Activity
From 09/03/2025 to 10/02/2025
10/02/2025
- 11:05 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- I have committed @9488/ rev. 15907@ for adding the overloaded methods @indexOf@ in @TextOps@.
After that, I investig... - 04:27 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- About the problem with classes that implement the same interface multiple times with different generics. This cannot ...
- 06:45 AM Bug #10519 (Review): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Merged 10519a_h2 to fwd-h2 rev 62 and pushed to projsrv01.
- 05:19 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I am OK with 10519a_h2. This can be merged to fwd-h2 trunk.
> *But* I want to stress out t... - 05:19 AM Bug #10519 (Merge Pending): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- 05:19 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- I am OK with 10519a_h2. This can be merged to fwd-h2 trunk.
*But* I want to stress out this is a high risk change an... - 03:48 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- *Alexandru* - do you think is safe to commit 10519a_h2 to fwd-h2 trunk? I need to add this to 9457c.
- 06:01 AM Bug #10662 (Review): Prodataset ADD-PARENT-ID-RELATION issue
- Committed revision *16191* on task branch *10662a*:
- DATASET:ADD-PARENT-ID-RELATION allow parent field before and a... - 05:47 AM Bug #10662 (WIP): Prodataset ADD-PARENT-ID-RELATION issue
- Created task branch *10662a*.
- 05:46 AM Bug #10662: Prodataset ADD-PARENT-ID-RELATION issue
- The following test passes on 4GL, but fails on FWD:...
- 05:43 AM Bug #10662 (Test): Prodataset ADD-PARENT-ID-RELATION issue
10/01/2025
- 07:39 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- I've noticed that the previous files didn't contain all the differences, so I've added the updated ones.
- 04:58 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- Update on the current status:
Currently, there are no more blocking issues when converting, however, there are still...
09/30/2025
- 10:58 AM Bug #10636: 4GL FOR FIRST LEAVE statement exits the function
- Also, you can target the @FOR@ block in OE if it has an explicit label and that is used for leave/next. So just th...
- 10:57 AM Bug #10636: 4GL FOR FIRST LEAVE statement exits the function
- Teodor, I think this is just the target of the leave/next is the outer block in such case:...
- 09:59 AM Bug #10636: 4GL FOR FIRST LEAVE statement exits the function
- There are other cases when the 4GL decides to convert a @LEAVE@ (or a @NEXT@) to a @RETURN@.
You can look inside @... - 06:28 AM Bug #10636: 4GL FOR FIRST LEAVE statement exits the function
- On OE 11.6, this does not happen when the @RECID@/@ROWID@ function is used on an inequality condition.
When there is... - 06:11 AM Bug #10636: 4GL FOR FIRST LEAVE statement exits the function
- On OE 11.6, there is a strange feature, when there is a @LEAVE@ statement on a @FOR@ block with a @RECID@ or @ROWID@ ...
- 05:59 AM Bug #10636 (Closed): 4GL FOR FIRST LEAVE statement exits the function
- 04:07 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- I fixed the problem from #9488-166 in @9488a/ rev. 15905@. I have made @ClassDefinition.candidates@ return a Set of @...
09/29/2025
- 04:26 PM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- I've started with testcases examples (tests/logmanager).
There is a problem in current @trunk@ with conversion of ... - 09:59 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- I think I understand the root cause for this problem: @WARNING: more than one method def found using fuzzy lookup: Ge...
- 08:58 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- I found a fix for the @annotateMethodCall@ error from above. In @ClassDefinition.isInheritedFrom@ we have logic for c...
- 06:45 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- I have managed to solve some of the issues presented in the last note by removing classes from the skeleton or removi...
- 08:08 AM Bug #10624 (Review): DO WHILE that contains a FINALLY block can be executed too many times
- Created task branch *10624a* and committed rev. *16186* which fixes the problem encountered in the customer's app.
...
09/26/2025
- 01:10 PM Bug #10627: Numeric FILL-IN: Format Index Miscalculation
- Consider the following example as an illustration:...
- 01:04 PM Bug #10627 (New): Numeric FILL-IN: Format Index Miscalculation
- 10:08 AM Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- The root cause for this regression is the change to not process any .schema files if there are not changes in .df fil...
- 07:41 AM Bug #10624 (WIP): DO WHILE that contains a FINALLY block can be executed too many times
- During the testing of a customer application I found that the following testcase is the subject of a problem in FWD:
... - 07:36 AM Bug #10624 (Review): DO WHILE that contains a FINALLY block can be executed too many times
- 07:24 AM Bug #10620: Missing getter when converting frame attributes in MESSAGE statements
- Oki, thanks Constantin for your prompt feedback!
- 07:19 AM Bug #10620: Missing getter when converting frame attributes in MESSAGE statements
- Paula Păstrăguș wrote:
> In the customer application I’m working on, the PIXELS-PER-ROW and PIXELS-PER-COLUMN attrib... - 07:15 AM Bug #10620: Missing getter when converting frame attributes in MESSAGE statements
- In the customer application I’m working on, the PIXELS-PER-ROW and PIXELS-PER-COLUMN attributes are only used as docu...
- 07:07 AM Bug #10620: Missing getter when converting frame attributes in MESSAGE statements
- Paula Păstrăguș wrote:
> I don’t think this will be easy to address. Right now, I can’t identify a simple solution.
... - 07:03 AM Bug #10620: Missing getter when converting frame attributes in MESSAGE statements
- Testcase:...
- 06:48 AM Bug #10620 (Review): Missing getter when converting frame attributes in MESSAGE statements
- Committed solution as rev *16185*.
Constantin, please review.
The only attributes that were incorrectly convert... - 06:38 AM Bug #10620 (WIP): Missing getter when converting frame attributes in MESSAGE statements
- Created task branch 10620a.
09/25/2025
- 08:59 AM Bug #10597: [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- No more issues found. I believe this is ready to be merged into trunk.
- 08:43 AM Bug #10620: Missing getter when converting frame attributes in MESSAGE statements
- When a frame attribute (e.g. @PIXELS-PER-ROW@) is used in a @MESSAGE@ statement, the conversion generates a call to @...
- 08:39 AM Bug #10620 (Review): Missing getter when converting frame attributes in MESSAGE statements
- 03:43 AM Bug #10567 (Review): same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- 03:42 AM Bug #10567 (WIP): same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- Committed revision *16165* on task branch *10567a*:
- Avoid @openScope@ call for the same buffer in the current scop... - 03:29 AM Bug #10567: same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- Please keep the change in @ScopedList@ (but still log a warning maybe). Otherwise, yes, find a place where we can av...
- 03:18 AM Bug #10567: same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- I have looked on this task and I might have a solution.
I made an investigation on what happens right now:
- The ...
09/24/2025
- 05:03 PM Bug #10597 (Internal Test): [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- I am OK with the latest changes from 10597a (I think there is is typo in note 12: @10579a@).
- 04:56 AM Bug #10597: [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- Good job, Stefanel. The conversion for the application seems right, however, right now I cannot build the code, but b...
- 06:00 AM Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Responses to questions from Tomasz (sent via email):
> Identified logging levels, reviewed logger code.
>
> Is ... - 05:25 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Added a new set of files:
* the differences between @PUT/DISPLAY/EXPORT AND MESSAGE@ for 1-255 decimal code points... - 02:58 AM Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- The change that fixes the incremental conversion is dependent on the changes from the 6083a branch. I think pulling a...
09/23/2025
- 10:46 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- The problem mentioned above is actually already solved in trunk by this change:...
- 09:50 AM Feature #9488: implement all built-in OO classes using the open source ADE code from 12.8.4
- I have tried to convert the ADE source code with the latest revision of @9488a@, however conversion of multiple files...
- 09:47 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Committed revision *16139* on task branch *10352a*:
- Changed @column.getXmlNodeName()@ with @column.getFieldName()@... - 09:12 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Committed revision *16138* on task branch *10352a*:
- Skipping relation fields when the parser reaches it. The chang... - 08:18 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Paul, one more fix: @Importer.processRelationFlds@ has the same dependency on @serialize... - 07:55 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Commit to 10352a.
- 07:55 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Exactly.
What should I do for this issue? Create a new task/commit here? - 07:53 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Teodor, please explain more: usually @PARENT-ID-RELATION@ are... - 07:52 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor, please explain more: usually @PARENT-ID-RELATION@ are hidden (thus computed aut... - 07:50 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Paul, one more fix: @Importer.processRelationFlds@ has the same dependency on @serializeName@; please fix this.
- 07:46 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Teodor, please explain more: usually @PARENT-ID-RELATION@ are hidden (thus computed automatically), as the recid is ...
- 03:10 AM Bug #10352: Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- There is a unit test from customer application, which fails because of a @RECID@ field.
Please see this test case, w... - 07:51 AM Bug #10381: READ-JSON dataset handle method doesn't throw error when parsing a invalid JSON
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Paul, please also add javadoc to @handleJsonParseException@
Committed rev. *16126* on... - 07:40 AM Bug #10381: READ-JSON dataset handle method doesn't throw error when parsing a invalid JSON
- Paul, please also add javadoc to @handleJsonParseException@
- 07:51 AM Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- Teodor: please find the change from 6083a which can be applied to 9457c, to resolve this.
- 07:46 AM Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Danut, the *6083a* has a fix for this issue? I see that Constantin reported it on #10536-15.
... - 04:58 AM Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- Danut, the *6083a* has a fix for this issue? I see that Constantin reported it on #10536-15.
- 04:19 AM Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- +Danut
+Constantin - 04:18 AM Bug #10613: Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- Steps to reproduce:
* Setup a *hotel GUI* project or any dataset project, with incremental conversion.
* Do a full ... - 04:08 AM Bug #10613 (Closed): Incremental conversion issue: temp-table dmo does not get converted
- 07:31 AM Bug #10509 (Internal Test): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- I'll put this into testing with other changes.
- 07:21 AM Bug #10518 (Test): Property getter call is ignored from conversion
- 07:08 AM Bug #10518 (Internal Test): Property getter call is ignored from conversion
- Branch *10518a* was merged into trunk as rev. *16181* and archived.
- 06:54 AM Bug #10518 (Merge Pending): Property getter call is ignored from conversion
- Please merge to trunk now.
- 06:42 AM Bug #10597 (Review): [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- The issue with the above test case was that the widget name comparison failed because the extent @NUM_LITERAL@ node w...
- 03:10 AM Bug #10597 (WIP): [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- There are other cases that need to be addressed. Andrei notified me that the conversion failed with the same output. ...
09/22/2025
- 06:24 PM Bug #10597 (Internal Test): [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> I created task branch 10597a and committed the patch in revision 16177.
> Please review... - 10:06 AM Bug #10597: [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Andrei, can you test this patch for #10566-12 ?
I have started a conversion for the m... - 08:33 AM Bug #10597 (Review): [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- I finally figured that this issue was fixed in the past, but only for @<function name="search_widget">@ (<!-- locate ...
- 07:04 AM Bug #10597: [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- So, the issue I see now is that the widget AST saved in the frame widgets list looks like this:...
- 08:44 AM Bug #10519 (Review): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Committed revision *63* on h2 task branch *10519a_h2*:
- Addressed code review #10519-24. - 07:16 AM Bug #10519 (WIP): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Review of 10519a_h2:
* I don't think @while (batchId >= (nextOffset = getAndIncNextOffset(session)))@ block is req... - 07:43 AM Bug #10601: Resolving of unqualified fields
- Constantin, given that the changes done for #9298 don't really impact the testcase posted on #10601 and if by testing...
- 04:30 AM Bug #10509 (Review): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- 04:29 AM Bug #10509 (Internal Test): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- 04:29 AM Bug #10509 (WIP): SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- 03:20 AM Bug #10558: READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> But it can be read also by this:
> [...]
> ... so the fix is not completely correct.
... - 02:20 AM Bug #10381 (Review): READ-JSON dataset handle method doesn't throw error when parsing a invalid JSON
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor - please add javadocs and history entries.
I think you meant me :)
I commi...
09/19/2025
- 02:00 PM Bug #10381 (WIP): READ-JSON dataset handle method doesn't throw error when parsing a invalid JSON
- 01:59 PM Bug #10381: READ-JSON dataset handle method doesn't throw error when parsing a invalid JSON
- Teodor - please add javadocs and history entries.
- 01:51 PM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- *Alexandru* - please review 10519a_h2 - it looks good to me.
- 01:49 PM Bug #10538: QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- Vladimir, thanks for the review; do you have any other concerns? Otherwise, we can put this into test.
- 08:45 AM Bug #10522: Bring changes from 7156e/15727 to trunk
- Committed *10522a/16177*. Changes from 7156e/15727 built on trunk/15726: Added change to collections java file from 6...
- 08:33 AM Bug #10597 (WIP): [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- So, this works if we remove the @assign@:...
- 02:09 AM Bug #10597: [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- Nice find Stefanel! I modified the scenario to use temp-tables since it was easier, but the original one uses persist...
- 07:47 AM Bug #10601: Resolving of unqualified fields
- This issue is a continuation of #9298. There is this testcase from #9298-43:...
- 07:26 AM Bug #10601 (New): Resolving of unqualified fields
- 07:29 AM Feature #5662: add -WSDLAuth and -SSLAuth (and related) connect options for the web-services handle
- This will be fixed in #10587
- 07:26 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Also I've added archives containing the results of comparison between FWD and 4GL results. Now, the files contain t...
- 03:54 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- *Constantin*, I've added the files which contain the differences between @PUT@ and @DISPLAY/MESSAGE/EXPORT@ (for defa...
- 06:43 AM Bug #10599: [Regression] undoLeaveTopLevel() generated during conversion, but it doesn't exist
- I discussed with Eduard and he said that the issues should be fixed by 4602a. He also provided a patch I could use fo...
- 06:23 AM Bug #10599: [Regression] undoLeaveTopLevel() generated during conversion, but it doesn't exist
- The test case is:...
- 06:20 AM Bug #10599 (New): [Regression] undoLeaveTopLevel() generated during conversion, but it doesn't exist
09/18/2025
- 10:50 AM Bug #10597: [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- This hasn’t worked for temp-tables for a long time, even before 15726. The issue is that temp-tables use the conversi...
- 08:42 AM Bug #10597: [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- Work on #10566 can't continue unless #10597 is fixed.
- 08:40 AM Bug #10597: [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
- ...
- 08:39 AM Bug #10597 (Test): [Regression] extent field in form fails conversion
09/16/2025
- 09:33 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- I've added:
* the archive which contains the differences between FWD and Progress for @OUTPUT TO@ used with default/... - 07:24 AM Feature #6432: implement the WEB special stream
- I see that @StreamFactory.openWebStream()@ has this:...
- 03:16 AM Bug #10352 (Review): Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Committed rev. *16136* on branch *10352a* that addresses the review above.
09/15/2025
- 12:02 PM Bug #10352 (WIP): Fix READ-JSON dataset handle method's behaviour
- Paul, this code in @Importer@ doesn't look right:...
- 09:16 AM Bug #10365: Mismatched number of parameters passed to routine for external function
- The changes are already in 6506b, and from the testing that I did until now, things seemed really good.
- 09:15 AM Bug #10365: Mismatched number of parameters passed to routine for external function
- We will rely upon the testing of 6506b to test these changes.
- 09:14 AM Bug #10365: Mismatched number of parameters passed to routine for external function
- The changes should be in 6506b.
- 09:07 AM Bug #10365 (Internal Test): Mismatched number of parameters passed to routine for external function
- Florin, please rebase and do conversion testing (compare src/ folder with trunk and 10365a).
- 08:54 AM Bug #10365: Mismatched number of parameters passed to routine for external function
- Constantin: Do you have any remaining concerns?
- 07:38 AM Bug #10380: WRITE-XML serializes decimals different than the specified format
- 10380a rev 16089 - Ensure a leading '0' is added for decimal values when writing to XML, which are between zero and o...
- 07:27 AM Bug #10558: READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- But it can be read also by this:...
- 07:25 AM Bug #10558: READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- 10558a rev 16164 adds another case:...
- 07:12 AM Bug #10309 (Internal Test): DATASET WRITE-JSON does not change value for a property
- The change is in 10309c rev 16162.
- 06:44 AM Bug #10567: same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- 10567a was created from trunk 16163.
Rev 16164 contains the ScopedList changes from #10483 and the patch above. - 06:37 AM Bug #10567: same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- We need to investigate the implications of this:...
- 06:32 AM Bug #10567 (Test): same buffer can be used as argument multiple times
- 05:19 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- This is an example that highlights that PUT and DISPLAY lead to different results (for some cases) when writing in a ...
09/14/2025
- 04:19 AM Bug #10309: DATASET WRITE-JSON does not change value for a property
- The correct function is this:...
- 04:09 AM Bug #10203 (New): XMLs cannot be imported into a dataset without a schema present
09/12/2025
- 06:45 AM Bug #10558 (Review): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- Committed revision *16163* on task branch *10558a*:
- Allow fields with XML prefix from a temp-table without NS-PREF... - 06:12 AM Bug #10558 (WIP): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- Created task branch 10558a.
- 06:09 AM Bug #10558: READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
- We have the following testcase:
{{Collapse(TestSimpleReadXml.cls)... - 06:01 AM Bug #10558 (Test): READ-XML does not populate the field with a XML prefix on SERIALIZABLE-NAME
09/11/2025
- 09:35 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- *Constantin*,I've added the archive *default_stream* with the results for @OUTPUT TO ... DISPLAY/EXPORT/PUT/MESSAGE@ ...
- 04:10 AM Bug #10309 (Review): DATASET WRITE-JSON does not change value for a property
- Committed revision *16161* on task branch *10309c*:
- Added support for handle method/properties on 'is_method_outpu... - 03:13 AM Bug #10309 (WIP): DATASET WRITE-JSON does not change value for a property
- Created task branch *10309c*.
I have missed a test case, when the temp-table/dataset handle is obtained using a ge...
09/10/2025
- 08:09 AM Bug #9572: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException and wrong newline handling in RedirectedTerminal.addCha...
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > >... - 07:29 AM Bug #9572: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException and wrong newline handling in RedirectedTerminal.addCha...
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > > Code review 9572a. Please start reg... - 07:50 AM Bug #9037: Two timers problem: only one fires
- *Note*: the fix for #10206 merged as rev. 16156 has not resolved this issue.
- 04:14 AM Bug #10410 (Closed): Error is thrown outside of topLevelBlock when block-level on error undo, thr...
- 04:14 AM Bug #10410 (Internal Test): Error is thrown outside of topLevelBlock when block-level on error un...
- 04:12 AM Bug #10410: Error is thrown outside of topLevelBlock when block-level on error undo, throw is not...
- The customer application code was changed and the issue was fixed.
- 02:22 AM Bug #10538: QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> @QUOTER(d)@ returns @"25/09/09"@ instead of the expected @"2025/09/09"@. Note that @S...
09/09/2025
- 02:36 PM Bug #10538: QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- I did not notice Constantin is the reviewer already, and made review myself.
Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Committed on ... - 08:46 AM Bug #10538 (Review): QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- Committed on 10538a, rev. 16154.
Use @toStringMessage@ in qouterWorker in @datetime@ and @datetime-tz@. - 08:15 AM Bug #10538 (WIP): QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- 07:56 AM Bug #10538: QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- Found a different behaviour between 4GL and FWD in the following test case:...
- 07:51 AM Bug #10538 (Test): QUOTER strips time part in datetime and datetime-tz
- 08:24 AM Bug #10509: SEARCH(directory_path) returns unkown
- 4GL also returns unknown on directories, but I was fooled by ABLUnit @Assert:IsTrue@ when the result is unknown and t...
09/08/2025
- 09:29 AM Bug #9572: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException and wrong newline handling in RedirectedTerminal.addCha...
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > Code review 9572a. Please start regression testing. I suppose ... - 05:11 AM Bug #10519 (Review): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Committed revision *16147* on task branch *10519a*:
- Reverted last commit. Removed hasChild = true on writeChildRec... - 04:25 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Created task branch *10519a_h2* on @p2j_repo/h2@.
Committed revision *62* on h2 task branch *10519a_h2*:
- Moved ... - 03:38 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What is the code which links the child with the parent via recid? Is the parent table t... - 03:21 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- > commonTable has 2 parents: node11 and node2, linked by the commonTable.parent_id. When there are two identical RECI...
- 02:07 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Lets take a step back. Why d... - 02:14 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Delia Mitric wrote:
> Found a problem in FWD during generating results for OUTPUT *STREAM* TO ... .
> This is t... - 02:12 AM Bug #10527: Using DISPLAY with DEFINED STREAMS and DOWN WITH FRAME leads to incorrect content in ...
- Here is the testcase:...
- 02:10 AM Bug #10527 (New): Using DISPLAY with DEFINED STREAMS and DOWN WITH FRAME leads to incorrect conte...
09/05/2025
- 09:28 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- The thing that puzzles me is this:...
- 04:39 AM Bug #10518: Property getter call is ignored from conversion
- I ran conversion testing on a customer application and it showed no differences between converting with this branch a...
09/04/2025
- 01:41 PM Bug #9572: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException and wrong newline handling in RedirectedTerminal.addCha...
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Code review 9572a. Please start regression testing. I suppose I will run the ChUI regression t... - 10:21 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Delia Mitric wrote:
> Found a problem in FWD during generating results for OUTPUT *STREAM* TO ... .
> This is t... - 07:44 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- Found a problem in FWD during generating results for OUTPUT *STREAM* TO ... .
This is the testcase:... - 04:09 AM Bug #4766: fix CHR and ASC
- About the modifications made on @Text@ class (for character to store the information about the codePage in which it i...
- 09:40 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Teodor Gorghe wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Lets take a step back. Why do we need in FWD for the recids t... - 09:28 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Lets take a step back. Why do we need in FWD for the recids to be different? What's th... - 09:23 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Lets take a step back. Why do we need in FWD for the recids to be different? What's the minimal standalone test (in...
- 09:18 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> There are limitations on how we can assign recid to _temp in FWD. There are changes to prop... - 08:25 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- I am sure this is a regression.
When I implemented the dataset support I would not have been able to identify the ... - 06:59 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Are you saying that if you call @CREATE@ twice one after the other, for different temp-t... - 06:13 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- There are limitations on how we can assign recid to _temp in FWD. There are changes to properly reclaim ids so that i...
- 06:09 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Are you saying that if you call @CREATE@ twice one after the other, for different temp-tables, both records will have...
- 06:03 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- There is a big problem on how we generate the @recid@ field from a record:...
- 05:22 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Committed revision *16146* on task branch *10519a*:
- Reset @hasChild@ flag to initial state while iterating through... - 05:19 AM Bug #10519 (WIP): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- 05:18 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Created task branch *10519*.
I have a fix for the first issue, which will come very soon.
For the second issue, the... - 04:37 AM Bug #10519: ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- Suppose we have a ProDataSet structure like this:...
- 04:25 AM Bug #10519 (Test): ProDataset WRITE-XML issue on nested PARENT-ID-RELATION
- 09:27 AM Bug #10518 (Internal Test): Property getter call is ignored from conversion
- I'm OK with the changes. Nice find.
Please run conversion with a small project which has OO and if it works, lets ... - 09:17 AM Bug #10518 (Review): Property getter call is ignored from conversion
- I checked and this solves the initial issue for which this task has been opened.
Standing by for review. - 08:49 AM Bug #10518 (WIP): Property getter call is ignored from conversion
- Created task branch *10518a* and committed rev. *16148* that fixes this issue.
- 02:59 AM Bug #10518: Property getter call is ignored from conversion
- The test case:...
- 02:41 AM Bug #10518 (Closed): Property getter call is ignored from conversion
- 08:50 AM Bug #10522: Bring changes from 7156e/15727 to trunk
- The purpose of this task is to take the changes from 7156e/15727 and put them into a separate branch, then review and...
- 08:48 AM Bug #10522 (New): Bring changes from 7156e/15727 to trunk
09/03/2025
- 03:52 AM Bug #10381 (Review): READ-JSON dataset handle method doesn't throw error when parsing a invalid JSON
- Committed rev. *16124* on branch *10381a* that makes FWD throw the correct exceptions for invalid JSON parsing.
Pl...
Also available in: Atom