Activity
From 12/30/2019 to 01/28/2020
01/28/2020
- 03:28 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Correct.
- 03:27 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Yes. The date and time picker extends @AbstractWidget@, even it is similar to @ComboBoxGuiImpl@, but it has another p...
- 03:11 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- It will be consistent with the rest of the application. You aren't writing a javascript widget, right? You are writ...
- 02:34 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Can this case confuse users if the today date will be different from the current jscript client date?
- 02:16 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- For the near future, all date/time processing will be done in the Java code. We are currently ignoring the JS locale...
- 01:57 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- The date and time control should display its data using the current locale settings. For the web client it is the cur...
- 10:18 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Following this plan:
1) Conversion support for these features:
@chCtrlFrame-4:DTPicker:VISIBLE@
@chCtrlFrame-4...
01/27/2020
- 05:18 PM User Interface Feature #4181: GetComputerNameA emulation
- In #4121, a number of winsock native API emulation methods were added. This led to the implementation of @LogicalTer...
- 05:15 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> For implementation of the @DBPARAM@ builtin function, correct. For those options which we in... - 05:09 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- For implementation of the @DBPARAM@ builtin function, correct. For those options which we intend to add support, the ...
- 04:09 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> The original, ordered list approach was based on a very limited set of connection options, w... - 03:52 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- The original, ordered list approach was based on a very limited set of connection options, which were basically the m...
- 03:47 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Hm, you're correct, that conversion looks completely wrong. I think the conversion may have ... - 03:34 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Hm, you're correct, that conversion looks completely wrong. I think the conversion may have been broken along the way...
- 02:40 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- The conversion of the @CONNECT@ statement looks a little bit strange.
For example. The statement ... - 01:39 PM Base Language Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Marian: 2 followup questions:
1. What is the unicode BOM character that is used?
2. Is it always the same unico... - 11:38 AM Database Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed
- I believe the original issue of the task is gone now as recently Adrian replaced the @schema-triggers@ two-stage trig...
- 11:26 AM Database Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The first phase is part of the 4-6 weeks?
Yes.
> The second phase is the extra 3-4 days?
Yes,... - 11:13 AM Database Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed
- >>> I plan to rely on an explicit list of files to 'incrementally convert'.
>>
>> We would build this list automati... - 10:29 AM Database Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > automatic incremental conversion
>
> By this do you mean item 3 in #3471-7/?
Yes.
> > I pl... - 09:49 AM Database Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed
- > automatic incremental conversion
By this do you mean item 3 in #3471-7/?
> I plan to rely on an explicit list... - 09:32 AM Database Bug #3471: incremental conversion is regressed
- I think it will take ~4-6 weeks to complete and stabilize. I've been working on identifying and analyzing the parts ...
- 08:52 AM User Interface Bug #4521: Broken mouse tracking when dragging in Web client
- Can be reproduced with current trunk in Web client. Run a test case with an active frame scroll bar. Grab the scroll ...
- 08:50 AM User Interface Bug #4521 (New): Broken mouse tracking when dragging in Web client
01/24/2020
- 05:53 PM Database Feature #3815 (Closed): more temp-table options
- 02:04 PM Database Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- Task #4520 was created for the inheritance from permanent to temp tables issue. This task can be closed.
- 04:47 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- It is more correct now. The reason is probably simple: the widget before was being created from a string literal and...
- 01:45 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I wanted to check that this is a valid addition to the frame definition for this testcase:
... - 01:35 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > addrId.setFormat("999999");
>
> This one needs to be there. I'm very surprised it isn't the... - 12:44 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- >> addrId.setAt(true);
>> addrId.setAtFormatLength(6);
I'm not sure about these. You'll have to... - 12:13 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I wanted to check that this is a valid addition to the frame definition for this testcase:...
- 09:34 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Did you read the javadoc?
Got it. Thanks for the discussion.
Regarding "junk" before the &#... - 08:19 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Did you read the javadoc?
- 07:58 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I have been working with @frame_generator.xml@ and @common-progress.rules@ to correct some regressions. I have a test...
- 07:43 PM Base Language Bug #4476 (WIP): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- 02:01 PM Database Bug #4520: Implement proper codepage inheritance from permanent to temp tables
- A code page can be set for a clob field of a permanent table. E.g....
- 01:41 PM Database Bug #4520 (New): Implement proper codepage inheritance from permanent to temp tables
- 11:55 AM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Did the original pf file you tested have parameters that are not relate... - 11:34 AM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> All connection parameters from #3813-11 are accepted in the @CONNECT@ statement and are sho... - 11:10 AM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- All connection parameters from #3813-11 are accepted in the @CONNECT@ statement and are shown by @DBPARAM@ in this case.
- 08:22 AM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Greg Shah wrote:
> One thing that was not clear from #3813-11: which of these items can be specified in the @CONNECT... - 08:17 AM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- >> I understand that I should add support for the remaining options in the CONNECT statement by just storing values a...
- 03:31 AM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Can anybody help me to figure which of the database connection p... - 09:24 AM Database Feature #4516: testing and completion of runtime compatibility for table/table-handle/dataset/dat...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin: Did I write up the part about the UAST testcases correctly?
Yes.
> All: What is th... - 08:12 AM Base Language Feature #4392 (WIP): add -pf support for appserver CONNECT() method
- 08:11 AM Database Feature #4175 (WIP): add support for -1 (single user) option for CONNECT statement
01/23/2020
- 06:15 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Can anybody help me to figure which of the database connection parameters described in the ... - 05:14 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Can anybody help me to figure which of the database connection parameters described in the previous note have direct ...
- 05:02 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Here is a (hopefully) complete list of database connection parameters shown by @DBPARAM@ function.
|_.Parameter|_.De... - 05:33 PM User Interface Feature #4517: optionally back the 4GL features for Registry access with the user-specific offlin...
- In #4286, an offline storage facility was created that allows persistent storage/retrieval of key/value pairs in the ...
- 05:20 PM User Interface Feature #4517 (Closed): optionally back the 4GL features for Registry access with the user-specif...
- 04:36 PM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- No, 3856b has been merged into 3856c instead of rebasing. 3856c is now the branch for this task. Marius is regressi...
- 03:49 PM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Marius Gligor wrote:
> I created a new task branch @3856c@ from current @trunk@, then I merged changes from @3856b@ ... - 04:15 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Now I reused the conversion rules of @ocx_conversion.rules@ (version 3856b rev 11371) to convert @chCtrlFrame-4:DTPic...
- 04:02 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Yes, I totally agree with the change of the way records are handled on rollback events. And I firmly believe that, ev...
- 02:07 PM Database Feature #4516: testing and completion of runtime compatibility for table/table-handle/dataset/dat...
- The buffer alias changes shouldn't affect any of the above. They are strictly regarding "proxying" any buffer paramet...
- 12:22 PM Database Feature #4516: testing and completion of runtime compatibility for table/table-handle/dataset/dat...
- Constantin: Did I write up the part about the UAST testcases correctly?
Adrian: Does your buffer alias work have a... - 12:21 PM Database Feature #4516: testing and completion of runtime compatibility for table/table-handle/dataset/dat...
- The initial work was done as part of #3816. All of those changes are in trunk. As of trunk 11340, this is the statu...
- 11:59 AM Database Feature #4516 (New): testing and completion of runtime compatibility for table/table-handle/datas...
- 12:28 PM Database Feature #3815: more temp-table options
- >> Also I left a comment in the code which says that it's not clear if a temp-table inherits code page from a permane...
- 12:23 PM Database Feature #3816 (Closed): table and table handle parameter options
- The final work will be done in #4516.
- 08:17 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122 (Test): spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
01/22/2020
- 06:20 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Great! Please add comments to the code (in the @smode == 0@ case) to explain this.
Done.
T... - 05:37 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Great! Please add comments to the code (in the @smode == 0@ case) to explain this.
- 05:18 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 4335a Revision 11391
>
> The changes are a nice improvement. I think ... - 05:07 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Code Review Task Branch 4335a Revision 11391
The changes are a nice improvement. I think they will work in @smode... - 03:48 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- The task branch @4335a@ has been updated for review to revision @11391@.
This is the notes resolution changes. The... - 10:29 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > You mean the command like: @spawn 1 debug_level=1 java all_the_rest_of_java_args@?
>
> Yes.
... - 10:25 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- > You mean the command like: @spawn 1 debug_level=1 java all_the_rest_of_java_args@?
Yes. - 10:11 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 4335a Revision 11369
>
> Overall, my primary concern is that from the ... - 09:54 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Code Review Task Branch 4335a Revision 11369
Overall, my primary concern is that from the Java perspective we appe... - 10:18 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- The @TODO@ list for this task for future work. The remaining issues are related to the fact we can not start the clie...
- 09:57 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- The task branch @4335a@ has been updated for review to revision @11369@.
This adds support for configurable debug ... - 05:49 PM Database Feature #3809 (Closed): ProDataSet support
- 05:49 PM Database Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- All remaining work (of which I'm aware) related to ProDataSets is documented in these tasks:
* #4514 run ProDataSe... - 05:42 PM Database Feature #4514: run ProDataSet test suite in FWD and resolve any issues such that it works the sam...
- As part of the work to add ProDataSet support in #3809, a test suite was written to explore the behavior of the PDS f...
- 05:40 PM Database Feature #4514 (WIP): run ProDataSet test suite in FWD and resolve any issues such that it works t...
- 02:01 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, I want to run my ideas for planned changes to the undo architecture by you and get your input...
To the gr... - 07:32 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- > We might be able to create some custom bulk/mass get/set methods to call from these methods that might be more effi...
- 01:21 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- I'm not sure why you get the @VerifyError@.
I haven't considered the most efficient ways these methods might be wr... - 12:56 PM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- > Another aspect: due to #4074-30, is seems that the new implementation will be committed in 4335a anyway, so no hope...
- 07:27 AM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- I have recently re-based 4231b where there is a revision regarding #4074-23. I converted AW recently and it seems lik...
- 10:05 AM User Interface Feature #4170: add drag and drop support to treeview widget
- An useful link to a description of VSFlexGrid Control: http://helpcentral.componentone.com/docs/vsflexgrid8/vsflexgri...
- 09:49 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- I created a new task branch @3856c@ from current @trunk@, then I merged changes from @3856b@ onto @3856c rev. 11341@
01/21/2020
- 05:58 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- > The reason the DirectoryService object refuses to get the read only lock. Is it expected? Are there the server side...
- 05:47 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Guys,
I have faced with strange issue here. The code in @ClientBuilder.buildCommand()@:... - 02:09 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The @spawn.ini@ is only used on Windows. I would like a solution that works on all platforms. W... - 01:46 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- The @spawn.ini@ is only used on Windows. I would like a solution that works on all platforms. We already pass param...
- 12:18 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- The task branch @4335a@ has been updated for review to revision @11364@.
Almost all notes are cleared in this upda... - 10:19 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I'm fine with the code changes.
>
> Please clean up the code. I want to leave the logging the... - 07:24 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- I'm fine with the code changes.
Please clean up the code. I want to leave the logging there, but changed:
1. R... - 04:01 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Yes, please go ahead and make the necessary changes to @DmoClass@ to add the missing signatu... - 03:33 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > For example, I have a @.pf@ file with multiple parameters, but only two of them are included in... - 03:17 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- > For example, I have a @.pf@ file with multiple parameters, but only two of them are included in the @DBPARAM@ resul...
- 12:17 PM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- The following statement from the Progress documentation regarding @DBPARAM@ functions (see https://docs.progress.com/...
- 02:29 PM User Interface Bug #4074 (WIP): Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- > Should I implement it?
Yes. The change can be put into 4335a. - 02:13 PM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- Closing seems to be premature. I didn't implement Hynek's idea (I got confirmation only now). Should I implement it?
- 01:44 PM User Interface Bug #4074 (Closed): Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- 01:39 PM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hynek: Does this satisfy your notes in #4074-24?
Yes I'm sure Stanislav tested the mentioned u... - 12:08 PM Bugs Bug #4513: Check up cases when the drawing code use ThinClient.isChui() in the redirected mode in...
- Please see #4439-13, #4439-17 and #4439-18.
- 12:06 PM Bugs Bug #4513 (New): Check up cases when the drawing code use ThinClient.isChui() in the redirected m...
- 11:51 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4357 (Closed): Infinite trigger loop
- 11:34 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4357 (Feedback): Infinite trigger loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Branch 3809e was merged to trunk as revision 11340.
>
> Is this task complete?
I retested t... - 09:38 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4357: Infinite trigger loop
- Branch 3809e was merged to trunk as revision 11340.
Is this task complete? - 10:48 AM User Interface Bug #4512: New inserted row has incorrect initial cell values
- New inserted rows should be blank. In order to reproduce please run @browse-entry.p@ and press 'i' to insert new row....
- 10:41 AM User Interface Bug #4512 (New): New inserted row has incorrect initial cell values
- 10:08 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 3809e was merged to trunk as revision 11340. If I understand correctly, the truncation of the fi... - 09:29 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- 3809e was merged to trunk as revision 11340. If I understand correctly, the truncation of the filename is now fixed ...
- 09:42 AM User Interface Bug #4473 (Closed): Chrome update issues
- Branch 3809e was merged to trunk as revision 11340.
- 09:24 AM User Interface Feature #4077: add option to OPEN-MIME-RESOURCE to delete the original source file when the send ...
- 3809e was merged to trunk as revision 11340.
Sergey: Please update the FWD implementation details in the OPEN-MIME... - 09:13 AM User Interface Feature #3908: implement browse column VIEW-AS COMBO-BOX
- 3809e was merged to trunk as revision 11340.
- 09:06 AM Database Feature #2156: datetime-tz and hibernate
- 3809e was merged to trunk as revision 11340.
- 07:26 AM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- > What is the purpose of this flag?
OK, I think I don't actually don't need this flag. The issue I want to address... - 06:56 AM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- > The only issue here is that I'll think I'll add a flag that indicates if the "layout part" of the enhanced configur...
- 06:04 AM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- Regarding storage of the "report title" parameter. I think I'll add it to the enhanced browse configuration. The only...
- 04:00 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Another issue can be observed with this expression @chCtrlFrame-4:DTPicker:VISIBLE@ and @...
01/20/2020
- 06:14 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- My annotations are being put into the tree:...
- 02:15 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > @ [java] Condition : ref_fmt = ref_fmtp.getImmediateChild(prog.kw_format, null@
>
> Do... - 01:43 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- > @ [java] Condition : ref_fmt = ref_fmtp.getImmediateChild(prog.kw_format, null@
Do you have a missing clos... - 01:42 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > This is OK.
>
> Good... moving onto adding the annotations in @fram... - 11:49 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This is OK.
Good... moving onto adding the annotations in @frame_scoping.rules@ to allow @setA... - 09:45 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- This is OK.
- 08:56 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I suspect that the format in trunk was wrong. I think the conversion of the frame def looks OK h... - 07:11 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I suspect that the format in trunk was wrong. I think the conversion of the frame def looks OK here in 4207a.
Wha... - 09:57 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I would expect the widget to have @character@ type. But the override specified by the @@@ is goi... - 06:03 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- The task branch @4335a@ has been updated for review to revision @11363@.
This is the set of changed to enable no-i... - 04:55 PM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- > Do we want to have "user-specific" and "all users" settings as with enhanced browse configurations?
Yes, but as ... - 03:41 PM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- > Let's focus on allowing the user to customize it. That really resolves the issue. What can be done for this?
I... - 01:33 PM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Guys, I need to get user id (logged in) on the client side. I'm planning to get it from th... - 01:18 PM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- For now, I think it is enough for the user to be able to clear their own customizations. I think this corresponds to...
- 01:14 PM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- > Implement proper "reset to default state" for the new security paradigm.
Every user (including admins) has three... - 01:14 PM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- Please check in your changes to 4335a.
- 12:55 PM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- Default report title, in order of preference:
# User-specified custom title.
# If the browse has a title, use it.... - 12:04 PM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- > ## Output a better title for browse exports. The current code uses "Browse Report", which means it has nothing to ...
- 09:39 AM User Interface Feature #3880: enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- Guys, I need to get user id (logged in) on the client side. I'm planning to get it from the server, but I wonder when...
- 04:31 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- The changes are good.
> Why am I not calling the main constructor directly with:
Because then you would create ... - 03:04 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 4207a Revision 11381
>
> 1. In @database_references.rules@, I don't se... - 02:20 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Code Review Task Branch 4207a Revision 11381
1. In @database_references.rules@, I don't see any protection for the... - 03:20 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Another issue can be observed with this expression @chCtrlFrame-4:DTPicker:VISIBLE@ and @chCtrlFrame-4:DTPicker:ENABL...
- 02:33 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Yes, I would like to convert @FONT@ to @ActiveXFont@, @FONT:NAME@ to @ActiveXFont:ActiveXFontName@, @FONT:SIZE@ to @A...
- 02:13 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sergey, the problem is that you have the following item in map @<action>map6.put("font" , "ActiveXFont")</a...
- 01:52 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Marius Gligor wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Marius, thanks, I updated 4174a over 3856a and got this AST nod... - 01:44 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Marius, thanks, I updated 4174a over 3856a and got this AST node for @chCtrlFrame-4:DTPic... - 01:40 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Marius, thanks, I updated 4174b over 3856a and got this AST node for @chCtrlFrame-4:DTPicker:FONT:SIZE@ expression
... - 09:24 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> I tried to add conversion rules for @FONT:NAME@ and @FONT:SIZE@ legacy attributes of Acti... - 09:22 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- I tried to add conversion rules for @FONT:NAME@ and @FONT:SIZE@ legacy attributes of ActiveX control using these rule...
- 06:48 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- It seems that @IFontDisp@ should be added but there exists the similar interface @CustomFont@. The @CustomFont@ uses ...
- 07:25 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Marius: Please rebase 3856b from the latest trunk. My plan is for 3856b to be the next branch to merge to trunk. Th...
- 02:41 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Code review @3856b@ revisions 11365-11371. The changes look good.
- 07:19 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Review for 4335a rev 11346 - I'm OK with the changes.
- 07:02 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> @isTracked@ actually removes a record's key. That doesn't seem right. Maybe I'm not understa... - 06:17 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, please hold off making changes to @UniqueTracker@ related to the above post. I have begun refactoring the dir...
- 04:15 AM Database Feature #3809: ProDataSet support
- 3809e passed ChUI and GUI regression tests. It was merged to trunk as revision 11340 and archived.
01/19/2020
- 05:30 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I would expect the widget to have @character@ type. But the override specified by the @@@ is going to be "temporaril...
- 05:20 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I have a quiz for the experts... What data type should the @getTmess()@ getter for the widget on @frame1@ return?
... - 03:41 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Code ready for review:
modified *rules/convert/database_references.rules*
modified *src/com/goldencode/p2j/persist/... - 10:54 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- From Eugenie:
> The current status is we have the spawn started with error code is 0. However nothing is happening...
01/17/2020
- 05:42 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Another feature we need is an atomic, context-safe, check and update feature to update an index with a new record if ...
- 04:41 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, thanks for the @UniqueTracker@ implementation. I am working to integrate this code now, but I have some quest...
- 01:33 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- > 1. Assume two cases. In one there are two users, user1 that regular user with password, home dir and etc... And ano...
- 01:06 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Does the Ubuntu 18.04 support passwordless user?
>
> I think so:
>
> https://askubuntu.co... - 09:07 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- > Does the Ubuntu 18.04 support passwordless user?
I think so:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1102195/how-to-l... - 09:00 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- Greg,
One question. Does the Ubuntu @18.04@ support passwordless user? I read the guest user support was removed w... - 12:18 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Looking into what the ramifications of passing @uppercase@ as *false* when constructing the @FieldReference@ for bulk...
- 10:30 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Does it matter what is passed for uppercase?
>
> This would not be used to match your new co... - 08:59 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- > Does it matter what is passed for uppercase?
This would not be used to match your new constructors. But it migh... - 12:01 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> We are only iterating through wlist once, because we no longer add the don't add @ as a ... - 11:57 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- We are only iterating through wlist once, because we no longer add the don't add @ as a widget, presumably when i...
- 11:45 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Given the failed regression testing, I'm revisiting with this testcase:...
- 02:37 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- It seems that this parameter name @length@ came from the web socket api. This web socket connection listener can conf...
- 02:30 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- 3809e revision 11472 has good changes.
- 02:14 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> this change is incorrect. Please look at all its usages and fix the new incorrect usages ... - 01:54 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > I found the cause and fixed it. The change is attached.
> >
>
> ...
01/16/2020
- 06:15 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Speaking of dynamic temp-tables, one of us is going to need to address the changes to the DMO interface design. Right...
- 06:15 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- In email, Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Have you had the time to add the support for extent properties? I am a bit bloc... - 07:36 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > ... The code is documented that _it is OK to do this with cached... - 05:20 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Roger Borrello wrote:
> > > A question to our database "gurus" with r... - 04:29 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- > why int versus NumberType for the index?
Because sometimes the 4GL code has a subscript which is a @NUM_LITERAL@... - 04:06 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > A question to our database "gurus" with respect to how the "bulk" opti... - 03:32 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- *FieldReference* has two very similar constructors:
* @FieldReference(DataModelObject dmo, String property, int inde... - 11:56 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> A question to our database "gurus" with respect to how the "bulk" option is used in @FieldRe... - 11:29 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- A question to our database "gurus" with respect to how the "bulk" option is used in @FieldReference.java@...
Why c... - 05:14 PM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I found the cause and fixed it. The change is attached.
>
Checked in to 3809e revision 11... - 04:59 PM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> It is incorrect change.
Can you provide more details? - 04:46 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin: please review.
- 04:45 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this ready for a code review?
I think so. - 04:40 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Is this ready for a code review?
- 05:36 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- @VALIDATE-SEAL@ is fixed in 4335a revision 11475.
- 02:50 PM Base Language Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Hi Constantin... fyi my regression testing was successful wit... - 01:42 PM Base Language Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Hi Constantin... fyi my regression testing was successful with that code removed. What was t... - 01:17 PM Base Language Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The conversion fixes are in 4207a rev 11360. It also moves the @ExtentExpr@ to anon cla... - 01:00 PM Base Language Bug #4123 (Test): conversion generates incorrect java code for Extent statement
- This is basically a duplicate of the issue #4160 and the fix is the same.
- 12:45 PM Base Language Bug #4123: conversion generates incorrect java code for Extent statement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In what branch and revision can you recreate this problem (i.e. is this in trunk 11319)?
I jus... - 11:18 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- This resource https://wutils.com/com-dll/constants/constants-MSComCtl2.htm defines related @IDTPicker@ constants from...
- 09:46 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- > Throw a few test samples in here and we can see.
That is your task. - 09:36 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hmm, this is worse than what we already knew (which was really bad).
>
> Questions:
>
> * D... - 09:33 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Hmm, this is worse than what we already knew (which was really bad).
Questions:
* Does this happen for any @@@ ... - 09:27 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Roger, please change @mymess... - 09:25 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some si... - 09:24 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some similar @Missing value@ - I w... - 09:19 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger, please change @mymess@ to be a decimal and use some similar @Missing value@ - I wonder if @@@ option just form...
- 09:10 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I just wanted to make a note that the 4GL behavior when including conflicting formatting between the variable definit...
- 08:47 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- I've fixed regression test errors as follow:
- remove @UIB_S = chCtrlFrame:LoadControls( OCXFile, "CtrlFrame":U)@ in...
01/15/2020
- 05:45 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- *Updated convert/frame_generator.xml in 4207a-11378*
We need to look at our parent node for @ base-field, instead ... - 04:13 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This is an expected consequence of the change. We are now creating the widget from the child of ... - 03:56 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- This is an expected consequence of the change. We are now creating the widget from the child of @AT@ instead of at t...
- 03:40 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trun... - 01:31 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trunk, and this revision.
>
... - 11:02 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- I see a difference in the generated frame definition between trunk, and this revision.
I modified the testcase @at... - 05:42 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- @VALIDATE-SEAL@ is almost fixed, but it appears the @LOAD-DOMAINS@ is broken. Will fix it tomorrow.
- 05:41 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The nice part is that if this works correctly (apparently it did until now) it will also co... - 05:35 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> One more thing: I see the cache is context-local. Wouldn't it cover all connections if we m... - 05:21 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> ... The code is documented that _it is OK to do this with cached queries, because each use ... - 04:42 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric,
after fixing some issues that surfaced while working with repetitive queries and client (re-)connections, my e... - 05:19 PM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- Hynek: Does this satisfy your notes in #4074-24?
- 11:57 AM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- > Please also test the case when you click in a browse, without focus, directly in an editable cell. If I interpret y...
- 09:29 AM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- Code review 4231b review 11472.
Please also test the case when you click in a browse, without focus, directly in a... - 05:48 AM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- Fix for double ROW-ENTRY events is committed into 4231b rev 11472. Please review.
- 02:48 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- @com.goldencode.p2j.pattern.CommonAstSupport$Library.upPath(String)@
That's just a convenience function for TRPL. ... - 02:04 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Greg Shah wrote:
> No. Read @CommonAstSupport@ for @upPath()@ to understand why.
I don't see that method in http... - 10:57 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Greg Shah wrote:
> That is not a regression. It is more correct. We WANT the @FieldReference@ to be emitted.
Th... - 10:16 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- That is not a regression. It is more correct. We WANT the @FieldReference@ to be emitted.
- 10:04 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- There is a regression found where this code line:...
- 01:50 PM Base Language Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ ... - 11:12 AM Base Language Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I looked into this case. I think you are talking about @ladder-safety-gen.p@ where it references... - 10:13 AM Base Language Feature #3867 (Test): direct java class access from 4GL code
- 10:12 AM Base Language Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Constantin/Hynek: Do you know of any other critical bugs or missing feat... - 08:11 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- It is incorrect change.
- 08:07 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> > >
> > > any reaction?
> >
> > Sorry,... - 08:03 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Yes, go ahead.
- 07:36 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> >
> > any reaction?
>
> Sorry, I was busy with other tasks. I w... - 04:18 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- ok I was just worried that the mail was lost
- 04:13 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
>
> any reaction?
Sorry, I was busy with other tasks. I will check the sources where the... - 04:10 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> I see what the problem is: the string is cut at 64 characters.
>
> The upload directory ...
01/14/2020
- 04:32 PM Database Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- I agree, let's pause work on this.
- 04:24 PM Database Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- The root of the problem is clearly at a lower level than anticipated. After some code analysis, the parser is the one...
- 04:17 PM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- The problem here is that @handle@ has no strong typing information that can always be known at parsing time. Sometim...
- 03:59 PM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Marius, could you explain why @ENABLED@ and @VALUE@ progress bar properties were named as... - 02:47 PM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- There are existing 4GL attributes of the same names, so the @PB-@ prefix was needed to differentiate these from the "...
- 02:31 PM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Marius, could you explain why @ENABLED@ and @VALUE@ progress bar properties were named as @PB-ENABLED@ and @PB-VALUE@...
- 04:02 PM User Interface Bug #4498 (WIP): Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- 04:01 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Committed @rules/convert/database_references.rules@ in *4207a-11377* to use field reference for the lvalue of an embe...
- 01:11 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- No. Read @CommonAstSupport@ for @upPath()@ to understand why.
- 12:25 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- With respect to updates to @convert/database_references.rules@ for emitting a field reference...
Wouldn't converti... - 10:54 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Updates for un-subscripted variables in an embedded assignment are committed in 4207a-11376:...
- 09:49 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Hmm... isn't @tt.getMyx7()@ returning a copy of the array?
Yes, I didn't look at that... - 09:26 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Hmm... isn't @tt.getMyx7()@ returning a copy of the array?
- 09:23 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- > The last will get us past conversion, but runtime will still need some work.
Not exactly. The last will get us ... - 09:17 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I think we need to change the constructor for @EmbeddedAssignment@ to receive a lambda e... - 03:57 PM Base Language Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ downpath:
>
> [...]
>
... - 02:17 PM Base Language Bug #4484: Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- The code no longer creates a field reference when there is a @[@ downpath:...
- 02:12 PM Base Language Bug #4484 (WIP): Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- 03:38 PM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- Yes, 4231b is fine.
- 03:36 PM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- > Please put your changes in 4335a.
I was going to put them into 4231b as they seem to be more risky. Is it OK?
- 10:50 AM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- 4103a is in trunk. Please put your changes in 4335a.
- 11:15 AM User Interface Feature #4170: add drag and drop support to treeview widget
- I created a new branch 4170a from current trunk and rebased with 3856b
- 02:26 AM User Interface Feature #4170: add drag and drop support to treeview widget
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Good summary.
>
> What happens if the drop event occurs outside of the tree control?
If the d... - 10:46 AM User Interface Feature #3880 (WIP): enhanced browse 3rd phase of improvements
- 09:15 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Manually merged updates into 4335a revision 11469.
- 09:13 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I will first merge into 4335a and continue in it. Is it OK?
Yes.
- 08:58 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Yes, please do. And please go through https://documentation.progress.com/output/ua/Open... - 08:56 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Oops. It seems that I've overlooked this, sorry. I have to add a corresponding test and upd... - 08:53 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Maybe it is better to just manually merge the changes as the... - 08:42 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Maybe it is better to just manually merge the changes as they affect only two classes?
Yes... - 08:22 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> And if is an unknown value?
An error 4065 is generated.
- 08:20 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
Constantin. 3810e wa... - 08:17 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin. In 4GL the @domainAccessCode@ parameter is mandatory for the @SEAL@ call.
And ... - 08:15 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
>
> On a side note, in... - 08:04 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor, I'm OK with the changes. This can be merged with 4335a.
On a side note, in @validateSeal@ I left this comme...
01/13/2020
- 02:52 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- I think we need to change the constructor for @EmbeddedAssignment@ to receive a lambda expression, which will actuall...
- 02:49 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Did you test this in the 4GL?
Yes... fields worked just like variables. - 02:42 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Did you test this in the 4GL?
- 02:16 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Built new testcases, which uses fields in a temp table.
@nonshared_frame_extra_widget_embedded_assign_field.p@
<... - 12:56 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Greg Shah wrote:
> This is not a bug. This is just the normal embedded assignment case. Since @i@ is still an edit... - 12:13 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- This is not a bug. This is just the normal embedded assignment case. Since @i@ is still an editable widget, this is...
- 11:30 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> There is a scenario which is still broken, and that is when there is a widget that *should b... - 10:54 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- There is a scenario which is still broken, and that is when there is a widget that *should be added* to a non-shared ...
- 10:41 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> By protecting the @evalLib("process_fake_scope", tmp, true)@ in *annotations/frame_scoping.r... - 08:52 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- By protecting the @evalLib("process_fake_scope", tmp, true)@ in *annotations/frame_scoping.rules* with a check for @t...
- 02:09 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Should it be designing exactly the same as the MS Date and Time Picker control?
>
> Yes. Th... - 02:04 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Sorry, it was 3856b. It seems that it looks like an issue in 3856b.
Yes, you have righ... - 01:32 PM Database Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Finally, I've got to the responsible area in the conversion. Mainly it looks like a new @BUFFER-SCORE@ Progress Ast s...
- 05:55 AM Database Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Didn't you previously find that some abbreviations were treated as the same buffer as @dummy@ but... - 12:24 PM User Interface Feature #4170: add drag and drop support to treeview widget
- Good summary.
What happens if the drop event occurs outside of the tree control? - 10:23 AM User Interface Feature #4170: add drag and drop support to treeview widget
- A. When a Drag&Drop operation is initiated, an @OLEStartDrag@ event is fired:
When the event is handled, the followi... - 08:58 AM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- 4335a
- 08:52 AM Database Feature #3813: misc DB features part deux
- Which branch should I use for this task?
Thank you. - 08:21 AM Database Feature #3813 (WIP): misc DB features part deux
- From Eric:
> Pending Ovidiu's review, I believe the rest of #3813-2 is now pretty accurate, though I don't know ho... - 08:46 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
I see what the problem is: the string is cut at 64 characters.
The upload directory that I have specified is: ...- 07:17 AM Base Language Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Greg,
I think we should support the thread "JOIN" concept by using an additional option @AS-THREAD [SET handle] [ON-... - 04:40 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- After addressing the items in #4011-61 through #4011-65, please consider and propose a design for a caching/optimizat...
- 04:29 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, currently, we determine which implementation of @DirtyShareContext@ we use for a particular buffer by the typ...
01/12/2020
- 02:05 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The issue #3810-407 resolved in 3810e revision 11342.
BTW: it appears the @PRIMARY_PASSPHRASE@ attribute value is ig... - 12:00 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- @SET-DB-CLIENT@ for the principal in a @LOGIN@ state validates only @DOMAIN-NAME@ and @DOMAIN-ACCESS-CODE@ (using MAC...
- 11:03 AM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- With 3810e revision 11341, the @SET-DB-CLIENT@ with the imported sealed principal works fine. So the issue described ...
- 10:13 AM Database Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Didn't you previously find that some abbreviations were treated as the same buffer as @dummy@ but @dum@ was somehow s...
- 10:07 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- > Should it be designing exactly the same as the MS Date and Time Picker control?
Yes. This is needed for compati...
01/11/2020
- 09:56 AM Database Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Issue #4492-1 is implying multiple changes regarding conversion:
# If the buffer used has the same name as the sch... - 09:40 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- It seems that developing the date time picker widget itself can be independent from the conversion issues.
Greg, a... - 08:37 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- > Do we need to validate that there isn't already an LBRACKET child? Perhaps there's display myx[1] = 1?
We are on...
01/10/2020
- 06:16 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> In @annotations/array_expansion.rules@ I updated the below to protect the setting of @attach... - 06:10 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> In @annotations/arrray_expansion.rules@ I updated the below to protect the setting of @attac... - 04:08 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- In @annotations/array_expansion.rules@ I updated the below to protect the setting of @attachIdx@ and @parentRef@:
<p... - 03:12 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- In focusing on the incorrect widget for @myx@, the @add_widget@ function in *annotations/frame_scoping.rules*, the @U...
- 01:16 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- > Strange that there are duplicated VAR_INT for i in the FRAME_ELEMENT, and the only difference in the annotations is...
- 01:08 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- In running the "extra widget" testcase, there is something strange generated in the AST.
Line 13 of the testcase i... - 11:55 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- h1. Shared Frame (Standalone)
Note that I could not get embedded assignment scalar versions to convert, per #4498#... - 10:25 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Received the following when I was adding scalar testcases...
>
> [...]
>
> Testcase is... - 10:11 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Received the following when I was adding scalar testcases......
- 05:32 PM Base Language Feature #3254 (WIP): add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- To create a new thread, I was planning to add an optional @AS-THREAD [SET handle]@ extension to the @RUN@ statement. ...
- 01:02 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sorry, it was 3856b. It seems that it looks like an issue in 3856b.
- 12:56 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- I just tested the conversion of my example with 3856b if @ext-hint@ file is given and found that this code...
- 12:30 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- > I think, the Hotel GUI project can be created from the fwdtemplate, if it is what you mean. But this need to be che...
- 12:05 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Are the @prepare_template.sh@ changes something generic enough to be accepted back as a standard ... - 10:40 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Are the @prepare_template.sh@ changes something generic enough to be accepted back as a standard part of the Hotel GU...
- 10:24 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> So you've made changes to the @prepare_template.sh@ and @build.xml@?
I have rewritten the @pre... - 10:17 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- So you've made changes to the @prepare_template.sh@ and @build.xml@?
- 10:06 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We should look at your new project code for sure. Please note that we currently create new proje... - 09:19 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> > Please help with these common questions about testing env... - 09:18 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The directory is used at runtime with the server. It is ignored completely during conversion. S... - 09:12 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- We should look at your new project code for sure. Please note that we currently create new projects from the Hotel C...
- 09:07 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Please help with these common questions about testing environment. I am still using old @... - 08:51 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- > I am still using old testcases project. Is it correct?
Yes, this is OK.
> Should I create a test environment ... - 08:49 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Don't mind this question about @&IF "{&OPSYS}" = "WIN32":U AND "{&WINDOW-SYSTEM}" NE "TTY":U &THEN@. This macros work...
- 08:47 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- > I created the task branch 4174a. Should it be rebased over 3856b? Would it be better to wait until 3856b merged in ...
- 08:39 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Please help with these common questions about testing environment. I am still using old @testcases@ project. Is it co...
- 07:35 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- I created the task branch 4174a. Should it be rebased over 3856b? Would it be better to wait until 3856b merged in th...
- 07:21 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Taking into account this working 4GL code #4174-12 the current implementation of @Control... - 06:54 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- > At least the MS Date Time Picker control name is stored in this file.
For now, this is put in the hints file in ... - 06:44 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think we only need to worry about item 4. Assuming no design tim... - 06:14 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Taking into account this working 4GL code #4174-12 the current implementation of @ControlFrameComObjectImpl.this.getC...
- 03:24 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think we only need to worry about item 4. Assuming no design time properties are set via the w... - 02:29 AM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think we only need to worry about item 4. Assuming no design time properties are set via the w... - 10:46 AM Database Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- Issue #4492-5 fixed. @RecordBuffer.create()@ should have called the trigger before updating the @dirtyContext@, other...
- 08:52 AM Database Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- There seems to be a sub-issue in #4492-1. The @find last@ statement will find the newly created record. In 4GL, an er...
- 10:05 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Sure, I will see if I can collect more data. This afternoon I will not have time for that unfortunately, so it'll be ...
- 09:50 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> > > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > > Jurjen ... - 09:40 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> > > > So now ... - 09:33 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> The dialog is needed for the security reasons - the local file acces... - 09:25 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> > Also, when statement @system-dialog get-file@ executes, it first d... - 08:47 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> Also the "filters" argument does not have any effect. I am specifying
> @filters "zip ... - 08:39 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> Also the "filters" argument does not have any effect. I am specifying
> @filters "zip ... - 08:26 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Also the "filters" argument does not have any effect. I am specifying
@filters "zip archive (*.zip)" "*.zip"@
b... - 08:21 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> > > So now how to continue?
> > > It s... - 08:03 AM User Interface Feature #4113: enable upload of files from the browser (in the web clients) using SYSTEM-DIALOG G...
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Jurjen Dijkstra wrote:
> > So now how to continue?
> > It seems to me that parameter filena... - 09:22 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- The trick is to write the @hashCode@ and @equals@ methods generically, to operate only on those properties that are c...
- 09:15 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> For the moment, I have one question, from 1st phrase, related to the key for the hash map/s... - 09:07 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- For the moment, I have one question, from 1st phrase, related to the key for the hash map/set: wouldn't it be a bit o...
- 08:21 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, please implement a feature which uses @BitSet@ and @HashSet@ (or @HashMap@) to implement a tracker for record...
- 04:10 AM Base Language Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I believe that we are at a good "first pass" level of support here. A future improvement would b... - 01:12 AM Base Language Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Constantin/Hynek: Do you know of any other critical bugs or missing features before we can accept...
01/09/2020
- 05:56 PM Base Language Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Understood. To implement "temp-tables" that are shared across threads we would have to implement a multi-user databa...
- 05:17 PM Base Language Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- To clarify, you can access a persistent table across threads, but not over the same connection. A temp-table actually...
- 05:16 PM Base Language Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Since JDBC connections cannot be shared across more than one thread, the current temp-table appro... - 05:09 PM Base Language Feature #3254: add support for running 4GL on multiple threads in a single session
- Some months ago, Eric noted to me that sharing temp-tables will be a problem since they are private to a single JDBC ...
- 05:45 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- h1. Testcase Results
h2. Shared Frames (Standalone)
Both testcases are very similar, with the exception of the ... - 03:37 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- h1. Non-Shared Frame
Again, the only difference between these 2 testcases is the embedded assignment. However, unl... - 02:55 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- h1. Shared Frame
The only difference between these 2 testcases is the embedded assignment. However, the one with t... - 02:36 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- In this testcase, you can add a widget to non-shared frame, and update the variables.
@nonshared_frame_embedded_up... - 02:31 PM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- These testcases both result in 4GL errors:
@cannot_add_widget_to_imported_frame.p@... - 10:59 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- > There are 3 types of frame:
>
> * non-shared (@DEF FRAME@, no use of the @SHARED@ keyword)
> * shared
> ** @DE... - 10:42 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- >> Does this failure only occur when this is an imported shared frame?
>
> If imported means non-shared (or local)
... - 10:34 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- > * Does this failure only occur when this is an imported shared frame?
If imported means non-shared (or local), t... - 10:12 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- Questions:
* Does this failure only occur when this is an imported shared frame?
* What does the 4GL do here? It... - 09:55 AM User Interface Bug #4498: Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- h1. Description
An array of extent 2 or more does not get the "hardcoded" array widgets created in the shared fram... - 09:39 AM User Interface Bug #4498 (Closed): Embedded assignment of extent in shared frame fails
- 04:36 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- I think we only need to worry about item 4. Assuming no design time properties are set via the wrx (see #4438), item...
- 04:31 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- These common 4GL usages of MS Date and Time Control:
# AppBuilder creates @wrx@ file that contains the AciveX contro... - 03:51 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- A key point: OCX controls are only 32-bit in nature. It is my understanding that Microsoft has never provided a 64-b...
- 04:28 PM Base Language Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- I believe that we are at a good "first pass" level of support here. A future improvement would be to support inherit...
- 04:24 PM Base Language Feature #3867: direct java class access from 4GL code
- I just committed revision 11467 to branch 4335a (which is derived from 3809e revision 11466). This revision provides...
- 12:04 PM Database Bug #4492 (WIP): database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- 10:29 AM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- Yes, that would be OK as well.
- 10:24 AM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- Greg, also there's a @FocusEvent@ generated by @requestFocus@ called right after the row entry event is generated, wh...
- 03:34 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Code review 3856b revision 11363. The changes look good.
- 03:29 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- I tested and fixed referenced indexed properties conversion rules. Basically the rules determine when to use set or g...
01/08/2020
- 04:22 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Tasks from note 59 are implemented and were pushed to branch 4011 as r11370.
- 04:07 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Checked in these testcases:...
- 02:10 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- *Updates are in 4207a-11372.*
- 02:10 PM User Interface Bug #4488 (WIP): Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- 12:50 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Good.
- 10:50 AM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Do we need to recalculate the node.parent.type each iteration of the while node.parent.type != ... - 08:24 AM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- > Do we need to recalculate the node.parent.type each iteration of the while node.parent.type != prog.statement?
I... - 07:10 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Looking at the more enhanced updates to @convert/frame_generator.xml@ where we want to use @firstref@, @lastref@, and...
- 03:37 PM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> These testcases are broken:
>
> ./uast/browse/shared_query_browse_frame.p
> ./uast/brows... - 02:08 PM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- These testcases are broken:
./uast/browse/shared_query_browse_frame.p
./uast/browse/shared_query_browse_frame-run... - 05:13 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- > The 4GL probably provides the ability to use a shared browse in more than one non-shared frame.
As far as I test... - 02:16 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- For details on using MS Common Controls OCXes in appbuilder, please see #3858-85 (through note 87).
- 12:49 PM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- You could create a subclass of @KeyInput@ for use with entry events.
- 11:53 AM User Interface Bug #4074: Mismatching ROW-ENTRY/LEAVE events
- > I suppose it's the best place to put a testcase that demonstrates unwanted row-entry events and duplicate row-entry...
- 09:00 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Marius Gligor wrote:
> could you tell me please what is a referencing indexed properties?
I meant an assignment o... - 08:55 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 3856b revision 11362. The changes are good. Also please test referencing indexed p... - 08:51 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Code review 3856b revision 11362. The changes are good. Also please test referencing indexed properties.
- 06:39 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- The idea behind conversion rules for indexed OCX properties is to transform the assignment right-side value into a CO...
01/07/2020
- 06:57 PM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> 4450a was merged into 4207a as rev 11371.
I updated my 4207a to that rev, and customer ... - 06:05 PM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- 4450a was merged into 4207a as rev 11371.
- 09:34 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 4450a Revision 11342
>
> I'm good with the changes. Please merge them... - 09:27 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Code Review Task Branch 4450a Revision 11342
I'm good with the changes. Please merge them into 4207a and then dea... - 09:20 AM Database Bug #4450 (WIP): implement shared query and shared browse
- Iterator issue and javadocs are fixed in 4450a rev 11342. (please note that I'll be unavailable for the next couple o...
- 08:11 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Please check in your changes and I will review. I'd like to have them merged into 4207a ASAP, if there is no issue.
... - 08:02 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Heh, I forgot to define a local iterator and and the one from the outer cycle was used.
The files in the customer's ... - 06:10 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- > 1. Why aren't shared browse instances registered with/imported from the SVM?
Browse widget is a part of a frame,... - 04:32 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Greg Shah wrote:
> What does this have to do with the regression in #4488-22?
Just a different approach. With #44... - 04:15 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- What does this have to do with the regression in #4488-22?
- 04:06 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Greg Shah wrote:
> That does seem wrong. But I thought that you said the @input mychar@ code did emit in Java with f... - 03:58 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- That does seem wrong. But I thought that you said the @input mychar@ code did emit in Java with frame f2.
- 03:43 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > and we should now be scoped to f2 frame for the getMychar() getter, due to the repeat with fram... - 03:25 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- > The mychar value ("myval") should be displayed in the frame sf1's fieldx widget.
Yes.
> The code (without rev... - 02:36 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes. That is the entire point of an at-base field. It IS a widget in the frame.
Taking this ... - 01:51 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Yes. That is the entire point of an at-base field. It IS a widget in the frame.
- 01:37 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Should this testcase:...
- 12:14 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Updates to:
> +rules/annotations/frame_scoping.rules+
> @add_widget@ was modified to inclu... - 12:11 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Updates to:
+rules/annotations/frame_scoping.rules+
@add_widget@ was modified to include another condition under wh... - 01:18 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- In Hotel GUI, you can see this usage as follows. You will see a button widget in some screen or dialog which as a tr...
- 01:07 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- Sergey Ivanovskiy wrote:
> There is @C:\Windows\SysWOW64\mscomct2.ocx@ OCX library that exposes @IDTPicker@ (called ... - 12:54 PM User Interface Feature #4174: implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- There is @C:\Windows\SysWOW64\mscomct2.ocx@ OCX library that exposes @IDTPicker@ (called Microsoft Date and Time Pick...
- 12:06 PM User Interface Feature #4174 (WIP): implement calendar control/dtpicker OCX replacement
- 11:43 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > * Does this problem only exist after 3856b? If so, is it caused by the ... - 11:09 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> * Does this problem only exist after 3856b? If so, is it caused by the improvements in COM/OCX c... - 10:20 AM User Interface Feature #3856: implement a widget that replaces the Microsoft ImageList OCX (VB 6.0 common control)
- During conversion regression testing with a large customer application, Marius found a regression that converts witho...
- 09:07 AM Conversion Tools Feature #4493 (New): create a runner process which makes it a simple one-step-process to convert ...
01/06/2020
- 05:54 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Please go ahead and implement the conversion changes for the DMO interface simplification (i.e., moving the bulk meth...
- 03:20 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> It seems we could rationalize the DMO interface and implementation class hierarchy a bit. Cu... - 02:09 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Another issue I want to discuss for when I get back to the bulk getters and setter for extent fields in @DmoClass@......
- 01:49 PM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The usage of @BitSet@ should be blazing fast.
I think it should be much better, though n... - 07:29 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, welcome back! I am reworking the @RecordBuffer$Handler@ inner class pretty drastical... - 01:21 AM Database Feature #4011: database/persistence layer performance improvements
- Ovidiu, welcome back! I am reworking the @RecordBuffer$Handler@ inner class pretty drastically, pushing much of the p...
- 02:22 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Greg Shah wrote:
> @fieldx@ still needs all those annotations because it is a real widget reference. Either your ch... - 10:49 AM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- @fieldx@ still needs all those annotations because it is a real widget reference. Either your changes are in the wro...
- 10:42 AM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Yes, that is what I was referencing in #4488-11. To solve it we need ... - 02:06 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Well, I understand what was wrong in my setup. I had @large_customer_application.jar@ in my project classpath. Now th...
- 02:00 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exi... - 01:56 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exist in your application jar f... - 01:40 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Does @com/goldencode/testcases/dmo/_meta/meta_table_ddl.sql@ exist in your application jar file?
- 01:21 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Please note that I still have no solution for problem #3810-413.... - 12:46 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Please note that I still have no solution for problem #3810-413. Any help will be highly ap... - 11:18 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Code Review Task Branch 4450a Revision 11341
1. Why aren't shared browse instances registered with/imported from t... - 09:19 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > 4450a rev 11341 fixes the testcase, not sure about the customer... - 09:13 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> 4450a rev 11341 fixes the testcase, not sure about the customer's app. Please review.
I... - 10:57 AM User Interface Feature #4077: add option to OPEN-MIME-RESOURCE to delete the original source file when the send ...
- I made some additional edits. Also, please note that the FWD implementation details are now also out of date.
- 09:22 AM User Interface Feature #4077: add option to OPEN-MIME-RESOURCE to delete the original source file when the send ...
- Greg, please review these changes https://proj.goldencode.com/projects/p2j/wiki/OPEN-MIME-RESOURCE#section-3.
- 08:30 AM User Interface Feature #4077 (Test): add option to OPEN-MIME-RESOURCE to delete the original source file when th...
- Sergey: Please update the documentation to fully explain the new syntax. You MUST leave the old syntax there as well...
- 09:30 AM User Interface Feature #4170 (WIP): add drag and drop support to treeview widget
- The drag and drop support is used in the customer application being converted in #4069. If you can easily implement ...
- 06:25 AM Database Bug #4492: database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- A database trigger defined in the following manner behaves differently on FWD:...
- 06:17 AM Database Bug #4492 (WIP): database trigger defined with abbreviation should create a new buffer
- 05:37 AM Base Language Bug #4160: Arrays assigment issue
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> That was not enough detail to get me going. I believe Greg thought it would be an exercise i...
01/04/2020
- 03:35 PM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- 4450a rev 11341 fixes the testcase, not sure about the customer's app. Please review.
01/03/2020
- 06:06 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, that is what I was referencing in #4488-11. To solve it we need to know when this is an @&#... - 05:30 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Yes, that is what I was referencing in #4488-11. To solve it we need to know when this is an @@ base-field@ refe...
- 05:13 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- It looks to me like the next-to-last @add_widget@ is the problem:...
- 04:45 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> The @jName@ values being @expr...@ is a little unexpected, as that is what was added to the ... - 04:03 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > The comment before adding the widget is "the variables used in @ base clauses in format_phrase ... - 03:35 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- > The comment before adding the widget is "the variables used in @ base clauses in format_phrase are also part of the...
- 03:26 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In both the shared and non-shared cases, the use of @@ base-field@ syntax *does NOT create a ... - 02:45 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- In both the shared and non-shared cases, the use of @@ base-field@ syntax *does NOT create a new widget* in the 4...
- 01:38 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Creating a standalone NON-SHARED testcase:...
- 11:25 AM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> I am struggling to understand what exactly I should expect that code to do:
> @display mych... - 11:23 AM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- I am struggling to understand what exactly I should expect that code to do:
@display mychar @@@ fieldx with frame sf... - 01:49 PM Base Language Feature #3810: SECURITY-POLICY and other security features
- The extended @uast/security/export-cp.p@ test produces the compatible results in 4GL and FWD branch 3810e rev. 11341....
- 09:38 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #4122: spawner segmentation fault when OS user has no password set
- More findings so far debugging @spawn.c@, Ubuntu+Chrome:
1. For the user without password the Java side sends @""@ e... - 01:52 AM Base Language Feature #2135: implement COPY-LOB language statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> * What is the structure/size/layout of the BOM for file input/output?
There is no special...
01/02/2020
- 05:56 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- When the @display mychar @@@ fieldx with frame sf1@ is used with a non-shared sf1, the code @SharedFrameMixupSf1@ cla...
- 04:31 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > ...
>
> Hold on... there's a typo in the testcase I need to co... - 04:18 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> ...
Hold on... there's a typo in the testcase I need to correct. - 04:17 PM User Interface Bug #4488: Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- h1. Testcase
*Updates are in 4207a-11372.*
The below has been checked in as @uast/sharedframes/shared_frame_mix... - 03:34 PM User Interface Bug #4488 (Closed): Wrong frame used after display includes widgets from other frame
- 01:07 PM Base Language Bug #4476 (Test): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- 12:12 PM Base Language Bug #4476 (WIP): Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- 12:11 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > but doesn't myat have to be defined properly, too?
>
> In the working case, the variable is ... - 10:23 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- > but doesn't myat have to be defined properly, too?
In the working case, the variable is not defined as an inline... - 10:15 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Greg Shah wrote:
> That is probably not related. The issue will be the tree structure under the @KW_FORM@. The @FO... - 10:07 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- That is probably not related. The issue will be the tree structure under the @KW_FORM@. The @FORM_ITEM@ related to ...
- 10:02 AM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Comparing the AST generated for the broken case (@shared_frame_at_label.p@) against the correct case (@shared_frame_a...
- 06:59 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Please summarize the status of the task, what is left to do and the estimated time needed.
- 05:09 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- > Let me know if you'd like me to run the customer code through this branch for testing purposes.
Sure, as soon as...
12/31/2019
- 03:04 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- This is data from a correctly built testcase, which does *not* create the fields in the from on-the-fly.
@sharedfr... - 02:14 PM Base Language Bug #4476: Shared frame does not get @ widget method generated
- Let me recap what is generated by the pair of testcases in #note-1 :
@sharedframes/SharedFrameAtLabel.java@... - 12:00 PM Base Language Bug #4484 (Test): Accumulator confusion using same field for count and total
- 12:00 PM Base Language Bug #4483 (Test): Unable to use logical variable check in underline statement
- 12:00 PM Base Language Bug #4482 (Test): Enable/Disable with empty EXCEPT causes issues
- 11:59 AM Base Language Bug #4480 (Test): Extent does not become fixed when there is an initial list of values
- 11:58 AM Base Language Bug #4455 (Test): Extent field on unsubscripted next-prompt not converted properly
- 11:57 AM Base Language Bug #4423 (Test): Incorrect buffer scoping when same buffer name used as a parameter to internal ...
- 10:42 AM Base Language Bug #4427 (Test): Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent
- 10:39 AM Base Language Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent
- Committed @rules/annotations/input_builtin_prep.rules@ to *4207a-11367*.
- 10:19 AM Base Language Bug #4427: Unable to convert keyword input when used to index into an extent
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Roger, I think I found the root cause. Try replacing the @walk-rules@ with @ascent-rule... - 10:00 AM Database Bug #4450: implement shared query and shared browse
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Created task branch 4450a from FWD trunk revision 11339.
Let me know if you'd like me t...
Also available in: Atom