Activity
From 11/17/2022 to 12/16/2022
12/16/2022
- 02:59 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Something is wrong in the @BufferImpl.fill()@ logic regarding child relations. In the @data_relation/recursive_relati...
- 03:48 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I need to iterate over a DATA-SOURCE twice - first with the original QUERY and then with the 'relaxed' one. What is t...
- 10:59 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I'm OK with the @6709-20221216.patch@.
You've tested conversion for both the large customer application and also H... - 09:53 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Please post an updated patch for review.
> We emit the getter or the @FieldReference@ in @conv... - 08:30 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- > The bug is fixed and the conversion was successful. Should I commit the changes?
Please post an updated patch fo... - 03:31 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Danut, please address the bug and make sure to test conversion with that application.
The bug is... - 09:50 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We need both server side and client side logging. I think most of the time the server side appro... - 09:33 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- > > We are at a point where we are still heavily modifying our implementation and that includes our external API.
> ... - 09:33 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- Yes, @LogHelper@ can be changed.
- 09:32 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We are at a point where we are still heavily modifying our implementation and that includes our e... - 09:31 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- Greg Shah wrote:
> At this time, I don't see how our 4GL-compatibility needs to change for this task, but I may be m... - 09:29 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- > If some FWD users want to develop their new Java code extending their app functionality, do they import / integrate...
- 09:25 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- > * Each system process should have a separate log file.
Yes
> * Screen / client drivers output on the screen e... - 06:49 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- A question: If some FWD users want to develop their new Java code extending their app functionality, do they import /...
- 08:50 AM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> > 6764.07.patch checked in to 3821c revision 14417.
>
> I reverted t... - 08:06 AM Database Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- I've made a mistake and used the wrong patch when testing previously. The second @removeRecords@ call didn't execute ...
- 07:24 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- Please focus on #5703 first and pause work on this task.
- 05:48 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- Galya Bogdanova wrote:
> The Windows spawner creates the new process with all the needed attributes as it is now, bu... - 03:01 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- Galya Bogdanova wrote:
> That's where we set a @stdout@ handler to the properly renamed filename and execute the @cm... - 02:52 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- I have another idea of how to solve the pid issue on Windows.
The Windows spawner creates the new process with all... - 02:30 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I think you can try any 4GL code which uses @DISPLAY@, @PUT@ or similar output statement without ... - 03:31 AM Base Language Bug #6999: OO methods/properties used in direct Java calls
- Consider this type:...
- 03:27 AM Base Language Bug #6999 (New): OO methods/properties used in direct Java calls
12/15/2022
- 02:56 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- > I need an ABL procedure that outputs to outputToFile to test it out.
I think you can try any 4GL code which uses... - 01:17 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- I'm attaching a diff for a demo implementation of how @%pid%@ replace and @stdout@ redirect can work in Java for back...
- 09:00 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- > Run the cmd in the spawner process itself. This looks like a more dangerous exercise, since I don't fully understan...
- 07:26 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- My proposal cannot actually work for Windows where @CreateProcess@ creates an independent new process without any ref...
- 02:11 PM Database Bug #6997: OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- I returned to this testcase. I altered the original code a bit and I found more evidences in favour of confirming the...
- 11:02 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- I'll use this comment to summarize the types of log files we ultimately need (it'll be updated additionally).
---... - 09:01 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5703: rationalize, standardize and simplify the client-side log file name configuration
- A related issue to be addressed by the change, as described in #4331:
> Standalone clients (confirmed for gui_swin... - 09:49 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Yes. At any given point in our development, new testcases are written for features we have no im... - 08:23 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Yes. At any given point in our development, new testcases are written for features we have no implemented yet. It i...
- 08:21 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Multiple files in the @testcases@ project do not convert with FWD. Is this expected?
- 09:28 AM Base Language Feature #6827 (WIP): reduce the memory footprint of WrappedResource implementations: replace BDTs...
- Sorry, guys, I think I've reviewed all FWD classes implemening @WrappedResource@ but there're no usages of BDT. I've ...
- 08:36 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Another update: after the last post I started working on a Factory design pattern for @SortCriterion@. This patch inc...
12/14/2022
- 02:07 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I've realized that we do not really need an auxiliary temporary table to use recursive CTE instead of iteration (see ...
- 02:31 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The FILL operation is QUERY driven. And that happens for each buffer affected (that is, aft... - 01:26 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- The lambdas will created like this:...
- 11:46 AM Database Bug #6997: OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- It does not make full sense. The BY-REFERENCE should be bound to the target table temporarily, hiding that table. As ...
- 05:46 AM Database Bug #6997: OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- In start.p, a temporary table @main@ is created which is assigned 1 element, then that table is used as an output par...
- 05:44 AM Database Bug #6997 (New): OUTPUT BY-REFERENCE records are not cleared
- 10:01 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Looks like the problem was caused by a @FOR FIRST table@ statement. Fixed by checking if the previous sibling of the ...
- 09:23 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I am aware of the @force-no-undo@ setting which forces all tables into @no-undo@. If this flag is set, no @SavepointM...
- 09:15 AM Base Language Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Yes, please use @PROVERSION@ and preprocessing to conditionally implement logic by OE version.
- 09:09 AM Base Language Feature #6410: implement additional built-in OO classes/interfaces
- Greg Shah wrote:
> OE 11.7.x is in use right now. They can't move to OE 12 without facing serious issues which have... - 07:42 AM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Can you do something low effort to work around this issue until we have 6129b changes ready?
I... - 07:32 AM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Can you do something low effort to work around this issue until we have 6129b changes ready?
- 06:27 AM Database Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- I've wrapped my head around this topic (@ProgressiveResults@ vs @ScrollingResults@) for a while now, so I can provide...
- 05:55 AM Database Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- Originally, my intention was to delete the records from a table based on the @targetMultiplex@ when the @outputParame...
- 04:22 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- Update: I noticed that @SortCriterion.toString@ gets called quite often so I had a look in that function to see if so...
12/13/2022
- 06:48 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> BTW: it looks that @FILL@ for recursive dataset can be very expensive since it can require ... - 04:54 PM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir: Please check your failing scenario in 6129b and let us know what you find.
Yes, in... - 04:53 PM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Check your classpath. ConvertedClassName no longer exists in 6129b.
Yes, I forgot to ... - 04:29 PM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Check your classpath. ConvertedClassName no longer exists in 6129b.
- 03:43 PM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir: Please check your failing scenario in 6129b and let us know what you find.
I canno... - 02:04 PM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Our OO implementation is much more advanced in vranch 6129b than in 3821c. In 6129b, at this time we only use @Legac...
- 07:30 AM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> No, it is the Java sources which will not compile.
> Note: the name if the field ref... - 07:24 AM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Marian Edu wrote:
> All classes in @OpenEdge@ and @Progress@ packages were created *manually*, this is the expecte... - 07:13 AM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> The fields in @OpenEdge.Core.DataTypeEnum@ are named after the corresponding Progress b... - 06:59 AM Base Language Bug #6993 (Review): OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Fixed in 3821c rev. 14438.
- 06:45 AM Base Language Bug #6993 (WIP): OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- 06:42 AM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- Please do fix this.
- 06:31 AM Base Language Bug #6993: OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- The fields in @OpenEdge.Core.DataTypeEnum@ are named after the corresponding Progress base data types, like @characte...
- 06:24 AM Base Language Bug #6993 (Closed): OO: incorrect field names in DataTypeEnum.java
- 03:19 PM User Interface Feature #6996: WebGUI: Analyze the effect of willReadFrequently option on the 2D renderer perform...
- According to this article https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/canvas.html#concept-canvas-will-read-frequently @wil...
- 03:13 PM User Interface Feature #6996 (New): WebGUI: Analyze the effect of willReadFrequently option on the 2D renderer p...
- 11:56 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I think @Session.log@ is responsible for logging the sub(tx) details needed for savepoints or rollback. This is enab...
- 11:13 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- I guess a simple first step is to profile typical flows in real applications and see if we can associate any bottlene...
- 11:08 AM Database Feature #6995: possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- NO-UNDO temp-tables are used heavily in many 4GL applications. Typically, regular temp-tables are used as well, such ...
- 10:41 AM Database Feature #6995 (Closed): possibly support NO-UNDO temporary tables directly in H2
- 10:37 AM Database Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > consider way stronger optimizations directly in the H2 engine: this involves some extended work... - 09:10 AM User Interface Bug #6994: session:set-wait-state("general") must mimic UI responsiveness and UI mouse pointer be...
- See testcase below.
# At @hBtnWaitstate@ of the (default-) window , the UI is irresponsive. At the @hBtnWaitstate@... - 09:06 AM User Interface Bug #6994 (New): session:set-wait-state("general") must mimic UI responsiveness and UI mouse poin...
- 07:47 AM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> As a side question, I see some changes from for-each structure into index based iteration: ... - 06:58 AM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- I got deep in most of the changes in rev. 8 - they seem reasonable. As a side question, I see some changes from for-e...
12/12/2022
- 04:34 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699 (Closed): broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on...
- 01:28 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699: broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on Windows)
- I ran the server on Windows with a batch process and was able to confirm the new behavior of the spawner of properly ...
- 02:29 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Based on my tests the @FILL@ for recursive DATA-RELATION add records which are not in the DATA-SOURCE QUERY only if b...
- 01:29 PM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Some additional notes:
* having both consumer and function lambdas doesn't really have a functional benefit, only fu... - 10:32 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Eric, please review attached patch - it adds a invocation handler like this:...
- 12:19 PM Database Feature #6928 (Review): H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- The changes are in fwd-h2 project rev 8.
Alexandru: please review. - 08:17 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I've uncommitted 3821c rev 14436. It causes the following regression in conversion for a large customer application....
- 04:29 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> You can just do this:
> ...
12/10/2022
- 11:52 PM Database Support #6714: check if there is an optimization opportunity when copying temp-tables based on mu...
- Dănuț,
I am sorry for the delay, somehow the notification emails got lost at the bottom of the list and I only saw...
12/09/2022
- 10:30 AM Database Bug #6767: Possible name clashes in DMO classes
- Eric: This is still waiting for review.
- 08:39 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > What puzzles me is the logic for 'relaxing' the @qEmp@ conditions to... - 08:19 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> What puzzles me is the logic for 'relaxing' the @qEmp@ conditions to find the parent record... - 07:45 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Please not that while the recursive relation does load the FK parent in the parent temp-table (s... - 05:32 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- The @data_relation/recursive_relation_fill.p@ test fails with FWD with @Cannot run GET methods on query qEmp until it...
- 04:51 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> >
> > > Marian,
> > > Is it correct that the DATA-SOURCE query shou... - 04:46 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>
> > Marian,
> > Is it correct that the DATA-SOURCE query should select a subset of a sin... - 08:16 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Regression is fixed, current revision number is 14434.
- 05:41 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699: broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on Windows)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> In your current setup, you are just using a local copy *bound to* the central repo. Any local co... - 05:38 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699 (Test): broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on W...
- When you believe that all functional requirements of the task are complete, please set the % Done to 100%.
- 05:37 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699: broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on Windows)
- > I messed up the branch creation / co and pushed from the local branch directly to 3821c. I'll be more careful next ...
- 05:32 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699: broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on Windows)
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 14429
>
> The change is good, however you are missing t... - 05:30 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699: broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on Windows)
- Code Review Task Branch 3821c Revision 14429
The change is good, however you are missing the history entry. - 05:20 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699 (Review): broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Is @string@ not a pointer to @WCHAR@? If the contents of @string@ are not wide characters, then ...
12/08/2022
- 06:44 PM Testing Bug #6920: Ins and outs of Sikuli for GUI testing
- Today I had an very challenging issue related to using masks. There are times when the Chrome warning for a non-priva...
- 04:40 PM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- > > 1. I don't think we should limit the for each processing to only match temp-tables and buffers. All record phrase...
- 04:32 PM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I think @FieldReference@ is less clean looking and it will be slower. In #4928, we do have some ideas to improve it ...
- 08:45 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- ...
- 03:24 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. I don't think we should limit the for each processing to only match temp-tables and buffers. A... - 04:33 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Boris, if you have a fix for the conversion regression, please commit it.
- 01:06 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Revision 6371a/14431 fixes some issues, including the following with the DMO interface assembly:
* a package path ... - 04:23 PM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699: broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on Windows)
- Is @string@ not a pointer to @WCHAR@? If the contents of @string@ are not wide characters, then that explains the re...
- 11:42 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5699 (WIP): broken logfile name on Windows appserver clients (and probably other cases on Wi...
- I was able to reproduce it. The problem is in @replace_str@ function. I've added to the code a few comments to show v...
- 03:45 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
>More than that, I understand that you aim for a 'fast-copy' mechanism where the rows are cop... - 03:27 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > > Oh, I see. Indeed, in this case we cannot be sure which versi... - 03:02 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Oh, I see. Indeed, in this case we cannot be sure which version of the CTE syntax to use.... - 05:59 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Oh, I see. Indeed, in this case we cannot be sure which version of the CTE syntax to use.
... - 01:31 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > It appears that DATASET:FILL() is not working at all for RECURS... - 03:13 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Yes. I assume the proxy case is being worked on in #6939.
- 02:42 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg, the 8 million iterations chosen for the MthdTest was because this is the number of Utils.invoke for a large app...
- 01:52 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- > How will it pass the parameters?
We can handle this with a bit of "standardization" in the registration or via a... - 01:41 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- I've tested something like this (for my original MthdTest):...
- 12:52 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > We can generate Java code to register lambdas with CFO during an i... - 12:41 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We can generate Java code to register lambdas with CFO during an initializer. It could be an arr... - 11:24 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- We can generate Java code to register lambdas with CFO during an initializer. It could be an array where each elemen...
- 11:20 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg, for ControlFlowOps, this lambda method approach can't be easily used - because we will have to generate 'on the...
- 10:13 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- > For this, we need to change the FWD proxy impl to send the lambda beside the Method to the handler.
Eric's idea ... - 10:03 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I'm especially excited to see how this improves the @ControlFlowOps@ usage since we could elimina... - 08:02 AM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- I'm especially excited to see how this improves the @ControlFlowOps@ usage since we could eliminate the dispatching c...
- 09:04 PM Base Language Feature #6819: refactor FWD proxy implementation to use ReflectASM instead of Java Method reflection
- I've been working on a different approach to this problem. The original problem noted above is that ReflectASM and J...
- 01:55 PM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- In the lambda approach, the target instance is already captured, so changing the array also changes the target.
- 01:43 PM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If we need the ability to temporarily replace the target methods for an implementation,
I don't ... - 01:29 PM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- If we need the ability to temporarily replace the target methods for an implementation, we should consider a kind of ...
- 01:10 PM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> ... directly from the bytecode of the i.e. DMO Implementation class setter/getter.
wh... - 01:07 PM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Eric, the main issue of the interceptor flavor of the @InvocationHandler@ is that in some cases the target instance o...
- 05:57 AM Database Support #6708 (Review): track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Committed 3821c/rev.14425. Small fix. The number of invalidated queries displayed in the Overview was wrong when @OUT...
12/07/2022
- 04:42 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> It appears that DATASET:FILL() is not working at all for RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION (the @Data... - 11:56 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I'm thinking about adding support for a RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION by re-writing the DATA-SOUR... - 10:45 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- The @BufferImpl.fill()@ method is pretty long (400 lines of code) and complicated.
I'm thinking about adding support... - 12:25 PM User Interface Feature #3931: single sign-on for virtual desktop mode
- Support for @<customers_large_gui_application>@ user name replacing OS account name in log files (as requested in #43...
- 07:07 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- From Galya, via email:
> I haven't looked at the Java classes instantiated by the spawner, so let me ask if there ... - 03:33 AM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> 6764.07.patch checked in to 3821c revision 14417.
I reverted the patch in 3821c revision 14...
12/06/2022
- 07:21 AM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- 6764.07.patch checked in to 3821c revision 14417.
- 07:00 AM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
>
> Marian, please add a file history entry to @ThinClient.java@ and also fix the one in @Even... - 03:48 AM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Greg Shah wrote:
> > > I'd like to get 6764.06.patch in 3821c. Any objection?
> >
> > No ob...
12/05/2022
- 03:01 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- It appears that DATASET:FILL() is not working at all for RECURSIVE DATA-RELATION (the @DataSet.getTopBufferList()@ re...
- 02:47 PM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I'd like to get 6764.06.patch in 3821c. Any objection?
>
> No objection from me.
None fr... - 02:34 PM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- > I'd like to get 6764.06.patch in 3821c. Any objection?
No objection from me. - 02:33 PM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Hi
What is the status of this issue ?
I'd like to move on with Regression Tests fix and events/triggers are next bi... - 02:16 PM User Interface Feature #6764: Improve trigger selection for keyboard events.
- Marian, Greg, I'd like to get @6764.06.patch@ in 3821c. Any objection?
- 01:54 PM User Interface Feature #6978 (WIP): Editor widget performance optimization
- 09:42 AM User Interface Feature #6978: Editor widget performance optimization
- From #6899-95:
Greg Shah wrote:
> Perhaps we can simplify things a bit. We store an array of lines. When we mak... - 09:12 AM User Interface Feature #6978: Editor widget performance optimization
- The remaining work discussion can be found in #6899.
In short when the editor content become big enough sending fu... - 09:09 AM User Interface Feature #6978 (WIP): Editor widget performance optimization
- 09:29 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The approach seems reasonable.
>
> Eugenie: Do you have any thoughts, questions or concerns?
... - 09:11 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- The approach seems reasonable.
Eugenie: Do you have any thoughts, questions or concerns? - 06:18 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- The Windows spawner is a lot more simple than the UNIX one in the process creation part (more complicated in the secu...
- 04:41 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- Greg Shah wrote:
> The test code doesn't help me understand the process tree/pid list/redirected output log name for... - 07:34 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Code Review 6709-rpt-20221205.diff
Good, it is getting closer.
1. I don't think we should limit the for each pr... - 03:51 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> 1. Please switch out the use of a @Stack@ for the @ScopedSymbolDictionary@.
I made the @FOR EACH... - 06:07 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- My suspicion is the logical change in @XmlHelper.setAttribute()@ - I added a check for @value.isEmpty()@ and it proba...
- 12:51 AM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> I found that I was unable to convert test cases using 6371a/14119, with an error during anno... - 02:50 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- After I did some investigation upon the @PreselectQuery.assembleHQL@ function, two types of optimization occurred to ...
- 02:13 AM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- |_. version |_. server run |_. client run |_. indexed (ms) |_. unindexed(ms) |
|h2-1.4.200.jar | 1...
12/02/2022
- 04:52 PM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Here are the results for two server runs, each with 5 client connection:
|\3=. First Run |/9. |\3=. Second Run |
|_... - 02:32 PM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Alexandru/Ovidiu: previously I uploaded the wrong jar (it was the rev 7 one, not the patched one). Please try with t...
- 11:17 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- The test code doesn't help me understand the process tree/pid list/redirected output log name for the FWD client. Ca...
- 09:09 AM Database Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Committed 3821c/rev.14409. Made a change in order to display the parent methods in the 4GL code by the number of call...
- 08:44 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> However, FWD in this case generates no row data at all.
It appears that this is the prob...
12/01/2022
- 10:49 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- I created a simple test to verify @execvp@ behaviour and uploaded it as zip. The test function in @C@ prints the pid ...
- 09:12 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701 (WIP): logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD c...
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> The spawner will use @NativeSecureConnection.command@ to determine the launch command fo... - 07:08 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- Galya Bogdanova wrote:
> ... running in background where no client driver seems to be instantiated in the Java code,... - 06:51 AM Runtime Infrastructure Bug #5701: logfile names for -O outputToFile use the spawner pid instead of the Java (FWD client ...
- This is how I read the logic for the spawner (I'll be going with the Unix example):
@ClientBuilder#localStart()@ b... - 10:46 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- When PK and a FK are specified in an incorrect order in the @relation-fields@ clause (see #6444-23), 4GL does not com...
- 10:30 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've noticed an intersting thing. In the absense of the @nsPrefix@ 4GL @WRITE-XML@ creates ... - 05:29 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I've noticed an intersting thing. In the absense of the @nsPrefix@ 4GL @WRITE-XML@ creates "html-style" output. See a...
- 04:46 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > What about navigation& I mean the following statement:
> > [...]
>... - 04:44 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> What about navigation& I mean the following statement:
> [...]
> How @a recursive ABL pro... - 04:35 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > What I'm doing wrong?
> By looking at the records created the 'cE' ... - 04:34 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> What I'm doing wrong?
By looking at the records created the 'cE' is the PK and 'cM' is the... - 04:27 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> This is mostly used by the 'tree-like' .NET UI components, as far as 4GL is concerned the effec... - 04:09 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Marian, can you shed any light on the RECURSIVE feature?
>
> This ... - 03:34 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Marian, can you shed any light on the RECURSIVE feature?
This is mostly used by the 'tree... - 02:54 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Found a number of incompatibilities in @(READ|WRITE)-XML(SCHEMA)?@ support for RECURSIVE DATASET.
Fixing them in 6129b. - 01:00 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Igor,
>
> You cannot have the same table to be both the source and destination for a @fi... - 07:52 AM Base Language Bug #6974: NPE at OpenEdge.Core.Class.IsInterface
- The test code (@isinterface.p@):...
- 07:46 AM Base Language Bug #6974 (New): NPE at OpenEdge.Core.Class.IsInterface
- 01:10 AM Database Feature #6371 (WIP): implement SAVE CACHE statement
- I found that I was unable to convert test cases using 6371a/14119, with an error during annotations:...
11/30/2022
- 06:31 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Igor,
You cannot have the same table to be both the source and destination for a @fill@ operation (we do not suppo... - 12:28 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Another problem with @RECURSIVE@.
I'm trying to write a test for @FILL@ (see the attachment).
When I run it I get... - 12:23 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Marian, can you shed any light on the RECURSIVE feature?
- 11:20 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- The OE documentation about @RECURSIVE@ Data-Relation object I see the following statement about such realtions:
<pre... - 04:07 PM Database Feature #6371 (Review): implement SAVE CACHE statement
- 02:18 AM Database Feature #6454 (Review): database informational features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor, other than requiring review for the patch in #6454-11 and for 6129b/14335, is this tas... - 02:04 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor, other than requiring review for the patch in #6454-11 and for 6129b/14335, is this task finished from your poin...
11/29/2022
- 01:06 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I assume you talk about the recent serialization updates for temp-tables and FOREIGN-KEY-HI... - 12:37 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- I assume you talk about the recent serialization updates for temp-tables and FOREIGN-KEY-HIDDEN attribute. I do not t...
- 10:16 AM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> > Ovidiu, thank you for the summary of status. I am reassigning to... - 07:50 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I understand that this is because we do not have even stubs for RCODE-INFO:CRC-VALUE and RCODE-... - 04:24 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Strangely enough I have found no @@DatabaseReferences@ annot... - 03:09 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Strangely enough I have found no @@DatabaseReferences@ annotation in a converted large cust... - 05:59 AM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- |_. version |_. server run |_. client run |_. indexed (ms) |_. unindexed(ms) |
|fwd-h2-1.4.200-6.jar| 1... - 05:34 AM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- I am doing the stress tests right now.
> I've been running the H2 unit tests, too, and this showed some problems w... - 04:16 AM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Thanks, Ovidiu, I'll profile some more and see what happens.
11/28/2022
- 06:42 PM Database Bug #6919 (Review): fix ErrorManager.displayError in TempTableBuilder
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> I see you added static import for @ErrorManager@. There are very few places where this is d... - 04:57 PM Base Language Bug #6963: Incorrect conversion of legacy class constructors with an unknown argument of object type
- If an unknown value is passed an an argument to a class constructor, the conversion produces an correct call.
The ... - 04:44 PM Base Language Bug #6963 (New): Incorrect conversion of legacy class constructors with an unknown argument of ob...
- 04:15 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, thank you for the summary of status. I am reassigning to Igor for implementation. Pl... - 04:01 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > Greg, Constantin, 3821c or 6129b for these changes? They most likely will be needed in 6129b fi... - 03:52 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- > Greg, Constantin, 3821c or 6129b for these changes? They most likely will be needed in 6129b first, but we should d...
- 01:29 PM Database Feature #6444 (WIP): dataset improvements
- 01:25 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Ovidiu, thank you for the summary of status. I am reassigning to Igor for implementation. Please assist him if he has...
- 03:15 PM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- With attached @h2-1.4.200.jar@, 1st run:
|_. n |_. indexed |_. non-indexed |
| 1 | 799 ms | 453 ms |
| 2 | 302 ms ... - 10:18 AM Database Feature #6928: H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- Attached is the second version of the patch and a stress-test for the UPDATE statement (10k field setters). The 'in-...
- 09:51 AM Database Feature #6928 (WIP): H2 UPDATE performance improvement
- 02:52 PM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > I understand that this is because we do not have even stubs for RCODE-INFO:CRC-VALUE and RCODE-... - 02:50 PM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- > I understand that this is because we do not have even stubs for RCODE-INFO:CRC-VALUE and RCODE-INFO:LANGUAGES.
> D... - 02:30 PM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- As far as I can see, @RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST@ inplementation in FWD uses the value of the @tables@ attribute of the @@...
- 12:23 PM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- I've noticed the following problem.
The statement... - 11:37 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> * It looks that the only database restriction we have to support is @READ-ONLY@. Should be ... - 10:04 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> > Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > > Igor, RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST... - 09:59 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> > Igor, RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST is already added in 6129b.
>
... - 09:18 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Igor, RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST is already added in 6129b.
Constantin,
I see only @Rcode... - 02:49 AM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- Igor, RCODE-INFO:TABLE-LIST is already added in 6129b.
- 08:59 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > This does not compile for me, or at least displays warning messa... - 08:48 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> This does not compile for me, or at least displays warning messages. Which OE version d... - 04:47 AM Database Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Committed 3821c/rev.14395. Made the changes mentioned in #6708-12 and fixed a problem where preselect and dynamic cal...
11/27/2022
- 01:06 PM Database Feature #6454: database informational features
- * As I can see from the code @DBPARAM@ reports *all* parameters supported by FWD for @CONNECT@
* It looks that the o...
11/26/2022
- 02:09 AM Database Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Review of @lobs.diff@:
>
> Good job! Implemented as requested in #6448-2.
> Please do t... - 10:21 PM Database Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Review of @lobs.diff@:
Good job! Implemented as requested in #6448-2.
Please do the cleanup (fix indentation of l...
11/25/2022
- 05:40 PM Database Feature #6459: query features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor, I'm looking into the history of this part of the code. I don't think it's as simple as... - 01:35 PM Database Feature #6459: query features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor, I'm looking into the history of this part of the code. I don't think it's as simple as... - 11:08 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- Igor, I'm looking into the history of this part of the code. I don't think it's as simple as releasing the record unc...
- 05:59 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> What's the stacktrace where #6459-5 calls @throwOffend()@?
Here it is:... - 05:24 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> According to my tests, both forms of @FIRST-OF@/@LAST-OF@ are fully supported.
>
> I've... - 05:31 PM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- OK, this is close to correct.
1. Please switch out the use of a @Stack@ for the @ScopedSymbolDictionary@. The i... - 07:11 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I made the changes for the report. Now, it can track FIND statements that reference the same buffer as the FOR EACH i...
- 05:30 PM Database Bug #6919: fix ErrorManager.displayError in TempTableBuilder
- Review of @6919.diff@.
Good job! There were a lot of methods to check.
Interesting findings. I was not expectin... - 05:12 PM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > Seems, OE does not support multiple @ABLUnit@ life cycle unit te... - 09:15 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Seems, OE does not support multiple @ABLUnit@ life cycle unit test procedures, like @JU... - 08:55 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Or perhaps it makes more sense to implement the 4GL-compatible versions as annotation names which more clearly mappin...
- 08:52 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- > Currently FWD supports this, and I wonder whether we should do unsupport :-)
We definitely need to implement in ... - 06:41 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Seems, OE does not support multiple @ABLUnit@ life cycle unit test procedures.
This ho... - 12:51 PM Database Feature #6454 (WIP): database informational features
- 12:50 PM Database Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Implemented as described in #6448-2.
The attached .diff file is for 6129b/14333.
Please review.
Thank you.
- 10:19 AM Database Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> I've got the following exception on the database import with 6129b/14333.
> [...]
> Is it... - 10:01 AM Database Feature #6448: make location of LOB files configurable for import
- I've got the following exception on the database import with 6129b/14333....
- 08:04 AM Database Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Nice work! I could generate insightful reports using customer applications. I will suggest only some fine tuning here...
11/24/2022
- 11:56 AM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Seems, OE does not support multiple @ABLUnit@ life cycle unit test procedures, like @JUnit5@ supports. That means we ...
- 10:57 AM Database Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- > consider way stronger optimizations directly in the H2 engine: this involves some extended work into the H2 optimiz...
- 10:56 AM Database Feature #6582: implement multi-table AdaptiveQuery
- *CHECKPOINT*
I am pending the work here as I can't find any more consistent optimizations to motivate that multi-t... - 10:24 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- > This is my intent, but I wanted to share my work until now.
Understood. No worries.
> Also, I guess you mean... - 05:00 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Neither annotations/annotations.xml and annotations/annotations_prep.xml can't be used for the ne... - 10:05 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- > Eric, what should we do: remove this list or expose this as a enhanced feature with a method in SESSION handle?
... - 01:15 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Actually, if we replace throwing @XmlStreamException@ with @return false@ this will resul... - 08:13 PM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> In fact, I do not understand why we add @TempTableBuilder@ to the @HandleChain@. I have not... - 09:43 AM Database Feature #6448 (WIP): make location of LOB files configurable for import
- 09:42 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- I do not see how we can reliably figure out how the @CACHE@ attribute value affects the performance. Such things usua...
- 09:39 AM Database Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- Committed 3821c/rev.14384. I applied all the suggestions mentioned by Alexandru in #6708-7 and moved all the changes ...
- 09:06 AM Database Support #6708: track/report at runtime when AdaptiveQuery shifts into dynamic mode
- I rebased 6708a with 3821c. Danut, you can now move the changes from 6708a to 3821c.
11/23/2022
- 01:39 PM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> In fact, the caller of this method just returns @false@ on @XmlStreamException@. Since this... - 06:52 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> This class is unique in the fact that we have control of the short lifetime of the @TempTab... - 11:16 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Code Review 6709-rpt.diff
Neither @annotations/annotations.xml@ and @annotations/annotations_prep.xml@ can't be us... - 07:40 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- I took a different approach after taking a look at #3194 and modified how the report is made. I created a new rule se...
- 06:20 AM Database Bug #6923: inner transaction block reverts too much
- I attached a patch with some changes that, in my opinion, make more sense than the current implementation. Mainly, th...
11/22/2022
- 01:52 PM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Sorry, but I'm confused. We create a new @TempTableBuilder@ instance e.g. in the @readTable... - 12:41 PM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> The problem is that @TempTableBuilder@ -s are @HandleChain@ objects which are kept in a lin... - 08:41 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- According to my tests, both forms of @FIRST-OF@/@LAST-OF@ are fully supported.
I've also fixed the problem with @...
11/21/2022
- 05:58 PM Database Bug #6919 (WIP): fix ErrorManager.displayError in TempTableBuilder
- I am attaching my changes for review. This should be the complete implementation, I will do more testing tomorrow.
- 02:57 PM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Related to 6129b/14329: after @ErrorManager.recordOrShowError@ do not @throw@ a new excepti... - 02:21 PM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Igor,
Related to 6129b/14329: after @ErrorManager.recordOrShowError@ do not @throw@ a new exception. After the 4GL... - 09:52 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> >> how safe is to abend here?
> > I think that it is safe because actually, it should never happ... - 07:30 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- >> how safe is to abend here?
> I think that it is safe because actually, it should never happen if the schema is co... - 02:21 PM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> # Bugs: the @abl_unit/procedure_annotations/test_suite_no_explicit_errors.p@ refers t... - 02:09 PM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Vladimir is only working on the ablunit parts. He is adding some tests at a minimum. One can th... - 02:04 PM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> > I've started reworking the sources @abl_unit/@ subdirectory into... - 01:40 PM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Vladimir is only working on the ablunit parts. He is adding some tests at a minimum. One can think of that work as ...
- 01:37 PM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> I've started reworking the sources @abl_unit/@ subdirectory into a "pure ABLUnit". Also... - 01:25 PM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- I've started reworking the sources @abl_unit/@ subdirectory into a "pure ABLUnit". Also I found some obvious bugs in ...
- 09:30 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Just to remind everyone: the "master plan" for testing can be found in [[p2j:Testing Process]] and those pages/tasks ...
- 09:13 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- Greg Shah wrote:
> I prefer to migrate these "in place". It is already confusing to have multiple testcase projects... - 08:40 AM Testing Support #6858: rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- I prefer to migrate these "in place". It is already confusing to have multiple testcase projects (old and busted vs ...
- 06:22 AM Testing Support #6858 (WIP): rework existing testcases to use ABLUnit
- We're working on this one and migrate existing unit tests (no user interaction) to new ones using ABLUnit, is there a...
- 01:06 PM Conversion Tools Bug #6901 (Test): Event handling - ON ANYWHERE
- 10:48 AM Conversion Tools Bug #6901: Event handling - ON ANYWHERE
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Hynek: Please commit the patch to 3821c.
Patch 6901.patch checked in 3821c revision 14378. - 08:24 AM Conversion Tools Bug #6901: Event handling - ON ANYWHERE
- Hynek: Please commit the patch to 3821c.
- 06:42 AM Conversion Tools Bug #6901: Event handling - ON ANYWHERE
- Marian Edu wrote:
> Hynek Cihlar wrote:
>
> > I find helpful to turn on rules tracing, this helps to pinpoint the... - 06:36 AM Conversion Tools Bug #6901: Event handling - ON ANYWHERE
- Hynek Cihlar wrote:
> I find helpful to turn on rules tracing, this helps to pinpoint the exact place where a part... - 06:32 AM Conversion Tools Bug #6901: Event handling - ON ANYWHERE
- Marian Edu wrote:
> It took me a while to get along understanding xml code in those rules and where/what exactly nee... - 06:17 AM Conversion Tools Bug #6901 (Review): Event handling - ON ANYWHERE
- It took me a while to get along understanding xml code in those rules and where/what exactly needs to change... this ...
- 06:15 AM Conversion Tools Bug #6901 (WIP): Event handling - ON ANYWHERE
- 07:40 AM Database Bug #6940 (Test): unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in a...
- Code Review Task Branch 6129b Revision 14327
The concept of the change is sound. Combined with the fact that it d... - 07:38 AM Database Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- In the end there was no information in email, @testcases/uast/@, Redmine or @bzr@ that could lead be back to the orig...
11/19/2022
- 08:16 AM Database Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- There is no change in the application used for task #346. In the customer's app, all changes look 'expected', the pa...
- 08:00 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Constantin Asofiei wrote:
> Review for 6129b/14326:
> * how safe is to abend here?
> [...]
I think that it is saf... - 07:41 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Review for 6129b/14326:
* how safe is to abend here?...
11/18/2022
- 05:51 PM Database Feature #6450 (Closed): buffer/buffer-field features
- 01:59 PM Database Feature #6450: buffer/buffer-field features
- Yes, I think so.
Note that, unlike #6444 (where the changes were committed to 3821c), this task uses 6129a/b. - 10:50 AM Database Feature #6450: buffer/buffer-field features
- Can this be closed?
- 02:44 PM Testing Feature #6183: design and implement (as needed) the approach for writing automated 4GL compatibil...
- A problem with @skeleton/oo4gl/OpenEdge/DataAdmin/Internal/Util/CdcTablePolicyInstanceEnum.cls@:...
- 01:57 PM Testing Bug #6920: Ins and outs of Sikuli for GUI testing
- This chunk of code will show monitor information:...
- 01:50 PM Database Feature #6444: dataset improvements
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Ovidiu, could you please review the list above and indicate what the actual support is curre... - 01:14 PM Database Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- The change was introduced in trunk revision 4785:...
- 12:56 PM Database Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- I think the intent was to promote the parameter buffer, and not the 'source' for the parameter buffer. For example, ...
- 12:22 PM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> Just found, that @@TestSuite@ annotation is not recognized and converted in procedures.... - 12:13 PM Database Feature #6459: query features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> There are 2 forms of these: built-in function and handle-based method.
>
> Built-In Function f... - 11:42 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- There are 2 forms of these: built-in function and handle-based method.
Built-In Function form:... - 10:21 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> Igor Skornyakov wrote:
>
> > In 6129b both @FIRST-OF@ and @LAST-OF@ are set to @rw.cvt_l... - 10:20 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- The @convert/methods_attributes.rules@ has support for both methods. Subclasses of @P2JQuery@ like @Persorter@ have ...
- 10:05 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> In 6129b both @FIRST-OF@ and @LAST-OF@ are set to @rw.cvt_lvl_full | rw.rt_lvl_full@
... - 09:42 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- Greg Shah wrote:
> > As far as I can see from my test, @FIRST-OF@, @LAST-OF@ methods are fully supported.
>
> At ... - 09:17 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- > As far as I can see from my test, @FIRST-OF@, @LAST-OF@ methods are fully supported.
At a minimum, the gap marki... - 08:37 AM Database Feature #6459: query features
- As far as I can see from my test, @FIRST-OF@, @LAST-OF@ methods are fully supported.
However, I see the following is... - 09:56 AM Database Feature #6453 (Closed): temp-table features
- 01:36 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Only one change before the commit, please: in @XmlImport.java@, instead of [...]use[...]
>... - 08:24 AM Database Bug #6923: inner transaction block reverts too much
- Thank you for the explanations!
I've taken them on board and I have seen that the bug is in fact about the restorati... - 08:01 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Nice! Please post the diff so I can review the approach. It can be tricky to do this kind of static analysis becaus...
- 05:51 AM Database Support #6709: track nested FIND inside a related FOR loop
- Greg Shah wrote:
> We are trying to evaluate how often in real 4GL code does this condition occur? Getting a measure...
11/17/2022
- 06:39 PM Database Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- FYI, I'm digging back through the history on this one. I'll pick it back up in the morning.
- 08:02 AM Database Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- The patch is built on top of 6129b/14324.
- 08:01 AM Database Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- Greg, the problem is that for a @DEF PARAM BUFFER ... FOR some-buf@ statement, @some-buf@ gets promoted because @def_...
- 02:52 AM Database Bug #6940: unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in an inter...
- The problem is when a buffer is defined explicitly as a parameter - FWD doesn't resolve the unqualified field properl...
- 02:46 AM Database Bug #6940 (Test): unqualified field name resolution when there is an explicit buffer defined in a...
- 03:18 PM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Only one change before the commit, please: in @XmlImport.java@, instead of ...
- 02:20 PM Database Feature #6453 (Review): temp-table features
- Igor Skornyakov wrote:
> Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> > Review of @read-xmlschema.diff@:
> [...]
> Can I commit the c... - 05:03 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Tests used for this task committed to @xfer.goldencode.com/opt/testcases/temp-table-marshal@. rev. 1300.
- 01:58 AM Database Feature #6453: temp-table features
- Ovidiu Maxiniuc wrote:
> Review of @read-xmlschema.diff@:
> * @AbstractTempTable@: the new method lacks the javadoc... - 02:32 PM Database Feature #6371: implement SAVE CACHE statement
- FYI, I am re-working the class unloading, which will not work currently in "real" use scenarios. When we create a DMO...
- 02:21 PM Conversion Tools Feature #6237: OEUnit support
- Just found, that @@TestSuite@ annotation is not recognized and converted in procedures. Will fix this...
- 02:19 PM Base Language Feature #4658: OO serialization support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> If a repo exists on both @devsrv01@ and on @xfer@, then the @devsrv01@ version is authoritative a... - 11:29 AM Base Language Feature #4658: OO serialization support
- If a repo exists on both @devsrv01@ and on @xfer@, then the @devsrv01@ version is authoritative and the @xfer@ versio...
- 11:27 AM Base Language Feature #4658: OO serialization support
- Greg Shah wrote:
> Are you using @~/secure/code/p2j_repo/skeleton@? You should have full commit access to that repo... - 09:03 AM Base Language Feature #4658: OO serialization support
- Are you using @~/secure/code/p2j_repo/skeleton@? You should have full commit access to that repo. It is OK to commi...
- 07:21 AM Base Language Feature #4658: OO serialization support
- Vladimir Tsichevski wrote:
> I think, I found an error in skeleton: class @DataAdminError@ has wrong class names in ... - 02:02 PM Database Bug #6923: inner transaction block reverts too much
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> ...the fact that the results are different in your first test case between temp-table and pe... - 01:52 PM Database Bug #6923: inner transaction block reverts too much
- When you nest transactions like:...
- 06:50 AM Database Bug #6923 (WIP): inner transaction block reverts too much
- An update to this issue:
I narrowed down the code, in order to describe what I have found until this moment. This is... - 12:02 PM Database Feature #6418: represent extent fields as arrays
- Alexandru Lungu wrote:
> Eric, is there any prior partial implementation/discussion into the array fields?
There ... - 03:29 AM Database Feature #6418: represent extent fields as arrays
- Eric, is there any prior partial implementation/discussion into the array fields? If no, this task can be the lead ef...
- 09:26 AM Testing Bug #6920: Ins and outs of Sikuli for GUI testing
- After working for a few days on the customer testcases, and making sure I was able to get the @Region(x,y,w,h)@ value...
- 09:07 AM Testing Feature #6183: design and implement (as needed) the approach for writing automated 4GL compatibil...
- In the "new" [[p2j:Testcases]] project, there is the @abl_unit/@ directory with the existing testcases. I think you'...
- 07:27 AM Testing Feature #6183 (WIP): design and implement (as needed) the approach for writing automated 4GL comp...
- I've created an @ABLUnit@ test for creating and sending all built-in errors implemented in FWD, which can be created ...
- 07:41 AM Runtime Infrastructure Feature #6939: improve proxy performance by hard-coding method invocation
- Eric Faulhaber wrote:
> But, recently we discovered that @ReflectASM@ actually can perform worse than reflection on ... - 07:35 AM Database Feature #2137: runtime support for FIELDS/EXCEPT record phrase options
- The @2137_20221114a.patch@ patch was committed to 3821c/14369, with these notes:
* only NO-LOCK records are loaded a... - 07:34 AM Database Bug #6941: conversion issue when using undo in do transaction
- There is a problem when converting examples that contain an @undo@ statement inside a @do transaction@.
For example,... - 07:20 AM Database Bug #6941 (Rejected): conversion issue when using undo in do transaction
- 05:40 AM Database Feature #6816: improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
- For an initial check, I recommend implementing a very small suite of performance tests (~6) for @PreselectQuery@ to t...
- 03:33 AM Database Feature #6816 (WIP): improve PreselectQuery.assembleHQL
Also available in: Atom