Activity
From 12/17/2022 to 01/15/2023
01/15/2023
- 05:13 PM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eric: Do you have any objections?
>
> This seems safe to commit this in both trunk and in 612... - 04:36 PM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- Eric: Do you have any objections?
This seems safe to commit this in both trunk and in 6129b. - 03:19 PM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- Please review the diff which allows to disable dirty sharing. I've tested trunk with this change on the big customers...
- 06:38 AM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- I've tested it in Hotel (I had to disable @ConnectionManager.authenticate@ to run it) and found no persistence-relate...
- 10:48 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Fixed second-pass query generation for queries with CONTAINS operator.
Committed to 6444a/14475.
- 12:13 AM Database Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- I have created the 7020a branch (from 6129b) and committed r14361 which includes the changes for a first version of "...
01/14/2023
- 05:00 PM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- The last time we measured it, I recall that about 10% of time was spent inside the dirty database. Removing it might...
- 04:59 PM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- Let's make sure that Hotel works properly with your changes.
- 07:17 AM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- Eric expected that the persistence layer will break badly if there is not a safe mocking version of the @NopDirtyShar...
- 04:57 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> [...]
>
> It looks interesting to me that functions are executed 10 times slower than p... - 04:28 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- ...
- 01:36 AM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- varargs in TRPL are emulated via @Object[]@ I think - see @CommonAstSupport.getAncestorOfType@ for an example.
- 09:56 PM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > That should make the replacement TRPL code simpler and more comp... - 08:37 PM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I understand. Even though it is possibly not much improvement, it still must be something small ...
01/13/2023
- 06:26 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I pushed minor updates to the table validation procedure - new rule plus the table name shows up in the error window....
- 11:56 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> On second thought, this might not be what you were seeing. This was... - 03:53 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Boris, with rev 14450, I get this in an infinite loop when I run @save-cache3.p@:
>
> [..... - 02:48 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris, with rev 14450, I get this in an infinite loop when I run @save-cache3.p@:...
- 05:23 PM Base Language Feature #6817: replace INSTANTIATING-PROCEDURE and other handle<ExternalProgram> with the actual ...
- The attached diff contains @handle@ replacements for the @com.goldencode.p2j.persist@ Java package. I left several co...
- 04:51 PM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- I'm done for today, but for the case you're in a hurry, I've attached option 1: @NopDirtyShareContext@ as well as opt...
- 03:44 PM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- > Please create a @NopDirtyShareContext@ by extending @DirtyShareContext@ and write each method as an empty implement...
- 02:15 PM Database Feature #7037 (WIP): remove dirty share manager
- 11:43 AM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please create a @NopDirtyShareContext@ by extending @DirtyShareContext@ and write each method as ... - 10:18 AM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- FYI, the following are the existing (known) use cases for the dirty share database.
# FIND query cross-session mod... - 10:07 AM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- Optimally this should be configurable in the directory so that we can turn it on or off without code changes.
- 10:06 AM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- Please create a @NopDirtyShareContext@ by extending @DirtyShareContext@ and write each method as an empty implementat...
- 03:27 AM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- Greg Shah wrote:
> How easy is it to separate the portions only used for the cross-session behavior (which is about ... - 02:49 AM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- How easy is it to separate the portions only used for the cross-session behavior (which is about the 4GL transaction ...
- 02:21 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Committed 6129b rev 14358: Final round of performance improvements which are replacements of some 'for-each' loops wi...
- 10:36 AM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > They must be grouped in a block / single_block / stmt_list to benefit from natural processing d... - 03:11 AM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I think there are other source of improvements in TRPL. One I can guess now are usages of @down... - 03:02 AM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- > I think there are other source of improvements in TRPL. One I can guess now are usages of @downPath@ and @upPath@ w...
- 03:01 AM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- > They must be grouped in a block / single_block / stmt_list to benefit from natural processing downstream. I debugge...
- 12:06 AM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- I tried to create a new @dynamic_query@ entry point for parser. There are 3-4 statements which need to be supported:
... - 08:42 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- When @-clientlog@ or @LOG-MANAGER:LOGFILE-NAME@ is defined logging level 1 is always enabled (except if explicitly se...
- 02:52 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Bref, using @-errostack@ has no effect on the client log so don't bother with it in this case.
... - 02:43 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Marian: Can you offer any guidance?
* @-errorstack@ (@session:error-stack-trace@) has no effec... - 06:25 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- I've attached a patch in which I've done some refactoring to the @SortCriterion@ constructor. Mainly, instead of call...
01/12/2023
- 02:30 PM Database Feature #7037: remove dirty share manager
- The dirty share manager originally was added to solve a problem with a particular use case in one customer's applicat...
- 01:53 PM Database Feature #7037 (Test): remove dirty share manager
- 10:54 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Added fix for H2 bug with bind parameters in recursive CTEs.
Now the test works fine both temp tables and permanent ... - 01:51 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- > It returns nothing. Moreover, as I mentioned the problem is gone if the query has no parameters.
> It is known tha... - 01:43 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Executing @.next()@ will cause the result to advance. You lose the object of interest. You ... - 10:05 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Marian: Can you offer any guidance?
- 06:40 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- I'm trying to find the difference in the log files when @SESSION:ERROR-STACK-TRACE@ (@-errorstack@) is enabled, but f...
- 09:33 AM Database Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- Some concerns on moving the source records to the destination table just by updating the multiplex ID to the destinat...
- 08:14 AM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- Nice! Let's see what we can get back by implementing a new parser rule (@dynamic_query@) which is designed to do the...
- 12:17 AM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- I added timers for the setup of @SymbolResolver@, @SchemaDictionary@ and other tasks needed for the @query-prepare@ a...
- 03:07 AM Database Bug #7035 (WIP): Extract query parameters from statically converted FQL
- The following is a testcase in which FWD hard-codes the arguments into the FQL:...
- 02:52 AM Database Bug #7035 (Closed): Extract query parameters from statically converted FQL
- 09:33 PM Base Language Feature #6824: lazy initialization of collection class members
- Review of: 6129b/14348.
I am OK with the code. However, in @DataSet@, when it is decided that @callbacks == null@ ...
01/11/2023
- 03:22 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've tested with permanent H2 tables.
> If I stop with the debugger in the @SQLQuery.scrol... - 02:16 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> In addition to #6444-86.
> If I set a breakpoint at the last statement of the @FqlToSqlCon... - 11:29 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- In addition to #6444-86.
If I set a breakpoint at the last statement of the @FqlToSqlConverter.toSQL()@ (@return sql... - 10:47 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> To test these queries during in real application using the data currently in temp-tables, y... - 06:23 AM Database Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- There already is a JMX for @OutputTableCopier@ with the same name and it measures the execution time and call count o...
- 04:35 AM Database Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- Danut, can you add a counter JMX for your modification? I think we can benefit from finding out how many times this s...
- 04:04 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Simply skipping surrogate primary key column seems to break index handling, rules are failing during AST validation. ...
01/10/2023
- 06:43 PM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- > Looking at the time results from #6813-18 it looks to me that the main slow-performance problem lies in the convers...
- 04:46 PM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- Looking at the time results from #6813-18 it looks to me that the main slow-performance problem lies in the conversio...
- 02:15 PM Base Language Feature #6827: reduce the memory footprint of WrappedResource implementations: replace BDTs with ...
- I'm still on #6821, so feel free to do anything you want here.
- 02:13 PM Base Language Feature #6827: reduce the memory footprint of WrappedResource implementations: replace BDTs with ...
- Stanislav, do you need help here?
- 12:14 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Committed 6129b rev 14351: @P2JIndex.components()@ provides direct access to the components array in order to improve...
- 11:13 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Don't we already know the exact list of rowids used for all @UPDATE@ statements? We also know th... - 10:27 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > Ultimately, we could iterate the tables individually and process (delete/update then invalidate) the records indivi...
- 08:40 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- The reason @pruneSessionCache()@ is called on @afterBuf@ and @beforeBuf@ after a batch operation executed using SQL d...
- 10:51 AM Base Language Feature #6826: reduce the BDT usage in FWD runtime
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> No.
OK, I'm taking it, as is easier to look in the profiler and see what can be reduced.
- 10:50 AM Base Language Feature #6826: reduce the BDT usage in FWD runtime
- No.
- 10:50 AM Base Language Feature #6826: reduce the BDT usage in FWD runtime
- Stanislav, did you start work on this?
- 09:20 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- *Logging level rules:*
|Startup params/4GL setters|Auto set logging level|
|none|2|
|-logentrytypes (invalid)|0|... - 09:18 AM Database Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- I've made a comparison between *3821c/rev.14467* and the patched version from #6714-5 using different *patched versio...
- 09:01 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I'm not sure how the @EDITOR:EMPTY@ attribute was included here. We will move that work to #7032.
- 09:00 AM User Interface Feature #7032 (New): implement the EDITOR:EMPTY attribute
- 08:24 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- > > Wonder if we can somehow get out hands on Vladimir's implementation to see how things are working in FWD?
> I th... - 08:07 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- > * First, not all tests are really unit-tests - some of them really need user interaction, other tests needs an appl...
- 07:53 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- When I made an entry in this task on 2022-12-15 at 09:55, I accidentally set it to private.
Here it is. It relate... - 07:48 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Wonder if we can somehow get out hands on Vladimir's implementation to see how thin... - 07:38 AM Base Language Feature #6650: improve performance of Scopeable notification in TM.processScopeNotifications
- 6129b/14350 improves:
* OUTPUT parameter processing: track if an output parameter is associated with a table field, ... - 07:34 AM Base Language Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- A batch of changes (including #4032-5) are in 6129b/14349
- 07:12 AM Base Language Feature #6824: lazy initialization of collection class members
- A batch of changes (including #6824-4) are in 6129b/14348
Please review. - 07:01 AM Database Feature #6825: improve table meta runtime (TableMapper and other)
- The changes for #6825-4 are in 6129b/14347
- 06:40 AM Database Feature #6830 (Review): find and fix all SQL SELECT statements with inlined literal arguments, an...
- 05:01 AM Database Feature #6830: find and fix all SQL SELECT statements with inlined literal arguments, and rewrite...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Radu, the changes are OK with 6129b and a customer app (performance is improved). Pleas... - 04:15 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Also, please review the data type checking in the PostgreSQL dialect again, and apply the methodology I described in ...
- 04:12 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Revision 14449 fixes the table name and legacy table name when creating the schema AST. Only the DMO interface name s...
01/09/2023
- 06:11 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- In the end the solution is pretty simple - see revision 14448.
- 12:58 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I was thinking of the DMO in its buffer form, not the concept of the specific record that is co... - 07:33 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > PreselectQuery.components() - 430k
Committed 6129b rev 14345: replaced components iterator with @ArrayList.get()... - 06:58 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > > > Greg, are you... - 06:33 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > I would start with Java arrays first (look for @[]@ in the text).
>
> Constantin, are... - 12:42 PM Database Feature #6830: find and fix all SQL SELECT statements with inlined literal arguments, and rewrite...
- Radu, the changes are OK with 6129b and a customer app (performance is improved). Please commit the 6830-6129b.patch...
- 06:36 AM Database Feature #6830: find and fix all SQL SELECT statements with inlined literal arguments, and rewrite...
- Here you go, the patch ported to 6129b, rev. 14344.
I tested some little examples to see that nothing breaks, but n... - 03:23 AM Database Feature #6830: find and fix all SQL SELECT statements with inlined literal arguments, and rewrite...
- Radu Apetrii wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Radu, what is the state of this task? Was anything committed to... - 02:36 AM Database Feature #6830: find and fix all SQL SELECT statements with inlined literal arguments, and rewrite...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Radu, what is the state of this task? Was anything committed to 3821c?
No, I did not co... - 12:08 PM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Marian Edu wrote:
> not sure how the test engine will work in FWD so we're trying to make the test methods that wa... - 10:00 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Greg, we have a number of things to discuss here.
* First, not all tests are really unit-tests - some of them rea... - 08:57 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I understand there is no performance difference in lambdas themselves. I'm wondering about the c... - 08:39 AM Database Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- > * added a new @denormalized@ attribute in @@Property@ annotation
Please name this @expanded@ because the "denorm... - 06:31 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Here is my understanding of the current task status
h3. DATA-RELATION:RECURSIVE attribute
* The FILL method s...
01/08/2023
- 01:36 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > I would start with Java arrays first (look for @[]@ in the text).
Constantin, are you suggesting to replace enha...
01/07/2023
- 05:51 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- The "for" cycle changes reviewed by Constantin were merged and committed as 6129b rev 14344.
- 10:20 PM Database Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The Open Client proxy generation is the replacement of the OpenEdge "proxygen" tool which creates... - 10:19 PM Database Feature #7020 (WIP): always use "expanded" extent fields
- Status update.
My work ATM include:
* re-enabled denormalisation for temp-tables. I do not use this except for havi... - 08:32 PM Database Feature #6813: analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and queries
- After previous note I changes the testcase a bit: I changed the second from the end line: @message "Run " + string(k)...
- 07:10 PM Database Feature #6813 (WIP): analyze and improve performance of dynamic conversion of temp-tables and que...
- I used the following 4GL program in order to replicate Constantin's testcase for static/dynamic queries:...
01/06/2023
- 05:53 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Greg Shah wrote:
> > > > Greg, are you suggesting to maintain for tem... - 03:41 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > Please backport this 3821c/14472 to 6129b and commit it there.
Committed as 6129b rev 14343. - 02:19 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > Greg, are you suggesting to maintain for temp-tables a map of Record... - 02:18 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Do we assign a new @rowid@ when we copy temp-table records from one temp-table to another, like in table parameter pr...
- 02:07 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- I made an assumption that temp-table record IDs are not unique across multiplex IDs, which is wrong, as you're saying...
- 02:05 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > Do I understand correctly that only the most recently added entry will be kept and any o... - 02:03 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> One thing that is not obvious to me is how the cache is used. Since we are using temp-tables wit... - 02:01 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > Do I understand correctly that only the most recently added entry will be kept and any older entry is overwritten? ...
- 01:56 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, are you suggesting to maintain for temp-tables a map of RecordBuffer.dmoClass -> Set of r... - 01:29 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- One thing that is not obvious to me is how the cache is used. Since we are using temp-tables with this mechanism, it...
- 01:25 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > Greg, are you suggesting to maintain for temp-tables a map of RecordBuffer.dmoClass -> Set of records?
Not exac... - 12:52 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- @invalidateRecords@ method is called only for temp-tables. And called only by @ACCEPT-CHANGES@ method (I'm interested...
- 12:25 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- All usage of @Session.invalidateRecords()@ comes from @RecordBuffer.pruneSessionCache()@ which is only called in 2 pl...
- 12:05 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > TableMapper$LegacyFieldInfo.getMutableInfo 1.8 million
>
> This one looks like cachin... - 11:39 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > TableMapper$LegacyFieldInfo.getMutableInfo 1.8 million
This one looks like caching may be slightly improved, but... - 02:14 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > You also need checks if this is the single resource in the chain being deleted, in this ... - 04:45 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Yes, I met this problem a few times. I will make the change you suggest. It will not be that straightforward because ...
- 12:30 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Upon a validation failure, the failing table needs to be removed from the last known @DatabaseState@. Otherwise, if a...
- 06:56 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> So, please implement a unique interface naming scheme, similar to what we have in @DynamicTa... - 04:46 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I committed 6371/14445, which fixes the raising of an error condition for a schema validation failure. Now @save-cach...
- 03:05 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- I understand there is no performance difference in lambdas themselves. I'm wondering about the call to @LambdaFactor...
- 02:51 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The dynamic generation of the lambdas for an external procedure is only done the first time the e... - 10:44 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- The dynamic generation of the lambdas for an external procedure is only done the first time the external proc is load...
- 10:22 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Eric: Are you OK with the proxy and persistence changes?
- 10:22 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Code Review 6819_20221223_6129b_14341.patch
I have no objections. - 02:48 PM Database Feature #6830: find and fix all SQL SELECT statements with inlined literal arguments, and rewrite...
- Radu, what is the state of this task? Was anything committed to 3821c?
- 02:44 PM Base Language Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> * I think I'll do some experimenting if keeping the reference of @ProcedureManager$Proce... - 09:51 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Committed the current state of the RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION support to 6444a/14473.
- 03:55 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Created task branch 6444a from the trunk
- 08:17 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- If we are doing any substantial work implementing NO-UNDO in the customer scenario, then let's move ahead.
- 05:09 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Furthermore, I just added @OrmNoUndoTrace@ in 3821c/rev. 14470. This is used to analyze th... - 02:29 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Constantin, do you see measurable @SQLRedo@ and/or @Savepoint... - 02:17 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Constantin, do you see measurable @SQLRedo@ and/or @SavepointManager@ activity in your profi... - 02:02 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> I tested with a large customer application (~10 mins POC) and I got only 7 redo operation... - 01:38 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- Constantin, do you see measurable @SQLRedo@ and/or @SavepointManager@ activity in your profiling of the large applica...
- 03:33 AM Database Feature #6448 (Closed): make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Thank you.
- 03:25 AM Database Feature #6448 (Feedback): make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor, if you've already tested this, the only thing that remains is to update the [[p2j:Data... - 02:44 AM Database Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Igor, if you've already tested this, the only thing that remains is to update the [[p2j:Data_Migration#Data-Import|do...
- 03:00 AM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Is there anything left to do, in order for FWD to use the new H2 jar by default? Is the FWD build updated? Is the jar...
- 02:51 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I've changed the way tracking is done based on #6709-33. The only change I've done to @TransactionManager@ is to retr...
- 02:28 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> The changes in @dbrestrictions.diff@ look good. Please commit it to 6129b. 6129b/14335 also ... - 12:37 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Igor, other than requiring review for the patch in #6454-11 and ...
01/05/2023
- 03:05 PM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Eric, I was assuming that the SortCriterion is being used at the FQL level, before the F... - 02:52 PM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> > Is the profiling done with multiple users? The cache is glob... - 02:25 PM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Eric, I was assuming that the SortCriterion is being used at the FQL level, before the FQL translation (dependent on ...
- 02:20 PM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Also, the cache Key doesn't need the dialect - the DmoMeta already is distinct for tem... - 11:06 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- I've increased the cache limit to something big (2048000) and now for 100 runs the average is only a little less wors...
- 10:06 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Is the profiling done with multiple users? The cache is global across all users, so it is a... - 09:15 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Is the profiling done with multiple users? The cache is global across all users, so it is a synchronized data structu...
- 07:59 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- I have a mod count for the @LRUCache.cache@ map (used by @SortCrtierionFactory@) of 11k for just 10 runs of the perfo...
- 07:45 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Unfortunately the patch shows a slowdown in the performance testing. I'm not sure from where it is. I wonder if is ...
- 06:26 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Sure, here you go. I've updated the file so the command @patch@ now works on 6129b.
- 02:37 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > You also need checks if this is the single resource in the chain being deleted, in this firstResource/lastResource ...
- 06:20 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Attached is a space-delimited file with all FOR EACH loops which have a List, ArrayList ... - 04:26 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Forgot to add the csv file.
- 04:25 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Keep in mind that this:...
- 04:25 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > what branch and revision did you use for this patch?
>
> 3821c rev 14467.
The patch ... - 02:20 PM Database Feature #6825: improve table meta runtime (TableMapper and other)
- Totally agree!
- 02:02 PM Database Feature #6825: improve table meta runtime (TableMapper and other)
- The @MutableFieldInfo@ is being kept in @TableMapper$TempTableMapper.fieldInfo@ by the @TempTable@ instance. So I se...
- 01:54 PM Base Language Support #4032: block/transaction processing context-local and other performance improvements
- Attached is a trace file with @ContextLocal.get@ usage in a customer application. This is expanded on 3 levels, leve...
- 12:59 PM Database Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- > AFAIK, the Open Client proxy generation rules are general purpose, not specific to @<customer>@. Constantin, can y...
- 12:58 PM Database Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- From Eric:
I think you have understood it exactly right.
> If we get rid of the custom name (I am not sure but ... - 12:56 PM Database Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- From Ovidiu:
I read this email several times in order to get the things right. I understand that the denormalizati... - 12:55 PM Database Feature #7020: always use "expanded" extent fields
- From Eric:
While you should read the whole history there, I can summarize as follows:
* We think there will be ... - 12:52 PM Database Feature #7020 (Test): always use "expanded" extent fields
- 08:10 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > > Is this different than @MESSAGE VIEW-AS ALERT-BOX@? Or is this just the case where the 4GL handles the really lo...
- 08:10 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > It is @ContextLocal@, which creates an instance of the log manager wrapper through @class Fallback extends ThreadLo...
- 07:57 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We must solve this properly. The behavior needs to match the 4GL implementation while implementi... - 07:51 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is this different than @MESSAGE VIEW-AS ALERT-BOX@? Or is this just the case where the 4GL handl... - 07:49 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Our implementation of @LOG-MANAGER@ runs purely on the server.
>
> It is certainly preferab... - 07:48 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > Do we want also the 32767 chars limit for @LOG-MANAGER:WRITE-MESSAGE@?
Yes. Also, please implement the limit of... - 06:47 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- A few observations in relationship to max log message length (tested):
* By default statement length is limited to... - 04:47 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Does the 4GL have an implicit set of settings for @LOG-MANAGER@ in an appserver process? If so, ... - 03:50 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Galya: please post what logmanager related config needs to added.
4GL LOG-MANAGER con... - 03:06 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> For @logthreshold@ and @numlogfiles@ and the other items from #3853-19, we should be able to conf... - 02:25 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris Schegolev wrote:
> I disabled DMO unloading in @SchemaCheck@, although I don't fully understand reasoning behi...
01/04/2023
- 06:38 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I disabled DMO unloading in @SchemaCheck@, although I don't fully understand reasoning behind it.
Also, I reworked... - 03:56 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> You said _"The same query executed against the same H2 database with H2 Console with the sa... - 03:38 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- You said _"The same query executed against the same H2 database with H2 Console with the same JDBC driver (fwd-h2-1.4...
- 03:00 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > I have a strange situation.
> > In fact, it is the same for al... - 02:35 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I have a strange situation.
> In fact, it is the same for all 3 dialects. For temp tables,... - 10:19 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I have a strange situation.
The second pass query provides a correct result set for PostgreSQL and MariaDB, but retu... - 02:44 PM Base Language Feature #6817 (WIP): replace INSTANTIATING-PROCEDURE and other handle<ExternalProgram> with the a...
- 11:23 AM Base Language Feature #6817: replace INSTANTIATING-PROCEDURE and other handle<ExternalProgram> with the actual ...
- In Eclipse, there is a way to look for a field or local variable of a certain type. Other IDEs should have something...
- 12:46 PM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> From Galya via email:
>
> > I've tested gui, batch, web gui clients and they are working well ... - 12:33 PM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- From Galya via email:
> I've tested gui, batch, web gui clients and they are working well with @LOG-MANAGER@. But ... - 12:29 PM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- For @logthreshold@ and @numlogfiles@ and the other items from #3853-19, we should be able to configure these via 2 me...
- 08:04 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Galya Bogdanova wrote:
> open a @-debugalert@ separate task (maybe #4065 or this one #3853) to migrate the logic to ... - 07:55 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Galya Bogdanova wrote:
> P.S.S. The easiest quickest patch to complete #5753 would be to just switch the dependency ... - 04:58 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- *Current clientlog implementation and -debugalert*
Currently the code uses @-clientlog@ startup param to enable lo... - 03:10 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- *Rotation and testing*
A substantial part of LOG-MANAGER's logic is related to handling rotation of log files and is... - 11:30 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Radu, can you port this patch to 6129b? I'd like to test the impact on a customer's application.
- 08:54 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > what branch and revision did you use for this patch?
3821c rev 14467. - 05:17 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > Related to map access (hashCode calls):
> > ** @HandleChain.delete@ 880k
>
> Maybe w... - 05:13 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> Please review the diff which replaces "for-each" loops with indexed "for" loops (I'll add ... - 08:32 AM Base Language Feature #6824 (WIP): lazy initialization of collection class members
- 05:28 AM Database Bug #6829: H2 forces re-parse of all prepared statements when metadata is changed
- Alexandru, I think a first pass would be to change the FQL generation to use @c1@, @c2@, etc as aliases instead of th...
- 05:14 AM Database Feature #6995 (WIP): possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I've added a @OrmRedo@ Timer JMX in 3821c/rev. 14469. I've debugged some local tests to find out a "pattern" scenario...
01/03/2023
- 02:54 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > Related to map access (hashCode calls):
> ** @HandleChain.delete@ 880k
Maybe we don't need to perform @first/la... - 02:35 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- The changes to support the DMO interface/class unloading and re-use at the proxy level are turning into something mor...
- 02:27 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Let's assume that only the denormalized extents will be supported for now. It doesn't make sense... - 09:47 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Let's assume that only the denormalized extents will be supported for now. It doesn't make sense to add the more com...
- 11:33 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've changed my test so that data sources used for FILL get data from the permanent tables.... - 11:09 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I've changed my test so that data sources used for FILL get data from the permanent tables.
However, at runtime, I s... - 08:33 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > Do we show the same error when LOG-MANAGER:WRITE-MESSAGE tries to write more than 15000 chars? If yes, then we'll h...
- 07:08 AM Database Bug #6829: H2 forces re-parse of all prepared statements when metadata is changed
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Alexandru, I have in a heap dump @UnclosablePreparedStatement@ instances with ~90KB reta... - 03:48 AM Database Feature #6720 (WIP): lazy hydration
01/02/2023
- 05:34 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris Schegolev wrote:
> > If there are any other critical configuration values that cannot be determined by defau... - 05:21 PM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Please review the diff which replaces "for-each" loops with indexed "for" loops (I'll add headers later), specificall...
12/31/2022
- 03:29 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> If I understand the issue correctly, I respectfully disagree. In the event there is no expli... - 02:56 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, please correct me if I am overly aggressive on this.
>
> If the application code can b... - 02:17 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In this case, I suspect we should implement the application-visible behavior.
I see. In this c... - 02:15 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I understand that, ultimately, the content of the databases (ABL and FWD) are identically a...
12/30/2022
- 06:11 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I added an implementation for SchemaValidator + unit test for it. See revision 14442.
- 11:00 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- > Do we have an example of the table structure where such 2-field DTTZ storage is used? First column is DATETIME and ...
- 05:07 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- > Greg, please correct me if I am overly aggressive on this.
If the application code can be implemented to rely up... - 03:19 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Well, the _binary_ might not have been the best attribute here to describe the compatibility.
I understand that, u... - 02:35 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I understand that. Can we isolate this damage to recursive relations only? These cases are ... - 02:11 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
>
> > > Should we care about the order in which records are added to the target tables dur... - 01:59 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > I understand that refactoring from using a 'plain' query string (@hql@) to a query string... - 01:34 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I understand that refactoring from using a 'plain' query string (@hql@) to a query string h...
12/29/2022
- 03:23 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I pushed an update for error handling and other minor changes - rev. 14441.
Greg Shah wrote:
> We have 2 customer... - 12:14 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris Schegolev wrote:
> Also, for the primary key: I guess we need to add a validation before registering a new tab... - 07:57 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- >> 2 What is the issue with timezoned types (timestamp with time zone)?
>
> We need to support them ultimately, but...
12/28/2022
- 04:47 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Also, for the primary key: I guess we need to add a validation before registering a new table to check that the table...
- 04:41 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Before you changed it to "TODO: Surrogate Primary Key", the note for 8-byte integer read, "T... - 02:09 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris Schegolev wrote:
> I updated the documentation / WIKI page. A few questions here:
>
> 1 What's the TODO for... - 01:59 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- > If this blocks you from making headway on the recursive FILL operation, please work on another item that needs atte...
- 01:51 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I think we should wait for Ovidiu's input when he returns before undertaking any massive cha... - 01:43 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > [...]
> > I understand that refactoring from using a 'plain' qu... - 01:40 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> [...]
> I understand that refactoring from using a 'plain' query string (@hql@) to a query... - 01:38 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I don't know what the intent of this variable was, maybe something that is only changed for ... - 01:37 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> At this moment it looks that @FqlToSqlConverter.generateUniqueSqlColumnNames@ is always @tr... - 05:30 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- At this moment it looks that @FqlToSqlConverter.generateUniqueSqlColumnNames@ is always @true@.
Can I rely on this?
... - 02:56 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Working on the second pass query for the recursive data-relation FILL support I have to deal with the situation when ...
- 07:27 AM Base Language Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, please use @PROVERSION@ and preprocessing to conditionally implement logic by OE version.
...
12/27/2022
- 05:28 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I updated the documentation / WIKI page. A few questions here:
# What's the TODO for Surrogate Primary Key about?
...
12/25/2022
- 04:20 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I think that we also can avoid it if the DATA-SOURCE QUERY uses a single table but at this ...
12/23/2022
- 11:55 AM Base Language Feature #6824: lazy initialization of collection class members
- Some notes :
* @BufferImpl.callbacks@ can be lazily created, not all buffers are used in FILL operations.
* @Record... - 11:15 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> That seems like a great idea, as long as column-level comments are supported in @create tabl... - 09:45 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- > As for branching, in git I would rebase 6371a onto 6129b. Not sure how to do that in Bazaar and don't want to break...
- 01:32 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris Schegolev wrote:
> I am implementing one-to-many SQL->4GL type mappings. I would only suggest to use column's ... - 09:43 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- In the relation model, the physical order or the records in the table is irrelevant and the order of records in the r...
- 08:30 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- @LOG-MANAGER:WRITE-MESSAGE@ supports by default text up to 15000 characters (actually it should be less, since that i...
- 05:45 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Attached patch is built on top of #6939 patch. Eric, ple...
12/22/2022
- 05:09 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I am implementing one-to-many SQL->4GL type mappings. I would only suggest to use column's comment property for 4GL t...
- 04:26 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris, please work on the validation of the mutable database requirements described in the [[p2j:Non-Standard_Save_Ca...
- 09:51 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Eric: Please review and advise.
- 09:49 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Code Review 6709-20221222.diff
The conversion changes seem reasonable.
Do we really need to implement this as p... - 08:40 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I will try to patch a customer application I have on my development environment to test the changes. If everything is...
- 07:02 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I managed to convert Hotel GUI and a few smaller tests and use FieldReference. I actually didn't make use of @convert...
- 09:50 AM Database Support #7004 (New): eliminate the off-end processing in the TransactionManager and minimize the ...
12/21/2022
- 02:29 PM Base Language Feature #6827: reduce the memory footprint of WrappedResource implementations: replace BDTs with ...
- I think the @object@ fields need to remain as-is, for the reference counting to work (which affects when these get de...
- 02:28 PM Base Language Feature #6827: reduce the memory footprint of WrappedResource implementations: replace BDTs with ...
- This code:...
- 01:19 PM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- The correct patch is this, forgot to do @bzr add@ before doing @bzr diff@.
- 11:55 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes, I was planning for all performance work to go in there.
OK, but not all performance work fr... - 09:42 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Yes, I was planning for all performance work to go in there.
- 09:39 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Do you have an updated version of the patch for 3821c? It does not apply cleanly on 3821c rev 14... - 09:36 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Do you have an updated version of the patch for 3821c? It does not apply cleanly on 3821c rev 14461.
Eric: This s... - 11:30 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I pushed a cleanup for PostgreSQL dialect - there were MySQL types mixed in.
- 02:11 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Revision 6371a/14438 works around the @SchemaDictionary@ issue described in #6371-80, but the workaround is limited, ...
- 10:35 AM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- 6764.08.patch checked in to 3821c revision 14462.
- 10:06 AM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Yes, please go ahead.
- 10:05 AM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Code review 6764.08.patch. The changes look good. Can I merge it to 3821c?
- 09:38 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Attached patch is built on top of #6939 patch. Eric, please review and use this one for... - 03:55 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- I'm not working on this task at the moment, but I randomly got an idea and just want to document it here, since we mi...
12/20/2022
- 02:19 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Attached patch is built on top of #6939 patch. Eric, please review and use this one for your tests.
- 04:40 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- I've tested with a 'static bytecode' (i.e. 10k .java files each with 300 lambdas, checked the disassembled .class and...
- 07:47 AM Base Language Feature #7000: Replace old-style synchronization primitives with java.util.concurrent classes
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Do you have specific areas seen in profiling where these old-style primitives are heavily involve... - 06:24 AM Base Language Feature #7000: Replace old-style synchronization primitives with java.util.concurrent classes
- Do you have specific areas seen in profiling where these old-style primitives are heavily involved?
- 03:22 AM Base Language Feature #7000: Replace old-style synchronization primitives with java.util.concurrent classes
- FWD code contains many places where old-style synchronization primitives (@synchronized@ blocks, @wait@/@notify@) are...
- 02:58 AM Base Language Feature #7000 (New): Replace old-style synchronization primitives with java.util.concurrent classes
- 05:42 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Committed 3821c/rev.14460. Added nested find annotation and report. Any annotated @FIND@ that is nested in a @FOR EAC...
12/19/2022
- 06:09 PM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Yes.
- 03:41 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You've tested conversion for both the large customer application and also Hotel GUI?
Yes, both... - 06:08 PM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- > > The base implementation is already handled at conversion and it is stubbed out in the runtime.
>
> Does it mea... - 06:35 AM Base Language Feature #3853: implement LOG-MANAGER runtime
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The base implementation is already handled at conversion and it is stubbed out in the runtime.
... - 05:09 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- > > Right now, I don't foresee any changes to conversion needed. If that changes, I would agree with this idea.
>
... - 06:51 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Galya Bogdanova wrote:
>
> > *Conversion* code should be reworked to not be broken by upcoming ... - 01:32 PM Database Bug #6834: RAQ navigation on records having NULL values on same index components
- The issue is described with details and example in #6755. I will copy it here because that task contains sensitive da...
- 12:03 PM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Please see #6667-268 for regression tests results for @6764.08.patch@
- 11:28 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- For @ArrayList.iterator()@, the top callers are:
* @PreselectQuery.components()@ - 430k
* @AnnotatedAst.notifyListe... - 10:26 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- The ones that are most important are listed in #6821-4. We aren't suggesting changing things everywhere.
- 10:22 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- That may be true. There're about 2k foreach loops, and about 10% of them can be updated. If we want, we can can limit...
- 09:57 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> > Actually, I doubt that such optimization will result in any significant performance in a... - 09:56 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Small improvements over millions of calls add up. The fact that the profiling tools don't show obvious hotspots mean...
- 09:45 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I would perform benchmarking/profiling first.
>
> This is what was done. See #6821-4.
Th... - 09:31 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > The point with all the Map and Set iterators is that they allocate lots of short-lived objects.
That's true. I m... - 09:25 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > Actually, I doubt that such optimization will result in any significant performance in all situations.
I did som... - 09:18 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- > I would perform benchmarking/profiling first.
This is what was done. See #6821-4. - 05:12 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Actually, I doubt that such optimization will result in any significant performance in all situations. See e.g. a dis...
- 04:54 AM Base Language Feature #6821: java collection performance
- Stanislav Lomany wrote:
> I assume we're taking about replacing
Correct.
> I found that there're not so many plac... - 04:45 AM Base Language Feature #6821 (WIP): java collection performance
- Constantin,
> For example, using Java for-each loop for an an ArrayList instead of a @for@ and getting the element... - 10:28 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I am not very happy with this double iteration. It implies a performance penalty. Ultimatel... - 10:12 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I need to iterate over a DATA-SOURCE twice - first with the original QUERY and then with th... - 09:08 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- > the performance decreased a lot (there may be some internal storage which affects the INVOKEDYNAMIC instruction at ...
- 09:08 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- From Constantin:
> More with the the lambda for ControlFlowOps, I think the lambda performance is directly proport...
Also available in: Atom