Activity
From 06/12/2025 to 07/11/2025
07/11/2025
- 09:31 AM Feature #10094: RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not overlap
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Why the @if (restInBucket++ == 0)@? Just to get the first result?
Sorry for the C/C++ ... - 09:17 AM Feature #10094 (Internal Test): RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not...
- I've also tested an import and it worked.
- 09:17 AM Feature #10094: RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not overlap
- @TenantIdContext.prepareNextBracket@ - there is a @while (rs.next())@ which suggets that there may be more than one ...
- 08:58 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- To do:
* add a report where nested find queries are displayed based on the type of block, but only if the block refe... - 07:40 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Committed *6709a/16034*. Included UNIQUE finds in the report, I missed those previously.
- 06:54 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> * Nested FIND: 13 first, 6 next, 5 last, 5 current, 3 where (this is confusing a bit because ... - 06:35 AM Bug #9078 (Review): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Fixed #9078-113 in *9078b/16039*. We did not emit the find query as a variable when we had a block in the queue, but ...
- 05:21 AM Bug #9078 (WIP): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Found the issue from #9078-113 again, but I got a reliable reproduction this time. It seems that when I use the array...
- 06:23 AM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- This is in trunk.
* Dialect has this:... - 06:14 AM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, first results on conversion: @nulls last@ is added on indexes for H2 dialect (th...
07/10/2025
- 06:09 PM Feature #10094: RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not overlap
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Ovidiu, are there any changes required in existing scripts (non-tenant and multi-tenant)... - 05:40 AM Feature #10094: RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not overlap
- Ovidiu, are there any changes required in existing scripts (non-tenant and multi-tenant) for data import?
- 03:51 PM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- This is not intentional. I wonder why I did not notice it. It is a regression. Thank you for reporting it. I'm fixing...
- 03:48 PM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Ovidiu, first results on conversion: @nulls last@ is added on indexes for H2 dialect (this includes the meta schema a...
- 11:58 AM Feature #9456 (Review): implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- 11:58 AM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Branch 9456a was rebased to trunk/16032. Pushed up to revision 16060.
It is ready for review.
Note: I have some... - 05:41 AM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Ovidiu, can 9456a be moved to review?
About the data/dump/ database folder missing: if you haven't already fixed i... - 09:57 AM Bug #10111: All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger and SQLStatementLo...
- I have run a test suite of a large customer application and also tested different options for the logging tools and d...
- 09:24 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I ran the reports for hotel and got:
* Nested FIND: 13 first, 6 next, 5 last, 5 current, 3 where (this is confusing ... - 08:02 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Committed *6709a/16032*. Extended the functionality of the nested_find annotation and added more detailed reports:
... - 05:48 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- > Alex, I took a look at the last example from #6709-38 and only the FOR EACH find has the nested_find annotation. Ar...
07/09/2025
- 12:17 PM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Tried to import the import the testcases database in sql server and got the following error....
- 10:34 AM Bug #10276: Joinable interface should be made public
- While investigating #8279, I found an important functional issue regarding @Joinable@ interface. I was getting this e...
- 08:51 AM Bug #10276 (New): Joinable interface should be made public
- 08:49 AM Bug #10111: All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger and SQLStatementLo...
- Thanks, Ovidiu for the review.
Regarding testing, I am thinking of running a test suite of a large customer applic... - 08:00 AM Feature #10094: RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not overlap
- *Eric/Constantin: Please review this ASAP so we can move this task ahead.*
- 08:00 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- ...
- 07:18 AM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- Ovidiu: Please get this into the merge queue if it is ready to go.
- 05:36 AM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- I fixed the above warnings by creating the @word@ field in the generated @wordTable@ with the parent field @maxWidth@...
- 04:33 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- > Maybe a possible solution is to have a mix of private FFCs and common FFC. The latter will keep only pristine data ...
- 03:49 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
>
> So I am not the person to blame :-).
OK, you get only a partial blame :-).
I ... - 03:37 AM Bug #10083 (Test): Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
07/08/2025
- 07:43 PM Feature #10270: implement some temp-tables using the persistent database instance when they are j...
- I think this might be useful, but the heuristic could be difficult to implement because of dynamic queries. What I me...
- 09:35 AM Feature #10270: implement some temp-tables using the persistent database instance when they are j...
- > The idea here is that we could analyze usage of each temp-table and implement heuristcs that mark specific temp-tab...
- 08:28 AM Feature #10270: implement some temp-tables using the persistent database instance when they are j...
- The idea here is that we could analyze usage of each temp-table and implement heuristcs that mark specific temp-table...
- 08:23 AM Feature #10270 (New): implement some temp-tables using the persistent database instance when they...
- 07:31 PM Bug #10111 (Internal Test): All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger an...
- I think the changes in 15984 are OK. Can we move to 100% done?
- 04:24 AM Bug #10111: All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger and SQLStatementLo...
- I remembered something worth noting. In my current implementation, I have changed the type of the @enabled@ node for ...
- 03:51 AM Bug #10111 (Review): All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger and SQLSt...
- I have committed @10111a/15984@ with the missing files and addressed the rest of the review. Ovidiu, please take a lo...
- 06:44 PM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- As discussed during technical meet from Monday I tried executing the import from within the guest OS. That required m...
- 01:05 PM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- 9456a seems stable now after the fixes for word tables.
The customer's 'small' database imports without any issue.... - 12:31 PM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Ovidiu/Stefanel/Eduard: please lets get 9456a stabilized and ready for review tomorrow (this will include all the UDF...
- 06:34 PM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Of course, I am looking further for *Ovidiu*'s input on this matter.
I had a look over 102... - 04:39 PM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- I have just noticed a warning when the word indexes are created:...
- 08:24 AM Bug #10171 (WIP): Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Hmm, another case of "IntelliJ knows better".
It tries to help based on your configurat... - 06:54 AM Bug #10171 (Review): Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- I fixed the above issues in revision 9456a revision 16053.
- 04:47 AM Bug #10171 (WIP): Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- 04:47 AM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I did not do a thorough review, only a few observations:
> * please stick to JDK8 for the ... - 02:56 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> The private data getter and setter was added by Vladimir in the context of #5144. I don't reca... - 01:42 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- The private data getter and setter was added by Vladimir in the context of #5144. I don't recall @PRIVATE-DATA@ neede...
- 09:47 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Alex, I took a look at the last example from #6709-38 and only the FOR EACH find has the nested_find annotation. Are ...
- 09:05 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I'll mention a few ideas from the latest discussions so that I do not lose track of them:
* Tracking nested finds in... - 07:59 AM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- There are some bugs in the report so that more nested FINDs are logged than needed. I think the flag is set incorrect...
- 09:43 AM Bug #10198: analyze FIND statements which use only a small number of fields
- Just FYI: I also thought of this a while ago, but there was an issue with caching. The more variance we have in the F...
- 09:43 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I do not know (most likely not yet) whether 9457c was also rebased. Therefore they are most... - 09:41 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>
> I do not know (most likely not yet) whether 9457c was also rebased. Therefore they are ... - 09:35 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Branch 9456a was rebased after 7020a was merged in. The denormalisation of extent fields was replaced with expanded c...
- 09:27 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> I think there is a issue with some @_meta@ dmos.
>
> The following field in @_meta.MetaDb@... - 09:26 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- I think there is a issue with some @_meta@ dmos.
The following field in @_meta.MetaDb@ dmo:... - 07:55 AM Bug #9078 (Review): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I added 9078b to my ETF conversion queue, it will take a while to get through it.
- 07:54 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> I've managed to fix the issue, I've also noticed that CAN-FINDs were ignored and AdaptiveFind... - 07:23 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I've managed to fix the issue, I've also noticed that CAN-FINDs were ignored and AdaptiveFinds were also counted. I'l...
- 06:24 AM Bug #9078 (WIP): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I've found an issue while converting ETF:...
07/07/2025
- 04:07 PM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- I did not do a thorough review, only a few observations:
* please stick to JDK8 for the moment. @List<E> of(E... ele... - 02:50 PM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- See my note #9991-52. The import of the smaller database was (pretty much) successful.
There are some issues with t... - 02:32 PM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Manage to set up Hotel Gui with connection to a SQL Server instance running on a virtual machine. Did a smoke test wi...
- 10:26 AM Bug #10111: All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger and SQLStatementLo...
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> +Review of 10111a/r15983+
>
> First, why in revno: 15983 the files: @src/com/goldencode/... - 10:12 AM Bug #10111: All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger and SQLStatementLo...
- +Review of 10111a/r15983+
First, why in revno: 15983 the files: @src/com/goldencode/p2j/persist/BaseLoggingConfigu... - 04:59 AM Bug #10111: All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger and SQLStatementLo...
- I think this branch is ready for a review.
Main changes:
* @10111a/15982@: Moved the common logic from @P2JLoggingD... - 09:22 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> > Is there anything else to do before merging 7020d to trunk?
... - 09:21 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Is there anything else to do before merging 7020d to trunk?
Yes... I know. Too late.
... - 09:16 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- > FWD is not leaking anything except FINDs that were done on other sessions as well. It sounds quite bad to me. Overa...
- 08:44 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- Of course, I am looking further for *Ovidiu's* input on this matter.
- 08:40 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- *Greg*, I decided in today's stand-up to put #10222 on hold. The implementation of fast-find cache is complete and so...
- 06:04 AM Support #10222 (WIP): Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disa...
- Review for #10222:
* I don't understand @session.getCached(dmo.getClass(), cacheResult.getRecordID()).equals(dmo))@.... - 08:36 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Argh, this is OCX.
It was, but it is not in FWD.
>
> Hynek: can you point Vladimir t... - 01:44 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Argh, this is OCX.
Hynek: can you point Vladimir to an example how @TreeFace@ emits @get/setPrivateData@ via OCX? - 07:17 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Rebased *9078b* to latest *trunk/16028*, the branch is now at revision *16037*.
- 02:39 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Danut, does @AdaptiveFind@ still emit properly? This is the @FIND FIRST. REPEAT: FIND N... - 02:25 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Danut, does @AdaptiveFind@ still emit properly? This is the @FIND FIRST. REPEAT: FIND NEXT. END.@ pattern, if I'm no...
- 02:19 AM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- The runtime regression testing for @7504b@ finished successfully.
07/04/2025
- 11:45 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- The 9078b/16012 seems OK.
- 09:36 AM Feature #7020 (Test): always use "expanded" extent fields
- Branch 7020d was merged to trunk rev 16026 and archived.
- 08:41 AM Feature #7020 (Merge Pending): always use "expanded" extent fields
- I don't think so. Please go ahead and merge.
Make sure to have in the note at #8828 what is needed to run for tha... - 08:37 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Is there anything else to do before merging 7020d to trunk?
- 08:04 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Rename the file so that we know the dialect. We will eventually group them by dialects if t... - 07:45 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Rename the file so that we know the dialect. We will eventually group them by dialects if the number of files in the ...
- 07:23 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I have reviewed revisions 16043..16046 (LE) of 7020d. I see nothing wrong with the code.
>... - 07:16 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- I have reviewed revisions 16043..16046 (LE) of 7020d. I see nothing wrong with the code.
The new file @migrate_wor... - 04:24 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Committed to 7020d revision 16046 a change to build.xml to include @tools/scripts/*.sql@ into @p2j.jar@.
- 01:57 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Branch *7020d* was rebased to *trunk revsion 16023*, now at revision *16045*.
In revision 16044, I added the @migr... - 05:33 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Added 3 more SQL test files to @testcases/udfs/t-sql@.
Committed on 9456a, rev. 16042 - 16043, fix ups of @tostrin... - 01:37 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Committed functions fixups on 9456a, rev. 16040.
- 04:09 AM Bug #10195 (Test): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- 10195a was merged to trunk 16024 and archived.
- 03:39 AM Bug #10195 (Merge Pending): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- 04:02 AM Bug #10171 (Review): Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- I have committed my changes for word tables support in MS SQL Server in *9456a revision 16041*.
At the moment only ...
07/03/2025
- 01:59 PM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I'll run ETF today.
ETF passed. - 10:34 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- I'll run ETF today.
- 10:31 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Testing performed the 10195 branch:
- smoke tests of a GUI application ☑️
- smoke and unit tests of a large GUI a... - 11:49 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Vladimir, please look into TreeFace.java and TreeWidgetB... - 11:16 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Vladimir, please look into TreeFace.java and TreeWidgetBase.java - these define i.e. @ge... - 10:48 AM Bug #10083 (Internal Test): Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- 10083a was merged to trunk rev 16023 and archived.
- 10:34 AM Bug #10083 (Merge Pending): Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- Please merge now.
- 10:30 AM Bug #10083: Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> ETF testing passed.
>
> Is there anything else to test?
Stefanel tested another cu... - 04:14 AM Bug #10083: Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- ETF testing passed.
Is there anything else to test? - 10:35 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Adopted the sql tests for T-SQL and posted on @testcases/udfs/t-sql@.
- 08:10 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- I have committed @migrate_word_table_names.sql@ to @7020d/tools/scripts@ and added copyright and history entries, etc.
- 07:57 AM Bug #9078 (Review): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Committed *9078b/16012*. In case of a DO block that is also a loop, ensure that a block/inner block with "instvarid" ...
- 06:17 AM Bug #9078 (WIP): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- There's a scenario when using a DO block as a loop and there is no "instvarid" to attach the array, this causes the c...
- 07:52 AM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Word tables should theoretically work now. All I need to do is to test them on a real te... - 07:15 AM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- Word tables should theoretically work now. All I need to do is to test them on a real testcase. Before that, I want a...
- 07:14 AM Bug #10111: All statements are logged to a single text file for P2JQueryLogger and SQLStatementLo...
- I have committed in @10111a/15980@ the main refactor for having the common logic from @P2JQueryStatisticsConfiguratio...
07/02/2025
- 10:49 AM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- I have the function to generate the necessary triggers for word index table updates. I attached a generated DDL to se...
- 05:46 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Question, can the tests from @testcases/udfs@ be adopted to SQL Server and properly tested?
... - 03:11 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Vladimir, please look into TreeFace.java and TreeWidgetBase.java - these define i.e. @get/setPrivateData@, while the ...
- 02:32 AM Bug #10083: Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> I'll run ETF with this. Eduard, what's the state of the #10083-17 tests?
Passed with... - 02:31 AM Bug #10083: Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- I'll run ETF with this. Eduard, what's the state of the #10083-17 tests?
07/01/2025
- 07:42 PM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Yes, I think so. That's a good idea. Although, at a quick look they are not very extensive, but it's better than noth...
- 04:09 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Question, can the tests from @testcases/udfs@ be adopted to SQL Server and properly tested?
- 01:43 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eduard,
>
> Do you have any pending changes to 9456a as part of this task?
For now n... - 03:41 PM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- Yes, please. Use 9456a.
- 05:04 AM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- I have an untested prototype for @P2JSQLServer2012Dialect.generateWordTablesDDLImpl@ method. I guess I should work ov...
- 08:13 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> I used the temp table for simplicity, the behavior of the @find@ should be similar. I am just... - 06:27 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- I used the temp table for simplicity, the behavior of the @find@ should be similar. I am just trying to understand wh...
- 06:18 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- PS: FWD is trying to do its best to cover such "no cost" with the FF cache.
- 06:17 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- > Is this accurate?
> find tt1 where tt1.f1 = 1. //no op? record already in buffer
Not really. We can't tell if... - 04:08 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- ...
- 02:56 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- I made the change, the code is in 10222a/16013.
06/30/2025
- 10:12 AM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- Yes, there are a few changes in the UDFs for word tables. To check their existence the right type is @IF@ not @FN@ an...
- 03:56 AM Bug #10171 (WIP): Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- What I have so far.
* An improved @dbo.words@ function:... - 10:08 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- 6767c rebased to the current trunk, rev now is 16018.
- 08:29 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Tested the branch with our big customer application, and no issues were identified. We can also validate using our Ch...
- 09:59 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Eduard,
Do you have any pending changes to 9456a as part of this task?
The reason to ask is that I have some o... - 09:54 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I looked at the fix in 16011. The changes are correct.
- 02:26 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> Artur found a regression while converting a customer application, currently investigating.
I... - 02:18 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Artur found a regression while converting a customer application, currently investigating.
- 09:12 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- *7020d* was rebased to *trunk revision 16013*. Last revision is 16033.
- 02:00 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- All regression testing has passed. The previous found regression for ChUI tests has been fixed.
I'd say *7020d* is... - 07:59 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> I agree, in a hypothetical scenario where someone changes a record and immediately attempts t... - 07:47 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- I agree, in a hypothetical scenario where someone changes a record and immediately attempts to find it more than once...
- 07:43 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- Yes, this is what happens in trunk and is a valid scenario. Removing this will be functionally OK, but we will see a ...
- 07:42 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- So to be clear, in the same session, If a record is modified, but not yet committed, it should be cached and be found...
- 07:39 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> It is my understanding that this is correct behavior, if the data is changed (and uncommitted... - 07:37 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I one session runs a FIND multiple times, then it won't benefit from the cache considering ... - 07:34 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- After writing #10222-1 I reckon that such change can introduce some performance penalty for same-session case. I one ...
- 07:21 AM Support #10222 (Review): Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if d...
- I added a new dmo state @COMMITED@, it indicates that a record contains committed data, dafault value is true. The fa...
- 04:31 AM Support #10222 (WIP): Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disa...
- 04:03 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- There are two changes we should consider implementing to prevent transaction isolation violations in Fast Find Cache:...
- 03:39 AM Support #10222: Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disabled?
- The Fast Find Cache is a cache that targets FIND queries. It is cross-session and per-database. If a session does a F...
- 03:28 AM Support #10222 (WIP): Is cross-session dirty share available through Fast Find Cache even if disa...
- 06:53 AM Support #10226: Consider creating one single dirty-share database per session to support intra-se...
- Similar to #10222, I think that @DefaultDirtyShareManager@ is still able to leak records in between sessions. I am no...
- 06:49 AM Support #10226 (New): Consider creating one single dirty-share database per session to support in...
06/27/2025
- 12:43 PM Bug #10181 (Test): Date shifted one day earlier when importing data
- Branch 10181a was merged into trunk on behalf of Lorian (ls) as rev. 16010 and archived.
- 09:24 AM Bug #10181: Date shifted one day earlier when importing data
- Update on the regression testing:
* harness ✅
* large app with fwd tests -- unittests ✅
* large GUI app unittest... - 09:44 AM Bug #10195 (Internal Test): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- I am OK with the changes in 10195a.
- 08:05 AM Bug #10195 (Review): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- 05:16 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Committed on 10195a, rev. 15997.
Changed iterateReleaseOverrideScope into a stack of scopes. A new level is added... - 03:55 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> This is a problem, right?
Of course this is a problem, I am currently giving a try to... - 03:25 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > > It is not affected since the RecordBuffer will not be included ... - 03:24 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > It is not affected since the RecordBuffer will not be included in the of the nested for-e... - 09:33 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> There may be a regression showing in the ChUI tests. I need to double check.
I might ... - 03:26 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- #10215 is the task handling this.
- 09:23 AM Feature #4012: replacing TCP/IP (AF_INET) sockets with Unix Domain Sockets (AF_UNIX) as PostgreSQ...
- I did a small investigation into this issue, my main conclusions are:
1. Unix sockets cannot be used to communicat... - 09:01 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I committed *9078b/16010* to address #9078-101 and #9078-102.
- 07:29 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I think @downPath(this, prog.kw_find, prog.record_phrase)@ will cover all @FIND@ statements. For example, a @FIND FIR...
- 04:16 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I looked at 9078b / r16008.
>
> The code looks pretty much solid. But it's difficult to ... - 08:42 AM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- As reported previously, I encountered some issues while fixing the FWD support for logical/boolean expressions in MSS...
- 02:51 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Changed udfs names and comments formats in *rev. 16007*. I confused the formats with @mariadb@ udfs, and it is a bit ...
06/26/2025
- 07:10 PM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Sorry, I did these changes unintentionally. I do not have an explanation for them 😕.
- 07:02 PM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Eduard,
I looked a bit over the UDFs you wrote. There is a bit of work still to be done. Please see my 5 notes blo... - 08:11 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Committed on 9456a, rev. *16006*.
Thank you, I am grabbing the changes right now.
> Add m... - 05:07 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Committed on 9456a, rev. *16006*.
Add most of the remaining udfs. There still some edge cases to handle, especiall... - 04:35 PM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I looked at 9078b / r16008.
The code looks pretty much solid. But it's difficult to spot all possible issues only ... - 07:25 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Rebased *9078b* to latest *trunk/16003*, the branch is now at revision *16008*.
- 06:57 AM Bug #9078 (Review): emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Committed *9078b/15974*, Added rules to count the number of FindQuery instances in a top level block, but also added ...
- 02:45 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The conversion with 6767c gives me this:
> [...]
>
> The compile error is on @getPri... - 02:06 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- The conversion with 6767c gives me this:...
- 01:43 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > I updated @methodText@ from @getNextSibling@ to @nextSib... - 12:35 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> I updated @methodText@ from @getNextSibling@ to @nextSibling@. However, this change did... - 01:22 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > An I apologize if this isn't related to expanded extents at a... - 01:09 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> An I apologize if this isn't related to expanded extents at all. I can post to #7143, if nec... - 01:00 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- And I apologize if this isn't related to expanded extents at all. I can post to #7143, if necessary.
- 12:58 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- I am not sure if this is related, but I the *ReportDriver* gives a NPE error getting the @"extent"@ annotation.
{{co... - 09:29 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Roger Borrello wrote:
> > Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> > > Radu tested @7020d@ with @<p... - 10:18 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- > It is not affected since the RecordBuffer will not be included in the of the nested for-each block or any other ite...
- 10:01 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I am OK with the changes in 10195a.
>
> The point here is that the buffer can have its s... - 08:57 AM Bug #10049: UDF configuration regression in Persistence.java
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> No intention. Sorry. Reverted back to old values.
Thank you! - 08:56 AM Bug #10083: Infinite loop when changing walking index fields
- Rebased to latests trunk, and performed the following tests:
- smoke tests of a GUI application ☑️
- smoke and un... - 08:06 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- I want this to also be documented in case the discussion about using one connection in a multithreaded environment ar...
- 07:29 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- I want to document on the task what exactly could the async 'for each' achieve and when it is especially beneficial.
...
06/25/2025
- 05:30 PM Feature #9455 (WIP): port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Yes, of course!
- 08:27 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Ovidiu, should I commit my udfs implementation on 9456a?
- 05:28 PM Bug #10049: UDF configuration regression in Persistence.java
- No intention. Sorry. Reverted back to old values.
- 05:03 PM Bug #10049: UDF configuration regression in Persistence.java
- I am a little concerned with how Hotel GUI has changed. I have been enabling the capability to modify the password fo...
- 10:37 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- > To answer Alexandru's questions, the JDBC driver does not allow for concurrent result set traversal within a single...
- 10:28 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- To answer Alexandru's questions, the JDBC driver does not allow for concurrent result set traversal within a single ...
- 09:23 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- I really don't want to purge some historical philosophy from FWD (JDBC + connection pooling + one connection per thre...
- 05:33 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- I also think we can determine if the queries in the for each alter the iterated table, if not, enable async, but crea...
- 05:26 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- I think I have hit a wall with the current approach. When you're using the same JDBC Connection and have an open Resu...
- 09:05 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> I managed to get a working version for #9078-95 and started working on a version where it use... - 08:18 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I managed to get a working version for #9078-95 and started working on a version where it uses an array in case too m...
- 04:56 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Current rule-set:...
- 04:53 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Constantin mentioned that I could count the number of FindQueries for each top level block and emit the array only wh...
- 03:10 AM Bug #10195 (Internal Test): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- I am OK with the changes in 10195a.
The point here is that the buffer can have its scope opened several times. Usi... - 02:05 AM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- There may be a regression showing in the ChUI tests. I need to double check.
06/24/2025
- 05:38 PM Bug #10198: analyze FIND statements which use only a small number of fields
- > * at runtime, a mode (when activated) will allow tracking and reporting buffer's field usage (how many fields are r...
- 05:21 PM Bug #10198: analyze FIND statements which use only a small number of fields
- #4400 is a mechanism to identify every query back to its original definition in source code. We could do a similar t...
- 03:45 PM Bug #10198: analyze FIND statements which use only a small number of fields
- In a customer application, there are patterns where FIND is used to get a record, and from that record only its recid...
- 03:35 PM Bug #10198 (New): analyze FIND statements which use only a small number of fields
- 05:11 PM Feature #10199: implement a temp-table size limit such that usage above that limit is backed by d...
- Unlimited temp-table usage causes an OOME for the server. OE "spills" to disk when temp-table usage is too large. W...
- 05:05 PM Feature #10199 (New): implement a temp-table size limit such that usage above that limit is backe...
- 04:43 PM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Created a table with SQL Server specific issues in "Limitations and Workarounds":https://proj.goldencode.com/projects...
- 04:38 PM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- As noted in the Monday technical meet, revision 16004 of 9456 contains full support for recognising and parsing custo...
- 03:33 PM Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- This needs to be brought back into focus. What we need is a mode (when activated) which will track FIND queries, at ...
- 12:33 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Roger Borrello wrote:
> Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> > Radu tested @7020d@ with @<parameter name="expand-extents" va... - 12:08 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Radu tested @7020d@ with @<parameter name="expand-extents" value="false" />@ in @p2j.cfg... - 10:02 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Eduard, it will take me a bit more time to review, so I may not make it by EOD. I need to get some tests ongoing on O...
- 04:05 AM Bug #10195 (Review): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- 04:04 AM Bug #10195 (WIP): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- 04:04 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Committed on 10195a, rev. 15996.
- 03:34 AM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- I think this tests is a bit more accurate....
- 07:26 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Ok, I revised the code, indeed I am creating one thread each time a @for each@ is called and leaking threads, but jus...
- 07:16 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- > Well, it may be a bit more complex to implement but a solution would be to use a pool of worker threads. Consider t...
- 07:05 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> But when FWD decided the code from a client requires a background execution, the context is... - 06:56 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Well, it may be a bit more complex to implement but a solution would be to use a pool of worker threads. Consider the...
- 05:42 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- My goal is to delegate as much work as possible to the secondary thread, ideally the whole @query.next@, this include...
- 03:36 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- I see. I wonder if you can't simply pass the result-set to the main thread and use it from there rather than using it...
- 03:22 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- !async_for_each.png!
Each line is a result set access for a given thread, but the connection is shared, so the acc... - 03:03 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- > I meant the access to any result set by a thread should not overlap with the access of another result set
I don'... - 03:00 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> we will need to synchronize the access to the result sets so that there is no overlap.
I ... - 02:56 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- > we will need to synchronize the access to the result sets so that there is no overlap.
I don't quite understand ... - 02:31 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- After a quick investigation, I found out that most JDBC drivers support multiple opened result sets on a single conne...
- 06:18 AM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- I think that should be enough. If the extracted data was identical to original .d files in the cases where these were...
- 05:46 AM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- An update on the testing :
* multitenant app : exported the data from a multitenant db ✅
* large GUI app : expor...
06/23/2025
- 02:02 PM Bug #10195: Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- Found a problem in unit tests of a customer application....
- 01:54 PM Bug #10195 (Test): Reset of query buffer in a nested function
- 10:33 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- > I am not sure how we could end up retrieving more records than indented. We still have the progressive results, the...
- 10:12 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- We might want some kind of "read ahead" limit to avoid doing too much on the secondary thread.
- 10:11 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> But with an implementation of async fetching, you may end up gathering record 100.000th and... - 09:59 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Using different connections is a big NO from my POV. If you have X nested FOR EACH, then you may end up with a sessio...
- 08:40 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- At the meeting, Alexandru raised a valid concern regarding the async execution for the foreach query. In my initial i...
- 09:15 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I've made some progress, but I will have to refactor all of the changes for the FindQuery. If I am using an array to ...
- 03:11 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I was thinking about @fqueryArray[0] = new FindQuery();@ initialization. To have a more com... - 09:07 AM Feature #9305: Replace begins with interval based conditional
- From #10165:
For temp-table (H2 database), @LIKE 'prefix%'@ does not use an index at the moment. I suspect it is bec... - 07:28 AM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I am OK with the changes.
> Please update the @%Done@.
>
> Just out of my curiosity, wh... - 07:23 AM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- I am OK with the changes.
Please update the @%Done@.
Just out of my curiosity, why the need to check for @null@ @... - 03:11 AM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I cannot update to those revisions. The latest I see on branch 7504b is 15914. Maybe you fo...
06/21/2025
- 06:45 PM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- I cannot update to those revisions. The latest I see on branch 7504b is 15914. Maybe you forgot to bind / push?
- 07:54 AM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- After exporting data from different customer databases, i've rebase to latest trunk and made two commits to @7504b@ :...
06/20/2025
- 04:28 PM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I was thinking about @fqueryArray[0] = new FindQuery();@ initialization. To have a more compact code, we could emit i...
- 07:39 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- > will the template above do to generate FindQuery[] fqueryArray = new FindQuery[5]; or is there a way to make it sim...
- 05:45 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- The solution would be to move @fqueryArray[0] = new FindQuery();@ in the @body()@, emit the FindQuery normally withou...
- 05:37 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- The following test:...
- 10:46 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- The java test cases show that the benefit of running the query in a separate thread is similar with running the busin...
- 08:02 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Well, this changes things. If the for each body cannot be executed in a new thread, I will go the other way and try t...
- 07:57 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- I don't think we should look at pushing 4GL logic into other threads. Our core design will not allow this without a ...
- 07:46 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> I attached the source for this test.
- 07:44 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Artur Școlnic wrote:
> I started working on introducing async in @forEachWorker@, currently there are issues with ou... - 07:35 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
On another note, I found a way to introduce artificial latency on a network adapter.
The delay is per tcp packet, ...- 07:32 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- I believe another way to utilize the result set streaming and async programming is streaming results in a for each wh...
- 06:38 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- At the time I wrote @CREATE FUNCTION dbo.modulo_ii (@p1 INT, @p2 INT) RETURNS BIGINT AS@ I was not able to test it. A...
- 05:44 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What if you call a PROCEDURE from a FUNCTION?
This could be done. And error is raised. - 05:21 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- What if you call a PROCEDURE from a FUNCTION?
- 05:21 AM Feature #9455: port native user defined functions to SQL Server
- I see that in T-SQL, statements like @RAISERROR('Dates before October 15, 1582 are not yet supported', 16, 1);@. coul...
- 03:52 AM Bug #10181: Date shifted one day earlier when importing data
- Thanks, Ovidiu.
What testing should be performed for this change?
06/19/2025
- 10:24 AM Bug #10181 (Internal Test): Date shifted one day earlier when importing data
- I am OK with the change because the UTC will leave the data unaffected by the TZ.
However, I think all occurrences... - 08:30 AM Bug #10181 (Review): Date shifted one day earlier when importing data
- 08:30 AM Bug #10181 (WIP): Date shifted one day earlier when importing data
- 08:26 AM Bug #10181: Date shifted one day earlier when importing data
- In #7504-31 :
> I also encountered a potential bug during *import*:
> * I imported a .d file containing the value... - 08:05 AM Bug #10181 (Test): Date shifted one day earlier when importing data
- 08:25 AM Feature #7504: Export data tool from FWD into .d files
- When testing the export tool and importing/exporting the db from a large gui app i encountered again this type of err...
- 07:33 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- The following template worked:...
- 07:20 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I've adjusted the template in the following way:...
- 07:06 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- I found the @named_array@ template in @java_templates.tpl@ and managed to generate something like:...
- 06:07 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- I think this implies tracking and storing the time of execution for queries and iterative blocks that have queries (a...
- 05:44 AM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- One approach for implementation would be to measure conditions at runtime and shift into this streaming/async mode wh...
- 04:59 AM Feature #10169 (WIP): result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- Below you can find the result of testing async execution for db queries combined with result set streaming.
To simul...
06/18/2025
- 04:14 PM Feature #10094: RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not overlap
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> @ImportWorker$TenantIdContext.prepareNextBracket@: Why is it safe to fall back to using the ... - 02:22 PM Feature #10094: RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not overlap
- One other thing I noticed in my last review, though it already existed in the code before your recent changes. In @Im...
- 02:14 PM Feature #10094: RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not overlap
- Code review 10094a/15985-15988:
@ImportWorker$TenantIdContext.prepareNextBracket@: Why is it safe to fall back to ... - 07:56 AM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- Another version without using the @dbo.Delimiters@ table:
{{Collapse(See sql ...)... - 05:10 AM Bug #10171: Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- This task is for implementing support for word indexing and CONTAINS statements in Microsoft SQL Server.
As part of ... - 04:14 AM Bug #10171 (Test): Word Index/CONTAINS support for MS SQL Server.
- 07:06 AM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- > * I hit another MSSQL implementation restriction, one we were not aware of in the iteration of several years ago: t...
- 06:56 AM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- Related to my note #9456-8: with my current changes in 9456a, I encountered in @hotel_runtime@ a query where predicat...
- 08:12 PM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- The @ORDER BY@ issue was partially resolved. In case of @UNIQUE@ finds, the HQL bundle was expressly setting the sort...
- 11:32 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Stefanel, did we ever get these ChUI test results? Is there any other testing needed?
Unf...
06/17/2025
- 04:01 PM Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Stefanel Pezamosca wrote:
> Radu tested @7020d@ with @<parameter name="expand-extents" value="false" />@ in @p2j.cfg... - 12:25 PM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- This seems quite promising, I especially like the idea of adding threading in to keep the data transfer happening in ...
- 12:23 PM Feature #10169: result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- From Artur in #9802-210:
As already discussed, one of the main reasons for the differences in performance we see i... - 12:20 PM Feature #10169 (WIP): result-set streaming (and asynchronous programming?)
- 08:00 AM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- One more thing, related to paging. We knew that MSSQL does not have a @LIMIT@ / @OFFSET@ syntax for query pagination,...
- 05:22 AM Bug #10080: Temp-table records are leaking in can-find statements
- Sure.
- 05:21 AM Bug #10080: Temp-table records are leaking in can-find statements
- Eduard, 8308f wasn't backed out from 7156c/e. Please commit the necessary changes from 10080a to 7156c and 7156e.
- 05:18 AM Bug #10080 (Test): Temp-table records are leaking in can-find statements
- 10080a was merged to trunk rev 15986 and archived.
- 04:38 AM Bug #10080 (Merge Pending): Temp-table records are leaking in can-find statements
- Go ahead and merge now.
- 04:32 AM Bug #10080: Temp-table records are leaking in can-find statements
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Still haven't got an response from harness/web/report of an application testing.
Testing... - 03:49 AM Bug #10080: Temp-table records are leaking in can-find statements
- unit tests and smoke tests of a large gui application ✅
- chui regression tests ✅
- smoke tests of a gui appl...- 03:45 AM Bug #10080: Temp-table records are leaking in can-find statements
- Can this be queued for merge?
06/16/2025
- 04:58 AM Feature #9456: implement SQL Server dialect and helpers
- A 'new' old issue: the MSSQL and lack of support for boolean literals. That is the reason the @Dialect.supportsBoolea...
- 02:40 AM Bug #10080: Temp-table records are leaking in can-find statements
- Yes, they are passing and received the news from Danut that ETF has passed.
- 02:39 AM Bug #10080: Temp-table records are leaking in can-find statements
- Eduard Soltan wrote:
> Tested performed:
>
> - unit tests of a large gui application ✅
> - chui regression tests...
06/13/2025
- 05:56 PM Feature #10094: RECIDs from different tenants of same logical database should not overlap
- I upgraded the project of the single customer to be MT-enabled. Committed to r89.
Here are the changes in @build.pro... - 04:13 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- I’m struggling to get the conversion to work as intended. For example, I’d like the @NEXT-SIBLING@ attribute converte...
- 02:20 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> We should distinguish these cases within the conversion rules, perhaps using conditiona... - 02:13 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > We need to update the conversion rules, as the correct m... - 01:40 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> We need to update the conversion rules, as the correct method names are now @privateDat... - 09:52 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
>
> > Looks like you don't need to revert.
> Good, now I ...
06/12/2025
- 12:11 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Looks like you don't need to revert.
Good, now I am running a customer big applicatio... - 12:02 PM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Review of 6767c rev 15980.
> > * @AbstractTempTable@
>... - 07:24 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Review of 6767c rev 15980.
> * @AbstractTempTable@
> ** line 2938 - please add back @d... - 05:05 AM Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Review of 6767c rev 15980.
* @AbstractTempTable@
** line 2938 - please add back @defBuffer.bufferManager@ instead o... - 10:22 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Danut, just keep in mind that a Map has a higher overhead than a plain array. That is why I am suggesting creating an...
- 02:24 AM Bug #9078: emit FindQuery as (reused) variables
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Dănuț Filimon wrote:
> > I did not take into account that there might be a limitation to t...
Also available in: Atom