru Lungu
06:37 AM Bug #10526 (Internal Test): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: Review of 10526a:
* extract @dstProp.getOffset()@ in a different variable to reuse. Also extract to @dstProp.getOf... Alexandru Lungu
03:17 AM Bug #10590 (Review): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: Committed on 10590a, rev. 16176. Created new method that will match exactly the index name in the table name. Eduard Soltan
02:48 AM Bug #10590: Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> Instead, please use the @SchemaDictionary.getIndex(NameNode, name)@ or to calculate ... Eduard Soltan
02:07 AM Feature #5220: extend word index support to SQL Server: Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Stefanel - can we consider this done for SQLServer?
Yes, this was implemented in 9456... Stefanel Pezamosca

09/19/2025

02:08 PM Bug #10455: Persistent table CAN-FIND FIRST issue: Alexandru, please review.
Teodor:
* please don't call @BufferManager.getInstance()@ - get it from @WorkArea.tm@.... Constantin Asofiei
01:58 PM Bug #10526: Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: Review of 10526a rev 16149:
* changing the access modifier for @RecordBuffer@ methods has implications in the proxy... Constantin Asofiei
01:28 PM Bug #10590 (WIP): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: Eduard, the table AST should already have the INDEX nodes. Keeping the dictionary-wide @tableIndexesNames@ map will ... Constantin Asofiei
01:14 PM Feature #5220: extend word index support to SQL Server: Stefanel - can we consider this done for SQLServer? Constantin Asofiei
11:12 AM Feature #10583 (Review): Implement a Database specific records cache.: Artur Școlnic
10:29 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: I completed the first stable version of the implementation.
The main points are:
* Each FFCache instance gets a new... Artur Școlnic
10:55 AM Bug #9763 (Internal Test): xml-node-name buffer option: I think the update is fine. Please go ahead with internal testing. Ovidiu Maxiniuc
10:25 AM Bug #9763 (Review): xml-node-name buffer option: Eduard Soltan
10:25 AM Bug #9763 (WIP): xml-node-name buffer option: Eduard Soltan
10:24 AM Bug #9763: xml-node-name buffer option: Exporting of child buffer (in a dataset relation) is using the attributes from @TempTableSchema@, when it should swit... Eduard Soltan
03:59 AM Bug #9383 (Review): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults...: Rev. 16144 should now hold the invariant from #9383-53. Please review. Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

09/18/2025

08:18 AM Bug #10590 (Review): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: Eduard Soltan
08:18 AM Bug #10590 (WIP): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: Committed on 10590a, rev. 16174.
Now the indices of the model temp-table are added to the main temp-table.
I al... Eduard Soltan
07:29 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: I managed to write an initial implementation, which is far from perfect, but stable enough to recreate the test from ... Artur Școlnic
04:26 AM Feature #10583 (WIP): Implement a Database specific records cache.: Artur Școlnic
07:17 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau wrote:
> I see. In this case, we need to change the whole @transactionCommiting()@ because ... Alexandru Lungu
07:08 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: I see. In this case, we need to change the whole @transactionCommiting()@ because it is already constructed to yield ... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
05:47 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: I can't deny that I am a bit stressed with such "partial" bracket. If you do a @previous@, then @Locator locator = lo... Alexandru Lungu
05:39 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > In #9383-46, position 830 is actually rows.get(0). The first record from rows will always match the record under po... Alexandru Lungu
05:37 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > Moreover, why the total size of reduction should always be 100? In your example from #9383-47, rows should end up w... Alexandru Lungu
04:35 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: In #9383-46, position 830 is actually @rows.get(0)@. The first record from @rows@ will always match the record under ... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
04:25 AM Bug #9383 (WIP): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is...: Review of 9383a:
> rows = new ArrayList<>(rows.subList(0, newSize));
Is this right? I expect that the starting ... Alexandru Lungu
04:19 AM Bug #9383 (Review): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults...: Please review rev. 16143. Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
03:33 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > As for actualMaxExponent = 2, setting it when bracket < 2 will force ProgressiveResults to fetch in brackets of max... Alexandru Lungu
02:27 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> If the bracket you are looking at is the 100th one generated with exponent 5, then techni... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
06:46 AM Feature #6695 (Review): Multi-table preselect query may underperform due to repetitive fetching: I have committed @6695/ rev. 16170@
First, I have fixed here the problem exposed in #6695-42. I have solved this by ... Andrei Plugaru
03:25 AM Feature #6695 (WIP): Multi-table preselect query may underperform due to repetitive fetching: I observed a small issue regarding the usage of @ScrollableResults.get(LazyFetching fetching, boolean forceOnlyId)@ i... Andrei Plugaru
06:32 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: I have created the following dataset structure, one thing to note that @Second@ table has a relationship with with @I... Eduard Soltan

09/17/2025

02:47 PM Bug #10590: Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: I think I found the problem why the indices from model table are not taken into consideration, this the culprit code ... Eduard Soltan
06:37 AM Bug #10590: Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: The following example:... Eduard Soltan
06:33 AM Bug #10590 (Test): Indices are not taken from the model temp-table: Eduard Soltan
12:14 PM Feature #6695 (Review): Multi-table preselect query may underperform due to repetitive fetching: I have committed @6695a/16167-16169@. Here, I have also adapted the solution for persistent tables, fixed some small ... Andrei Plugaru
06:20 AM Feature #6695: Multi-table preselect query may underperform due to repetitive fetching: While trying to understand the behaviour for FIND triggers, I actually understood that currently, @6695a@ doesn't imp... Andrei Plugaru
08:24 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > In this case, we should copy the rows from 830 to 910. We just need to calculate what is the starting row of the ne... Alexandru Lungu
07:58 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: For example, the current position is 830:
* Old bracket = 3 (from 111 to 1010)
* new bracket = 10 (from 811 to 910)... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
07:50 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: PS: I think there are cases in which you can't, because the offsets of the records may be 1111, 1112, 1113, ..., 2110... Alexandru Lungu
07:48 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > You are correct, but what if we just shrink rows to size 100 (i.e. Math.pow(BASE, actualMaxExponent))? Wouldn't tha... Alexandru Lungu
07:43 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > delegate = new SimpleResults(rows);
>
> Is a delegate with maybe 1M rows, but this i... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
07:35 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > @bracket = lastValidBracket = locateRow(position).getBracket();@
This will return the bracket index N considerin... Alexandru Lungu
07:31 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: I've just now realized that we don't actually need neither to call @moveTo@ because we already have the rows in cache... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
06:53 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: But there is also a trailing:... Alexandru Lungu
06:46 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: Yes. Executing @moveTo@ may be safer than manually updating the state at the cost of re-executing the query. The good... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
06:30 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > so we perform moveTo just to align ProgressiveResults to the new state, but completely ignore the fetched results, ... Alexandru Lungu
06:18 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> ** Also, shouldn't it be @> 2@ instead of @>= 2@? If it is already equal to 2, the progress... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
06:07 AM Bug #9383 (WIP): Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is...: Review of 9383a:
* I think @getMaxExponent@ should have:... Alexandru Lungu
06:26 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> A transactional database can have different representation of the same record at the same t... Artur Școlnic
06:20 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: > Can't this be changed? I don't see why a dmo should belong to a specific session, it should be the representation o... Alexandru Lungu
06:10 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> * by nature DMOs are *per-session*.
Can't this be changed? I don't see why a dmo should... Artur Școlnic
05:56 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: > - multiple cache instances can hold the same record?..
Yes, different sessions can cache different *versions* of... Alexandru Lungu
05:29 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: A database specific records cache could be 'simulated', for testing purposes, by increasing the existing session case... Artur Școlnic

09/16/2025

10:51 AM Feature #6695: Multi-table preselect query may underperform due to repetitive fetching: I have made some commits to @6695a@:
# *16165* - The most important change is that I deleted some throws for @Illega... Andrei Plugaru
07:40 AM Feature #10583: Implement a Database specific records cache.: Currently, @BaseRecords@ are cached in the session cache, which has a few drawbacks:
- fairly small capacity;
- one... Artur Școlnic
07:38 AM Feature #10583 (Review): Implement a Database specific records cache.: Artur Școlnic

09/15/2025

12:09 PM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: Eduard, see 10560a rev 16164 for my current changes. Please try to break them (see the TODO in XmlImport) by creatin... Constantin Asofiei
03:41 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: There is another case where there is a @field f1 serialize-name "oa:f1"@, and the XML has the field like @f1@ - in th... Constantin Asofiei
10:39 AM Feature #6695: Multi-table preselect query may underperform due to repetitive fetching: Even though the scope of this task is mainly optimizing the @PreselectQuery@ case, I found the idea that is applied h... Andrei Plugaru
06:46 AM Feature #6695: Multi-table preselect query may underperform due to repetitive fetching: I have created branch @6695a@ and ported and committed the changes from #6695-32 in @6695a/rev.16163-16164@. However,... Andrei Plugaru
10:09 AM Bug #10171 (Test): Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.: Stefanel Pezamosca

09/12/2025

09:10 AM Bug #10560: Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspond to the...: I have the following test case:... Eduard Soltan
09:00 AM Bug #10560 (Closed): Wrong buffer picking for ReadXml when seralization name of a buffer correspo...: Eduard Soltan
05:56 AM Bug #9016 (Test): Improve performance in FQLPreprocessor by using astCache: Dănuț Filimon
05:56 AM Bug #9016: Improve performance in FQLPreprocessor by using astCache: Branch 9016a was merged into trunk as revision 16162 and archived. Dănuț Filimon
05:48 AM Bug #9016 (Merge Pending): Improve performance in FQLPreprocessor by using astCache: I'll be merging 9016a now. Dănuț Filimon
04:57 AM Feature #6695: Multi-table preselect query may underperform due to repetitive fetching: The results from the last note seem to be skewed as I was having query logging enabled. Without that I am getting muc... Andrei Plugaru
04:21 AM Feature #6695: Multi-table preselect query may underperform due to repetitive fetching: I have started working on this task by redoing the tests from #6695-3 both in FWD and 4GL. These are the results:
|_... Andrei Plugaru
04:29 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: Alex, please review rev. 16142 when possible.
Note that #10172 sees only a reduction of 7.5k @load()@ calls out of... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

09/11/2025

08:11 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Artur, can you pick up 10480a fox performance testing (only runtime)? Alexandru Lungu

09/10/2025

08:46 AM Bug #10542 (Internal Test): Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Alexandru Lungu
08:39 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I am OK with the changes.
>
> * @setLocked@ should always be set to false. It is basica... Eduard Soltan
08:21 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: I am OK with the changes.
* @setLocked@ should always be set to false. It is basically related to the fact that t... Alexandru Lungu
07:56 AM Bug #10542 (Review): Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Eduard Soltan
07:56 AM Bug #10542 (WIP): Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Committed on 10542a, rev. 16160. Eduard Soltan
07:14 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: > Then we have to really fire the trigger only on explicit releases. The implicit query initialisation will fire it o... Alexandru Lungu
06:43 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Very well.
Then we have to really fire the trigger only on explicit releases. The implicit query initialisation will... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
06:38 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Please test this assumption to confirm or infirm my assumption.
I have the following tes... Eduard Soltan
06:29 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Does it matter? In both cases, the modified record is still loaded in a buffer. The trigger will have the chance to f... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
06:26 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> <notextile>@</notextile>Alex: @prepareBuffer()@ calls @buffer.flush()@. The @flush()@ (@val... Eduard Soltan
06:22 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: <notextile>@</notextile>Alex: @prepareBuffer()@ calls @buffer.flush()@. The @flush()@ (@validateMaybeFlush()@ actuall... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
05:19 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: I am inclined to say that @prepareBuffer@ should have taken @isMultiplyReferenced@ into consideration. Alexandru Lungu
05:08 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
>
> Just a heads-up: in FWD, the newly created records are *flushed* to the database if all... Eduard Soltan
04:35 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: > Just a heads-up: in FWD, the newly created records are flushed to the database if all indexes are validated (check ... Alexandru Lungu
04:31 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: > Then in the main buffer I try to load the second record from book4 table. As you can observe the WRITE is not trigg... Alexandru Lungu
04:17 AM Bug #10542: Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: I have found the following test case. Please note that I defined on @book4@ table a WRTIE TRIGGER that just message *... Eduard Soltan
03:58 AM Bug #10542 (Test): Write trigger called when multiple buffers reference the same record: Eduard Soltan
03:41 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > Moreover, the results can have a boolean variable which dictates in what mode we are currently in. convertBracket()... Alexandru Lungu
01:49 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: If the concern is on the bracket calculation, maybe when commiting a transaction we can convert the current bracket t... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau

09/09/2025

06:13 PM Feature #10491: Tool to standardize PG cluster creation: Roger Borrello wrote:
> I added functionality so that the cluster can be controlled properly with *systemctl*.
>
... Roger Borrello
06:12 PM Feature #10491 (Review): Tool to standardize PG cluster creation: Usage of @fwd_create_pg_cluster.sh@:... Roger Borrello
12:54 PM Feature #10491: Tool to standardize PG cluster creation: Roger Borrello wrote:
> I added functionality so that the cluster can be controlled properly with *systemctl*.
>
... Roger Borrello
10:25 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > If as in your example, the requested row is 1.000.000 and we iterate with brackets of 100 in size, it will take som... Alexandru Lungu
08:27 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: > For 1e9 - 1, if the forcedMaxExponent is 2, then the right bracket is around (1e9 - 100) and offset is 99 (size is... Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
07:22 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: Review of 9383a:
* @bracket == forcedMaxExponent + 1@ I don't think this is a hard constraint. I think @bracket > ... Alexandru Lungu
04:25 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: Also commited rev. 16141 to remove some unnecessary history entries. Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
04:14 AM Bug #9383: Cache only the current delegate on transaction commit if a ProgressiveResults is used: Alex: Please review *9383a/rev. 16138-16140*. Razvan-Nicolae Chichirau
07:28 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Huh, this will be tough. Having it in trunk will affect at least one production customer. We will have a meeting tomo... Alexandru Lungu
07:26 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Will this change be compatible with current database, right? But it will simply be slower.
... Eduard Soltan
07:24 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Got it. Then I think 10380a integration in trunk will be highly dependent upon customer's schedule to update the data... Alexandru Lungu
06:54 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Did this happen only with run-time testing? The fix only include DDL changes ... were the... Eduard Soltan
06:53 AM Bug #10480 (Internal Test): Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: I am OK with the changes.
> Testing of all customer applications has passed with 10480a.
Did this happen only w... Alexandru Lungu
05:51 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Testing of all customer applications has passed with 10480a. Eduard Soltan
07:25 AM Bug #9016: Improve performance in FQLPreprocessor by using astCache: All regression tests passed, *9016a* can be merged. Dănuț Filimon
07:08 AM Feature #6720: lazy hydration: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > Well, I don't think lazy hydration really avoids creating BDT objects. Lazy hydration jus... Alexandru Lungu
07:04 AM Feature #6720: lazy hydration: > Well, I don't think lazy hydration really avoids creating BDT objects. Lazy hydration just populates the data array... Alexandru Lungu
03:04 AM Feature #6720: lazy hydration: Greg Shah wrote:
> In these tests you aren't measuring the cost of creating the BDT values. That tends to be expens... Andrei Plugaru
04:43 AM Bug #10385 (Internal Test): Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition: * Check javadoc: @If position = -1, this means that a operation was triggered by REPOSITION-BY-ID statement.@ this sh... Alexandru Lungu

09/08/2025

07:29 PM Feature #10491: Tool to standardize PG cluster creation: I added functionality so that the cluster can be controlled properly with *systemctl*.
*TBD:* In order to control... Roger Borrello
10:57 AM Feature #6720: lazy hydration: In these tests you aren't measuring the cost of creating the BDT values. That tends to be expensive. Greg Shah
10:44 AM Feature #6720: lazy hydration: Based on the previous note, it seemed that hydrating a record from H2 would be slower than a persistent one. So, I we... Andrei Plugaru
04:54 AM Feature #6720: lazy hydration: I have analysed some performance snapshot of 2 large customer applications that use different DBMS and discovered som... Andrei Plugaru
08:15 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Review of 10385a:
>
> * Mind that @cursor.@ is viable is cursor is not null (i.e. the qu... Eduard Soltan
06:59 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition: Review of 10385a:
* Mind that @cursor.@ is viable is cursor is not null (i.e. the query is scrolling). If the quer... Alexandru Lungu
02:04 AM Bug #10526 (Review): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: Committed on 10526a, rev. 16148. Eduard Soltan
01:47 AM Bug #10526 (WIP): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: I have the following test case:... Eduard Soltan
01:37 AM Bug #10526 (Closed): Progressive results don't get invalidated when buffer-copy is performed: Eduard Soltan

09/05/2025

11:21 AM Feature #9542: finish ORIGIN-HANDLE ProDataSet attribute: The implementations for these two APIs have 2 years now and they are unchanged ever since. I think we should consider... Ovidiu Maxiniuc
09:34 AM Feature #6720: lazy hydration: Update on the current status:
* I have added the implicit hydration of fields from unique indexes proposed by Alex i... Andrei Plugaru
06:53 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition: Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Hmm, you are right. But this should still hold for Locator, right? So @trimToTableCount@ sh... Eduard Soltan
06:26 AM Bug #10385: Incorrect reset of the cursor cache in Reposition: > Doesn't DBUtils.trimToTableCount method trim the ids array only when the array size is bigger then query.getTableCo... Alexandru Lungu
06:03 AM Feature #9543: implement missing BUFFER attributes: Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Is there anything left to do on this task, or can we close it?
@CAN-READ@ runtime support... Eduard Soltan
05:44 AM Bug #10480: Wrong sort criteria in FOR LAST when index has desc component: Added @tests/table/index/TestSuite.cls@ unit tests.
From my observation, I noticed that @recid desc@ is used only ... Eduard Soltan

« Previous

Also available in: Atom

Project

General

Profile

FWD » Core Development » Database

Activity

Activity

10/04/2025

10/03/2025

10/02/2025

10/01/2025

09/30/2025

09/29/2025

09/26/2025

09/25/2025

09/24/2025

09/23/2025

09/22/2025

09/19/2025

09/18/2025

09/17/2025

09/16/2025

09/15/2025

09/12/2025

09/11/2025

09/10/2025

09/09/2025

09/08/2025

09/05/2025